MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE
2006-01-24
Meeting No. 3
All
Members of Council
Development
Services Economic
Development
Chair: Councillor G. McKelvey Chair: Councillor J. Virgilio
Vice-Chair: Councillor D. Horchik
PART A - 11:00 a.m. - Canada Room
PART B - 1:00 p.m. - Council Chamber
Attendance
|
Councillor A. Chiu
Regrets
Mayor D. Cousens
|
J. Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services
A. Brown, Director of Engineering
J. Carnegie, Director of Corporate
Communications
C. Conrad, Town Solicitor
S. Chait, Director, Economic
Development
D. Ciastko, Senior Economic
Development Officer
D. Clark, Town Architect
G. Day, Planner
G. Duncan, Heritage Planner
S. Heaslip, Senior Project
Coordinator
L. Irvine, Manager, Parks and Open
Space Planning
I.
James, Senior Planner, Urban Design
C. Jay, Senior Planner, Urban Design
R. Kendall, Senior Project
Coordinator
T. Lambe, Manager, Policy and
Research
S. Marsh, Senior Planner, Urban Design
T. Northcott, Senior Business
Development Officer
T. Roberge, Administrative Assistant
V. Shuttleworth, Director of
Planning and Urban Design
K. Webber, Administrative Assistant
M. West, Manager, Strategic
Initiatives
L. Wimmer, Senior Planner, Urban Design
K. Bavington, Committee Clerk
|
The Development Services Committee convened at the hour of 11:10 a.m. in the Canada Room
with Councillor G. McKelvey in the Chair. Councillor J. Virgilio assumed the
Chair for Economic Development items, Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 23.
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST – none
declared
1. MINTO
MARKHAM PARTNERSHIP LTD.
NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROUGE PARK
DRIVE AND 9TH LINE
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVSIION
(19TM-05015) TO PERMIT
12 DWELLINGS (SU 05 016171) (10.5)
Report 1 2 3 4 Appendix A
Moved by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
Seconded by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That
draft plan of subdivision 19TM-05015 (SU 05 016171) located at the northwest
corner of Rouge Bank Drive and 9th Line, proposed by Minto Markham
Partnership Ltd., be draft approved subject to the conditions outlined in
Appendix ‘A’ to the staff report dated January 24, 2006;
And
that servicing allocation for 12 units be granted to Draft Plan of Subdivision
19TM-05015 (SU 05 016171) as per Council’s November 29, 2005,
resolution;
And
that the Region of York be advised of the servicing allocation for this
development;
And
that the Town reserve the right to revoke or reallocate water and sewage
allocation at its sole discretion;
And that
the applicant be required to pay their proportionate share of the
Hwy. 48 flow control measures, to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering;
And
that the applicant provide to the Town the required payment of 30% subdivision
processing fees in accordance with the Town’s Fee By-law (By-law 2005-357).
CARRIED
2. 14TH
AVENUE WATERMAIN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT
STATUS REPORT (5.4)
Report 1
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Jones
That
the report entitled “Status Report on the 14th Avenue Watermain
Construction Project” dated January 24, 2006 be
received;
And that the Mayor and Clerk to be authorized to enter
into agreements with CN Rail, Hydro One and other external agencies as may be
required to implement the construction of the 14th Avenue watermain
project subject to the approval of the CAO and the Town Solicitor;
And that the Mayor and Clerk to be authorized to enter
into agreements to acquire easements as may be required to implement the
construction of the 14th Avenue watermain project subject to the
approval of the CAO and the Town Solicitor;
And that in the event that
staff are unable to come to an agreement with the property owners for the acquisition of the required
easements, staff be authorized to apply for approval to expropriate easements
on the lands;
And
that an exemption to the Town’s Noise Control By-law # 2003-137 be
approved to allow construction of the watermain between Middlefield Road and Markham
Road to proceed 24 hours a day, 7 days a week from May 1 to December 31, 2006
subject to traffic operations restrictions;
And
that staff report back to Council with respect to including these and other
increased costs in updates to the existing development charge by-laws;
And
that the Finance and Engineering
Departments report back to Council on the impact of this project and other Engineering
capital projects funded from Development Charges on projected debt financing
requirements;
And
that staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect
to these recommendations.
CARRIED
3. BUTTONVILLE
HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT STUDY
AND PROPOSED DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES (16.11)
Report Attachments
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu
That the report dated January 24, 2006, entitled
“Buttonville Heritage Conservation District Study and Proposed Boundaries” be
received;
And that the Buttonville
Heritage Conservation District Study and Plan Update Report be received and
endorsed;
And that the boundaries
for the Buttonville Heritage Conservation District as proposed by the
consultant team be approved;
And that the preparation
of a Buttonville Heritage Conservation District Plan proceed on the basis of
these boundaries.
