Logo

 

MINUTES

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

2008-02-19

Meeting No. 5

All Members of Council

Development Services                                                                 Economic Development

Chair:              Councillor J. Webster                                                                             Chair:              Regional Councillor T. Wong

Vice-Chair:      Councillor D. Horchik                                                                            Transportation Issues

                                                                                                                                        Chair:          Regional Councillor G. Landon

 

 

PART B

Report Agenda

9:00 a.m. – Council Chamber

 

Attendance

Mayor F. Scarpitti

Deputy Mayor J. Heath

Regional Councillor J. Jones

Regional Councillor T. Wong

Regional Councillor G. Landon

Councillor V. Burke

Councillor E. Shapero

Councillor J. Virgilio

Councillor C. Moretti

Councillor J. Webster

Councillor D. Horchik

Councillor L. Kanapathi

Councillor A. Chiu

J. Livey, Chief Administrative Officer

J. Baird, Commissioner of Development Services

A. Brown, Director of Engineering

C. Conrad, Town Solicitor

L. Duoba, Project Coordinator

R. Kendall, Manager, Central District

V. Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design

A. Tari, Committee Clerk

 

 

 

The Development Services Committee convened at the hour of 9:07 AM in the Council Chamber with Councillor J. Webster in the Chair.  Regional Councillor G. Landon assumed the Chair for Transportation items, Nos. 13 – 19.

 

 

 

DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST

 

None disclosed.

 


 

1.         DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES
- February 5, 2008, Part B (10.0)

            Minutes

 

Moved by Regional Councillor J. Jones

Seconded by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

 

That the minutes of the Development Services Committee meeting, Part B, held February 5, 2008, be confirmed.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

2.         MAIN STREET MARKHAM COMMITTEE
            JANUARY 16, 2008 RECOMMENDATION
            DIRECTIONAL PARKING LOT SIGNS (16.39)

            Appendix A  Memo

 

Moved by Regional Councillor J. Jones

Seconded by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

 

That the Memo dated February 19, 2008 titled “Main Street Markham Committee Recommendation Parking Lot Signage”, be received; and,

 

That there is no objection to the design of the revised, heritage-friendly parking lot directional sign for Markham Village including the use of white reflective lettering; and,

 

That Operations staff, in consultation with the Manager of Real Property, and BIZ representatives meet on site to discuss the appropriate and feasible number of, and placement of parking lot directional signs on the street; and,

 

*That Operations staff manufacture and install the revised parking lot directional signage, as required and that the Markham BIA subsidize the cost of manufacturing and installation of the signs; and,

 

That the issue of parking lot map signage is supported in principle and referred to staff for further analysis (appropriate lot location, design of sign).

 

CARRIED

______________________________________________________________________________

 

*Amended by Council at its meeting held on March 4, 2008 to read as followings:

 

“That Operations staff manufacture and install the revised parking lot directional signage as required; and,

 

Council also added the following as paragraph 5 at its meeting on March 4, 2008:

 

That the cost of manufacturing and installation of the signs be taken from account 083 5350 7343 005 (Engineering Capital Projects – Markham Main Street), subject to confirmation from staff as to fund availability; and,

 

 

3.         REPORT ON INCOMING PLANNING APPLICATIONS
            FOR THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 12, 2008 TO JANUARY 21, 2008 (10.0)

            Report

 

Moved by Regional Councillor J. Jones

Seconded by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

 

That Committee receive the report entitled “Report on Incoming Planning Applications for the period of January 12, 2008 to January 21, 2008” and direct staff to process the applications in accordance with the route outlined in the report; and,

 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

4.         WOODBINE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE CORPORATION &
            WOODBINE INTERNATIONAL HOTEL CORPORATION
            APPLICATIONS FOR OFFICIAL PLAN AND
            ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT
            A MIXED-USE HOTEL, RETAIL, AND CONFERENCE
            AND TRADE CENTRE AT 9390 WOODBINE AVENUE
            (OP 07 129406 & ZA 07 129420)
            (10.3, 10.5)

            Report  Attachment

 

Moved by Regional Councillor J. Jones

Seconded by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

 

That a public meeting be held to consider the applications submitted by the Woodbine International Centre Corporation & the Woodbine International Hotel Corporation for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit the development of a mixed-use hotel, retail, conference and trade centre at 9390 Woodbine Avenue; and,

 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution; and,

 

That the correspondence from Peter Smith, Bousields Inc., be received and referred to staff.

