COUNCIL MINUTES
April
3, 2012, 7:00 p.m.
Council
Chamber, Anthony Roman Markham Civic Centre
Meeting No. 6
Alternate
formats for this document are available upon request
ROLL CALL
Mayor Frank
Scarpitti, Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Regional Councillor Jim Jones, Regional
Councillor Gord Landon, Regional Councillor Joe Li, Councillor Valerie Burke,
Councillor Howard Shore, Councillor Don Hamilton, Councillor Carolina Moretti,
Councillor Colin Campbell, Councillor Alan Ho, Councillor Logan Kanapathi,
Councillor Alex Chiu.
STAFF
Andy Taylor, Chief
Administrative Officer
Jim Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services
Catherine Conrad, Town
Solicitor
Brenda Librecz, Commissioner
of Community and Fire Services
Kimberley Kitteringham, Town
Clerk
Kitty Bavington,
Council/Committee Coordinator
Joel Lustig, Treasurer
Nasir Kenea, Chief
Information Officer
Dennis
Flaherty, Director, Communications & Community Relations
John Wong, Technology
Support Specialist
The Regular
Meeting of Council convened at 7:09 p.m. on April 3, 2012 in the Council
Chamber. Mayor Frank Scarpitti presided.
1. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
(1) None
declared.
2. MINUTES
(1) COUNCIL MINUTES – MARCH 20, 2012
Minutes
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Councillor
Carolina Moretti
1) That
the Minutes of the Council Meeting held on March 20, 2012, be adopted.
CARRIED
3. PRESENTATIONS
There were no
presentations.
4. DELEGATIONS
(1) ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (OMB) (13.0)
Moved by Regional Councillor Gord Landon
Seconded by Councillor Howard Shore
1) That
the following delegations and the written communications regarding the proposed
motion on Ontario
Municipal Board (OMB) be received:
1. Eileen Liasi on behalf of the German
Mills Residents Association, Spoke in support of the proposed motion.
2. David
Jordon, Thornhill Conservation District Ratepayer’s Association, spoke in
opposition to the proposed motion.
3. Fred
Webber, spoke in support of the proposed motion.
4. Brian
Chadderton, spoke in support of the proposed motion.
5. Danielle
Chin, BILD (York Chapter), spoke in opposition to the proposed motion.
6. Donna
Bush, spoke in opposition to the proposed motion.
7. Annette
Cacorovski, spoke in opposition to the proposed motion.
8. Karen
Rea, spoke in opposition to the proposed motion.
9. Zuzana
Zila, spoke in opposition to the proposed motion.
10. Bhupen
Karia, spoke in opposition to the proposed motion.
11. Joyce
Raymer, on behalf of Ray Menzies, spoke in opposition to the proposed motion.
12. Alex
Hardy, Markham Residents for Responsible Community Planning, spoke in
opposition to the proposed motion.
13. Brahm
Satov, spoke in support of the proposed motion.
14. Benjamin
Fitzerman, spoke in support of the proposed motion.
15. Gerald
Diner, offering an alternative to the proposed motion.
16. Leon
Brumer, spoke in support of the proposed motion.
17. Marion
Matthias, provided comments.
(See Motion Item No. 2 on Council's decision on this matter)
(See Petition Item No. 1)
(See Communication Item No. 21-2012)
(See New/Other Business Item No. 1)
CARRIED
(See following
to bring the motion forward for consideration)
(See following
regarding Marion Matthias's delegation)
Moved by Councillor Howard Shore
Seconded by Councillor Logan Kanapathi
That Council consider the proposed motion regarding Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) immediately
following the delegations with respect thereto.
(See Communication No. 21-2012)
(See Motion No. 2 on Council's decision on this matter)
(See New/Other Business Item No. 1)
CARRIED
Moved by Regional Councillor Gord Landon
Seconded by Regional Councillor Jim Jones
That Council hear the delegation of Marion Matthias regarding the proposed
motion on Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) immediately following the consideration of
Report No. 20, although
the matter has been considered by Council earlier in the meeting
CARRIED
(2/3 Vote was
requested & obtained)
(See following
to receive the delegation)
Moved by Regional Councillor Gord Landon
Seconded by Regional Councillor Jim Jones
That delegation of Marion Matthias regarding the proposed motion on Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) be
received.
CARRIED
(2) RICCARDO
PACI
- MAIN STREET RECONSTRUCTION
UPDATE HIGHWAY 7
TO BULLOCK DRIVE – UNDERGROUND SERVICES (5.10)
Moved by Councillor
Carolina Moretti
Seconded by Councillor
Colin Campbell
1) That
the delegation by Riccardo Paci providing comments with respect to the proposed
motion titled "Main Street Reconstruction Update Highway 7 to Bullock
Drive – Underground Services" be received.
(See Item 6 of Report 17 on Council's
decision on this matter)
CARRIED
5. PETITIONS
(1) ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (OMB) (13.0)
Petition
Moved by Regional
Councillor Gord Landon
Seconded by Councillor
Howard Shore
1) That the petition signed by 40 residents providing their
support with respect to the proposed motion on Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) be received.
(See Motion Item No. 2 on Council's decision on this matter)
(See Delegation Item No. 1)
(See Communication Item No. 21-2012)
(See New/Other Business Item No. 1)
CARRIED
6(a) REPORT NO. 16 - GENERAL COMMITTEE (March
26, 2012)
Moved by Regional
Councillor Gord Landon
Seconded by Councillor
Colin Campbell
That Report
No. 16 – General Committee comprised of 3 items be received and adopted.
(1) CONTRACT
EXTENSION FOR 007-T-09
TOWNWIDE CATCH BASIN CLEANING
(5.10)
Report
1) That
the report entitled “Contract Extension for 007-T-09 Townwide Catch Basin
Cleaning” be received; and,
2) That
contract 007-T-09 Townwide Catch Basin Cleaning be extended to Flow Kleen Tech
Ltd. for an additional three (3) years (April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2015) in the estimated annual amount of
$221,424 inclusive of HST impact; and,
3) That
the Director of Operations and Manager of Purchasing be authorized to extend
the contract for Townwide Catch Basin Cleaning for two (2) additional years,
provided that it is in the best interest of the Town and increase per year does
not exceed 5% of the cost of the previous years contractual value; and,
4) That
the tendering process be waived in accordance with Purchasing By-Law 2004-341,
Part II, Section 7 (1) (c) which states “when the extension of an existing
contract would prove more cost-effective or beneficial”; and,
5) That
funds be provided from the budget accounts as listed in the Financial
Considerations in the amount of $221,424, inclusive of HST impact; and,
6) That
the award for 2013 – 2015 be funded from the respective years operating budget
accounts subject to Council approval of the annual operating budgets; and,
7) That
this report be brought forward to the April 3rd, 2012 Council meeting; and
further,
8) That
Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to
this resolution.
