FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE MEETING

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Jim Sales, Commissioner of Community Services and Fire     

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

 Alan Wolfe, P.Eng. Project Consultant

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

2004-June-14

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Proposed Schematic Design for the Centennial Community Centre Expansion and Indoor Bocce Courts

 

 

 


 

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT this report entitled “Proposed Schematic Design for the Centennial Community Centre Expansion and Indoor Bocce Courts” be received;

 

1) CENTENNIAL COMMUNITY CENTRE EXPANSION

AND THAT Council approve the Schematic Design of the Centennial Community Centre Expansion including a two-floor addition, with a new fitness centre and fitness studio, a multi-purpose room, an exterior translucent ramp, renovations of existing area to accommodate new change rooms, and renovations of the lobby as presented in Alternative 3a) by Oleson, Worland_Taylor Smyth Architects;

 

AND THAT Council authorize the architect to proceed with the Design Development;

 

AND THAT Council approve the approximate size of this project as follows:

 

New Construction   23,185 square feet

Renovated Area      16,150 square feet

Total                        39,335 square feet

 

AND THAT Council approve a Schematic Design cost estimate for the New Construction and Renovation as summarized below:

 

 

 

New Construction

 
Renovation

 

Total

Construction    

$5,903,100

$2,738,600

$8,641,700

Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment

$   220,000

$   85,000

$   305,000

Internal*          

$   685,000

$   250,000

$   935,000

TOTAL

$6,808,100

$3,073,600

$9,881,700

*Internal costs include:  Architectural fees, signage, security, insurance, & move-in expenditures

AND THAT Council approve the following funding sources for the New Construction ($6,808,100):

 

         Previously approved capital proj. (4987 & 5047)           $4,080,300
         Development Charges Reserve Fund                              $1,120,607
         General Capital Reserve                                                 $   124,512
         Non-Development Charge Sources                              $1,482,681
                                        Total New Construction                  $6,808,100

 

AND THAT Council approve the Renovation project cost estimate of $3,073,600 for consideration in the 2005 (tax-funded) Capital Budget;

           

                                                

AND THAT Council approve the project schedule detailed below with a proposed opening date for the project of December 1, 2006;

 

Activity                              Target Completion Date                     Council Approvals

Schematic Design               June 30, 2004                                    Council Approval

Design Development          October 1, 2004                                 Site Plan Approval

Contract Documents           February 15, 2005

Tendering Process              April 1, 2005                                      Council Award Contract

Construction Start               May 15, 2005

Construction Complete       October 1, 2006    

Opening                              December 1, 2006                              Council Open Expansion

 

AND THAT Council endorse the Public Input process that includes two public meetings to be held during the Design Development of the project to be held at Centennial Community Centre;

 

AND THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to amend the architectural services contract based on the proposed increased scope of the building program and to execute the architect’s agreement;

 

2) PROPOSED ADDITION OF INDOOR BOCCE COURTS 

 

AND THAT Section “2” of this report regarding providing additional recreational square footage for indoor bocce courts within the Centennial Community Centre Expansion project be received;


AND THAT If Council approves including recreational area for indoor bocce courts within the Centennial Community Centre Expansion project that the following recommendations be adopted:

·        that the Schematic Design of the Centennial Community Centre indoor bocce courts of 11,045 square feet including four international size courts located side-by-side, viewing areas, and a social area as presented in Alternative 3c) by Oleson, Worland_Taylor Smyth Architects as endorsed by the Building Steering Committee be approved;

·        that a funding source for the $1,953,600 cost of the additional area be from non-DCA sources, including a significant contribution from the Bocce Club, be identified based on the options listed in this report;

·        and that the Bocce Club be required to enter into an operational agreement with the Town for the operation of the Bocce Courts.

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to obtain Council approval of the Schematic Design of the Centennial Community Centre Expansion. The report will also discuss the provision of additional recreation area to be used for indoor bocce courts and the options available to fund the courts. The report will also establish a Schematic Design cost estimate, a project schedule, a public input process for the project, and an increase in the architect fees.

 

BACKGROUND:

On September 17, 2002, Council adopted a report that approved hiring an architect to design an expansion of Centennial Community Centre and that established an Executive Steering Committee (ESC) for the project. The Executive Steering Committee was requested by Council to review the project to expand Centennial Community Centre to determine if there were opportunities for some of the recreational components to be located elsewhere.