And that staff bring forward a
report recommending designation
under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the Royal
Bank property (with respect to the older building on the property) and the
cemetery lands.
CARRIED
4. COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED GROWTH PLAN
FOR THE GREATER GOLDEN
HORSESHOE
– NOVEMBER 2005 (13.2)
Report 1
Committee
agreed on the following additional comments and directed the revised motion be
brought forward to Council.
a. include provisions
in the Building Code to ensure energy efficiency, green structures, and
sustainability
b.
use stronger wording with respect to a
provincial commitment to a long-term infrastructure and transit strategy
c.
requirement for proper planning, phasing
and consideration of impacts in achieving target of a minimum 40%
intensification
d.
local autonomy to decide where
intensification occurs
e.
request the necessary tools or extension
of the three-year limit to bring the local Official Plan into conformity with the Growth Plan, in order
to facilitate local autonomy and phasing control
f. add
wording with respect to establishing a Greater Toronto Transportation
Authority: “establish a coordinating body, such as…..”
g.
add reference to commitment from all
levels of government (including the Federal gov’t) for funding and dependency
clauses for sustainability
h.
add reference to Rouge Park North, and
linking the Growth Plan with the Greenbelt Plan and reinforce that they work
together
i.
add emphasis that the Provincial
government must develop a strategy for a high-speed rail system to protect the
viability of the GTA
Moved by:
Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded
by: Councillor E. Shapero
That the
staff report entitled “Comments on the Proposed Growth Plan for the Greater
Golden Horseshoe – November 2005” dated January 24, 2006 be received;
And that the Council of the Town of Markham
congratulate and commend the Province for their leadership and commitment
to bringing forward a comprehensive long-term provincial plan to guide municipalities
in managing growth in the Greater Golden Horseshoe;
And that the Town of Markham
support the Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal and the Ontario Growth
Secretariat in the finalization and implementation of the Growth Plan for the
Greater Golden Horseshoe, as outlined and commented on in this report;
And that Council advise the
Province, through the Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, that the
growth contemplated in the Growth Plan will only be viable with a significant
and sustained Provincial commitment to infrastructure funding, including
funding for transit, and financial policy reform;
And that Council request the
Province, through the Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, to make a
commitment to release for consultation, with municipalities and key
stakeholders, a long term, multi-year, sustainable provincial infrastructure
investment strategy identifying road, transit, piped and human services
infrastructure investment and natural heritage funding priorities, in support of
implementation of the Growth Plan policies;
And that Council request
the Province, through the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Municipal
Affairs and Housing to make a commitment to deliver new fiscal tools including
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and permanent removal of tax capping in TIF
areas, and changes to the Development Charges Act, to assist municipalities
with the implementation of the growth plan policies, particularly as they
relate to intensification and development of higher order transit;
And that Council request
the Province (through the Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal) and the
Region of York (through the Regional Commissioner of Planning) to make a
specific commitment to consult with Markham
staff at the technical review stage of the implementation analysis to ensure
that:
·
the
refinement and allocation of growth forecasts and the assessment of the need
and location for future designated greenfield areas, and intensification areas
within the current “built boundary” to meet the 40% target, is properly linked
to essential infrastructure improvements and funding plans and fits with Markham’s emerging
growth management strategy;
·
the “built boundary” accurately
reflects all committed development and includes all lands within the OPA No. 5
planning districts and along the Highway 7 regional transit corridor; and,
·
the scope and scale of Markham
Centre and the delineation of its designated land area as urban growth centre
be based on developable land area, and not include natural heritage features
and areas where development is not permitted in accordance with provincial
plans and policies;
And that Council request the
Province, through the Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, to revise the
Growth Plan policies, or provisions of implementing Provincial legislation as
they relate to:
o
ensuring
that the Provincial commitment to implementation of the Rouge Park North,
identified in the Greenbelt Plan, is also confirmed in the Growth Plan;
o
providing
for municipal control over the phasing of development in new greenfield areas,
where these are designated to achieve conformity with the objectives of the
Growth Plan;
o
the 40%
intensification policies of the Growth Plan should be approved as a target, as
opposed to a minimum;
o
to incorporate
polices into the Growth Plan to ensure that determination of intensification