CARRIED
(2) AMENDMENT
OF WATERWORKS FEES (7.0)
Report Attachment
A
1) That the report titled “Amendment of
Waterworks Fees” be received; and,
2) That the proposed fees outlined in
Attachment ‘A’ for services provided by the Waterworks Division be approved
effective June 1, 2012; and,
3) That By-Law No. 2002-276 be amended to
update the user fees set under ‘Community Services – Water’ section of Schedule
A, with fees outlined in Attachment ‘A’; and,
4) That the Director of the department be authorized to set future increases
annually based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (Toronto All Items
September – September) with such increases effective January 1 and rounded to
the nearest half dollar; and,
5) That
staff report back on the possibility to exempt the waterworks service fee to
turn water off at the curb during emergency situations and the monitoring of
water trucks filling up from fire hydrants; and further,
6) That Staff be authorized and directed
to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
(3) MARKHAM
ARTS COUNCIL (3.0)
Report
1) That
the report titled Markham Arts Council (MAC) be received; and,
2) That
Council approve a 10 year unsecured, interest free loan of $66,000 to the
Markham Arts Council, repayable in ten (10) equal installments commencing
November 1, 2013; and,
3) That
Council authorize the execution of a loan agreement to the satisfaction of the
Chief Administrative Officer and the Town Solicitor based on the terms outlined
in the report including that no liability be incurred to any of the Board
Members or staff of the Markham Arts Council; and,
4) That
Council authorize the Commissioner of Community and Fire Service to enter into
a Partnership Agreement that would outline roles, expectations and accountabilities
between the Markham Arts Council and the Town of Markham under the stewardship
of the Department of Culture; and further,
5) That
staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to
this resolution.
CARRIED
6(b) REPORT NO. 17 - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COMMITTEE (March 27, 2012)
Council
consented to separate Item Nos. 4, 5 and 6.
Moved by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
Seconded by Councillor
Don Hamilton
That Report
No. 17 – Development Services Committee comprised of 6 items be received and
adopted, except Item Nos. 4, 5 and 6. (See following Item Nos. 4, 5 and 6)
(1) AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE MINUTES
- FEBRUARY 2, 2012 (16.34)
Minutes Appendix
A
1) That
the minutes of the Agricultural Advisory Committee meeting held February 2,
2012, be received for information purposes; and,
2) That
the following recommendation from the Agricultural Advisory Committee meeting
held on February 2, 2012 be endorsed:
"That the revised Agricultural Advisory Committee Terms of Reference be
approved to acknowledge the agency members as voting members as presented in
Appendix A."
CARRIED
(2) INTENTION TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY UNDER
PART IV OF THE ONTARIO
HERITAGE ACT
NAME: JARVIS-FAIRTY HOUSE
ADDRESS: 6350 STEELES AVENUE
(16.11.3)
Report Attachment
1) That
as recommended by Heritage Markham, the Jarvis-Fairty House – 6350 Steeles Avenue, be approved for
designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act as a property of
cultural heritage value or interest; and,
2) That the
Clerk’s Department be authorized to publish and serve Council’s Notice of
Intention to Designate as per the requirements of the Ontario Heritage Act;
and,
3) That
if there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the provisions
of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be authorized to place a
designation by-law before Council for adoption; and,
4) That
if there are any objections in accordance with the provisions of the Ontario
Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to refer the proposed designation to
the Ontario Conservation Review Board; and further,
5) That
Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to
this resolution.
CARRIED
(3) REVISED LOCATION FOR
CASELY HERITAGE HOUSE
198 ANGUS GLEN BOULEVARD
ANGUS GLEN WEST VILLAGE
BUILDING PERMIT TO BREAK
FOUNDATION
(12 111426 DP) (16.11.3)
Memo
1) That
the staff memorandum entitled “Revised Location for the Casely Heritage House,
198 Angus Glen Boulevard, Angus Glen West Village, Building Permit to Break
Foundation 12 111426 DP,” dated March 27, 2012, be received; and,
2) That
Council approve the new location for the Casely House on “Lot 26” of the
proposed future plan of subdivision subject to:
a) the
proposed lot in the future plan of subdivision being increased in size to
adequately accommodate the size of the heritage dwelling;
b)
the applicant providing a Letter of
Undertaking with (i) a commitment
to complete the site plan agreement for the Casely House within three (3)
months, and (ii) a timeline for the Casely House to be placed on a new
foundation acceptable to the Commissioner of Development Services;
c) the
applicant providing the required financial security of $100,000 along with the
Undertaking prior to the issuance of the Building Permit to Break Foundation.
d) the
building being properly secured/boarded and made weather-tight once it is
removed from its foundation, including any openings in the floor and any window
openings; and
e) the
temporary relocation area being fenced off to provide security for the heritage
building; and,
3) That
Council has no objection to the building permit submitted to allow the Casely
House to be broken from its foundation and relocated to the property (Lot 26)
where it will be stored pending the completion of the site plan agreement and
approval of the future plan of subdivision for the specific area, but that the
permit only be released once the Undertaking is signed by the applicant and the
required financial security has been provided to the Town, to the satisfaction
of the Commissioner of Development Services; and further,
4) That
Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to
this resolution.
CARRIED
(4) FEDERAL PARKS CANADA REVIEW
FOR A ROUGE NATIONAL URBAN
PARK (10.0)
Report Attachment
Moved
by Deputy Mayor Jack Heath
Seconded
by Councillor Colin Campbell
1) That
the staff report entitled Federal Parks Canada Review for a Rouge National
Urban Park dated March 27, 2012 be received; and,
2) That
Council endorse the Parks Canada partnership ‘Statement of Intent – Towards
Cooperation and Collaboration in the establishment of a national urban park in
the Rouge Valley’ and continue to advance the Federal Rouge Park planning
process as identified in this report; and,
3) That
staff and Council representatives continue to monitor and participate in
landowners discussions and stakeholder discussions regarding a new Rouge
National Urban Park and any alternative interim and long term Rouge Park
arrangements;
4) That
the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and CAO be requested to hold a preliminary meeting
with senior Parks Canada officials regarding the new National Park and
following that, staff be requested to schedule in April an educational and
training session for Council on the Rouge National Urban Park to discuss
Markham’s interests relative to the proposed National Park including, but not
limited to:
- Milne
Dam Conservation Area and whether it should be included in Rouge National Urban
Park
- Other
areas in Markham and whether they should be included or excluded in Rouge
National Urban Park
- A
potential large group picnic area, potential activity and/or cultural centre
and other public uses
- Long
term recommendations for residential properties and agricultural leases
- Heritage
building strategy and Transport Canada’s building demolition requests
- Maintenance
and operations facilities
- Existing
and planned infrastructure
- Recommendations
of Markham’s Rouge Park Implementation Task Force
- Other
relevant matters as determined by Council and staff; and,
5) That
staff schedule a discussion, on the subject of Item (4a) above, at a
Development Services Committee Part A meeting as soon as possible after the
education and training session; and,
6) That
Parks Canada officials be invited to meet with the Town (Markham and Region
Rouge Park Alliance representatives, other interested Members of Council and
Town staff) following the above two meetings and release of the Federal Budget,
to discuss Markham’s interests in the Rouge National Urban Park; and,
7) That
Council reaffirm its December 13, 2011 resolution (Appendix C) requesting Parks
Canada and Transport Canada to work together with respect to heritage buildings
on the Pickering Airport lands in Markham, which are under consideration as
part of the Rouge National Urban Park; and,
8) That
this staff report and appendices be forwarded to Parks Canada, Transport
Canada, Province of Ontario (represented by Ministry of Infrastructure), Rouge
Park Alliance, City of Toronto, Region of York, Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority, City of Pickering and Region of Durham, local MPs and MPPs as well
as other MPs and MPPs involved with the National Park project for information;
and further,
9) That
Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to
this resolution.
