|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor
and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
J.
Sales, Commissioner of Community and Fire Services |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Deborah
Walker, Manager, Library Strategy |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2004-Mar-9 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Markham Village Library Expansion |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATIONS:
THAT the report “Markham Village Library Expansion” be received;
AND THAT Council approve the design of Option 1 for the Markham Village
Library expansion of 10,500 square feet at an estimated cost of $3,821,300
(inclusive of 3% GST) and authorize the Architect, Shoalts and Zaback, to
proceed with the schematic design;
AND THAT Council approve the (finishing) renovating of the (proposed)
basement to accommodate the Library Administration and Technical Services
Department at an estimated cost of $530,450 (inclusive of 3% GST) to be funded
annually from the elimination of the operating lease until fully offset;
AND THAT Council approve the
renovation of the existing Library to be undertaken at the same time as the new
construction, at an estimated cost of $2,266,000 (inclusive of 3% GST), to be
funded from a non Development Charge source to be determined through the 2004
Budget process;
AND FURTHER THAT staff provide a detailed
cost estimate for Council approval upon completion of the detailed design.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to obtain
approval from Council for the Schematic Design of Option 1 of the Markham
Village Library Expansion and authority to proceed with the Detailed Design of
this project.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Markham Village Library
Expansion project consists of an addition of 10,500 sq. ft. to expand the
Public Library Space and 5,250 sq. ft. to accommodate the Library
Administration and Technical Services (ATS) departments.
The design process began
with analysis of the Library’s site and where the Expansion should be
positioned in relation to the existing Library.
The architect has developed three site Options for the consideration of
the public, the Executive Steering Committee (ESC), and Council.
The project’s initial site plan was very similar to Option 1, which is
shown below. A series of Public Meetings
were held to obtain community input. As
a result of the extensive public input received, a new Option 3, which links the
Library to the adjacent Arena, has been developed. Options 1 and 3 represent
distinct and divergent visions for the expansion of the Library at this
site. Both options meet the Library’s
space and functional needs. (Option 2 is
similar to Option 1 in costing, but is less functional in terms of library
operations. The Executive Steering
Committee does not recommend it. See
Appendix “A” for a full description of Option 2.)
Those who have attended the
public meetings and design workshops prefer Option 3. The public believes that only Option 3 takes
full advantage of the potential of this site and the possible synergies with
the adjacent community facilities. The
public understands that significant additional funding is required for Option
3.
Option 1 meets the funding formula for the project. Option 3 requires additional funding, and is
fundable in part through Development Charges.
Funding Option 3 through Development Charges would reduce DC funding
availability for other future growth-related recreational and library facility
projects.
Staff supports Option 1 as the base project that fully meets the Libraries’ functional and service needs, as outlined in the 1999 Feasibility Study, and is achievable within the original funding formula.
The Library recognizes the benefits of Option 3, as expressed by the community in terms of aesthetics, improving the Library’s civic presence, and fulfilling the opportunities of the site. However, Option 3 does not provide any further assistance over Option 1 to the Library’s program, services, operations, and functionality.
ESC believes it is important that Council considers both options and
then decides how the project should proceed.
The report outlines each option in further detail, including a summary of pros
and cons, describes the public input process to date, and provides
budgets for each option. The business
case for proceeding with the existing
Library renovation at the same time as new construction is also presented.
|
|
(See Appendix “A” for full-page
views of Options 1, 2 and 3.)
BACKGROUND:
The Executive Steering
Committee (ESC) met for the first time on October 27, 2003, and subsequently on
November 12, 2003, December 15, 2003, and January 28, 2004. The members are:
Chief
Administrative Officer John Livey
Commissioner of
Community & Fire Services Jim Sales
Commissioner of
Corporate Services Andy Taylor
Library Chief
Executive Officer Catherine Biss
Councillor Jack Heath
Councillor George
McKelvey
Councillor Alex
Chiu
Councillor John
Webster
Library Board
Chair Joanne Pickering
Library Board
Member Michelle Tidball
Library Board
Member Ed Brewer
Commissioner,
Development Services Jim Baird
Director of
Financial and Client Services Joel Lustig
Project Manager
Eardley Adams
Manager, Library
Strategy Deborah Walker
Manager,
Corporate Communications Marjorie Rebane
Architect Gerald
Shoalts
Architect’s
Library Consultant Roger Jones
Consultation
regarding Main Street Markham Streetscape and Traffic Management Study On
March 27 and April 10, 2003, Library staff met with Urban Design staff to
discuss the Main Street Markham Streetscape and Traffic Management Study
process as it affects Main Street south of Highway 7, abutting the Library’s
site. To ensure the Library’s expansion
would be integrated with the Main Street Study, information has continued to be
shared between Library staff, Urban Design staff, Main Street Study consultant
Ken Hoyle, and (following their retention) architect Shoalts and Zaback
Architects Ltd.