CARRIED

 

 


 

5.         CIVIC MALL DESIGN PRINCIPLES
            MARKHAM CENTRE
            (10.0)

            Report  Attachment

 

There was some discussion regarding the consultant’s proposed speed of 20 – 30 km/hr for the VIVA bus for an approximate distance of 1.5km within the Markham Centre (Civic Mall).  Staff advised there are issues in terms of safety, design and functionality of the plan and that they rely on the transit consultants to address some.

 

Moved by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

Seconded by Regional Councillor J. Jones

 

That the staff report dated February 19, 2008 titled “Civic Mall Design Principles, Markham Centre” be received; and,

 

That Council endorse the design principles and key design elements for the design and construction of the Civic Mall, through the Remington Group’s Downtown Markham project, as discussed in this report; and,

 

That Council waive the tendering process in accordance with Purchasing By-law 2004-341, Part II, Section 7 (1) – (h) where it is necessary or in the best interests of the Town to acquire Consulting and Professional Services from a preferred supplier or from a supplier who has a proven track record with the Town in terms of pricing, quality and service; and,

 

That Council authorize staff to retain Janet Rosenberg and Associates, Landscape Architects, as the Town’s consultant to work with YRRTC and the Remington Group on the conceptual design of the Civic Mall and the detailed design of the park component within the Civic Mall as required; and,

 

That funding for the above, in the amount of $50,000 be funded from Planning and Urban Design’s Capital Account #81-5350-7647-005 entitled “Markham Centre Amenity / Urban Park (Phase I Design)” and that the balance in the account be retained for the original purpose intended; and,

 

That Council authorize staff to establish a technical working group consisting of representatives of the Planning and Urban Design and Engineering Departments, Community and Fire Services Commission and the Markham Centre Advisory Group, to work with the landscape architect, the Remington Group and YRRTC on the design of the Civic Mall; and,

 

That staff report back to Council on the preliminary design concept for the Civic Mall, including possible funding sources for future landscape architectural consulting services for detailed design of the park component of the civic mall, and on the preferred park construction delivery model, prior to the summer recess; and further,


 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

6.         SUBCOMMITTEE ON SECOND SUITES
            RECOMMENDATIONS
            (10.0)

            Report  Attachment

 

The Committee thanked Jim Baird, Commissioner of Planning, Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design, Councillor John Webster, Deputy Mayor Jack Heath, Councillor Logan Kanapathi, and Glen Dick, Fire Services for all their contributions to the Sub-Committee on Second Suites.  They also thanked Murray Boyce, Senior Project Coordinator Policy & Special Project for his patience and dedication. 

 

Staff advised they anticipate holding the Public Meeting in late March/early April and will coordinate the preferred date with the Chair of the Sub-Committee on Second Suites.  The Committee suggested sending notification of the public meeting to those residents who participated in the extended driveway and who indicated an interest in second suites discussions.

 

Ms. Ruth Devor, Thornhill resident, addressed the Committee with respect to second suites and spoke in support of legalizing second suites.  She advised she had three basement apartments in her house to help supplement her income.  Ms. Devor indicated that each apartment was built to code and inspected and that she was never told it was illegal to have these in her basement.  She stated she subsequently had to evict her tenants because of the Town’s prohibition of second suites.  

 

Moved by Councillor E. Shapero

Seconded Councillor V. Burke

 

That the Report dated February 5, 2008 entitled “Subcommittee on Second Suites Recommendations” be received; and,


 

That Staff be authorized to schedule a Public Open House and a Statutory Public Meeting to receive input on a new Strategy for Second Suites, which addresses the directions of the Subcommittee on Second Suites for a broader strategy as outlined in Appendix ‘D’, and includes:

a)   the introduction of Town-wide zoning permissions for second suites in single detached and semi-detached dwellings, subject to certain development and property standards;

b)   the requirement for registration and registration renewal (every 3 years or upon change in property ownership) of any house with a second suite to ensure compliance with all applicable codes and standards;

c)   development of a comprehensive public education program (following approval of Town-wide zoning permission) to communicate changes to Markham’s policy on second suites and support implementation of the strategy, including an incentive program to encourage voluntary registration of a second suite; and

d)   the establishment of an 18 month monitoring program to monitor the implementation of the strategy and report on any further changes required to the strategy components.