areas to address the 40% intensification target, will remain a matter for local
municipal policy-making and development approval;
o
extending
the 3 year requirement for achieving conformity with the Growth Plan to 5 years
for lower tier municipalities, providing these municipalities have initiated
and advanced the conformity process within the first 3 years;
*
o
acknowledging
the need for corresponding improvements to the Ontario Building Code to achieve greater energy efficiency and
sustainability in conjunction with intensification;
o
making a
specific commitment to consultation between lower tier municipalities, the
Province and upper tier municipalities in completing the technical review and
sub-area assessment; and
o
revising
Schedule 4 – Urban Growth Centres to make correct reference to “Markham Centre”
instead of “Markham City Centre” as an urban growth centre;
And that Council request
the Province, through the Minister of Environment, to expedite the provincial
response to the Environmental Assessment (EA) Advisory panel’s recommendations
on streamlining the EA process for key infrastructure projects (ie. transit,
roads, water and wastewater) that support the Growth Plan for the Greater
Golden Horseshoe;
And that Council request the
Province, through the Minister of Transportation, to fulfill its commitment to
establish a coordinating body for transportation planning, such as a Greater
Toronto Transportation Authority, to ensure coordination of road, transit and
related transportation infrastructure and services, particularly in regard to
infrastructure impacts across municipal boundaries and implement the
transportation initiatives of the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe,
and that the Province be requested to confirm that the continued development
and delivery of rail transit system serving the Greater Toronto Area is a
Provincial responsibility ;
And
that Council endorse the aforementioned staff report and submit it to the
Province, along with the Council resolution, as the Town of Markham’s comments
on the Proposed Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and Environmental
Bill of Rights Registry No. XR05E0002;
And
that the Clerk be requested to forward a copy of this report to the Premier, the
Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, the Assistant Deputy Minister for
the Ontario Growth Secretariat, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing,
the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Environment, the Minister of
Transportation, York Region MPPs, the Prime Minister elect, and York Region MPs
elect and the Region of York.
* Amended by Council on January
31, 2006,
to replace the sixth bullet of the eighth clause, as follows:
o
acknowledging the need for corresponding
improvements to the Ontario Building Code to achieve greater energy efficiency for new building standards and sustainability in building design in conjunction with intensification;
CARRIED
5. MARKHAM MISSION TO CHINA AND NEXT STEPS
(10.16)
Report
Committee
was provided with a promotional page from Ecotech and two newspaper
articles from the Markham Economist and
Sun dated March 3, 2005,
and the Toronto Star dated February
19, 2005, for information.
Staff
reviewed the recent Markham Mission to China
to promote the Town for investment and trade purposes, and commented on the
phenomenal growth in China.
Staff described the potential for opportunity and reviewed the recommended
10-step program to maximize Markham’s
strategic resources.
Several
members of the business community were in attendance and spoke to the Committee
about their experiences and opportunities in China.
Committee expressed appreciation to the speakers.
Committee
inquired about obtaining assistance in transferring earning from China,
and on the progress of human rights and intellectual property rights standards
in China.
Committee requested that the CBC movie called "China Rising" be made
available for viewing.
It was
noted that the Maritime provinces
are initiating a connection with China,
and that Markham should pursue a
presence within that initiative. Committee also directed that the resolution be
amended to add one or two additional target cities for the alliance program,
and that a more formal term such as “economic alliance” be used instead of “sister city”.
Staff
advised that a list of proposed members for the Markham
– China Advisory Group will be presented to the Committee. Deputy Mayor F.
Scarpitti indicated his interest in joining the Group.
Moved by:
Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded
by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That
the report entitled “Business Mission to China and Next Steps” be received,
And
that the Town re-affirm its commitment to strengthening its economic
development relations with China;
And
that the Town authorize the Economic Development Department to develop a 3-year
alliance program with Beijing and with Wuhan and one or
two other cities, to be determined in
consultation with the Markham-China advisory group, to be based on the recommendations in this
report;
And that strategic proposal No. 5 in the report be titled “An Economic Alliance Agreement Between Wuhan People's Republic of
China and Markham, Canada on the Establishment of Sister City Relation”;
And that staff
investigate pursuing involvement with the Maritime – China connection.
CARRIED
6. PROCLAMATION
MARKHAM BOARD OF TRADE MONTH
(3.4)
Moved by: Councillor J. Webster
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That the month of May, 2006, be proclaimed Markham
Board of Trade Month in the Town of Markham.