On June 18, 2003, at the
Markham Train Station, Library staff attended a community information meeting
regarding the Main Street Master Plan for south of Highway 7 and the Markham
Village Library expansion. Library
expansion was well received. The concept
of expanding the Library to the north and linking it to the existing Community
Centre appeared to gather support.
Various concerns were expressed regarding traffic issues, parking,
traffic safety on Reeve Drive, and traffic access to the Library parking
lot. These concerns were carried forward
into the design process.
On October 15, 2003, the
contract for architectural services was awarded to Shoalts and Zaback
Architects Ltd.
Review
of Schedule by Executive Steering Committee—Expansion to the North benefits
schedule for moving Library’s Administration & Technical Services
The need to move the Library’s Administration & Technical Services (ATS) out of its leased facility and into the basement of the expansion, to avoid additional leasing costs, has been a pressing concern throughout the project. As a result of concern regarding the schedule for construction, ESC directed an investigation of a previously unconsidered option – renovating the existing Library’s lower level for ATS. This option assumed an expansion to the west or the north, which appeared to be the community’s preference. Renovation of the lower level for ATS could proceed independently of the Library expansion and could start and conclude by the end of November 2003, allowing ATS to move from its leased facility and avoid incurring additional leasing costs.
Public
Consultation November 17-19, 2003—Expansion to the North is preferred
As part of the communication
process, staff identified an extensive list of project stakeholders (see
Appendix B). The architect’s library
consultant, Roger Jones, contacted stakeholders and invited them to attend personal
interviews. During the week of November
17, Roger Jones met one-on-one with those stakeholder groups that accepted the
invitation to be interviewed (i.e. Markham Veterans’ Association, Ontario
Pathways [Early Years], Markham Pathways [Early Years], Heritage Markham,
Legacy Ratepayers Association, Toastmasters, Yoga, Participation House,
Literacy Council, and the Markham Group of Artists).
All stakeholders were also
invited to a public meeting on November 19, 2003, to gather public input for
the design process, and thirty members of the public attended. This public meeting was extensively
advertised through the Town page in the Economist
& Sun, flyers inserted in the Economist
& Sun, meeting notices on the Town and Library websites, and
flyers distributed in the Library itself.
Public input gathered at this meeting is summarized as follows:
Also, on November 19, 2003,
the architect attended a meeting of the Main Street Markham Committee to gather
Committee members’ input.
Design
Charrette for Councillors, Library Board Members, Town Staff & Library
Staff—Three Options Developed
On December 15, 2003, at the request of ESC, a design charrette was held with Councillors, Library Board members, Town staff, and Library staff. Bearing in mind public input received as well as the urgency of moving ATS out of its leased facility, charrette participants developed three options for the architect to expand and cost (see Appendix “A”).
At the January 28, 2004 ESC meeting, the architect’s three options were reviewed, along with order of magnitude costs for each option. ESC directed that the three options be taken to the public for further communication and input, prior to the submission of a Report to Council.
Public
Consultation February 4, 2004—Presentation of Three Options—Community Prefers
Option 3 Expansion to North
On February 4, 2004, as directed by ESC, the three options and the budgets were presented at a public meeting (see Appendix “A” for full review of the Options). 37 members of the public attended, including representatives of the Reeve Drive Ratepayers Association, the Main Street Markham Committee, the Veterans Association, Markham Village Library users, other ratepayer groups, and interested community members. The following summarizes the meeting’s analysis and discussion of the three Options:
Option One:
Option Two:
Option Three:
At the conclusion of
discussion, informal votes were conducted on the main issues raised:
1. Should the Library be expanded? Unanimous support.
2. Preferred Option:
Option 1: 2.