 

That Staff report back to Development Services Committee following the Statutory

Public Meeting on actions required to implement the new Strategy for Second Suites,

including:

a)      a draft zoning by-law amendment to permit second suites;

b)      required amendments to the Town’s Registration By-law and Property Standards By-

      law;

c)      any further changes required to the Town’s procedures for inspecting and registering  second suites;

d)      preparation of a comprehensive public education program; and

e)      any financial implications associated with implementing the strategy;

CARRIED

 

Moved by Regional Councillor T. Wong

Seconded by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

 

That a “most frequently asked questions” document be included with notices distributed to the public on second suites and also added to the Town’s web site.

 

That notification of the public meeting be sent to those residents who participated in the extended driveway and who indicated interest in second suites discussion.

 

CARRIED

 

 


 

7.         APPLICATIONS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL
            TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF
            THREE NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND
            THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS
            (SC 06 134364)
            MAIN & MARKHAM INVESTMENTS LTD.
            5954- 5956 HWY. 7 E.
            MARKHAM VILLAGE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT
            (10.6)

            Report  Attachment

 

Staff advised a site plan application for the construction of three new commercial buildings and demolition of existing office buildings has been reviewed by Heritage Markham and that staff is satisfied with the proposal.

 

Moved by Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by Councillor V. Burke

 

That the Site Plan Control application (SC 06 134364) submitted by Main & Markham Investments be endorsed in principal subject to the general and specific conditions outlined in Appendix ‘A’ attached to the staff report entitled “Main & Markham Investments Ltd., 5954 – 5956 Hwy. 7 E”; and,

 

That demolition of the existing office buildings located at 5954-5956 Highway 7 E. be approved; and further,

 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 


 

8.         1685904 ONTARIO INC.
            4600 STEELES AVENUE EAST
            (NORTH-EAST CORNER OF STEELES AVENUE EAST
            AND THE FUTURE MIDLAND AVENUE EXTENSION)
            SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
            (SC 06 113701)
            (10.6)

            Report  Attachment

 

Staff advised there have been a number of revisions made to the site plan application for 4600 Steeles Avenue East and that these changes address the residents concerns.

 

Moved by Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by Councillor D. Horchik

 

That the staff report entitled “RECOMMENDATION REPORT – 1685904 Ontario Inc. – 4600 Steeles Avenue East (North-east corner of Steeles Avenue East and the future Midland Avenue extension) – Site plan application  for a mixed-use development”, dated February 19, 2008, be received; and,

 

That the application for site plan control approval be endorsed, in principle; and,

 

That  site plan approval be delegated to the Director of Planning and Urban Design or her designate, to be issued following execution of a site plan agreement (Site Plan approval is issued only when the Director has signed the site plan “approved”), when the following conditions have been met:

  1. The Owner has conveyed all lands required for Steeles Avenue and the Midland Avenue extension to the City of Toronto and the Town of Markham.
  2. The Town owned lands which are to be incorporated into the proposed development have been acquired by the Owner.
  3. The Owner has conveyed a heritage easement to the Town over the south (front) façade, portions of the sidewalls, and the wood doors with their associated glazing within the vestibule of the former Milliken Public School. 
  4. The Owner has entered into a site plan agreement with the Town containing all standard and special provisions and requirements of the Town and public agencies and the conditions outlined in Schedule ‘A’ to the February 19, 2008 staff report, including provisions for the payment of a local improvement contribution in lieu of the area-specific development charge in the event that the Area Specific Development Charge By-law has not been enacted.
  5. Provision for the payment by the Owner of all applicable fees, recoveries, development charges, parkland dedications and financial obligations related to applicable Developers Group Agreements.
  6. The Trustee for the Milliken Main Street Landowners Group has advised the Town in writing that the Owner is in good standing with the Group and that the Group supports the assignment of 129 units of servicing allocation to 1685904 Ontario Inc.