CARRIED AS AMENDED
(See following recommendation not considered
by Council)
Council consented to not consider the following proposed recommendation
from the March 27, 2012 Development Services Committee:
"1) That
the staff report entitled Federal Parks Canada Review for a Rouge National
Urban Park dated March 27, 2012 be received; and,
2) That
Council endorse the Parks Canada partnership ‘Statement of Intent – Towards
Cooperation and Collaboration in the establishment of a national urban park in
the Rouge Valley’ and continue to advance the Federal Rouge Park planning
process as identified in this report; and,
3) That
staff continue to monitor and participate in landowners discussions and
stakeholder discussions regarding a new Rouge National Urban Park and any
alternative interim and long term Rouge Park arrangements;
4) That
staff schedule a discussion item for the Rouge National Urban Park at a Part A
Development Services Committee meeting in April to identify Markham’s interests
and requirements relative to the proposed National Park including, but not
limited to:
- consideration
of Milne Dam Conservation Area and other inclusions and exclusions for the
Rouge National Urban Park
- consideration
of a potential large group picnic area, potential activity and/or cultural
centre and other public uses
- discussion
of long term management options of residential and agricultural leases
- discussion
of heritage building strategy and Transport Canada’s building demolition
requests
- provision
for maintenance and operations facilities
- provision
for existing and planned infrastructure
- review
relevant recommendations of Markham’s Rouge Park Implementation Task Force
- other
relevant matters as determined by staff; and,
5) That
Parks Canada staff be invited to meet with the Town (Markham and Region Rouge
Park Alliance representatives, other interested Members of Council and Town
staff) following the Park A session and release of the Federal Budget, to
discuss Markham’s interests in the Rouge National Urban Park; and,
6) That
Council reaffirm its December 13, 2011 resolution (Appendix ‘C’) requesting
Parks Canada and Transport Canada to work together with respect to heritage
buildings on the Pickering Airport lands, which are under consideration as part
of the Rouge National Urban Park; and,
7) That
this staff report be forwarded to Parks Canada, Transport Canada, Province of
Ontario (represented by Ministry of Infrastructure), Rouge Park Alliance, City
of Toronto, Region of York, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, City of
Pickering and Region of Durham for information; and further,
8) That
Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to
this resolution."
(5) PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE
CENTRAL PICKERING DEVELOPMENT
PLAN (10.0)
Report
1) That the report entitled “Proposed Amendment to the Central
Pickering Development Plan,” dated March 27, 2012 be received; and,
2) That the Region of York be requested to continue to address
the need to protect the Community of Box Grove and the Bob Hunter Memorial
Park/Rouge Park in negotiations with the Province and the Region of Durham
pertaining to transportation planning and related infrastructure decisions;
and,
3) That this report be forwarded to the Ministry of Municipal
Affairs and Housing by April 2, 2012; and further,
4) That staff be authorized and directed to do all things
necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
(6) MAIN STREET RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE
HIGHWAY 7 TO BULLOCK DRIVE
– UNDERGROUND SERVICES (5.10)
Report Attachment
A1-A3 Attachment
B1-B3
Attach
C Attach
D Attach
E Attach
F
1) That
the deputation by Diane Kobalowsky, representing Markham Village BIA, be
received; and,
2) That the staff report entitled “Main
Street Reconstruction Update, Highway 7 to Bullock Drive – Underground
Services”, be received; and,
3) That Main St. Markham from Bullock
Drive to Highway 7 be restricted to one lane southbound, and no northbound
traffic, from July 2, 2012 to November 19, 2012 to facilitate the replacement
of underground services on Main Street; and,
4) That,
Schedule “C” of Traffic By-law 2005-188, restricting parking be amended by
including both the west and east sides of Main Street Markham North, between
Highway 7 and Bullock Drive; and,
5) That,
upon completion of the project, Schedule “C” of Traffic By-law 2005-188, be
amended by rescinding the parking restriction on both sides of Main Street
Markham North, between Highway 7 and Bullock Drive; and,
6) That
the Parking Control Department be directed to enforce the parking prohibition
upon installation of the signs; and,
7) That the Director of Engineering be
authorized to finalize and implement the traffic management plan in
consultation with the Region of York, Operations Department, the Fire and
Emergency Services Department, and the Project Liaison Committee; and,
8) That staff and the Markham Village BIA
be authorized to finalize the draft Marketing Plan and implement such; and,
9) That a maximum $30,825.00 + HST from
capital account (083-5350-12048-005) be authorized to implement
the draft Marketing Plan for 2012 subject to conditions specified in this
report; and,
10) That Staff be authorized to proceed with
the tender for the underground servicing upgrades from Highway 7 to Bullock
Drive based on the construction staging and road closures outlined in this
report; and,
11) That the Robinson Street bridge
rehabilitation works be carried out between July and September 2012; and
further,
12) That Staff be authorized and directed to
do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
(By-laws 2012-79)
CARRIED BY A UNANIMOUS RECORDED VOTE
(See following recorded vote)
YEAS: Mayor Frank Scarpitti, Deputy Mayor Jack
Heath, Regional Councillor Jim Jones, Regional Councillor Gord Landon, Regional
Councillor Joe Li, Councillor Valerie Burke, Councillor Howard Shore,
Councillor Don Hamilton, Councillor Carolina Moretti, Councillor Colin
Campbell, Councillor Alan Ho, Councillor Logan Kanapathi, Councillor Alex Chiu.
