COMMUNITY SERVICES & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Paul Ingham, General Manager of Operations

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Mark Ingwersen, Manager of Parks Construction & Maintenance

Victoria McGrath, Manager, Environmental Leadership

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

2004-Feb-04

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Pesticide Reduction in the Town of Markham

 

 

 


 

RECOMMENDATION:

That the report titled “Pesticide Reduction in the Town of Markham”, dated February 4, 2004, be received;

 

And that the recommendations to reduce and ultimately eliminate pesticide use within the Town of Markham, as outlined in the Pesticide Reduction Strategy, be approved.

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to outline existing practices in pesticide reduction in the Town of Markham and to recommend ways to further reduce the use of pesticides on Town properties with the opportunity of becoming pesticide free.

 

BACKGROUND:

Pesticide reduction is a matter of intense debate and discussion within Markham as well as at the regional, provincial and federal levels.  In order to respond to this, the Town of Markham needs to establish a pesticide strategy that supports its corporate goals and community vision and allows its operations to move forward in a sustainable manner.  Such a strategy should also be based on partnerships with the community, lawn care industries (that may be contracted to perform landscape services on Town properties), retailers and other government agencies.

 

OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:

The following discussion outlines the existing maintenance practices of the Parks Department and the costs associated with this maintenance, and then leads into a suggested Pesticide Reduction Strategy for the Town.

 

Town of Markham Pesticide Application Policy

The current Town of Markham Pesticide Application Policy and the Integrated Pesticide Management Program (I.P.M.) have significantly reduced the Town’s application of pesticides in parks.  The current maintenance program has provided reduction in excess of 95% from the 1992 application levels.

 

What are pesticides?
A pesticide is any chemical substance used to kill animals, insects, weeds or plant diseases. This includes insecticides (kill insects), herbicides (kill plants), fungicides (kill moulds, mushrooms and yeast) and rodenticides (kill rodents). Some items, like fertilizers and lawn-care products, may contain pesticides without the applicant even being aware.
 
Within the environment, some pesticides are species-specific, while others do not differentiate between pests and beneficial organisms. Some lawn and garden pesticides may persist in the environment, which may result in unintended exposure to other species. Once applied to a lawn or garden, a pesticide may migrate into the air, soil, and water, both groundwater and surface water.
 
In addition, pesticides are used in and around facilities, including the Civic Centre, to control, for example, wasp nests or ants. 

 

When the Town uses Pesticides

The Town’s Pesticide Application Policy suggests the use of herbicides, in a park application, only when weeds comprise 40% or more of groundcover on Town owned manicured turf. Herbicides are used on a spot-spray basis only.  There are only two types of herbicides used by the Town in these conditions, Killex and Roundup. Killex is a broadleaf herbicide which kills weeds but does not affect grass. Roundup is a non selective weed killer that kills all vegetation it contacts. Currently, the Parks Department uses Roundup in specific, limited applications such as to control poison ivy or to eliminate weeds in pavement cracks.

 

Over the last three years, Parks Maintenance staff has applied pesticides in response to complaints only, where the weed cover has exceeded the 40% threshold.  In 2003, the Town applied herbicides on three occasions, two to control poison ivy (40 ml per application) and another because the area had exceeded 40% weeds.

 

When the Town Doesn’t Use Pesticides

Natural areas on Town owned lands, including creek banks, valley lands, woodlots, meadows and other park areas left in natural state are not treated with pesticides or removed. In addition, the Parks Maintenance staff does not use pesticides on either Town or Region boulevard areas.

 

Cultural Practices Implemented

“Cultural” practices are a recognized term in the turf care industry. These practices include increased mowing frequency, aerating, fertilizing and over-seeding of turf to strengthen and promote growth. In addition, topdressing, using organic materials, is used on sports fields to increase general turf health and promote grass seed germination.  Topdressing is not a practical option for typical neighbourhood parks due to topography, tree and shrub-bed plantings and other potential obstructions.