  7. The City of Toronto has confirmed in writing that the Owner has entered into an acceptable arrangement for the interim construction of the portion of the Midland Avenue extension required to provide access to the subject development, or alternatively an interim private driveway, prior to the completion of the Class Environmental Assessment for the Midland Avenue extension; and,

 

That 129 units of servicing allocation be granted by Council to 1685904 Ontario Inc., subject to the conditions outlined above; and,

 

That Council authorize the enactment of a by-law to remove the Hold (H) provisions on the subject lands, upon application by the Owner, once the conditions of hold removal have been satisfied; and further,

 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

9.         TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
            – PETTICOAT CREEK WATERSHED REQUEST FOR FUNDING
            (13.13.2)

            Report  Attachment

 

Moved Councillor E. Shapero

Seconded by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

 

That the Development Services Commission Report entitled “Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Petticoat Creek Watershed Request for Funding”, be referred to the Environmental Issues Committee for review.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

10.       BOB HUNTER MEMORIAL PARK MASTER PLAN
            (10.0)

            Report  Attachment

 

Staff advised that the above report is also related to item #11 on the agenda (Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan) and that Staff generally supports the policy direction that the plans are taking.  However, Town staff are continue to highlight the need for the Rouge Alliance to develop a clear implementation strategy and funding source strategy.


 

There was considerable discussion regarding outstanding issues that need to be worked out primarily between the Town of Markham and the Rouge Park Alliance.  Reference was made to comments in the two reports.  The Committee suggested establishing a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Bob Hunter Memorial Park with the Rouge Park Alliance.  The Committee also discussed the need for an area of park for family oriented activities in the east end similar to Milne Park Conservation Area which is owned by the Toronto & Region Conservation Authority and managed by the Town of Markham.

 

Staff advised that both parks are being implemented slowly and Provincial money has been allocated to Bob Hunter Memorial Park.  Town Staff continue to work closely with the Rouge Park Alliance.

 

The Committee suggested forming a working group of Council to work through all the outstanding issues.

 

Moved by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

Seconded by Councillor E. Shapero

 

That the staff recommendations be endorsed in principle and referred to a Working Committee of Council; and

 

That the following members of Council be appointed to the Working Committee:  Councillor J. Webster, Councillor E. Shapero, Deputy Mayor J. Heath, Councillor L. Kanapathi, Mayor F. Scarpitti; and,

 

That the staff report entitled draft “Bob Hunter Memorial Park Master Plan” dated February 19, 2008, be received; and,

 

That Council express support for the Rouge Park’s Bob Hunter Memorial Park Master Plan; and

 

That the Rouge Park consider the comments made in the report entitled “Bob Hunter Memorial Park Master Plan” dated February 19, 2008; and,

 

That the Rouge Park be requested to prepare and maintain a financial implementation strategy, identifying private and public funding opportunities, as well as economic opportunities within the Park to implement and sustain the Park as a public resource; and,

 

That the ongoing Town of Markham Rouge Park grant of $25,000 per year be directed to implementation of the Little Rouge Corridor Park or Bob Hunter Memorial Park from account 25-210 0024, and that the Rouge Park continue to provide the Town with a year end report on expenditure of the grant; and,


 

That the Rouge Park Alliance be requested to focus implementation efforts first on providing the public amenities (including trails, trailheads and picnic areas) for Bob Hunter Memorial Park, in order to raise the profile of Rouge Park and facilitate public enjoyment on these lands, consistent with the “paramount actions” identified in the Rouge Watershed Plan to recognize and develop the Regional Open Space System; and,

 

That a copy of the report entitled “Bob Hunter Memorial Park Master Plan” dated February 19, 2008 be forwarded to the Rouge Park and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Region of York as the Town’s input into the Final Bob Hunter Memorial Park Master Plan; and,

 

That staff continue to work co-operatively with the Rouge Park, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, York Region, the Province of Ontario, residents and stakeholders, as appropriate to implement the Bob Hunter Memorial Park Master Plan; and further,

 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

11.       LITTLE ROUGE CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PLAN
            (10.0)

            Report  Attachment

 

Moved by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

Seconded by Councillor E. Shapero

 

That the Staff recommendations be endorsed in principle and referred to a Working Committee of Council; and,

 

That the Working Committee together with Staff identify a substantial acreage in the Rouge Park to permit leisure activity similar to Milne Park Conservation Area, and review other uses that relate to recreational activities; and,

 

That the staff report entitled draft “Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan” dated February 19, 2008, be received; and,