CARRIED
7. 2006
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING PLAN (10.16)
Report 1 2
Moved by: Councillor G. McKelvey
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Jones
That the report entitled “2006
Economic
Development Marketing Plan” be received and endorsed;
And that approval be given to
fund the non-travel related projects described in this report from within the
2006 Economic Development Business
Development budget account #610-9985808, those projects being: key initiatives/sponsored
events to a maximum of $87,000; business conferences and industry/trade shows
to a maximum of $36,000; the economic alliance program to a maximum of $25,000;
and the production of advertising and promotional materials and purchase of
print ads to a maximum of $75,000 for a maximum total of $223,000;
And that
approval be given to fund the business travel-related projects described in
this report from within the approved 2006 Economic
Development Business Travel budget account #610-9985201, those
projects being: business conferences and industry/trade shows to a maximum of
$4,000; and the business travel and economic alliance program to a maximum of
$18,000 for a maximum total of $22,000.
CARRIED
8. KNOWLEDGE
COMMUNITY SUB-COMMITTEE (10.16)
Report 1 2
Moved by: Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu
That the report entitled “Knowledge Community Sub-Committee” be
received,
And that the recommended Terms of Reference and 2006 implementation
program be approved,
And that the Director of Economic Development, the Director of the
Varley Gallery, and the CEO of Markham Public Libraries be authorized to work
with the Sub-Committee to implement the program,
And that Ms. E. Huggins be retained to guide the launch of “Creativity
& Innovation Week” April 15 – 21 in Markham
at a cost not to exceed $12,500 to be funded from within the 2006 Knowledge
Community capital account.
CARRIED
9. ON-LINE
BUSINESS DIRECTORY (10.16)
Report 2
Moved by: Councillor A Chiu
Seconded by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
That the
report entitled “Online Business Directory” be received;
And that the
business-to-business (B2B) community awareness program be implemented at a cost
not to exceed $8,000 to be funded from within Business Development account #
610-998 5808.
CARRIED
10. MARKHAM
LAVAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE (YR. 2) REPORT (10.16)
Report 1 2 3 4
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Councillor S. Daurio
That the report entitled “Markham-Laval
Economic Alliance 2005 (Yr. 2) Report” be received;
And that staff be approved to implement the proposed 2006 action plan
at a cost not to exceed $9,500 and to be funded through Economic
Development Capital account #086-6900-6775-005 and Economic
Development Business Travel Account 610-9985201.
CARRIED
Public
Meeting – to Council
11. 1199394 ONTARIO LIMITED (LONGO’S FRUIT
MARKET)
3085 HIGHWAY 7, EAST OF
WOODBINE AVENUE
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT
APPLICATION (ZA 05 015040) (10.5)
The Chair advised that the
subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider the proposed Zoning
By-law amendment, File ZA 05 015040, submitted by 1199394 Ontario Limited
(Longo’s Fruit Market) for 3085 Highway 7, East of Woodbine Avenue.
Committee was advised that 26
notices were mailed on January 4, 2006, and a Public Meeting sign was
posted on December 21, 2005. Committee received one written
submission from Aird & Berlis, representing Angelico Investments Inc., with
comments.
Staff gave a presentation
regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses, and outstanding issues.
Staff clarified that the cost-sharing agreement referred to by Aird &
Berlis does not have a bearing on this application, however, staff will review
the wording of agreements with Michealangelos that may involve the subject
property.
Judy Bates of Goodmans,
representing the applicant, 1199394 Ontario Limited, concurred with the staff
report and advised that the purpose of the application is to update the by-law
to reflect changes that have been made over the years through minor variances,
and to recognize the existing retail store.
There were no comments from
the public with respect to this application.
Moved
by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
Seconded
by: Regional Councillor J. Heath
That the written submissions
from Aird & Berlis, representing Angelico Investments Inc., with comments
regarding the proposed Zoning By-law amendment, File ZA 05 015040, submitted by
1199394 Ontario Limited (Longo’s Fruit Market) for 3085 Highway 7, be received;
And
that the Development Services Commission report dates August 30, 2005 entitled “preliminary
Report, 1199394 Ontario Limited (Longo’s Fruit Market), Rezoning Application
for 3065 Highway 7, located at the southeast corner of Highway 7 and Woodbine
Avenue (ZA 05 015040)” be received;
And
that the record of the Public Meeting held on January
24, 2006, be
received;
And
that the proposed amendment to By-law 165-80 be enacted without further notice.
CARRIED
12. NEAMSBY INVESTMENT INC., 95 DUFFIELD
DRIVE
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT AND
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
TO PERMIT A BANQUET HALL (ZA
05 024222, SC 05 022598) (10.5)
The Chair advised that the
subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider the proposed Zoning
By-law amendment and site plan approval applications, Files ZA 05 024222, SC 05
022598, submitted by Neamsby Investments Inc. to permit a banquet hall at 95
Duffield Drive.
