|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Barbara
M. Roth, Director, Recreation and Culture Services |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Lori Wells, Manager,
Programs |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2004-Sep-13 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Fitness Centres –
2003 Customer Service Survey Results |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT
the report entitled “Fitness Centres – 2003 Customer Service Survey Results” be
received as information.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to present to Council the
findings of the Customer Satisfaction Survey that was conducted at the
BACKGROUND:
In 1999, Fitness staff set the objective to measure
customer satisfaction. In order to
accomplish their objective, it was necessary to develop a customer satisfaction
survey.
With the assistance of the Quality Office, the
customer survey process was initiated.
Focus groups comprised of members from both Fitness Centres helped staff
develop survey questions. The first
survey was completed in December 1999.
Gaps in
In 2003 the combined survey return rate was 20%.
Over the past three fitness surveys, from 1999 to 2003, the
fitness centres have seen the overall satisfaction rating climb from 78% in
1999, 80% in 2001, to an 83% overall satisfaction rating in 2003.
Survey Format
The survey is a two-step process developed from
focus group input. The first step is to
ask fitness members and fitness class participants to rate the level of
importance of various
The next step is to ask members to rate their
current satisfaction level with these attributes. Collecting the data in this format creates
the opportunity to measure if there is a “gap” between important features and
current satisfaction.
TABLE 1 below provides an overview of the top items that fitness
members listed as the most important attributes, their current satisfaction in
these areas and the satisfaction “gap”.
The complete results are attached in Appendix A.
Attribute and
Location
|
|||
|
Level of Importance |
Satisfaction |
Gap between Importance
& Satisfaction (%) |
Has sufficient gym space to exercise
comfortably |
88% |
58% |
30% |
Stretching Area |
86% |
58% |
28% |
Tied for 3rd
|
80% 86% 90% |
70% 76% 80% |
10% |
Tied for 4th
|
90% 86% 90% 84% |
84% 80% 84% 78% |
6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Has sufficient gym space to exercise
comfortably |
88% |
58% |
30% |
Stretching Area |
86% |
58% |
28% |
Provides good value for fees paid |
53% |
65% |
12% |
Staff who regularly provide input re:
performing exercises properly |
86% |
76% |
10% |
Cardio Machines |
89% |
79% |
10% |
The fitness members at the two locations agreed on 4
of the top 5 most important facility attributes. The largest satisfaction “gaps” at both sites
is the lack of facility space, both for exercising and stretching (two separate
issues). Fitness members also expressed
a desire for our staff to be more proactive with customer
Our
goal is to continuously improve
As
the expansions of our facilities become a reality, the fitness member’s
perception for improvements will shift into other
Action Steps - update
We have begun the problem
solving process to determine the root cause of each of these issues. Potential solutions to the problem will be
determined and those solutions that are doable will be implemented and
monitored.
Once we have gathered this
information we will go through the problem solving process to determine the
root cause of each of these issues.
Potential solutions to the problem will be determined and those
solutions that are doable will be implemented and monitored.
Staff will continue to use the results of the bi annual survey to guide
the operations of the fitness centres, group fitness classes and in setting
annual objectives to continuously improve
____________________________________
Barbara
M. Roth, R.D.M.R. Jim
Sales
Director, Recreation and Culture Services Commissioner of Community and Fire Services
Q:\Recreation\DISCIPLN\DIS004\Survey Results\2003
Fitness Survey Report3.doc