 

That Council express support for the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan as a broad based park planning guideline, but encourage the Rouge Park to consider comments made in this information report; and,

 

That the Rouge Park be requested to prepare and maintain a financial implementation strategy, identifying private and public funding opportunities, as well as economic opportunities within the Park to implement and sustain the Park as a public resource; and,


 

That Council request the Rouge Park Alliance to ensure the Plan retains sufficient flexibility to respond to recreational and economic opportunities which could support the profile and funding of the regional park system; and,

 

That Council urge the Rouge Park Alliance to continue to seek private, corporate and senior government funding sources, including a Trust Fund to accept private donations, for the implementation of the Rouge Park, recognizing the significant costs to deliver the regional park infrastructure and ongoing operation costs; and,

 

That Council request the Rouge Park Alliance in its 5 year review of the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan, to assess if the allocation of funding for the delivery of the Little Rouge Corridor Park is sufficient to deliver the park infrastructure and ongoing operations in a reasonable and timely manner; and,

 

That the ongoing Town of Markham Rouge Park grant of $25,000 per year be directed to implementation of the Little Rouge Corridor Park or Bob Hunter Memorial Park from account 25-210 0024, and that the Rouge Park continue to provide the Town with a year end report on expenditure of the grant; and,

 

That consistent with the paramount actions identified in the Rouge Watershed Plan, the Rouge Park be requested to prioritize the implementation and funding activities of the Little Rouge Corridor to recognize and develop the public use and trails component of the Regional Open Space System; and,

 

That the park uses proposed in the Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan be considered in the Greenbelt Conformity process to ensure that the uses are permissible, and consistent with the provisions of the Greenbelt Plan;  and,

 

That Council request the Rouge Park staff to provide written communications with Town staff in the Planning Department and the Operations and Asset Management Group regarding implementation activities on Town owned lands and implementation activities requiring Town permits and approvals; and,

 

That a copy of the staff report entitled “Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan” dated February 19, 2008 be forwarded to the Rouge Park Alliance, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Region of York as the Town’s input into the Final Little Rouge Corridor Management Plan; and,

 

That staff continue to work co-operatively with the Rouge Park Alliance, and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, York Region, the Province of Ontario, residents and stakeholders, as appropriate to implement the Little Rouge Creek Management Plan; and further,

 

That Staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 


 

 

12.       BOX GROVE COMMUNITY FUND DISTRIBUTION
            (10.0)

            Report  Attachment

 

The Committee discussed allowing the local ratepayer associations to submit their comments and/or concerns.  The Committee discussed the option of a reimbursement plan for residents west of 9th Line and north of 14th Avenue that were charged a connection fee.

 

Moved by Deputy Mayor J. Heath

Seconded by Councillor L. Kanapathi

 

That the item regarding Box Grove Community Fund Distribution be deferred to the Development Services Committee meeting on March 18, 2008.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

13.       DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE
            MARKHAM BY-PASS, HIGHWAY 407
            MCCOWAN ROAD, MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE
            MAIN STREET MARKHAM AND NINTH LINE (5.10)

 

Sabbir Salyed, Manager, Transportation Engineering, delivered a PowerPoint presentation regarding the existing truck routes and existing truck prohibitions on Main Street Markham and 9th Line.

 

The Committee discussed that although the “truck route” signs will be removed from McCowan Road trucks are still permitted to use it.  It was noted that the residents are requesting that these signs be removed.

 

Moved by Councillor J. Webster

Seconded by Regional Councillor J. Jones

 

That the presentation on Markham By-pass Directional Signage from staff be received; and

 

That the proposed sign be changed to read “Street” instead of “St”; and,

 

That Town supports York Region’s proposal to install guidance signs directing all non-local traffic (including trucks) to use Donald Cousens Parkway as a by-pass to Main Street Markham; and further,

 

That Staff report back with the final signage plan for the east end.