Committee was advised that 64
notices were mailed on January 4, 2006, and a Public Meeting sign was
posted on December 22, 2005. There were no written submissions
received.
Staff gave a presentation regarding
the proposal, the location, surrounding uses, and outstanding issues.
Committee discussed the
proximity of the parking lot to the adjacent houses and requested staff
approach the applicant regarding shared parking with the neighbouring
townhouses. A concern was noted for the orientation of the building and “brick
wall” appearance from the street.
Rudy Buczolits, representing
the applicant, Neamsby Investments Inc., was in attendance. He displayed
revised site plans indicating placement of the building and parking locations,
and discussed wall glazing and building design details.
There
were no comments from the public with respect to this application.
Moved
by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded
by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That
the record of the Public Meeting held on January 24, 2006, with respect to
“Neamsby Investments Inc., Applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site
Plan Approval to Permit at Banquet Hall Facility at 95 Duffield Drive (ZA 05 02422 and SC 05
022598)” be received;
And
that the Zoning By-law Amendment application (ZA 05 024222) to amend By-law
108-81, as amended, submitted by Neamsby Investments Inc. to permit a Banquet
Hall Facility at 95 Duffield Drive, be approved and the draft Zoning By-law
Amendment be enacted without further notice.
CARRIED
13. 1625140 ONTARIO INC., (BRUNO SPINOSA)
6050 HIGHWAY 7 EAST, MARKHAM
VILLAGE HERITAGE
CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ZONING
AMENDMENT AND
SITE PLAN CONTROL (ZA 05
015302, SC 05 015309) (10.5, 10.6)
The Chair advised that the
subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider the proposed Zoning By-law amendment and site plan
approval, Files ZA 05 015302, SC 05 015309, submitted by 1625140 Ontario Inc.
(Bruno Spinosa) for 6050 Highway 7 East.
Committee was advised that 57
notices were mailed on January 4, 2006, and a Public Meeting sign was
posted on December 29, 2005. There were no written submissions
received.
Staff displayed renderings.
There were no comments from the public with respect to this application, and the
Committee had no concerns.
Moved
by: Councillor S. Daurio
Seconded
by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
That
the Development Services Commission report dated December
6, 2005
entitled “Preliminary Report, Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Control, 1625140
Ontario Inc. (Bruno Spinosa), 6050 Highway 7 E., Markham Village HCD, ZA 05
015302 and SC 05 015309” be received;
And
that the Record of the Public Meeting held on January
24, 2006,
with respect to the proposed amendments to By-law 1229 be received;
And
that the application by 162510 Ontario Inc. to amend By-law 1229 be approved;
And
further that the proposed amendment to By-law 1229 be enacted.
CARRIED
14. 594607 ONTARIO LIMITED, MICHAEL
DELLI-BENEDETTI
32 (34) WASHINGTON ST, MARKHAM
VILLAGE HERITAGE DISTRICT
ZONING AMENDMENT ‑
ZONING USE CATEGORY (ZA 05 017696) (10.5)
The Chair advised that the
subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider the proposed Zoning By-law amendment, File ZA 05 017696,
submitted by 594607 Ontario Limited, Michael Delli-Benedetti, for 32 (34)
Washington Street, Markham Village Heritage District.
Committee was advised that 104
notices were mailed on January 4, 2006, and a Public Meeting sign was
posted on December 21, 2005. There were no written submissions
received.
Staff gave a presentation
regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses, and outstanding issues,
and clarified that due to a numbering change, the address of the subject
property is now 34
Washington Street.
Allan Windrem of Chadwin and
Company Limited, representing the owner, 594607 Ontario Limited, was in
attendance to answer any questions.
Stephen Reid, 29 Washington Street, discussed the previous severance
on the property, and stated his concerns for the proposed smaller lots, and
construction impacts. Mr. Reid questioned the Heritage restrictions for this
proposal, and suggested a single lot with a single home would be more
appropriate.
Jamie
Lumsden, 32 Washington Street, expressed concern for the small
lots, the side yard setback, and preservation of the large walnut tree. Mr.
Lumsden did not object to the residential zoning, but has concern with the site
plan details.
Drew
Atamanuk, 36 Washington Street, supported the statements of the
previous speakers.
Committee
noted that the proposed zoning would eliminate possible higher density and
commercial uses currently permitted. With respect to the division of the land,
part lot control will be implemented in this case, therefore the only avenue
for appeal by the residents is through the zoning application. Discussions
included the difference in style, height, and front yard setbacks, with
existing homes. Whether the construction should precede the land division was
also discussed.
