|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Sheila Birrell, Town Clerk |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
same as above |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2005-05-10 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Ward Boundaries |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That staff be directed to prepare a report and by-law adopting new ward
boundaries described on Schedule “A” or “B” attached hereto, to take effect for
the 2006 municipal election.
PURPOSE:
To facilitate the enactment of a by-law authorizing the implementation
of new ward boundaries to take effect for the 2006 municipal election.
BACKGROUND:
Chronology of Events
January 2004 Council Retreat identified
discrepancies in representation by population in current ward boundaries
November 2004 Information
Report to Committee of the Whole
January 2005 Council
Retreat discussed and an option selected
February 2005 Report to
Committee of the Whole and Council requested
further
changes to Wards 4 and 6
March 2005 Council approval of two options
to proceed to a public
consultation
process.
May 2005 Public Consultation
Process completed
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:
The two options that were the subject of the public consultation process
are attached hereto as Schedules “A” and “B”.
The public consultation process included newspaper notices, individual
letters to all Ratepayer Associations, an extensive webpage and two public
meetings held out in the community. The
first public meeting on
proceed. Copies of the official
minutes are attached hereto as Schedule “C”.
A suggestion was raised on the floor at the April 18th
meeting that the boundary of Wards 1 and 2 be extended east of Highway 404. However, a previous Ontario Municipal Board
decision specifically stated that the Highway 404 was to be considered a natural
boundary. The decision went on to
include a comment that residents of Wards 1 and 2 would not be impacted by development
of the area east of Highway 404. Any
impact would rest with the residents of Wards 7 and 8.
A question as to the source of the population information was raised at
the April 18th public meeting and it was agreed information on that
aspect would be included in the final report to Council. The Planning Department advise that the estimates were prepared using
the population projections in the 2004 Development Charges Review. These
estimates are based on applying a standard Town-wide persons-per-unit value to
the projected total units.
The difference between the two options is that Option A includes the
area bounded by
Wards 3 & 4 Population in Options A and B
Ward 2006 2009 2012
Option A 3 29,593 30,229 32,261
4 39,378 43,022 47,649
Option B 3 32,032 32,612 34,593
4 36,939 40,639 45,317
The area in question, bounded by
The current ward boundaries would range from a low of 19,100 to a high
of 40,050 in 2006; from a low of 18,700 to a high of 48,100 in 2009; and from a
low of 19,400 to a high of 56,850 in 2012.
Either Option A or B is an improvement upon the status quo. The current ward boundaries is illustrated in
Schedule “D”.
Option A contains clean lines using major roads and natural barriers to
establish the proposed boundaries.
Option B also establishes the boundaries along major roads and natural
barriers. The population numbers are
slightly more equitable in Option B. A
difference in population of only 11,000 residents (Option B) or 15,000 (Option
A) in an overall projected 2012 population in excess of 276,000 residents is
not significant, particularly as not all those residents will be
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION: (cont’d.)
eligible voters. Staff are of the
opinion that either Option A or Option B can be justified at an Ontario
Municipal Board hearing, based on generally accepted criteria for ward
re-distributions and the extensive public consultation process followed.
A by-law will be presented to Council in June. The Town is required to publish a notice of
passing of the by-law in the newspaper and a 45 day appeal period will
follow. Appeal is to the Ontario Municipal
Board.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
None
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule
“A” – Option A
Schedule
“B” – Option B
Schedule
“C” – Public Meeting Minutes
Schedule
“D” – Current Ward Boundaries
|
|
|
Sheila
Birrell, Town
Clerk. |
|
Andy
Taylor, Commissioner
of Corporate Services |