 

The ESC met to discuss the options for relocating some of the components to other locations. As part of these discussions, a report from Poulos and Chung entitled ‘Centennial Community Centre Expansion Assessment of Parking Demand On-Site Parking Supply, Access and Circulation’ was presented to the committee. This report recommended a parking lot design that would accommodate the proposed expansion.

 

Subsequently, on the January 28, 2003 Council adopted a report that endorsed the parking lot design as recommended in the Poulos and Chung report. Council added a recommendation to the report that requested staff to review options for the including additional recreation area for indoor bocce courts at Centennial Community Centre.

 

Based on the Recreation and Cultural Services Department (Recreation Services) preliminary assessment of their requirements, a Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued for the architectural services to design and construct an 18,000 square foot (sf) addition including a new fitness area and a new multi-purpose room, 6,500 sf of renovations of the existing area to accommodate new change rooms, and a reconstructed parking lot. It also requested that methods to improve the lobby and administrative area be explored and that a feasibility study for the addition of recreation area to accommodate indoor bocce courts be conducted.

 

After a comprehensive competition, Oleson Worland_ Taylor Smyth Architects (OWST) was engaged to provide architectural services for this project on October 30, 2003. They immediately began working with Recreation Services staff to establish the building program for the expansion.

 

 

OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:

 

1)                  CENTENNIAL COMMUNITY CENTRE EXPANSION

 

1.1)     The Architects have met with Recreation Services staff to determine a building program for the project.

The architects met several times with the Recreation Services staff to determine the required building program and possible schematic layouts.

 

It was determined that it would be desirable to include the following building components:

·                    New fitness centre including a fitness studio and new change rooms

·                    A multi-purpose room/small gym

·                    Renovated pool change rooms that include family change rooms

·                    Renovations to the lobby that would improve the reception area, improve customer flow, enhance security and provide a more customer-oriented administration area

 

The multi-purpose room identified for this project will be utilized as a small gymnasium for active and passive programming. Recreation Services staff has identified a strong demand for a facility of this nature and anticipate that it would be heavily utilized.

 

1.2)     The Architect developed alternative Schematic Designs for consideration of the       Executive Steering Committee.

Based on these program requirements and the size requirements defined in the RFP, four alternatives were developed for consideration of the Executive Building Steering Committee (ESC). The associated drawings are included in Appendix “A”. The four alternatives originally presented are summarized below:

 

Alternative 1 – Single-Floor Addition including new fitness centre and studio, renovation of existing change rooms and with no changes to existing lobby.

            Size

New Construction – 11,730 sf

Renovated Area    -    8,900 sf

TOTAL                    20,630 sf


 

Alternative 2 – Single-Floor Addition including a new fitness centre and multi-purpose room, renovation of existing change rooms and with minimal changes to existing lobby.

Size

New Construction – 16,950 sf

Renovated Area    -    9,430 sf

TOTAL                     26,380 sf

 

Alternative 3 – Two-Floor Addition including a new fitness centre and second floor fitness studio, renovation of existing change rooms, an exterior translucent ramp, and changes to lobby.

Size

New Construction – 18,150 sf

Renovated Area    -  10,765 sf

TOTAL                     28,915 sf

 

Alternative 3 a) – Two-Floor Addition, including a new fitness centre and fitness studio, renovations of existing change rooms, multi-purpose room, an exterior translucent ramp, and complete renovations of the lobby.

Size

New Construction - 23,185 sf

Renovated Area    - 16,150 sf

TOTAL                    39,335 sf

 

1.3)    ESC endorses Alternative 3a) as the Schematic Design for the Centennial Community Centre Expansion.

Alternatives 1- 3 were generally within the building program areas specified in the RFP for this project. However, these alternatives do not meet all of the identified program requirements. Alternative 1 does not include the multi-purpose room. Alternative 2 does not include a fitness studio. Lastly, Alternative 3 does not include the multi-purpose room. Furthermore, Alternatives 1 and 2 do not improve the lobby area and do not allow for future expansion or improvements.

 

The fourth alternative referred to as Alternative 3a) incorporates all the program requirements identified by the Recreation Services staff. Although this option substantially exceeds the building program areas identified in the RFP it meets the program requirements of the community and results in a facility that will meet the operational requirements for a modern community centre.