Staff
advised that the proposed side yard setback is .6m. It was suggested that
Council hold the zoning by-law until site plan issues are resolved. The Ward
Councillor and staff agreed to meet with the applicant and residents to resolve
zoning and site plan issues, as soon as possible.
Moved
by: Councillor J. Webster
Seconded
by: Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti
That the deputations by
Stephen Reid, Jamie Lumsden, and Drew Atamanuk, with concerns regarding the
proposed Zoning By-law amendment, File
ZA 05 017696, submitted by 594607 Ontario Limited, Michael Delli-Benedetti, for
32 Washington Street, be received;
And
that the Development Services Commission report dated November 22, 2005
entitled “Preliminary Report, Zoning Amendment – Zone Use Category, 594607
Ontario Limited, Michael Delli-Benedetti, 32 Washington Street (renumbered 34
and 34a), Markham Village HCD, ZA 05 017696” be received;
And
that the Record of the Public Meeting held on January
24, 2006,
with respect to the proposed amendments to By-law 1229 be received;
And
that the application by 594607 Ontario Limited to amend By-law 1229 be
approved;
And
further that the proposed amendment to By-law 1229 be enacted, once staff and the residents are satisfied with the zoning and site
plan applications.
CARRIED
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other
matters considered by Development Services Committee on January 24, 2006:
15. MARKHAM
CENTRE
PARK/CENTRAL AMENITY FEATURE (10.8)
Janet Rosenberg and Wayne
Swanton of J. Rosenberg & Associates, Landscape Architects, and David
Olesen of Olesen Worland Architects, and Robert Smyth of Taylor, Smyth
Architects, were in attendance to present a proposal for the Markham Centre
central amenity feature. With the Committee’s endorsement, the plan will be
presented to the public and a final design will be brought back to Council by
June, 2006.
Discussions included the unique qualities of the
proposal, phasing and investment strategies, the use of underground parking,
and sustainability issues.
Moved by: Councillor E. Shapero
Seconded by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
That the Consultant presentation regarding Markham
Centre Park/Central Amenity Feature be received and
endorsed, and that a Public Information Meeting be held on February 16, 2006.
CARRIED
16. ALTERNATIVE
PARKLAND STANDARDS FOR
RESIDENTIAL INFILL AND INTENSIFICATION
AREAS (6.11)
Staff is seeking direction from the Committee
regarding alternate parkland standards for residential infill and intensification
projects. Staff reviewed the policy framework, current practices and
challenges, and options with respect to determining land values for parkland
dedication and ensuring viable development.
Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded by: Councillor S. Daurio
That the staff presentation regarding alternative
parkland standards for residential infill and intensification projects be
received, and that staff report back further.
CARRIED
17. DELEGATED
APPROVALS UNDER BY-LAW 2002-202
(DM 2001-03) (10.6)
Report
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That
Council be advised that in accordance with Delegation By-law 2002-202, and
additional site specific delegations authorized by Development Services
Committee, the Commissioner of Development Services or the Director of Planning and
Urban Design have
approved applications listed in the report dated January 24, 2006.
CARRIED
18. HERITAGE
MARKHAM COMMITTEE MINUTES
- January 11, 2006 (16.11)
Minutes
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That the minutes of the Heritage Markham Committee
meeting held January 11,
2006, be received for information.
CARRIED
19. MACKENZIE
BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS LTD.,
DANVEST WISMER INVESTMENTS
LTD.,
AMBER PLAIN INVESTMENTS LTD.,
16TH AND MCCOWAN HOLDINGS
LTD.,
MATTAMY (ROBINSON CREEK) LTD.,
BRAWLEY MANOR CORP.,
WISMER MARKHAM DEV. INC.,
1039954 ONT. LTD.,
WISMER COMMONS COMMUNITY
PROPOSED PLANS OF SUBDIVISION
AND
IMPLEMENTING ZONING BY-LAW
AMENDMENTS
SU 02 116539 (19TM-02012) SU 02 114206 (19TM-02009)
SU 02 110218 (19TM-02003) SU 02 115896 (19TM-02011)
SU 03 113679 (19TM-03008) SU 02 115478 (19TM-02010)
SU 02 113757 (19TM-02008) SU 02 118676 (19TM-02016) (10.5, 10.7)
Report
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That a Public Meeting be
held to consider the applications submitted by Mackenzie Builders and
Developers Ltd., Danvest Wismer Investments Ltd., Amber Plain Investments Ltd.,
16th and McCowan Holdings Ltd., Mattamy (Robinson Creek) Ltd.,
Brawley Manor Corp., Wismer Markham Dev. Inc. and 1039954 Ont. Ltd. for
draft plan of subdivision approvals and implementing zoning by-law amendments
to permit residential plans of subdivision within the Wismer Commons community.
