|
Town of REPORT TO FINANCE AND
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE |
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and
Members of Council |
|
|
FROM: |
John Livey Chief
Administrative Officer |
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Rick Dominico Manager,
Corporate Quality Department |
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2004-08-30 |
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Results of
2004 Staff Satisfaction Survey |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report “Results of 2004 Staff Satisfaction Survey” be received.
PURPOSE:
The Town’s quality journey began in late 1996 with the
formation of the Markham Management Model and an organizational assessment to
identify corporate areas for improvement. The Management Model was created
using the National Quality Institute’s Framework for Excellence as a guide.
Their four level Progressive Excellence Program
provides recognition to organizations who have demonstrated success at meeting
the criteria for each of the stages of the quality journey.
The Markham Management Model provides the framework for how
this organization operates and successful application of the practices
contained in the Model contributes to our corporate goal of organizational
excellence. A key component of the Model is the measurement of satisfaction and
This program was initiated in 1998 and was repeated in 2000, 2002 and recently in May/June of 2004. During the period May 17 to June 2, 2004 615 employees of The Town of Markham completed the Staff Satisfaction Survey. Ninety-five percent of the respondents were full time staff. After completion of the surveys, the survey data and comments were captured and analyzed for this report by Bench Strength Inc. The results of this year’s survey will be shared with all staff through department meetings and posting on the internal intranet site. Overall, the results reflect a decline from the 2002 survey, with more areas demanding attention and improvement than in previous surveys. Some of the specific highlights of the Staff Satisfaction Survey include:
Overall staff participation rate: 73% (615 employees)
Top scoring items include:
Item # |
Subject |
Mean |
86 |
I provide a high level of service to my customers. |
4.46 |
84 |
My work group provides a high level of service to its
customers. |
4.26 |
88 |
In my work group, staff go the
extra mile to make sure our customers get what they need. |
4.23 |
75 |
I can clearly identify the immediate customers for my
work. |
4.22 |
85 |
My work group’s services are delivered in a timely
fashion. |
4.10 |
72 |
My co-workers are committed to doing quality work. |
4.02 |
46 |
In my work group, staff do not give up when things get tough. |
4.00 |
36 |
The Town of |
3.99 |
87 |
In my work group, customers can easily find the right
staff to deal with their situation. |
3.98 |
Low scoring 2004 items included:
Item # |
Subject |
Mean |
66 |
In my work group, unplanned priorities often disrupt
normal activities and add to our workload.
(Please elaborate below) |
1.99 |
30 |
I am satisfied with the performance management system. |
2.64 |
32 |
In the last six months, time pressure at work has not
caused me worry, “nerves”, or stress. |
2.71 |
28 |
My compensation package is fair in terms of my
responsibilities and level of contribution to the Town. |
2.79 |
10 |
In my work group, employee morale is high. |
2.81 |
69 |
Over the last two years there has been improvement in the
timeliness and effectiveness of the performance management system. |
2.88 |
51 |
Effective actions have been taken in my work group to
improve in the areas identified in the last staff survey. |
2.89 |
52 |
There is an appropriate level of communication between my
work group and other work groups. |
2.98 |
54 |
Over the last two years there has been improvement in
inter-departmental communication and co-operation. (Please comment below) |
2.98 |
Overall satisfaction of staff with
the Town of
|
1998 |
2000 |
2002 |
2004 |
Overall
Satisfaction with Town |
62% |
67.6% |
78% |
70% |
Improvement Plans
Leaders workshops occurred in late June to provide Directors and senior managers with an overview of the Town results and to provide specific results for their respective departments. Each Department is required to identify and select two or more specific areas for improvement that pertains to their unit, along with feedback on Town-wide improvement areas related to workload and communication between departments. This process is to include all staff in the department, with improvement plans established by the end of September. Regular progress reporting on these plans will be managed by the Corporate Quality Department. Where appropriate, departments that have a significant number of potential improvement areas will receive facilitated support from outside of their department. Areas identified for this assistance are:
· CIO’s Office
· Fire and Emergency Services
· Operations
· Waterworks
· Roads
· Parks
· Human Resources
Town-wide improvement areas have been identified as follows:
Performance Management System
Workload and its impact, including unplanned priorities
Use of Town’s customer satisfaction measurements
Inter-Departmental communication and cooperation
Management practices
These areas have been listed as corporate operational priorities for 2005 and the CAO and Commissioners Committee (CCC) will be leading and tracking the implementation efforts for each of these priority areas. An external review of the performance management system is under way, specific management practices are being identified for potential improvement, and all staff are being asked for their specific feedback on the workload and communication/cooperation areas. The results of the upcoming citizen satisfaction survey will be used to respond to the customer satisfaction area.
The Markham Management Model is a key component of the Quality Services through Quality People initiative and includes a strong focus on improvement measurement for both staff and external customers. The results of our fourth staff satisfaction survey provide the organization and specific departments with direction for improvement efforts that will assist the Town with its goal of Organizational Excellence.
FINANCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
No financial implications are to be considered in this
report.
___________________________ ________________________
Rick Dominico John Livey
Manager, Corporate Quality Chief Administrative Officer