(13)
6(c) REPORT NO. 18 - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PUBLIC MEETING
(March 27, 2012)
Moved by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
Seconded by Councillor
Don Hamilton
(1) PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT
TO PROHIBIT NEW REVERSE SLOPE
DRIVEWAYS
IN THE TOWN OF MARKHAM (PR-128052)
(10.5)
Report Staff
Presentation
1)
That correspondence from John Webster, Doris Cheng, Mike McLean, James
Andrew, Eileen Liasi, Roy Vanek, and Marilyn Ginsberg representing
the Grandview Residents Association and the Bayview Glen Residents Association, with comments regarding the
proposed prohibition of reverse slope driveways, be received; and
2)
That the deputations by Marilyn Ginsberg representing
the Grandview Residents Association and the Bayview Glen Residents Association,
Marion Matthias, and Roy Vanek regarding the proposed prohibition of reverse slope driveways, be
received; and
3) That the Development Services Commission report dated
December 6, 2011 entitled “PRELIMINARY REPORT – Proposed Zoning By-law
Amendment to Prohibit New Reverse Slope Driveways in the Town of Markham, File
Number: ZA 11-128052” be received; and,
4) That the record of the Public Meeting held on March 27,
2012, with respect to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment to Prohibit New
Reverse Slope Driveways in the Town of Markham (ZA 11-128052) be received; and,
5) That the proposed amendments include an exemption for properties with naturally sloping topography, with
an evaluation by Engineering staff regarding appropriate measures to be taken;
and,
6) That the Zoning By-law
Amendment application (ZA 11-128052) to amend Zoning By-laws 1229, 1442, 1507,
1767, 1914, 2053, 2150, 2237, 2284-68, 2402, 2489, 2551, 2571, 2612, 11-72,
122-72, 77-73, 83-73, 84-73, 119-73, 151-75, 88-76, 127-76, 250-77, 145-78,
162-78, 163-78, 184-78, 72-79, 91-79, 118-79, 134-79, 153-80, 165-80, 72-81,
90-81, 108-81, 193-81, 221-81, 28-82, 194-82, 196-82, 47-85, 304-87, 19-94,
177-96, as amended by 28-97, as amended, and 2004-196, as amended, be approved;
and further,
7) That the proposed
amendment to Zoning By-laws 1229, 1442, 1507, 1767, 1914, 2053, 2150, 2237,
2284-68, 2402, 2489, 2551, 2571, 2612, 11-72, 122-72, 77-73, 83-73, 84-73,
119-73, 151-75, 88-76, 127-76, 250-77, 145-78, 162-78, 163-78, 184-78, 72-79,
91-79, 118-79, 134-79, 153-80, 165-80, 72-81, 90-81, 108-81, 193-81, 221-81,
28-82, 194-82, 196-82, 47-85, 304-87, 19-94, 177-96, as amended by 28-97, as
amended, and 2004-196, as amended, be enacted without further notice.
CARRIED
6(d) REPORT NO. 19 - GENERAL COMMITTEE (April
2, 2012)
Council
consented to add Report No. 19 and to separate Item No. 1. (See following Item
No. 1)
Moved by Councillor
Carolina Moretti
Seconded by Councillor
Alan Ho
That Report
No. 19 – General Committee comprised of 2 items be received and adopted.
(1) FLATO
DEVELOPMENTS – NAMING RIGHT
FOR MARKHAM THEATRE (6.2)
Report Attachment
A Attachment
B Attachment
C Attachment
D
Presentation
1) THAT the report titled Flato
Developments Naming Right for Markham Theatre be received; and,
2) THAT the Town of Markham agrees to name
the Markham Theatre: “FLATO MARKHAM THEATRE”, the new name to be branded and
utilized in all promotional, administrative, and legal functions, operations
and communications associated with Markham Theatre; and,
3) That the Flato Developments VIP Lounge
naming right will be extended for the same term as the Naming Rights to the
Markham Theatre for Performing Arts; and,
4) That the proposed Terms for a Naming
Right Agreement for Markham Theatre of $75,000 per annum, provided by Flato
Developments, for a ten year period subject to an increase each year during the
term of this agreement to reflect the change in the Consumer Price index
(Toronto All items September – September) with such increases effective January
1st rounded off to the nearest dollar, be approved; and,
5) That Flato Developments provide
$30,000, a one
time contribution to cover the costs to change the name, signage and other
material for the Theatre, and to be paid at time of execution of the agreement;
and,
6) That the remaining Naming Rights terms
as outlined in the report be approved; and,
7) That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized
to execute an agreement with Flato Developments, for naming rights for the
Markham Theatre, on the terms set out in this report, in a form satisfactory to
the Commissioner of Community and Fire Services and the Town Solicitor; and,
8) That the proceeds for the naming
agreement be deposited into account 890 890 9254 (General Sponsorship); and,
9) That the correspondence from Dr. Pat
Kincaid, Markham resident be received; and further,
10) That Staff be authorized and directed to
do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
BY A RECORDED VOTE (11:2)
(See following recorded vote)
YEAS: Mayor
Frank Scarpitti, Regional Councillor Jim Jones, Regional Councillor Gord
Landon, Regional Councillor Joe Li, Councillor Howard Shore, Councillor Don
Hamilton, Councillor Carolina Moretti, Councillor Colin Campbell, Councillor
Alan Ho, Councillor Logan Kanapathi, Councillor Alex Chiu. (11)
NAYS: Deputy
Mayor Jack Heath, Councillor Valerie Burke. (2)
(2) MINUTES
OF THE FEBRUARY 23, 2012
LEASH FREE MARKHAM COMMITTEE
(16.0)
Minutes
1) That
the Minutes of the February 23, 2012, Leash Free Markham Committee be received
for information purposes; and,
2) That
Regional Councillor Joe Li be appointed to the Leash Free Markham Committee for
the term ending November 30, 2014.
CARRIED
6(e) REPORT NO. 20 - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COMMITTEE (April 3, 2012)
Council
consented to add Report No. 20.
Moved by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
Seconded by Councillor
Don Hamilton
That Report
No. 20 – Development Services Committee comprised of 1 item be received and
adopted.
(1) DEMOLITION
OF NON-HERITAGE DETACHED GARAGE
28 JOHN ST. THORNHILL (16.11)
Report
1) That
the staff report titled “Demolition of Non-Heritage Detached Garage 28 John St.
Thornhill” dated March 27, 2012 be received; and,
2) That
Council endorse the demolition of the detached garage at 28 John St. located
within the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District; and further,
3) That
Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to
this resolution.