 

On this basis, ESC endorsed Alternative 3a) as the Schematic Design for the Centennial Community Centre Expansion.

 

It should also be noted that in addition to the major elements mentioned above the recommended Alternative 3a) also includes the following features:

·                    Windows to allow for more natural light into the pool

·                    Public washrooms within the lobby

·                    A training room for the swimming pool

·                    An outside fitness area adjacent to the fitness studio

·                    A relocated Pro shop within the lobby 

 

The roof above the fitness centre could be developed into a green roof for the additional cost of $75,000 but is currently not included in the building program. The project does not include any renovations or improvements to the second floor Penalty Box lounge, second floor meeting rooms or the swimming pool viewing area

 

1.4)      The architect has developed an architectural approach to the expansion that meets the Town’s urban design requirements.

A description of architect’s conceptual design is included as Appendix “C”. The Town Architect has reviewed the conceptual architectural design and is satisfied that it meets Town urban planning guidelines. The ESC also supports the proposed conceptual architectural design.

Once the Design Development is complete, the detailed design of the building will be submitted for a complete site plan approval process.

 

1.5)      A schedule for the project has been developed with a proposed completion date of December 1, 2006.

The proposed project schedule is summarized below. It indicates Council approvals required during the process.

Activity                              Target Completion Date                     Council Approvals

Schematic Design               June 30, 2004                                      Council Approval

Design Development          October 1, 2004                                  Site Plan Approval

Contract Documents           February 15, 2005

Tendering Process               April 1, 2005                                      Council Award Contract

Construction Start               May 15, 2005

Construction Complete       October 1, 2006    

Opening                              December 1, 2006                               Council Open Expansion

 

The construction will proceed in three phases. The first phase will include constructing the new fitness centre and change rooms. The second will include renovating the existing change rooms and fitness centre to accommodate new public change rooms and the renovations to the lobby.

Lastly, the multi-purpose room and the bocce courts will be constructed. 

 

This schedule will permit the facility to remain open during the construction. The pool change room renovation will be scheduled to coincide with the August/September maintenance closing of the pool. If this is not feasible, the pool may have to be closed for a period.

 

Progress on this schedule will be reported to the new Building and Parks Construction Committee (BPCC) on a regular basis.

 


1.6)      Once Council approves the Schematic Design, a public meeting will be held to obtain public input into the design of the project.

The public has been consulted throughout the planning process through the Recreation, Culture and Library 1998 Master Plan, which is currently being updated. Recreation staff members maintain a close contact with all affected user groups and have reflected user group requirements in the program development and the Schematic Design. It should be noted that fundamental design components have been established and no major design alterations can be considered without major cost and delay ramifications. The public input process will contribute valuable suggestions for design details that can be incorporated as part of the Design Development without significantly increasing the costs.

 

A public meeting will be held at the Centennial Community Centre to discuss the schematic design and receive suggestions. The Schematic Design will be displayed at the community centre for two weeks prior to the meeting. All user groups will be invited to the meeting. The meeting date will be posted prominently in the community centre. It will be advertised on the Markham Page of the Markham Economist and Sun. All suggestions from the meeting will be documented and presented to the BPCC. The committee will determine which of the suggestions will be incorporated into the design.

 

In addition, the design will be presented to the Accessibility Committee for their review and comments.

 

A second Public meeting will be held once the Design Development is completed to report back to the participants on the status of their suggestions.     

 

2)            PROPOSED ADDITION OF INDOOR BOCCE COURTS

 

2.1)      A brief  summary of  bocce within the Town is provided below. 

There are currently 8 outdoor bocce courts in the Town. There are four courts in Springdale Park, which are not being used.  There are four courts at Milliken Mills Park, which are used infrequently.

 

The Markham Bocce Association and the Markville Bocce are currently operating indoor bocce courts in the Town. Both clubs lease indoor space in industrial units for their courts. During discussions regarding a previous expansion to the Centennial Community Centre in the early 1990s, the Markham Bocce Association requested that bocce courts be included in the proposed expansion. Rather than include bocce courts as part of the Town’s building program, the Town provided financial assistance to the Markham Bocce Association. The financial assistance was provided from 1991-1993. Currently, both of the Bocce Clubs operate without Town financial support.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.2)        Staff is reluctant to recommend including any additional Development Charge (DC) funded recreation square footage at Centennial Community Centre over and above what was identified in the building program as Alternative 3(a) totalling 23,185 sf.