 

CARRIED


 

 

 

14.       MICRO COURT PROPOSED
            PARKING PROHIBITION
            (5.12.4)

            Report  Map  By-law 

 

Moved by Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by Councillor C. Moretti

 

That the report entitled “Micro Court Proposed Parking Prohibition” dated February 19, 2008 be received; and,

 

That the Schedule ‘C’ of Parking By-law 2005-188, pertaining to “Prohibited Parking” be amended by including Micro Court; and,

 

That the By-law attached to the report titled “Micro Court Proposed Parking Prohibition” dated February 19, 2008, be approved; and,

 

That the Operations Department be directed to install the appropriate signs, funded through the 2008 Engineering budget, account #8402; and,

 

That the Operations Department be directed to maintain the appropriate signs at the subject location; and,

 

That the Parking Control Department be directed to enforce the parking prohibition upon installation of the signs; and further,

 

That staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

15.       CLEGG ROAD PROPOSED
            PARKING PROHIBITION
            (5.12.4)

            Report  Map  By-law

 

Moved by Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by Councillor C. Moretti

 

That the report entitled “Clegg Road Proposed Parking Prohibition” dated February 19, 2008, be received; and,


 

That Schedule ‘C’ of Traffic By-law 2005-188, pertaining to “No Parking” be amended by including the south side of Clegg Road, from Rodick Road to a point 220 meters east thereof; and,

 

That the By-law attached to the report entitled “Clegg Road Proposed Parking Prohibition” dated February 19, 2008, be approved; and,

 

That the Operations Department be directed to install the appropriate signs at the subject location, funded through the 2008 Engineering budget, account #8402; and,

 

That the Parking Control Department be directed to enforce the stopping prohibition upon installation of the signs; and further,

 

That staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

16.       RODICK ROAD PROPOSED STOPPING
            PROHIBITION BETWEEN HIGHWAY 7 &
            16TH AVENUE
            (5.12)

            Report  Attachment  By-law

 

Moved by Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by Councillor C. Moretti

 

That the report entitled “Rodick Road Proposed Stopping Prohibition, between Highway 7 & 16th Avenue” dated February 19, 2008, be received; and,

 

That Schedule ‘E’ of Traffic By-law 2005-188, pertaining to “No Stopping Zones” be amended by including both sides of Rodick Road, from Highway 7 to 16th Avenue, as outlined in Option 3 of the report entitled “Rodick Road proposed stopping prohibition between Highway 7 & 16th Avenue” dated February 19, 2008; and,

 

That the By-law attached to the report entitled “Rodick Road proposed stopping prohibition between Highway 7 & 16th Avenue” dated February 19, 2008, be approved; and,

 

That the Operations Department be directed to install the appropriate signs at the subject location, funded through the 2008 Engineering budget, account #8402; and

 

That the Operations Department be directed to maintain the appropriate signs at the subject location, funded through the 2008 Operations Budget; and,


 

That the Parking Control Department be directed to enforce the stopping prohibition upon installation of the signs; and further,

 

That staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

17.       CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
            FOR THE HIGHWAY 404 MID-BLOCK CROSSING
            BETWEEN MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE AND ELGIN MILLS ROAD
            (5.10)

             Report  Att A  Att B  Att C  Att D

 

Staff advised that Attachment D in the report demonstrates three alignments and the most southerly alignment is identified as the preferred alignment.  Staff also advised they are suggesting to only protect the lands for the suggested alignment, therefore releasing the other employment lands adjacent to Highway 404. It is advisable to protect for the alignment through the subdivision approval process, once the EA is completed.  Actual implementation and construction would depend on future municipal decisions on funding and timing.

 

Ms. Gina Tomasone representing the Cathedraltown Community Ratepayer’s Association addressed the Committee and spoke in opposition to the Highway 404 mid-block crossing.  She advised that the mid-block crossing was never shown on any plans when residents purchased their homes in the Cathedral Community. 

 

Ms. Helen Roman-Barber, Romandale Farms Ltd. addressed the Committee and spoke in opposition to the Highway 404 mid-block crossing.  She stated that the original Secondary Plan for Cathedral did not provide for a mid-block crossing which was added as a modification by the Region.  She does not see the need for one and is concerned with the visual impact and traffic infiltration.  Ms. Roman-Barber indicated she believes a full impact analysis needs to be completed before a decision is made.

 

The Committee thanked staff for the further explanations provided on this issue.  There was considerable discussion regarding where the mid-block crossing ends and that when planning future ones such as the one north of Elgin Mills Road there should be plans to have it extend right across the Town.  The Committee also discussed whether such expenditure is warranted considering the estimated cost to build it.