Option 2: 0
Option 3: 35
The consensus was that Option 3 was the preferred solution for the community. The group understood that substantial additional funding is required to achieve Option 3. The group understood that Option 1 meets the Library’s functional needs but believed that it fails to capitalize on the opportunities of the site. There was also recognition that, if Option 1 were selected, the future opportunities for the site would be lost.
Renovation
of Existing Library—Architect Recommends Integration with New Construction
In 2003, the renovation funding for Markham Village Library was deferred by the Budget Committee until 2004 budget discussions, at which time the renovation project was to be reconsidered. Shoalts and Zaback Architects has estimated the cost of renovation of the existing Library building to be approximately $2.3 million. The architect has also reviewed the issue of when and how renovations to the existing building should proceed, and has provided the following Business Case for an Integrated Project:
· The existing building was constructed in 1981 and is, therefore, 23 years old.
· By carrying out the expansion project, a longterm commitment to Library Services at this site is being made.
· The existing HVAC system and southern exterior Library wall are in poor, deteriorating condition. Significant financial investment is necessary to repair and upgrade building systems and exterior fabric. This work could be deferred for a limited time, but not indefinitely.
· Renovations to the existing building are needed to integrate it with the addition and provide a single optimally functioning Library.
· If renovations are deferred, repair work will need to be done in the short term. Much of this repair cost will be lost when final renovations occur.
If Council directs that renovation to the existing building, at a cost of approximately $2.3 million, be integrated and new construction proceeds, the following Order of Magnitude Cost Savings will result:
Option
1 Order of Magnitude Cost Savings:
Avoid short term repair work |
$125,000.00 |
Elimination of Phases |
$100,000.00 |
6% per annum for deferring renovations (assume 1 year deferral on $2,266,000.00) |
$130,000.00 |
Cost of Interim Measures to operate Library as separate addition and unrenovated existing building |
$200,000.00 |
Total
Order of Magnitude Cost Savings |
$555,000.00 |
Option
3 Order of Magnitude Cost Savings:
Avoid short term repair work |
$125,000.00 |
8 months rent savings on Administration Centre offices |
$150,000.00 |
Elimination of Phases |
$100,000.00 |
6% per annum for deferring renovations (assume 1 year deferral on $2,266,000.00) |
$130,000.00 |
Cost of Interim Measures to operate Library as separate addition and unrenovated existing building |
$200,000.00 |
Total
Order of Magnitude Cost Savings |
$705,000.00 |
In order to capture these
Cost Savings, it is therefore recommended that new construction and renovation
proceed as an integrated project.
The renovation cost is
included for each Option under Financial Considerations below.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Shoalts and Zaback Architects has developed the following estimates for each design Option. Since the project is currently in the pre-design phase, all cost estimates are necessarily “order of magnitude” costs only, based on preliminary sketch charts. The following notes apply to all estimates:
· Each estimate includes Design Contingency (8%), Escalation Contingency (5%, assuming a Spring 2005 construction start), and Post Construction Contract Contingency (7%).
· The estimates below do not include:
o Professional Fees and Disbursements,
o Soil Tests, Site Survey, Inspection and Testing,
o Hazardous Material Survey of Existing Library and Arena,
o Library Security System, Automation, Furniture, Equipment and Collections, Window Treatments,
o Municipal Permits and Fees,
o Computer, Telephone Cabling (conduit only in estimates),
o Redevelopment of Village Green,
o Handling, removal or disposal of hazardous, deleterious or contaminated soils or materials,
o Dewatering of foundations during construction (i.e. unusual groundwater conditions).
· The following assumptions have been made:
o Competitive bids will be received from local prequalified contractors.
o Local market conditions are competitive at time of tender.
o Native soils will support required loads.
· The estimates assume one construction contract with two Phases: Phase 1 – New Construction and Phase 2 – Renovate Existing. If renovations are deferred, additional costs will be incurred.
OPTION
1—PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
New Construction & Site Work |
$3,821,300.00 |
Fitting out the basement of the New Construction for ATS |
$530,450.00 |
Renovation of the existing building’s 3 levels |
$2,266,000.00 |
Total
Option 1 |
$6,617,750.00 |
FUNDING
SOURCES:
Option 1 provides a two-storey addition with half basement to the south of the Existing Library. In order to analyze the funding sources for each element of Option 1, the following chart illustrates the elements/components of Option 1 as a construction project:
|
Element
Description |
Preliminary
Cost Estimate |
1 |
New Construction (the two upper levels of the addition plus the shell of the half-basement) and Site Work |
$3,821,300 |
2 |
Finishing the half-basement level of the addition to be occupied by the Library’s ATS |
$530,450 |
3 |
Renovation of the existing building’s 3 levels |
$2,266,000 |
|
TOTAL
|
$6,617,750 |
Of Option 1’s $6,617,750 total preliminary cost estimate, $3,439,170 could be funded through Development Charges. Additional funding of $3,178,580 from the tax base is therefore necessary.