An additional 11,045 sf of space for recreational use was not included in the original building program for Centennial Community Centre Expansion in the 1999 Development Charge By-law, whether it be for Bocce or any other recreational use. The inclusion of any additional square footage in this project beyond Alternative 3(a) will reduce the square footage allocated to future planned recreational complexes slated for Central East and South East Markham. Furthermore, adding any additional square footage will reduce the funding envelope for DC funding available for the proposed future facilities that are in service growth areas.

 

For these reasons, Staff is reluctant to recommend including any additional DC funded recreation square footage at Centennial Community Centre over and above what was identified in the building program as Alternative 3(a) totalling 23,185 sf.

 

Although recreation square footage for the proposed bocce courts is currently under consideration in the new Development Charge By-Law, the proposed overall building program far exceeds the amount that can be financed utilizing development charges. It will not be possible to fund the bocce courts using development charges without reducing the area identified for other facilities such as the Central East or the South East community centres. Consequently if the bocce courts were to be approved by Council, the funding source would need to come from a non-DC source. The funding options available are discussed in detail in Section 2.7) of the report.

 

  

2.3)        The ESC establishes the design requirements for the proposed indoor bocce courts     and the level of commitment of the Bocce Clubs to the facility

The ESC established a sub-committee consisting of Councillor McKelvey, Commissioner Sales, and Recreation Services staff to determine Bocce Clubs’ level of commitment to the facility as well as their requirements for the location of the courts, and the general design criteria for bocce courts.

 

The sub-committee held a meeting with the presidents of Markham Bocce Association and Markville Bocce to discuss these items. The results were as follows.

 a) Club Commitments

·                    The Bocce Clubs agreed that they would merge into one club.

·                    They committed to enter into agreement with the Town to operate the facility. The agreement would include a financial contribution from the clubs based on their current costs to lease space for the courts. However, they did not include an offer for a capital contribution to the facility.

·                    They have also indicated that they will be actively promoting the sport of bocce. In addition, they have indicated a willingness to share the facility with other compatible sports (for example, lawn bowling).

 

 

b) Location criteria

·                    In a central location, for the convenience of the existing Bocce Clubs members

·                    In an active location, that allows for high visibility of the sport to encourage participation

·                    Construction should proceed in the near future, as their current lease is expiring

·                    Combination with an existing project, in order to share common facilities (washrooms, parking etc.) and minimize overall costs

c) Design criteria

·                    Four international size courts located side-by-side

·                    Ground level location

·                    Viewing and social areas surrounding the courts

 

 2.4)      The ESC was satisfied with the level of commitment demonstrated by the Bocce Clubs to the operations of the proposed courts.  

The Bocce Club have agreed to enter into an operational agreement with the Town for the operation of the bocce courts. The courts will operate independently from the Town. The financial contribution will fund the operation costs of the courts. However, the financial commitment currently does not include a contribution to the capital cost of constructing the facility.

 

The two clubs have agreed to merge into one club which will result in a more efficient operation and make it feasible for the clubs to operate one centralized bocce court facility.

 

Lastly, they have agreed to promote the sport and to permit other compatible sport groups to utilize the facility. This will ensure the facility has maximum utilization.

 

For these reasons, the ESC was satisfied that the Bocce Clubs have demonstrated a sufficient commitment to operate the courts to make the construction of the bocce courts feasible.

 

2.5)     The ESC confirms Centennial Community Centre as the appropriate location for the bocce courts.

Based on the above criteria ESC reviewed the suitability of Centennial Community Centre as a location for the bocce courts. After careful consideration of other possible locations, the committee concurred that the Centennial Community Centre met the location criteria and was the best location for the bocce courts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.6)      The BPCC endorses Alternative 3 c) as the best option to accommodate indoor bocce courts with the Centennial Community Expansion project.

The architect developed and presented alternatives to the ESC for locating the bocce courts on both the north and south side of the arena, alternatives 3a) and 3b). Both of these alternatives were 7,800 sf.  These alternatives did not meet the Bocce clubs requirements. Consequently, the architect was requested to develop an alternative with four courts located side-by-side on the ground level adjacent to the multi-purpose room on the north side of the arena as requested by the Bocce Clubs.