 

All high-end, Category A (lit, irrigated fields) and B (some are irrigated) sports fields town wide are maintained based on the use of cultural practices.  The ongoing cultural practices program on these sports fields has been a success and has not required the use of herbicides since the program began over ten years ago.  It should be noted, however, that pesticides were applied to these fields at the beginning of the process and these fields were weed free when the cultural practices were implemented.  Although the cultural maintenance costs per hectare for sports fields are higher than the maintenance of general parks, the revenue generated from permits subsidizes these costs.

 

Cultural practices have proven to be successful over the long term, however, seasonal factors, such as extended periods of summer drought or extended periods of rain and wet soil conditions in the spring and fall, may adversely impact the Operations Department’s capacity to complete aerating and over-seeding operations each year.  Under these conditions we may not see the benefits of this type of program each year, however, over the long term this program could be very successful. 

 

The Pesticide Free Pilot Project in Ward 2 and the Cultural Practices Project in five Ward 2 parks and the Civic Centre

Pesticide use in Ward 2 Parks and Civic Centre was eliminated in 2001.  Parks Department staff monitored these areas and no complaints were received during this period.  However, weed cover continued to expand at differing rates, depending on various environmental factors including soil types, weed types and population, and extremely dry or wet conditions. 

 

The 2001 Pesticide Free Pilot Project was amended for 2002 with the addition of Cultural Practices.  The cultural practices include increasing the mowing cycle from 10-14 days to 5-7 days, aerating each park three times per year, and over-seeding each park twice per year. This pilot project concluded at the end of 2003.

 

Organic non-chemical alternatives tested at the Civic Centre

As part of the Parks Department’s ongoing initiative to continue to reduce pesticide use, the Parks Department has undertaken trials at the Civic Centre and at Millennium Park involving two organic alternatives to pesticides.

 

Beat Pulp Molasses was first used on a plot at the Civic Centre in September 2002.  Three applications of beat pulp molasses were made.  Although the contractor claimed that there was a decrease in weeds, staff did not observe any appreciable difference. In order to further evaluate the benefits of beat pulp molasses, six applications were made between June 6, 2003, and October 30, 2003, as recommended by the organic lawn care contractor performing the applications.  Throughout this initiative and after the last application of beat pulp molasses staff inspected the plots and found a 10% decrease in weeds over the five month program.

 

Corn Gluten is a substance that is reported to prevent seed germination when applied under certain conditions. Corn gluten works best in dry conditions, and is time and weather sensitive. This initiative was piloted in 2003 at Millennium Park on a ½ ha. plot. Corn gluten was applied twice throughout the season as recommended by the manufacturer/supplier. The first application was carried out in June, 2003, and the second application was carried out in September, 2003. The results of this project are inconclusive and Operations staff recommend that the corn gluten project continue in 2004 to further evaluate the benefits.

 

Parks Mowing

The Town’s approved standard for grass-mowing intervals in parks is 10 to 14 days between cuts.  The Parks Department is currently cutting with intervals up to 12 to 14 days between cuts during peak growing season, as weather and ground conditions permit.  This cutting schedule is consistent for Category C and D fields located within these parks.  Category A and B sports fields are cut on a 5 to 7 day interval. 

 

Parks Maintenance

In addition to mowing, Parks staff maintain shrub beds in parks and on medians, boulevards and gateways.  On average, shrub bed maintenance is currently performed at facilities five times per year, in parks once per year and on boulevards three times per year.

 

Boulevard Mowing

The Parks department cuts grass on Town and Regional boulevards within the Town of Markham.  Until 2001, these boulevards were cut 7 times per year, however, due to the large number of complaints received, the number of cuts was increased to 11 per year in 2001.  The Region currently subsidizes the Town for 11 cuts per year on Regional roads.

 

Council approved funding to allow an increase in cuts from 11 to 14 in 2003. Staff anticipates that 12 cuts per year, which is consistent with parks practices, will be sufficient. The additional funding will be used to remove weeds on roadway medians across Town approximately three times per year.  This will enhance the aesthetics of the boulevards across the Town of Markham.

 

Due to road clearing requirements adjacent to boulevards, grass coverage is limited, but weeds are still able to grow in these conditions providing valuable ground cover and greenery. To eliminate the weeds, extensive sodding and seeding would be required annually. The establishment of grass would be difficult due to compaction and subsequent “suffocation” of turf plants, compounded by the residual presence of road salt remaining in the soil on boulevards. 

