THE FIFTH MEETING OF THE
THORNHILL SUBCOMMITTEE IN
2004
TOWN OF MARKHAM
Canada Room, Markham Civic
Centre
June 17, 2004
MINUTES
Attendance
Thornhill Subcommittee
Mayor D. Cousens
Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti (Chair)
Regional Councillor J. Jones
Other Council Members
Councillor G. McKelvey
Councillor J. Webster
Staff
J. Baird, Commissioner of Development Services
A. Taylor, Commissioner of Corporate Services
C. Conrad, Town Solicitor
B. Cribbett, Treasurer
S. Birrell, Town Clerk
S. Chait, Director, Economic Development
V. Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design
R. Blake, Senior Project Coordinator
D. Ciastko, Economic Development Officer
K. Bavington, Committee Clerk
Applicants, representing
1107656 Ontario Inc.
Hashem Ghadaki, owner
Mohamad B. Ghadaki, owner
Saeid B. Aghaei, owner
Ira Kagan of Kagan Shastri
Jim Kirk of Malone Given Parsons
Others
Marion Matthias, Thornhill resident
The Thornhill Subcommittee convened at 3:30 p.m. with Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti in the Chair.
SUBJECT:
1107656 Ontario Inc. (Times Group) -
Leitchcroft Planning District
Dwelling units, park, and commercial uses
Blocks 45, 46, 49, 50 Reg. Plan 65M-3226 (OP 03 116474, ZA 03
116428)
- And-
Apartment buildings fronting onto Saddlecreek Dr. and South
Park Rd.,
and townhouse blocks fronting Times Ave. (OP 03 116476, ZA 03
116428)
(10.3, 10.5)
1. Minutes
Moved by: Regional Councillor
J. Jones
Seconded by: Councillor G.
McKelvey
That the Minutes of the
Thornhill Subcommittee meeting held May 19, be received.
CARRIED
2. Correspondence
a) Frederick Woo, 127 Pond
Drive, May 4, 2004, requesting notice of all meetings, including Subcommittee
meetings, with respect to the proposal in Leitchcroft.
b) Councillor David Cohen,
Ward 3, Richmond Hill, with comments on the proposal.
c) Frederick Woo, June 6,
2004, with comments on the proposal.
Moved by: Regional Councillor
J. Jones
Seconded by: Councillor G. McKelvey
That correspondence from Frederick Woo (2) and Richmond Hill Councillor
David Cohen, be
received;
And that Frederick Woo be notified of future Thornhill Subcommittee
meetings regarding
Leitchcroft.
CARRIED
3. Applicant's
Summary
Ira Kagan advised that at the OMB pre-hearing
conference held on June 14, 2004, strong support for the applicant was
demonstrated by residents. A second pre-hearing meeting is set for July 26,
2004, as the Town has not yet determined its position. He urged the Town to
make a determination by June 30, 2004.
Mr. Kagan summarized the applicant's proposal
and advised that further amendments have been made to the proposed park, in the
nature of adding 1.5 acres and including linkages to open spaces on both side
of the park, a walking trail throughout, enhanced street landscaping, and
"active" park features - tennis courts, splash pools, a gazebo with
potential for band shell activities, an ice rink, and a building that will
accommodate a community centre, daycare, indoor gymnasium, and a private
school.
Mr. Kagan reviewed the benefits relating to
fiscal impacts and transit support with the proposed high density residential
use on the transit line. He considered that major business uses rather than
industrial uses are more appropriate for this site, and that office lands
should front on Highway 7, although in discussions with major office
developers, they had indicated they would not be interested in the Highway 7
sites.
Mr. Kagan summarized that if Council supports
the conversion of the use, that the OMB hearing would not be necessary,
however, the OMB will have to deal with the concerns of other parties that are
seeking status at the hearing.
4. Summary
of Town Staff Position
The Commissioner of Development Services summarized the position of Town
staff.
Fiscal Impact Analysis: Finance
staff question the underlying assumptions of the applicant with respect to tax
rates, assessment values, and long-term costs. Staff conclude
that the proposal would, at best, break even financially, and that employment
lands would provide positive net revenues.
Employment Land Needs: Only 240 acres of
market-ready Business Park land is available in Markham, less that a three-year
supply. There is also a shortage of market-ready and undeveloped Business Park
land in the Town. The Town has an ample
supply of vacant residential land.
Residential development of the Leitchcroft lands is not necessary to
meet the Town's housing requirements.
Market Considerations: There is a growing
demand for office and prestige industrial land, and there are few market-ready
sites available.
Land Use and Planning: The subject site is
well suited for office use, and it is an opportunity for high-density office
development. Conversion to residential would set a precedent for similar redesignation
applications and is inconsistent with Markham's Engage
21st Century strategic objectives. A balanced mix of
residential/commercial/employment uses is more conducive to live/work
combinations and to rapid transit support.
5. OMB Prehearing Update
The Town Solicitor provided an update
regarding the OMB prehearing conference held on June 14, 2004. A second
pre-hearing conference has been scheduled for July 26, 2004 and the appeal
hearing has been set to start on November 24, 2004, despite both the applicant
and the Town indicating to the Board that they did not want to proceed at this
time. Other parties besides the Town and the applicant are involved and will be
part of the negotiations, whether the Town approves the application and the
applicant withdraws the appeal, or not.
The Town Solicitor did not recommend approval
in principle, as issues need to be identified, and details need to be included.
If the Town approves the application, as much detail as possible (such as
maximum number of units, size of the park, and setbacks) should be in the
resolution, otherwise, all the details will be entirely up to the Board. The
Town could lose the right to negotiate, other than site plan issues.
6. Discussion
The following comments were made:
- overall
proposed density is 90 units per acres (1,800 units)
- 407 frontage should be prime business park
use, avoid setting a precedent for other developers to request the same
conversion of use
- Regional figures indicate that York Region has
the poorest live/work ratio -53.8% - and this area has become a residential
area, through incremental amendments. The nature of the development in this
area has changed, and more residential use should be considered
- assessment ratios for
live/work areas is usually 70/30 (residential/non-residential) This provides an
opportunity for a higher ratio, to avoid more residential units that would
result in larger commuter numbers
- this matter was
referred to the Thornhill Subcommittee to seek compromise, however, no
compromises have been achieved
- Council does not have the benefit of a staff
review or report on the proposal, including recent amendments to the plan such
as the increase in the park size, to base an approval on. It would be difficult
to make a decision dealing with parking, maximum number of units, rapid transit
sites, and other details.
- the applicants indicated they are willing to
work out details with the Town before the November hearing, as long as progress
is made, such as the Town's approval of the application
- if the Town agrees
with residential conversion, it was suggested the Town should deny the
application and fight for the details at the OMB. If the Town adopts the
amendment, the details will be worked out between the Board and the applicant.
- Committee
requested tax revenue information for the IBM complex and other similar sites.
7. Recommendation
Moved
by: Councillor G. McKelvey
Seconded
by: Mayor D. Cousens
That the application by 1107656 Ontario Inc. (Times Group) - Leitchcroft Planning District
(OP 03 116474, ZA 03 116428,
OP 03 116476, ZA 03 116428) be referred to Council on June 30, 2004, without a
recommendation.
CARRIED
8. Adjournment
The Thornhill Subcommittee adjourned at 5:00 p.m.