 

A second meeting was arranged with the Bocce Clubs. Deputy Mayor Frank Scarpitti, Councilor George McKelvey, Commissioner Sales, the Project Manager, the Architects, and a number of officials of both Bocce Clubs attended this meeting.

 

The Architects presented a Schematic Design containing four side-by-side courts, viewing areas, and a social area, (see Alternative 3 c). The courts were located on the north side of the arenas adjacent to the multi-purpose room. They were connected to the community centre and shared washrooms and some common areas. This alternative expanded the area to 11,045 sf.

 

The Bocce Clubs were very pleased with this alternative and confirmed it met all their requirements. They also agreed to confirm in writing their commitment to merge into one club and to enter into an operating agreement with the Town. A copy of their letter is included as Appendix “B” of this report.

 

The proposed location of the bocce courts would encroach into the current GO Transit parking area and displace approximately 50 parking spaces. These spots can be replaced by expanding the parking lot in the area between the existing parking lot and the railway track. The east limit of the current GO Transit parking area will be shifted to provide an equivalent number of locations. Furthermore, the existing layout of the GO Transit parking area will also have to be modified to accommodate the new building. An amendment to the GO Transit parking agreement will have to be negotiated if the bocce courts proceed.

 

A number of trees will have to be relocated into the remaining grassed area between the parking lot and the railway tracks.

 

The proposal to construct the new bocce courts was presented to the April 16, 2004 meeting of the new Building and Parks Construction Committee (BPCC). The BPCC endorsed proceeding with the bocce court project as described above.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.7)        There are four options available to fund the construction of the facility

The cost estimate for the Centennial Community Centre bocce courts includes facility and parking lot construction, internal costs and furniture, fixture & equipment costs totalling $1,953,600.

 

Construction Costs                                                       $1,733,600
Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment Costs                    $     40,000

Internal Costs                                                               $   180,000

                        Total                                                                             $1,953,600

 

It should be noted that there are cost efficiencies achieved by constructing the bocce courts as part of the Centennial Community Centre Expansion rather than as a stand-alone facility.  The facility will share the entrance, washrooms, and walls, mechanical systems, parking, and viewing areas with the community centre. This results in a 50% savings in cost over constructing a stand-alone facility.

 

The four options available to fund this facility are discussed below.

 

a)      Development Charge based funding

The additional recreational square footage required to accommodate the bocce proposal can be financed by development charges. However, given the funding limitations of the Development Charge Act, using development charges to fund square footage for activities such as bocce courts will divert funding from core activities such as pools, arenas, youth or senior programming or gym space that are being proposed in the Recreation, Culture and Libraries Master Plan.  Therefore, funding bocce courts through development charges will reduce the square footage of space allocated for the proposed Central East and South Central community centres, which are unserviced growth areas, by 11,045 square feet, totaling $1,953,600.

 

Utilizing development charges as the sole funding source will be precedent setting and will provide the opportunity for other organizations, such as curling, gymnastics, etc., to request development charges funds to support their respective facilities.  This would further compound the issue of reducing the square footage of development charges funds for the proposed two new community centres.

 

b)      Tax based funding

Tax based funding includes providing funds in the annual capital budget that would be funded from the tax rate or from reserves. Funding the courts in this manner will result in stress on the tax rate or deplete the limited reserves available.

 

c)      User based funding

This option requires the clubs to make a significant financial contribution to the capital cost of the courts to reduce the amount of development charge funding or tax based funding required for the project.

 

Bocce is not considered to be a core recreational activity in the new Master Plan. However, the Master Plan does recommend partnerships with community clubs to construct facilities on Town property.  These partnerships would be based on the clubs agreeing to provide a significant financial contribution to capital cost of constructing the facility as well as the clubs agreeing to pay for the operating cost of the facility.

 

The User based funding option is the preferred option for funding of the bocce courts as it is consistent with the principles established in the Master Plan, minimizes the reduction to the development charges available for the South East and South Central community centres or the amount of tax based funding required, and does not set a precedent for fully funding of other clubs.

 

d)         Combination of the above

This option would consist of a combination of the three options discussed above.

  

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

1)      The funding sources for the projects have been determined.

The project cost estimates for the recommended Schematic Design for the Centennial Community Centre Expansion project, and for the bocce courts project are included as Appendix “D”.