 

The current standards of care are helpful to understand in order to look at the increased service levels and costs required to move towards a pesticide free approach.

 

Moving Towards a Pesticide Free Approach to Parks Maintenance

The Town of Markham is committed to protecting, enhancing and restoring Markham’s natural features and green spaces as part of a vital and healthy ecosystem.  A Pesticide Reduction Strategy (PRS) would reflect the Town’s ongoing commitment to protecting and enhancing the community and environment.
 

Reduction Strategies and Alternatives to Pesticide Use

In order to facilitate the goals of the PRS, alternative methods may be considered as pilot projects to determine efficacy and sustainability. These pilot projects may include:

·        Naturalization - demonstrating bio-engineered sustainable landscape practices using naturalization techniques that eliminate or reduce herbicide use. This may include the use of geotextile landscape fabrics as a weed suppression aid, using specific plant selection to ensure sustainability in the environment, soil amendments and/or mulch/erosion control.

·        Compost Trials – test the use of compost/compost tea in a series of managed landscapes to identify alternatives to traditional pest and pathogenic control. Specific types of compost can create an optimal balance of fungal organisms, bacteria and beneficial microbes suited to the plant community under consideration.

·        Heat Alternatives – Using radiant and flaming equipment fuelled by propane to eliminate weeds.

·        Steam Heat Weeder – Experimenting with boiling water/steam heat as a weed-control possibility. This technology has been employed by the City of Toronto, however, it is not a sustainable solution on its own and must be employed in combination with replanting with sustainable vegetation.

·        Zero Maintenance Landscape – Testing the outcome of a controlled zero-maintenance landscape, which would include:

·       Removal of existing weeds and unsuitable plant material without the use of pesticides.

·       Amending soil with compost, possibly adding additional soil

·       New plant selections, including ground covers, based on drought tolerance, resistance to disease, low pruning needs, visibility for traffic, attractiveness, toughness and tolerance of being driven over

·       Mulching exposed soil after replanting to discourage weed growth and conserve moisture until fully established

·       Minimal watering as needed until plants establish themselves

·       Hand weeding until plant materials have covered ground sufficiently to exclude weed growth

 

Funding, service levels and operational practices (including research, planning, implementation, evaluating and reporting on specific pilot projects) need further exploration and could be included in a follow-up report to council.
 
Objectives of a Pesticide Reduction Strategy

A Pesticide Reduction Strategy (PRS) for the Town of Markham could have two main goals:

 

(1) To first eliminate the use of pesticides and implement a ‘cultural practices’ maintenance program on all Town property. This can be done immediately, or phased in over a period of time. Eliminating the use of pesticides on Town properties would demonstrate leadership and commitment to the environment. 
 
The first goal of the Pesticide Reduction Strategy could have a three-phased approach:
·        Naturalization may be an appropriate tool to phase out maintenance, and therefore the use of pesticides, in some areas. Naturalization has already been promoted in many Town open spaces including Milne Park.  This could be the first phase, to investigate and implement naturalization to the highest level possible without losing active recreation space. 
·        The second phase could be to eliminate the use of pesticides on all passive recreation/open space. 
·        The third phase could be the elimination of all pesticide use on Town property *. 
 
(* The only condition the Town may want to include in the PRS is the potential application for herbicides in a particular situation. For example, poison ivy is not a health threat, however, it is a pervasive and uncomfortable rash that can affect many people using a park. Perhaps controlling poison ivy in areas normally accessible to the public such as manicured parks or immediately adjacent (within 1.0 metre) to pathways is appropriate. Controlling poison ivy in natural areas, or in those areas that are not used frequently, is not appropriate, particularly as poison ivy provides a widely enjoyed food source to birds.)
 

(2) To achieve a significant reduction in overall pesticide use in the Town through a phased approach on private property with residents and businesses, starting with a voluntary program/pilot project.  Eventually, if necessary, a by-law prohibiting the use of pesticides could come into effect if it is apparent that voluntary efforts are not achieving the desired results.