CARRIED
7. MOTIONS
(1) MARKHAM
EAST TORONTO RAIL
ONTARIO-EXPRESS ALL DAY TRAIN
SERVICE (5.14)
Moved by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
Seconded by Deputy
Mayor Jack Heath
That the
following motion be referred to a Part A Session of the May 1, 2012 Development
Services Committee meeting:
"WHEREAS the Metrolinx Regional
Transportation Plan 2009 (“The Big Move 2020”) identifies full day, 2-way
service on the Stouffville line from Mount Joy to Toronto’s Union Station as
part of the 15 year plan for Regional Rapid Transit; and,
Whereas GO Transit will be undertaking an
Environmental Assessment (EA) study on the Stouffville line for future
infrastructure improvements in Markham and Toronto to provide for the planned
full day, 2-way service, to be operational between Markham Center and Toronto’s
Union Station by 2014; and,
Whereas Metrolinx in 2013 is reviewing and
updating its Regional Big Move 2020 Transportation Plan. The Stouffville Go
Line should be considered for electrification in its entirety; and,
Whereas the Stouffville Rail Corridor
Environmental Assessment process allows opportunities to consider alternative
technologies. These alternative
technologies include MagLev which is currently used in major centers and is
extremely quiet, affordable, efficient and fast; and,
Whereas smaller, more cost effective
diesel-electric multiple unit (DEMU), trains that are used throughout Europe,
in use today in Ottawa on their O-Train line, and is currently being implemented between
Toronto Pearson Airport and Union Station; and,
Whereas consideration should be given to go
directly to Electric Train Technology for the Stouffville GO Line; and,
Whereas the electric technology will enable
more frequent, lower cost service, with a greater number of new stations
stops along the route and improve travel
time to our transit riders; and,
Whereas the electric technology trains could
carry a similar or larger number of transit rides than subway service; and,
And Whereas the Markham East Toronto Rail Ontario-Express (I-METRO-E) concept would enable more
frequent headways, and more frequent transit stops along this approved
north-south rapid transit corridor between Stouffville and Union Station; and,
Whereas this north-south corridor will also
interconnect with a number of existing and planned east-west rapid transit
corridors, including VIVA bus rapid transit, 407 Rail Transitway, Steeles
BRT/LRT. Finch BRT/LRT, Sheppard, Eglinton-Crosstown, and Bloor-Danforth Subway,
and Lakeshore East GO; and,
Whereas the I-METRO-E would stimulate transit
dependant development (TDD) and redevelopment along I-METRO-E transit corridor;
and,
Whereas climate change, global warming, end
of oil and gridlock are issues facing all major cities, it is important that
all station communities are TDD designed systems to be net zero in energy, waste and emissions and produce
the best public realm and quality of life for our citizens; and,
Whereas I-METRO-E would reduce automobile
dependence, energy consumption and would promote environmental, social and
economic sustainability initiatives; and,
Whereas
Metrolinx has allocated their budget for transit projects for the next five
years and revenues from development charges, TIFs, Section 37, HST, taxes, Gas
Taxes increased user fees, improve operating performance are viable and can be
leveraged within a Public Private Partnership (P3) model;
Now therefore be it resolved:
1) That
a steering committee co-chaired by Markham Regional Councillor Jim Jones and a
member of Toronto Council selected by City of Toronto Council be created. The committee will determine its membership
which will include members of Markham, Toronto Council and other municipalities
and levels of Government. This committee
will focus on station and rail strategy, TDD, community planning, Government
Relationships and Public Private Partnerships; and
2) That the Steering Committee seek advice from the participating government bodies,
agencies and other sources as determined
by the committee with respect to terms of reference and funding requirements for comprehensive
studies and reports that would be required to pursue the I-METRO-E
concept; and
3) That a working group reporting to the steering
committee be formed of representatives
from Metrolinx, the City of Toronto, the Region of York, and the Town of
Markham to review the need and justification of the I-METRO-E concept, and the
associated transportation, land use planning and economic development benefits;
and
4) THAT Metrolinx and other government agencies and
stakeholders at the Federal, Provincial, Regional and Municipal level be
requested to consider the merit and implications of the I-METRO-E concept and
Maglev/Electric/DEMU technology on the Stouffville rail line in the context of
the current review and update of the Metrolinx Regional Transportation Plan and
Metrolinx Environment Assessment Study for the GO’s Stouffville Line; and further,
5) That copies of this resolution be forwarded to the Premier
of Ontario, the Federal Ministers of Finance, Transportation, Infrastructure
and the Provincial Ministers of Finance, Transportation and Infrastructure
Ontario, East Toronto and Markham area MPP’s, the City of Toronto, the Mayor
and Council members of the City Toronto, the Toronto Transit Commission,
Metrolinx, York Region and York Rapid Transit Corporation."
CARRIED
For reference purposes:
- February 28, 2012 - The notice of this
motion was given.
- March 20, 2012 - Council
deferred the consideration of this motion to the April 3, 2012 Council meeting.
- April 3, 2012 – Council referred
the consideration of this motion to the May 1, 2012 Development Services
Committee meeting.
(2) ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (OMB) (13.0)
Moved by
Councillor Howard Shore
Seconded by
Councillor Don Hamilton
Whereas
municipal Councils are democratically elected and accountable representative
bodies; and,
Whereas
municipal councillors are the elected officials most closely tied to the
residential and business community and have the broadest understanding of the
issues that affect their neighbourhoods; and,
Whereas
municipal councillors have the obligation to make decisions on planning matters
in the best interests of their community at large; and,
Whereas
municipal councillors make determinations on issues of planning based on direct
and personal knowledge of the community, its potential and opportunities that
are not restricted to the boundaries of the Planning Act, such as strategic
plans, including Markham’s Growth Alternative to 2031; and,
Whereas
despite the Provincial of Ontario’s effort to heighten the relevance of local
municipal decisions by amending the Planning Act and directing that the OMB “shall have regard to” decisions made by municipal councils
this has proven to be so vague that the OMB's decisions are not, in fact, being
influenced by this amendment; and,
Whereas
it would be more appropriate in matters of law to have legal disputes referred
to the courts; and,
Whereas
particular planning concerns respecting land severance applications and minor
variances are heard by the municipal Committee of Adjustment and are subject to
appeal to the OMB;
Now therefore be it resolved:
1) That the Town of Markham recommend an
intervenor funding function be created within the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
and Housing (MMAH) to financially assist community associations and citizen
groups engaged in hearings before the OMB (or its successor) on local,
municipal matters; and,
2) That the Town of Markham
convene a forum discussion entitled “Rethinking the Ontario Municipal Board” to
include panellists from the development community or the Building Industry and
Land Development Association; municipal law; residents; and, municipal planning
and that such a Forum be held here in Markham, no later than the fall of 2012;
and,
3) That the MMAH be
requested to hold public hearings on amending the Planning Act to consider:
a) Appeals
of decision so a local Committee of Adjustment being held by Municipal Council;
b) Appeals
of Official Plan or Zoning By-law matters being from Municipal Council to the
Divisional Court, with leave of the Divisional Court, on questions fo law or
where there is a matter of Provincial interest; and,
4) That copies of this
resolution be sent to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, all local
members of Provincial Parliament, GTA municipalities, registered ratepayer
associations in the Town of Markham, Markham Action Group for Improved Community, and
Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO).
(See Delegation Item No. 1)
(See Petition Item No. 1)
(Communication Item No. 21-2012)
(See Other/New Business Item No. 1)
MOTION LOST BY A RECORDED VOTE (4:9)
(See following recorded vote)
(See following to introduce a new motion for consideration with 2/3
vote)
(See following to refer the new motion to General
Committee Workshop, which was lost)
(See following to include several revisions, which was declared Out of
Order)
(See following for motion given at the March 20, 2012 Council meeting,
which was lost)
(See following to move the matter forward for consideration)
The new motion considered by Council was lost by a
recorded vote (4:9):
YEAS: Deputy
Mayor Jack Heath, Councillor Howard Shore, Councillor Don Hamilton, Councillor
Logan Kanapathi. (4)
NAYS: Mayor
Frank Scarpitti, Regional Councillor Jim Jones, Regional Councillor Gord
Landon, Regional Councillor Joe Li, Councillor Valerie Burke, Councillor
Carolina Moretti, Councillor Colin Campbell, Councillor Alan Ho, Councillor
Alex Chiu. (9)
To introduce a new motion for
consideration with 2/3 vote:
Moved by Councillor Howard Shore
Seconded by Councillor Don Hamilton
That a new motion regarding Ontario Municipal Board be introduced for Council's
consideration under New/Other Business.
(See New/Other Business Item No. 1)
CARRIED
(2/3 Vote was
requested & obtained)
Motion to refer
to General Committee Workshop which was lost by a recorded vote:
Moved
by Regional Councillor Gord Landon
Seconded
by Deputy Mayor Jack Heath
That the new motion moved by
Councillor Howard Shore and seconded by Councillor
Don Hamilton not be considered at this time and be referred to a General Committee Workshop
in May 2012.