 

The total project cost estimate for each of these components of the project are listed below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


1.1)            New Construction

This cost estimate includes the total project cost for the new construction required to expand the community centre including the new fitness centre, small gymnasium and site work necessary to accommodate the expansion.  The total cost for the site work, which includes reconstructing, expanding, reconfiguring, and landscaping the parking lot area to suit the expanded facility, is $715,000.  However, $190,000 is included in the Roads capital improvement program and will be shown as a "RENOVATION" cost.  The balance, $525,000 ($715,000 - $190,000) is attributable to the new construction.

 

The preliminary cost per square foot allowed in the Development Charge Background Study (DC Study) is $229.69.  As outlined in Table A, on the next page, the cost per square foot in the cost estimate for new construction is $293.64.  This represents an increase of $63.95 per sf ($293.64 - $229.69) over the DC Study cost per square foot.  Over the 23,185 sf area of the new construction, higher cost per sf results in costs totalling $1,482,681 ($63.95/sf * 23,185 sf) in excess of the DC Study.

TABLE A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Thus, of the $6,808,100 cost for the new construction, $1,482,681 exceeds the preliminary DC Study average.  It is not recommended that the $1,482,681 be funded from development charges as this may bring the development charge reserve into a deficit position and may not be fully recovered in the next DC by-law period.  The balance, $5,325,419 can be funded 90% ($4,792,877) from development charges, 10% ($532,542) from the General Capital Reserve.

 

Two capital projects, totalling $4,080,300 (90% DC:10% General Capital Reserve), have previously been approved for the Centennial Community Centre Expansion project.  As outlined in the table below, an additional $2,727,800 is required to fund the new construction component of the Centennial Community Centre Expansion.  The $2,727,800 will be funded from DC's ($1,120,607), General Capital Reserve ($124,512) and the balance ($1,482,681) from a non-development charge source.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


1.2) Renovations

The renovations cannot be financed from the development charges and will have to be funded 100% from taxes. Therefore, the amount of  $3,073,600 will be included as a project for consideration with the 2005 (tax-funded) Capital Budget.

 

1.3) Bocce Courts

The cost estimate for the Centennial Community Centre bocce courts includes facility and parking lot construction, internal costs and furniture, fixture & equipment costs totalling $1,953,600. 

 

As outlined in Options/Discussion section (section 2.7 on page 10), the $1,953,600 required for the bocce courts have four possible funding sources:  Development Charges, Tax based funding,  User based funding and/or a combination of the other options.

 

2)               Architect fees increase due to increase in scope of project.

The amount of the architectural fees awarded to OWST was $319,000. These fees were for an expansion of 18,000 sf and a renovation of 6,500 sf as defined in the RFP. It was indicated in the RFP that this project would be completed in December 2004.

 

The project recommended in this report consists of an expansion of up to 34,230 sf and renovation of 16,150 sf and the projected completion date of December 1, 2006.

 

The fee proposal submitted by OWST provided for a fee calculated on the basis 6% of the increased construction estimate cost. This amount would cover the architectural fees including structural, electrical, and mechanical sub-consultants for additional work not included in the RFP. This amount did not include for the speciality sub-consultants required for the project.

 

As the scope of the project has not been finalized at the time the report was prepared,

it is recommended that Finance, and Operations and Asset Management staff be given the authority to negotiate the additional fees with the architect based on the final scope of the project and the provisions in the RFP discussed above.

 

Once these negotiations have been completed, it is recommended that the Mayor and Clerk be given authority to approve the increased fees and to execute the architect’s agreement.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The Recreation and Culture Services Department, Strategic Services Department, Finance Department and the Urban Design Section of the Planning Department have been consulted in the preparation of this report.

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Appendix “A” – Centennial Community Centre – Drawings of the Alternatives

Appendix “B” -  Letter of Commitment – Markham Bocce / Markville Bocce Club

Appendix “C” - Description of Architect’s Conceptual Design 

Appendix “D” – Project Cost Estimates

 

 

 

 

Barb Roth, Director

Recreation and Cultural Services

 

 

 

Stan Bertoia, P. Eng.

General Manager Construction and Utilities

 

 

 

Peter Loukes, P. Eng., Director

Operations and Asset Management

 

Jim Sales, Commissioner

Community and Fire Services

Q:\Commission Share\Operations and Asset Management\Reports\2004\C & U\Report_to_FA_Schematic_Design_for_the_Centennial_Community_Centre_Expansion June 14 Final.doc