 

Eliminating pesticides on Town properties should be done in combination with a significant education program, letting residents and businesses know through media releases, community page notifications and on the web page, that the Town is eliminating the use of pesticides on its properties and to expect changes in appearance of their local open space areas. 

 

Creating Natural Parks

In addition to implementing a pesticide-free policy, the Town will need to reconsider how parks are developed and designed. In order to support a pesticide-free approach, park design needs to consider low maintenance vegetation, including native trees and plant materials, and ground covers. Grass, in general, is high maintenance, requiring adequate irrigation and fertilization to survive. Even in conditions that support turf grass, eventually weed species out-compete grass and begin to fill in the gaps.

 

Education/Outreach/Communications

Community education will be a necessary component of a PRS as reductions of pesticide use result in “changing” landscapes. Promoting positive messages, such as “These landscapes may look less manicured, and take on a more natural appearance.  The Town will continue to ensure that these areas provide an inviting and safe atmosphere to be enjoyed by all”, on the Town’s web page, on the community page of the local paper, and in communications with the media, will help the community understand what the Town is hoping to achieve.

 

CONCLUSION:

The Town has already reduced pesticide use by more than 95% since 1992, and continues to investigate and promote the use of new technologies, alternatives and reduced risk products as they become available. 

 

In order to demonstrate commitment to Environmental Focus in the Town’s Corporate Goals and Community Vision, the Town of Markham can evolve into an organization that leads by example. Because the Town maintains a significant amount of property that is used constantly by the community, it is important to protect, enhance and restore Markham’s natural features and green space as part of a vital and healthy ecosystem. In order to do this, staff recommend a pesticide free approach.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

Parks Standards of Care

Proposed standards ensure the Parks Department is able to implement a pesticide free approach to parks maintenance while maintaining approved standards for turf care throughout the Town of Markham.  Further changes to these standards may be required if Town of Markham decides in what manner it is to become pesticide free.  It is expected that the proposed Pesticide Reduction Strategy will address the funding impact of implementation, including implications for the services outlined below.

 

Service

Current Standard

Proposed Standard

Financial Implications

Grass-mowing intervals in parks

10 to 14 days

5 to 7 days

Estimated $900 per hectare (approx. $500,000) to double mowing frequency and include aeration and over-seeding

Shrub bed maintenance at facilities

5 times a year

5 times a year

(No change)

None

Shrub bed maintenance at boulevards

3 times a year

5 times a year

$123,000 per annum

Shrub bed maintenance at parks

1 time a year

3 times a year

$209,000 per annum

Boulevard mowing on Town and Regional roads

14 cuts per year

12 cuts per year

Savings in this area will be utilized to implement weed removal program on Town and Regional roads.

Removal of weeds on roadway median

As required on Town roads

1 time a year on Regional roads (spring clean-up)

3 times a year on all Town and Regional roads

Transfer of the 2 cuts from boulevard mowing to this service

Note:  Above estimates to increase grass cutting frequency in parks to not include funding requirements for additional fleet.  Funding/Service Level and Operational practices will have to be revised and reported back on.

 

Cost saving opportunities 

The Operations Department will investigate opportunities to implement naturalization to the highest level possible without losing active recreation space.  Potential savings will be realized through the reduced mowing requirements.

 

New and existing shrub beds at entrance features to various communities throughout the Town are an integral component of the aesthetic quality of the Town.  However, the Operations Department will investigate opportunities to reduce shrub bed areas in parks and along extended sections of both Town and Regional roads and replace these beds with alternative materials that are both aesthetically pleasing and low maintenance.

 

 

 

Education / Public Awareness

The education/outreach component of the Pesticide Reduction Strategy will be designed to promote an understanding of the changing landscape and to help residents make informed choices regarding their own practices.  Programme materials may include media advertising, information brochures, Park signage, etc. at an estimated cost of $10,000 to $20,000 annually.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

Community Services Commission

 

ATTACHMENTS:

 

 

 

    ____________________________

 

Paul Ingham,

General Manager of Operations

Peter Loukes,

Director of Operations and Asset Management

 

 

 

 

 

Jim Sales,

Commissioner of Community and Fire Services