OPTION
2—PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
New Construction
& Site Work |
$4,454,750.00 |
|
|
Renovation of the existing building’s 3 levels |
$2,266,000.00 |
Total
Option 2 |
$6,720,750.00 |
Since Option 2 did not receive support at the Public Meeting on February 4, it has been withdrawn from further analysis.
OPTION
3—PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Base Building
& Site Work |
$4,351,750.00 |
|
|
|
|
Renovation of the existing building’s 3 levels |
$2,266,000.00 |
|
Sub-total Base Building |
$6,617,750.00 |
|
New Link to Arena (interior street) |
$2,111,500.00 |
|
Alterations to Existing Arena |
$515,000.00 |
|
Relocation of Ice Making Equipment and New Façade to Transformer Vault |
$257,500.00 |
|
Sub-total |
$2,884,000.00 |
$2,884,000.00 |
Total Option 3 |
|
$9,501,750.00 |
Funding Sources:
Option 3 provides a two-storey addition on a slab-on-grade foundation, to the north of the Existing Library. It requires the construction of new public meeting rooms to replace the current public meeting rooms displaced by ATS moving into the existing basement. A north-south internal street links the Existing Arena and the new Library addition. In order to analyze the funding sources for each element of Option 3, the following chart illustrates the elements/components of Option 3 as a construction project:
|
Element
Description |
Preliminary
Cost Estimate |
|
BASE
BUILDING & SITE WORK |
$4,351,750 |
1 |
10,500 sq. ft. of new public library space as per the original projection |
|
2 |
5,250 sq. ft. of new ground floor public meeting/program rooms required to replace the existing program rooms |
|
|
RENOVATION
OF EXISTING BUILDING |
$2,266,000 |
3 |
Renovation of the existing building’s 3 levels |
|
|
LINK
TO ARENA |
$2,884,000 |
4 |
Link to the Arena, including alterations to the Arena and relocated services |
|
|
TOTAL
|
$9,501,750 |
If DC funding was made available to fund Element 4 (Arena Link) of Option 3, $5,399,775 of Option 3’s total cost estimate could be funded through Development Charges. Additional funding of $4,101,975 from the tax base would be necessary.
Staff’s position is that Development Charges should not be used to fund Element 4 (Arena Link) of Option 3, as this would reduce DC funding availability for other future growth-related recreational and library facility projects.
If DC does not fund Element 4 (Arena Link) of Option 3, Option 3’s $9,501,750 total preliminary cost estimate requires funding of $2,804,175 through Development Charges, and requires additional funding of $6,697,575 from the tax base.
OPTION
3A (phased)—PRELIMINARY PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
As discussed in Appendix A, Option 3 could be
developed in two stages:
Phase 1 Library and
Landscape Courtyard where future Link will go |
$6,772,250.00 |
(Additional Costs ($150,000.00) due to : 1) East wall of Library addition is now an exterior wall; and 2) Landscaped Courtyard) |
|
Phase 2 “Interior Street” |
$3,167,250.00 |
(Additional Costs ($275,000.00) due to : 1) Assume construction inflation of 6% per year 2) Assume construction is 1 year later 3) More restricted site) |
|
Total Option 3A |
$9,939,500.00 |
This is approximately $437,750.00 higher than Option 3.
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
None.
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
None.
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
None.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The
Financial Services Department, the Director, Recreation and Culture Services,
and the Director, Operations and Asset Management reviewed this report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Appendix “A”: MARKHAM
VILLAGE LIBRARY EXPANSION—REPORT ON OPTIONS 1, 2, AND 3
Appendix “C”: SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT TO MARKHAM VILLAGE LIBRARY
EXPANSION NOV 17-19, 2003
|
Jim Sales Commissioner, Community
& Fire Services |
I:\SENIOR\MV Expansion\Report
to Council Mar 9 04\Report MV Mar 9 04