 

Staff advised traffic studies in the area have been premised on this flyover, and road network implications will need to be considered if this project is terminated.


 

Moved by Mayor F. Scarpitti

Seconded by Regional Councillor T. Wong

 

That the staff report entitled “Class Environmental Assessment for the Highway 404 Mid-block Crossing between Major Mackenzie Drive and Elgin Mills Road,” be received; and,

 

That the petition dated February 15, 2008 submitted by the Cathedraltown Residents be received; and further,

 

That the Town of Markham withdraw as a proponent of the Environmental Assessment for the Highway 404 Mid-Block Crossing between Major Mackenzie and Elgin Mills Roads and that the Region of York and the Town of Richmond Hill be advised that the Town no longer supports the Highway 404 Mid-Block Crossing. 

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

18.       404 NORTH SECONDARY PLAN
            CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
            (5.0)

            Report  Attachment A  Attachment B

 

Moved by Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by Councillor D. Horchik

 

That the February 19, 2008 report entitled “404 North Secondary Plan, Construction Agreement,” be received; and,

 

That the Mayor and the Clerk be authorized to execute a construction agreement with the 404 North Developers Group for the installation of the internal and external sanitary sewers and watermains in the Woodbine Bypass area to service the Honda site plan, in a form satisfactory to the Chief Administrative Officer and the Town Solicitor; and,

 

That the 2008 Engineering Department Capital Budget be amended to include a new account for the construction of sidewalk and illumination related to the construction of the Woodbine Bypass (Phase 2B & 3) and development of the Honda site plan in the amount of $359,621.00 (sidewalk - $178,517.00, illumination - $181,104.00), to be funded by development charges;

And that the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute a credit agreement with the 404 North Developers Group for front-ending of the costs incurred by the Town to provide downstream sanitary sewer capacity for the area in a form satisfactory to the Chief Administrative Officer; and further,

 

That staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED


 

 

 

19.       CONSULTANT SELECTION RFP# 181-R-07
            DETAILED DESIGN AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
            FOR RODICK ROAD WIDENING AND EXTENSION
            14TH AVENUE TO ESNA PARK DRIVE
            (5.10, 7.12.2)

            Report  Attachment

 

Moved by Regional Councillor J. Jones

Seconded by Councillor D. Horchik

 

That the report entitled “Consultant Selection RFP # 181-R-07, Detailed Design and Contract Administration for Rodick Road widening and extension, 14th Avenue to Esna Park Drive” be received; and

 

That staff be authorized to retain the highest ranked and lowest priced qualified firm UMA Engineering Ltd. for the detailed design of the project for an upset fee limit of $291,435.00 exclusive of GST and disbursements ($306,006.75 inclusive of 5% GST); and,

 

That Engineering staff be authorized to retain the highest ranked and lowest priced qualified firm UMA Engineering Ltd. for the construction inspection and contract administration for an upset fee of $233,060.00 exclusive of GST ($244,713.00 inclusive of 5% GST), subject to the  satisfactory completion of the detailed design phase of the project as described in the RFP document; and,

 

That a contingency amount of 78,674.25 exclusive of GST ($82,607.96 inclusive of 5% GST) be established to cover any additional costs and that the Director of Engineering be authorized to approve expenditure of this contingency amount up to the specified limit; and,

 

That the awards be funded and pre-approved from the 2008 Engineering Capital budget project 8299 Rodick Road Extension, in the amount of $675,549.56 exclusive of GST; and,

 

That upon payment of all invoices, any remaining funds be returned to the original funding source; and further,

 

That staff be authorized and directed to do all things necessary to give effect to this resolution.

 

CARRIED

 

 


 

20.       IN CAMERA ITEMS (8.0)

 

Moved by Councillor J. Virgilio

Seconded by Councillor C. Moretti

 

That Development Services Committee resolve into an in camera session to discuss the following confidential matters (11:49 AM):

 

(1)        LITIGATION MATTER REGARDING COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION

(2)        LITIGATION MATTER REGARDING COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION, DEMOLITION PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION

 

CARRIED

 

Moved by Regional Councillor J. Jones

Seconded by Councillor C. Moretti

 

That the Committee rise (12:05 PM)

CARRIED

 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

The Development Services Committee meeting adjourned at the hour of 12:05 PM

 

No Item Selected