MOTION LOST BY A RECORDED
VOTE (4:9)
(See following recorded vote)
YEAS: Deputy
Mayor Jack Heath, Councillor Howard Shore, Councillor Don Hamilton, Councillor
Logan Kanapathi. (4)
NAYS: Mayor
Frank Scarpitti, Regional Councillor Jim Jones, Regional Councillor Gord
Landon, Regional Councillor Joe Li, Councillor Valerie Burke, Councillor
Carolina Moretti, Councillor Colin Campbell, Councillor Alan Ho, Councillor
Alex Chiu. (9)
Motion to include several revisions, which was declared
Out of Order:
The motion moved by Councillor Howard Shore seconded by Councillor Don Hamilton
to consider the motion, including several revisions to the version with notice
given at the March 20, 2012 Council meeting, was declared by the Chair to be
Out of Order.
Motion as given at the March 20, 2012 Council meeting,
which was lost:
The following motion,
as given at the March 20, 2012 Council meeting with a notice, was lost as there
was no seconder. Councillor Don Hamilton withdrew from seconding the motion, once the
proposal to include several revisions was declared by the Chair to be Out of
Order.
"Whereas municipal
councils are democratically elected and accountable representative bodies; and,
Whereas
municipal councillors are the elected officials most closely tied to the
residential and business community and have the broadest understanding of the
issues that affect their neighbourhoods; and,
Whereas
municipal councillors have the obligation to make decisions on planning matters
in the best interests of their community at large; and,
Whereas
municipal councillors make determinations on issues of planning based on direct
and personal knowledge of the community, its potential and opportunities that
are not restricted to the boundaries of the Planning Act, such as strategic
plans, including Markham’s Growth Alternative to 2031; and,
Whereas despite
the Provincial of Ontario’s effort to heighten the relevance of local municipal
decisions by amending the Planning Act and directing that the OMB “shall have regard to” decisions made by municipal councils
this has proven to be so vague that the OMB's decisions are not, in fact, being
influenced by this amendment; and,
Whereas it would
be more appropriate in matters of law to have legal disputes referred to the
courts; and,
Whereas
particular planning concerns respecting land severance applications and minor
variances are heard by the municipal Committee of Adjustment and are subject to
appeal to the OMB;
Now therefore be it
resolved:
1) That
the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) be requested to amend the
Planning Act, the Heritage Acts, and all other legislation under which the
Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) operates and has jurisdiction to abolish the OMB
and to provide that decisions of municipal councils are only appealable to the
courts on matters of substantive law; and,
2) That the MMAH be requested to amend
the Planning Act to direct that appeals of decisions of the Committee of
Adjustment be appealable to municipal councils and that municipalities be
authorized to conduct hearings on such appeals through an Appeals Committee of
Council, if viewed appropriate to do so by the municipality; and,
3) That copies of this resolution be
sent to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, all local members of
Provincial Parliament, GTA municipalities, registered ratepayer associations in
the Town of Markham, Markham Action Group for Improved Community, and
Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO); and,
4) That the MMAH be requested to hold
public consultations regarding these requests; and,
5) That
upon confirmation of the dissolution of the OMB, Town Development Services
Commission staff continue the process of establishing the local appeal body for
decisions of the Committee of Adjustment; and,
6) That
the Town of Markham support the request of the City of Mississauga to the MMAH
for public consultations on these requests, and advise the Minister of its
support in writing and offer of assistance to liaison with local stakeholders
including business owners, property owners, residents, and individuals and
corporations working in land use development and planning; and,
7) That
should during the MMAH and city-lead public consultations, it be determined
that municipal jurisdictions wish to remain subject to OMB hearings, then
Markham Council and other municipal jurisdictions by a majority vote, be
granted the option of removal from the OMB's purview; and,
8) That
should the MMAH not accede to the request to dissolve the OMB, in the
alternative, the Town of Markham would recommend that leave to appeal be
required in all appeals to the OMB. Such
leave to appeal shall be to a Master of the Superior Court of Ontario."
MOTION
LOST
Motion to move the matter forward for consideration:
Moved by Councillor Howard Shore
Seconded by Councillor Logan Kanapathi
That Council consider the proposed motion regarding Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) immediately
following the delegations with respect thereto.
CARRIED
8. NOTICES OF MOTIONS
There were no
notices of motions.
9. COMMUNICATIONS
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Councillor
Logan Kanapathi
That Council
receive and consent to the disposition of Communication Nos. 15-2012 to 20-2012
as outlined below.
CARRIED
Moved by Regional
Councillor Gord Landon
Seconded by Councillor
Howard Shore
That Communication
No. 21-2012 regarding Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) be received.
CARRIED
Referred to all Members of
Council
15-2012 ROAD CLOSURE
REQUEST - UNIONVILLE FESTIVAL 5 KM & 10 KM RUN (3.5)
The
following street will be closed on June 3, 2012 between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00
a.m. to facilitate the run:
- Start on
Carlton Road (at Main Street) in front of Varley Art Gallery
- Run
northwest on Carlton to Toogood Park near Pomander (path near transformer) - Follow
trail to end of Toogood Pond
- Go
northeast towards Toogood Pond and Toogood Pathways
- Circle
TooGood pathways to exit onto 16th ave Toogood Pathways - keeping
river to the right
- Go east
of 16th Avenue along the sidewalk and turn south onto Normandale Rd
- Follow
Normandale Rd around and back onto 16th AveLocal
- Proceed
east on 16 Ave and re-enter Toogood Park prior to Aiken Circle
- Exit park
system onto Toogood Pond Park Rd to Main Street
- Proceed
south on Main Street & turn west onto Carlton Rd (Road Closure required)
- End in
front of Varley Art Gallery
Info
CARRIED
16-2012 ROAD CLOSURE
REQUEST – EASTER PARADE & EGG HUNT (3.5)
The following roads will be closed on April 7, 2012 between 10:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. to facilitate the event:
- Main Street
Unionville north from Concession Road to south of Carlton Rd
- Main Street
Unionville east onto Carlton Rd
- Main Street
Unionville west onto Fred Varley Drive & Carlton Rd
Info
CARRIED
17-2012 ROAD CLOSURE
REQUEST – CANADA DAY CELEBRATIONS (3.5)
The following roads will be closed on July 1, 2012 to facilitate the
celebrations:
3:00
p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
- McCowan
Road from Bullock Drive to South Unionville Avenue – Regional Roadway
- McCowan
Road and Heritage Rd
- Hwy
7 – east and west of McCowan Road
8:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.
- McCowan
Road north of South Unionville Avenue Regional
Roadway –rolling closures
Info
CARRIED
18-2012 TEMPORARY
EXTENSION APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR SALES LICENCE - MARKHAM VILLAGE BIA (3.21)
Requesting an approval from the Town of Markham
to extend their existing liquor licence for the outdoor
areas created by using the sidewalks located directly in front of the
establishment while the street is closed to vehicular traffic. The proposed extension will be utilized in
conjunction with the events as follows:
Events:
Markham Village Music Festival
- June 15, 2012 (4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.)
