Councillor Ritch Lau declared a conflict on this item and did not participate in the discussion or vote on this matter.
Arvin Prasad, Commissioner, Development Services, provided an introduction advising that this application is related to a proposed zoning by-law amendment to permit 107 dwelling units on Russell Dawson Road. By way of background, Mr. Prasad confirmed that this application has been brought forth at a Development Services Public Meeting and a Unionville Sub-Committee Meeting. Mr. Prasad introduced Marshall Smith, KLM Planning, to provide a presentation.
Marshall Smith, Associate, KLM Planning Partners Inc., provided a presentation.
Janice Cheung, Deputant, shared a brief presentation highlighting her concerns regarding the proposed road network, and particularly access to Russell Dawson Road. Ms. Cheung recommended connecting Staglin Court and Russell Dawson Road with a through street, and to close one of the access roads on Russell Dawson Road. Ms. Cheung requested that the application be denied until further public consultation and further review of the access points within the proposed development take place.
Frank Clarizio, Director, Engineering, responded to the deputant's road access concerns, advising that two access points are planned off of Russell Dawson Road to ensure that one of the access points would be available at all times.
Further to the deputants comments regarding public consultation, Staff advised that at the May 10th Public Meeting, the consultant had proposed a new concept that Staff had not yet reviewed but noted that there was also a community meeting regarding the proposal. Staff confirmed that residents surrounding the subject property were provided notice ahead of the Development Services Public Meeting and noted that numerous residents have provided comments on the proposal through the several public feedback opportunities.
Alex Siu, Deputant, expressed concerns regarding the increased traffic that this proposed development may add to the surrounding road network. Mr. Siu requested additional road access on the west side of the development to minimize traffic congestion.
Mr. Clarizio advised that a transportation study was undertaken by the applicant which concluded that traffic generated as part of this proposal would not significantly impact traffic volumes in the surrounding road network.
Bin Wei, Deputant, expressed concerns that the original intention of the subject lands becoming a school are not reflected in the proposal but noted that the applicant has largely incorporated public feedback into the proposal, including the removal of a connecting road to Staglin Court.
Crystal Yi, Deputant, expressed concerns with road access from the proposed development to Staglin Court, noting safety and traffic concerns.
Brian Ma, Deputant, expressed support for the current proposed design, with two access points onto Russell Dawson Road.
Yuou Zhang, Deputant, expressed agreement with neighbours of Staglin Court, expressing concerns with access to Staglin Court from the proposed development.
Doug Denby, Deputant, provided deputation on orthography, noting that 2D modeling or drawings do not accurately depict proposed buildings.
The Committee provided the following feedback:
- Inquired if a transportation study was conducted while Staglin Court access was being considered. Staff confirmed that a transportation study was conducted and concluded that the impact from the proposed units would be low as it would generate a low number of peak-hour trips.
- Recommended a cycling and pedestrian network be established within the proposed development as many children and other residents would proceed through the new development to a nearby school.
- Noted that this proposed development would assist the City's efforts to build more homes within Markham.