CARRIED
20. GREENBELT
VOLKSWAGEN
7997 KENNEDY ROAD AND 31 HELEN
AVENUE
UPDATE MEMO FOR OFFICIAL PLAN
AND
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT
APPLICATIONS TO
PERMIT VOLKSWAGEN DEALERSHIP
EXPANSION
(OP 03 108961, ZA 03 108969) (10.3, 10.5)
Report
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That a Public Meeting be
held to consider revisions to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment
applications submitted by Greenbelt Volkswagen.
CARRIED
21. 1113899 ONTARIO LTD., 23 WATER STREET
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT TO
PERMIT
FOUR RESIDENTIAL LOTS (ZA 03
112248) (10.5)
Report
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Councillor J. Virgilio
That a Public Meeting be held to consider the zoning
by-law amendment application submitted by 1113899 Ontario Limited to permit
four new residential lots at 23 Water Street, Markham Village.
CARRIED
22. MARKHAM
CENTRE - EAST PRECINCT
PROPOSED PRECINCT PLAN (10.8)
Report
Committee received electronic correspondence from Glenn Baron of Helen
Avenue, requesting extension of the public
information notice area.
Moved by: Councillor D. Horchik
Seconded by: Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti
That the electronic correspondence from Glenn
Baron of Helen
Avenue, regarding
the Markham Centre Precinct Plan, be received;
And that the report dated January
24, 2006,
entitled “Markham Centre – East Precinct, Proposed Precinct Plan” be received;
That a public information
meeting be held to discuss the proposed East Precinct Plan as discussed in this
report;
And
that notice for
this meeting be consistent with that given for the open house in the summer,
with the boundaries for
circulation purposes being the greater of 120 metres or the limits of the GO
line to the West, Highway 7 to the north, Kennedy Road to the east, Highway 407
to the south, and extended east,
to the terminus of Helen Avenue and north to the limit of the South Unionville Secondary
Plan.
CARRIED
23. MARKHAM
BOARD OF TRADE (10.16)
Presentation 2005 Presentation
2006
Keith Bray, President and CEO of the Markham Board of
Trade, and Glenn Crosby, Chair MBT Board of Directors, made a presentation to
the Committee with respect to their successes in the past year and initiatives
for the coming year.
Committee acknowledged the work of the Board of Trade
and the contributions of Mr. Bray and Mr. Crosby.
Moved by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
Seconded by: Regional Councillor J. Jones
That the presentation by Keith Bray, CEO of the
Markham Board of Trade, be received;
And that Keith Bray, President and CEO of the Markham Board of
Trade, and Glenn Crosby, Chair MBT Board of Directors, be commended for their
contributions and success.
CARRIED
24. NEW BUSINESS
ROYAL CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC
AND PROPERTY MATTERS (8.7
& 13.6)
Staff was requested to assist a Councillor and the Royal
Conservatory of Music, in meeting with the School Board with respect to setting
up a satellite office in Markham.
Committee requested updates regarding road completions
and property matters, at the next Committee of the Whole meeting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN CAMERA
25. LEGAL MATTER (10.0)
Moved by:
Councillor S. Daurio
Seconded
by: Councillor D. Horchik
That the Development Services Committee recess
in-camera at 12:50 for a legal matter.
CARRIED
Moved
by: Councillor A. Chiu
Seconded
by: Councillor J. Webster
That the
Committee rise from in-camera at 1:10
p.m.
CARRIED
Moved by:
Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded
by: Councillor D. Horchik
That the Development Services Committee recess and
continue the in-camera matter at 4:30 p.m.
CARRIED
Moved by:
Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded
by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
That the
Committee rise from in-camera at 5:30
p.m.
CARRIED
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART C
Public Meeting
7:00 p.m. - Council Chamber
Attendance
|
Councillor A. Chiu
Regrets
|
G. Duncan, Heritage Planner
A. Henriques, Planner
B. Karumanchery, Senior Project
Coordinator
R. Kendall, Senior Project
Coordinator
V. Shuttleworth, Director of
Planning and Urban Design
N. Surti, Planner
M. Wouters, Senior Planner
K. Bavington, Committee Clerk
|
The Development Services Committee convened at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber with
Councillor G. McKelvey in the Chair.
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST – none
declared
See also: Item Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14.