- June 16, 2012 (11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.)
World
Music and Dance Event
-
July 22, 2012 (11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.)
Establishments:
- Stanley’s Fish and Chips, 48 Main Street
North, Markham
- Liberty
Burgers & Wings, 144 Main Street North, Markham
- The
Duchess of Markham, 53 Main St. N. Markham, and
- Main’s
Mansion Restaurant and Bar, 144 Main St. N., Markham
- Al
Dente Restaurant, 39 Main St. N., Markham
- Folco’s
Restaurant, 42 Main St. N., Markham
Note: The application for
Stanley’s Fish is from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., as the additional extended
hours will be specifically for the patio area located within the
establishments.
Info
CARRIED
19-2012 TEMPORARY
EXTENSION APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR SALES LICENCE - MARKHAM DISTRICT VETERANS
ASSOCIATION (3.21)
Requesting an approval from the Town of Markham
to extend their existing liquor licence for the parking lot area at 7
Washington Street. The
proposed extension will be utilized during their Multi Cultural Festival and
Pot Luck Dinner being held on June 29, 2012, 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Info
CARRIED
20-2012 TEMPORARY
EXTENSION APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR SALES LICENCE – OLD COUNTRY INN (3.21)
Requesting an approval from the Town of Markham
to extend their existing liquor licence for the patio and indoor areas at 198
Main Street Unionville. The proposed
extension will be utilized in conjunction with the Unionville Village Community
Festival from June 1, 2012 to June 3, 2012, 11:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Info
CARRIED
Received
21-2012 COMMUNICATION RECEIVED
REGARDING ONTARIO
MUNICIPAL BOARD (OMB) (13.0)
1. Debra
C. Saxe (In support of the proposed motion)
2. Ray
Menzies (In opposition to the proposed motion)
3. Annette
Caron (In opposition to the proposed motion)
4. Donna
Bush ((In opposition to the proposed motion)
5. Janice
Fox (In support of the proposed motion)
6. David
Slotnick (In support of the proposed motion)
7. Brahm
Satov (In support of the proposed motion)
8. Shafiq
Sediqzadah (In support of the proposed motion)
9. Fred
Webber (In support of the proposed motion)
10. Reid
McAlpine (Providing comments)
11. Shanir
Jamal (Providing comments)
12. George
Chammas (In opposition to the proposed motion)
13. Karen
Gullason (In support of the proposed motion)
14. Danielle
Chin, BILD (In opposition to the proposed motion)
15. Brian
Chadderton (In support of the proposed motion)
16. German
Mills Residents Association (In support of the proposed motion)
17. Keith
Thirgood, President, Old Markham Village Ratepayers Inc., (Providing comments)
Fred Leitner (In support of the proposed
motion)
Rachael
Pasternak (In support of the proposed motion)
18. Executive
Board, Aileen-Willowbrook Ratepayers Association (In opposition to the proposed
motion)
19. David Jordon (In
opposition to the proposed motion) (copy of deputation statement)
20. Donna
Bush (In opposition to the proposed motion) (copy of deputation statement)
Communication AddendumCommunications
(See Motion Item No. 2 on Council's decision on this matter)
(See
Delegation Item No. 1)
(See Petition Item No. 1)
(See New/Other Business Item No. 1)
CARRIED
10. PROCLAMATIONS
(1) APPROVED
PROCLAMATIONS - FOR INFORMATION (3.4)
Moved by Councillor
Alan Ho
Seconded by Councillor
Valerie Burke
1) That the following proclamations issued by the Town Clerk in
accordance with the Town of Markham Proclamation Policy be received for
information purposes:
-
Steward of the Earth Day (May 9, 2012)
- Jazz Celebration Week (August 13 to 19,
2012)
CARRIED
11. NEW/OTHER BUSINESSES
(1) ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (OMB) (13.0)
Moved by Councillor Howard Shore
Seconded by Councillor Don Hamilton
1) That a new motion regarding Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) be introduced for Council's
consideration.
(See Motion Item No. 2 on Council's decision on this matter)
(See Delegation Item No. 1)
(See Petition Item No. 1)
(See Communication Item No. 21-2012)
CARRIED
(2/3 Vote was
requested & obtained)
12. BY-LAWS
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Gord Landon
That By-laws
2012-64 to 2012-82 and By-law 2012-84 be given three readings and enacted.
Three Readings
BY-LAW 2012-64 ROAD DEDICATION BY-LAW – RUSTLE WOODS AVENUE
- A by-law to dedicate certain lands as part
of the highways of the Town of Markham (Block 88, Plan 65M-4256)
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-65 ROAD DEDICATION BY-LAW – RIVERLANDS AVENUE AND CORNELL ROUGE
BOULEVARD
- A by-law to dedicate certain lands as part
of the highways of the Town of Markham (Blocks 104 and 105, Plan 65M-4093 and
Block 178, Plan 65M-4093)
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-66 MATTAMY (WYKLAND) LIMITED, PART LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW
- A by-law to designate part of a certain
plan of subdivision not subject to Part Lot Control, Blocks 170, 174 and 187,
Plan 65M-4306, north of Church Street and east of Bur Oak Avenue.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-67 ELDIN HOMES LIMITED, PART LOT CONTROL EXEMPTION BY-LAW
- A by-law to designate part of a certain
plan of subdivision not subject to Part Lot Control, Blocks 1 to 10, 65M-4290,
south of 14th Avenue and east of Box Grove By-Pass.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-68 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – BECKETT FARMHOUSE, 4672 16th Avenue.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-69 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – JOHN B. MILLER HOUSE, 7134 MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE EAST.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-70 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – WELLINGTON WIDEMAN HOUSE, 11201 REESOR ROAD.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-71 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – DAVID BURKE HOUSE, 10531 REESOR ROAD.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-72 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – ANTHONY ROMAN CENTRE/MARKHAM CIVIC CENTRE, 101 TOWN CENTRE
BOULEVARD.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-73 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – ADAM BETZ HOUSE, 10676 REESOR ROAD.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-74 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – JOHN BOYLES HOUSE, 11190 YORK DURHAM LINE.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-75 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – NOBLE TENANT FARMER'S HOUSE, 11122 REESOR ROAD.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-76 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – RICHARD TARR HOUSE, 7368 ELGIN MILLS ROAD EAST.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-77 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – JAMES BRISON JOHNSON HOUSE, 10295 NINTH LINE
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-78 A BY-LAW TO DESIGNATE A PROPERTY AS BEING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE
VALUE OR INTEREST – JAMES COLLINS HOUSE, 11223 REESOR ROAD.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-79 A BY-LAW TO AMEND PARKING BY-LAW 2005-188 (MAIN STREET MARKHAM
NORTH PARKING RESTRICTION)
- Between Highway 7 and Bullock Drive.
