|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Sales, Commissioner of Fire
and Community Services Stuart Taylor, Director,
Strategic Services |
|
PREPARED BY: |
Mavis
Urquhart, Manager, Environmental Leadership |
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Report to Committee of the Whole on
Pesticide Issue |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Markham Staff report, “Report to Committee of the Whole on
Pesticide Issue”, dated
THAT a meeting on pesticides be held in accordance
with the Council resolution of
THAT recruitment of the four (4) panelists as
identified in this report be completed as soon as
possible;
THAT other experts, as described in this report, be invited
to attend and respond to technical questions;
THAT the Partners in
THAT the cost of the facilitator’s services and any panelists
fees/expenses/honorariums be funded from remaining funds originally identified
for consulting assistance for this issue;
AND THAT the meeting be held either
on November 17th or the 24th, contingent upon the panelists
and moderator’s availability.
PURPOSE:
To report back on matter of a pesticide
meeting as directed by Council.
BACKGROUND:
On
“That the deputations from Mr.
G. Forman, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, and Ms. S.
Merson, York Region Environmental Alliance in support of a Pesticide by-law in
Markham be received;
And that the Markham Staff
report entitled Pesticide By-law-Town of
And that Staff proceed with
the preparation of a draft Pesticide By-law, with options from other
municipalities, to restrict “non-essential” use of pesticides based upon the
precautionary principle and utilizing research undertaken by the City of
Toronto regarding the potential health impacts associated with pesticide use;
And that the Region of York
Medical Officer of Health be requested to supply an
opinion on the use of pesticides to the Town of
And that a Town Hall meeting
be convened at the earliest possible date incorporating a facilitator and an
expert panel to be comprised of four (4) persons to outline the pros and cons
of implementing a Toronto style Pesticide By-law and other options from other
municipalities, following which input will be invited from residents;
And that the cost of a
facilitator’s and panel members' services, to an upset limit of $25,000, be
funded from the 2005 operating budget approved for Pesticide-Free parks;
And that the Town of
And that the Minister of the
Environment be requested to take leadership to uniformly
and consistently address the issues of “non-essential” use of pesticides on
lawns and gardens by homeowners and local applicators in urban municipalities
across the Province”.
A
copy of the correspondence from the Region of York Medical Officer of Health
respecting the Region’s position is appended to this report (Appendix 2).
DISCUSSION:
The proposed meeting would be in accordance with the
above resolution. The facilitator would:
Potential panelists have been contacted using the
original list of suggested panelists and Councillor
input. Appendix 1 is a list and brief description of candidates that staff has
contacted and their responses. Staff
suggests that from the list of 7 willing panelists, the following individuals make
up the panel:
1. Debbie Conlon, Urban
2.
Final selection of panelists would have to be subject
to confirming their schedules and availability.
City of
The format of the meeting in accordance with the
Council recommendation and discussions to date would be:
·
Welcome
by Mayor Cousens/Councilor Shapero, Chair of Environmental Issues Committee
·
Purpose
of the meeting by Facilitator
·
Brief
Overview of Markham’s pesticide reduction program to date/Brief Overview of
other municipal by-laws by Town staff
·
Each
panelist has 10 minutes to present their perspectives
·
Open
the session to questions and answers from the floor (about 1 hour)
·
Wrap
up (including next steps) and adjourn
A stakeholder’s list has
been prepared and public notice will be provided with the assistance of Corporate
Communication staff. The proposed timing for the meeting is either November 17th
or the 24th. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Staff will use the stakeholder list and background
information already prepared for this project to the greatest extent possible.
Staff recommends that remaining funding identified for
the purpose of holding a public meeting be approved to cover the cost of a
facilitator, as described in this report, and any compensation for the
panelists.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The following
Business Units are directly affected:
|
|
|
Stuart Taylor Director of Strategic Services |
|
Jim Sales Commissioner of Fire and Community Services |
APPENDICES:
Appendix 1 – Potential
List of Panellists/Others
Appendix 2 -
Letter from Region of
APPENDIX
1
Potential Panelists Contacted
The following shows
the individuals that have been contacted to participate on the panel and their
responses.
PANELISTS IN FAVOUR OF
REGULATION
1. Dr.
Sheila Basrur - Ontario Chief Medical Officer of
Health. Not Available.
2. Dr. Lesbia Smith - Physician and consultant in risk assessments.
Not Available.
3.
Dr.
Kathleen Kerr -
4.
Micheleine Levesque – Environmental consultant with Solutions,
Alternatives, Environment, a consulting firm in Quebec that specializes in
pesticide by-laws and frameworks for their application; in training of
horticultural and green space professionals; and in sustainable green spaces.
She is an expert in pesticide reduction strategies and plant health care and
has written/collaborated in the writing of by-laws in
5.
Gideon
Forman - Executive Director, (or other representative depending on
availability) - Canadian Physicians for the Environment.
6.
Cheryl
Shour – Environmental
consultant, with expertise in Organic Lawn Care. Lead author of
7.
Mark Mackenzie, President of the Organic Landscape
Alliance (or other
representative depending on availability) which promotes 100% organic
methods and products for caring for gardens. It is a non-profit trade
association that is committed to the development of organic horticulture. Yes.
PANELISTS NOT IN FAVOUR OF REGULATION
1.
Jill Fairbrother – Scotts Canada (leading lawn care and garden
company). No response.
2.
Debbie
Conlon – Executive Director, Urban
Pest Management Council who has been involved through most of the pesticide
debates and was involved in the appeal process regarding the City of
3.
Jackie
Fraser – Executive Director of AGCare and an individual who has been monitoring this issue
from an agricultural perspective. AGCare (Agricultural Groups Concerned about Resources and
the Environment) is an ad hoc committee that provides public communications and
initiatives on crop protection and related environmental matters. Yes.
4.
OTHER EXPERTS