26. BOX GROVE HILL DEVELOPMENTS INC.
6788 14TH AVENUE, BOX GROVE
COMMUNITY
SUBDIVISION AND ZONING BY-LAW
AMENDMENT
TO PERMIT 22 SINGLE-DETACHED
UNITS (19TM-050018)
(SU 05 023032, ZA 05 023033)
(10.5, 10.7)
The Chair advised that the
subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider the proposed Draft Plan
of Subdivision and Zoning By-law amendment, Files SU 05 023032, ZA 05 023033,
submitted by Box Grove Hill Developments Inc. to permit 22 single-detached
units at 6788 14th Avenue.
Committee was advised that 62
notices were mailed on January 4, 2006, and a Public Meeting sign was
posted on January 3, 2006. Committee received one written
submission from James and Flora Bajari, 6795 14th Avenue, with concerns.
Staff gave a presentation
regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses, and outstanding issues.
Staff advised that a site plan proposal has not been submitted, and that the
zoning on adjacent lots fronting on 9th Line and 14th Avenue, are for residential and low
density uses. Heritage Markham will not be pursuing Heritage designation for
the older dwelling on the property, as it is not a significant structure.
Roy Mason of KLM Planning Partners Inc., representing the
applicant, Box Grove Hill developments Inc., was in attendance to answer
questions.
Tom Farrar, Chair of Box Grove
Ratepayers Association, stated his concerns for the delay in the completion of
the 9th Line By-pass, and provision of street lighting along 9th
Line.
Tim Koski, 7845 9th
Line, asked about the use of the right-of-way through to 9th Line,
and objected to the small lot size. Mr. Koski advised that possible human
remains have been found by the large maple trees near the property line.
Janice Kaiman, 7775 9th
Line, on behalf of her parents, the previous owners of the subject property,
supported the proposal. Ms. Kaiman advised that her parents are anxious to be
able to settle on their lot within the development.
Dan McCombe, 7783 9th
Line, stated his concern that the small lots being proposed are not compatible
with the existing larger lots, and enquired about the type of fencing to be
provided. Mr. McCombe requested that the 9th Line residents have
access to sewer hook ups from the new development.
Robert Watt, 7831 9th
Line, stated his opposition to the small 42 – 44 foot lots, which won’t be
compatible. He advised that he will have three new lots backing onto his yard.
Staff responded to comments,
advising of the anticipated completion of the 9th Line by-pass, and
that the right-of-way to 9th Line will be for pedestrian and
emergency vehicle use only. With respect to the possible human remains on site,
an archaeological assessment will be required. Other issues, including lot size,
will be further reviewed by staff and addressed in the final report. An update
regarding the lighting along 9th Line will be e-mailed to Mr.
Farrar. It was suggested that a meeting be arranged with the residents and the
Ward Councillor.
Committee questioned the
ownership of the right-of-way, and asked staff to review provisions for the
older home on Block 26.
Moved
by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell
Seconded
by: Regional Councillor J. Jones
That the written submission
from James and Flora Bajari, 6795 14th Avenue, with concerns
regarding Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law amendment Files SU 05
023032, ZA 05 023033, submitted by Box Grove Hill Developments Inc. to permit
22 Single-detached units at 6788 14th Avenue, be received;
And that the deputations by Tom
Farrar, Chair of Box Grove Ratepayers Association, Tim Koski, Dan McCombe, and
Robert Watt with concerns, and from Janice Kaiman, in support of the proposal for
Files SU 05 023032, ZA 05 023033, submitted by Box Grove Hill Developments Inc.
to permit 22 Single-detached units at 6788 14th Avenue, be received;
And
that the Development Services Commission report dated December 6, 2005 entitled
“Preliminary Report, Box Grove Hill Developments Inc. 6788 14th
Avenue, subdivision and zoning by-law amendment applications to permit 22
single-detached units (19TM-050018) Box Grove Community, SU 05 023032 and ZA 05
023033” be received;
And
that the Record of the Public Meeting held on January 24, 2006, with respect to
the plan of subdivision and zoning by-law amendment applications submitted by
Box Grove Hill Developments Inc. be received;
And
further that the applications by Box Grove Hill Developments Inc. be referred
back to staff for a report and recommendation.
* Amended by Council on January
31, 2006 to
add a clause as follows:
"That
staff report back to Development Services Committee as soon as possible on
opportunities and options and potential costs, if any, to provide sewer
connections to nearby homes in the current Box Grove."
CARRIED
ADJOURNMENT
The Development Services Committee meeting adjourned at the hour of 8:50 p.m.