(Item No. 6, Report No. 17)
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-80 S AND J REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP., PART LOT CONTROL
EXEMPTION BY-LAW
- A by-law to designate part of a certain
plan of subdivision not subject to Part Lot Control, Blocks 23 to 26, Plan
65M-4263, north of Castlemore Avenue and south of Fred Mclaen Boulevard.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-81 A BY-LAW TO DELEGATE THE AUTHORITY FOR THE CONVEYANCE OF
PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
- Amend By-law 4-2000, being a by-law to
appoint a Chief Administrative Officer for the Town of Markham.
(In-camera Item No. 1)
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-82 A BY-LAW TO AMEND ZONING BY-LAWS TO PROHIBIT REVERSE SLOPE
DRIVEWAYS IN THE TOWN OF MARKHAM
- Amend Zoning
By-laws 1229, 1442, 1507, 1767, 1914, 2053, 2150, 2237, 2284-68, 2402, 2489,
2551, 2571, 2612, 11-72, 122-72, 77-73, 83-73, 84-73, 119-73, 151-75, 88-76,
127-76, 250-77, 145-78, 162-78, 163-78, 184-78, 72-79, 91-79, 118-79, 134-79,
153-80, 165-80, 72-81, 90-81, 108-81, 193-81, 221-81, 28-82, 194-82, 196-82,
47-85, 304-87, 19-94, 177-96, as amended by 28-97, as amended, and 2004-196, as
amended.
By-law
CARRIED
BY-LAW 2012-84 A BY-LAW TO CHANGE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF
MANAGEMENT FOR UNIONVILLE BIA
- Amend By-law 169-83, being a by-law to
designate an area in the Unionville Business District as an Improvement Area
and to establish a Board of Management for the Business Improvement Area
By-law
CARRIED
13. IN-CAMERA ITEMS
Council
consented to not resolve into in-camera session and to report out the following
items, as proposed, at open Council session:
GENERAL
COMMITTEE – March 26, 2012
(1) A PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR
DISPOSITION OF
LAND BY THE MUNICIPALITY OR
LOCAL BOARD
[Section 239 (2) (c)]
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES COMMITTEE - March 20, 2012
(2) LITIGATION OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION,
INCLUDING MATTERS
BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNALS, AFFECTING THE MUNICIPALITY
OR LOCAL BOARD IN WARD 4
[Section 239 (2) (e)]
GENERAL
COMMITTEE – April 2, 2012
(3) PERSONAL
MATTERS ABOUT AN IDENTIFIABLE INDIVIDUAL,
INCLUDING MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL BOARD EMPLOYEES
– BOARD AND COMMITTEE RESIGNATIONS
[Section 239 (2) (b)]
(4) PERSONAL
MATTERS ABOUT AN IDENTIFIABLE INDIVIDUAL,
INCLUDING MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL BOARD EMPLOYEES
– BOARD AND COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
[Section 239 (2) (b)]
(5) THE
SECURITY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE MUNICIPALITY
OR LOCAL BOARD: WARD #1
[Section 239 (2) (a)]
(6) THE SECURITY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE MUNICIPALITY
OR LOCAL BOARD: WARD #6
[Section 239 (2) (a)]
(7) THE SECURITY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE MUNICIPALITY
OR LOCAL BOARD: WARD #7
[Section 239 (2) (a)]
CARRIED
Council
reported out the items as follows:
GENERAL
COMMITTEE – March 26, 2012
(1) CONVEYANCE
OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY EASEMENTS (8.6)
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
1) That
the confidential report dated February 3, 2012 from the Chief Administrative
Officer and Town Solicitor regarding Conveyance of Permanent and Temporary
Easements, be received; and,
2) That
By-law 4-2000 be amended to delegate the authority for the conveyance of
permanent and temporary easements to the Chief Administrative Officer; and,
3) That
staff be authorized to proceed as directed by Council on April 3, 2012.
(By-law 2012-81)
CARRIED
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES COMMITTEE – March 20, 2012
(2) MINOR VARIANCE APPEAL
10 HENRIETTA STREET, MARKHAM
A/134/11 (8.0)
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
1) That
the confidential report titled “Minor Variance Appeal, 10 Henrietta Street,
A/134/11” be received; and,
2) That
Council direct staff not to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing
regarding the decision of the Committee of Adjustment to approve a Minor
Variance to permit a 0.0 metre side and rear yard setback, whereas the By-law
requires minimum side and rear yard setbacks of 0.5 metres, as it relates to an
existing shed; and further,
3) That Staff be authorized
and directed to do all things nessesary to give effect to this resolution.
CARRIED
GENERAL
COMMITTEE – April 2, 2012
(3) BOARD AND COMMITTEE RESIGNATIONS (16.24)
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
1) That
the resignation of Kelly Huff from the Cemetery Board be received with regret for information
purposes and that a letter of appreciation be forwarded by Mayor Frank
Scarpitti; and,
2) That
the resignation of Erika Lontoc from the Environmental Advisory Committee be received with regret for
information purposes and that a letter of appreciation be forwarded by Mayor
Frank Scarpitti.
CARRIED
(4) UNIONVILLE BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
AREA (UBIA) (16.0)
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
1) That Markham Council amend Markham By-law 169-83, a by-law
to designate an area in the Unionville Business District as an improvement area
and to establish a Board of Management for the Business Improvement Area, to
increase the number of members appointed to the Board to between seven (7) and
eleven (11) members, two (2) of whom shall be Members of Council.
2) That Andrew Black, Kieng Ly, Sylvia Morris, Shauna
Podrozney, Sharon Taylor-Wood and Mario Tiano be appointed to the UBIA Board of
Management for the term ending November 30, 2014.
(By-law 2012-84)
CARRIED
(5) LADIES
GOLF CLUB OF TORONTO PROPERTY MATTER UPDATE (8.0)
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
1) That the confidential
report dated March 1, 2012 from the Town Solicitor and Chief Administrative
Officer regarding an update on the Ladies Golf Club of Toronto property matter
be received.
CARRIED
(6) SURPLUS
LAND - PROPERTY MATTER (8.7)
Moved by Councillor
Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
1) That
the confidential report dated March 19, 2012 from the Town Solicitor and Chief
Administrative Officer regarding a property matter be received; and,
2) That Blocks 8, 9 and 10 on Plan
65M-3998 be declared surplus to Town purposes; and further,
3) That
staff be authorized to proceed as directed by Council on April 3, 2012.
CARRIED
(7) LEASE EXTENSION - PROPERTY
MATTER (8.0)
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Regional
Councillor Jim Jones
1) That
the confidential report dated January 20, 2012 from the Town Solicitor and
Chief Administrative Officer regarding a lease extension be received; and,
2) That
staff be authorized to proceed as directed by Council on April 3, 2012.
CARRIED
14. CONFIRMATORY BY-LAW
Moved by
Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Councillor
Don Hamilton
That By-law 2012-83
be given three readings and enacted.
Three Readings
BY-LAW 2012-83 A BY-LAW TO CONFIRM THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL
3, 2012.
By-law
CARRIED
15. ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Councillor Alex Chiu
Seconded by Councillor
Valerie Burke
That the Council meeting be adjourned at 10:14 p. m.
CARRIED
_______________________________ _______________________________
KIMBERLEY
KITTERINGHAM FRANK
SCARPITTI
TOWN CLERK MAYOR
(Signed)