FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services

Jim Sales, Commissioner of Community Services

Andy Taylor, Commissioner of Corporate Services

Catherine Conrad, Town Solicitor

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Murray Boyce, Senior Project Coordinator, Policy and Research

for the Interdepartmental Working Group on Second Suites

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

November 8, 2004

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Recommended Town Procedures for Inspecting and Registering Two Unit Houses

 

 

 


 

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT the staff report entitled “Recommended Town Procedures for Inspecting and Registering Two Unit Houses”, be received.

 

AND THAT Council approve the recommended Town regulations for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses as outlined in this report, notably that:

(a)  the Fire Services Department continue to act as “Lead” Department for the inspection and registration of “grandfathered two unit houses”;

(b) the Town’s By-law for Registration of Two-Unit Residential Occupancies (By-law 308-97) be amended to:

- incorporate a new definition of “two unit house” and “residential unit” consistent with the

  provincial government’s definition; and

       - require that prior to registration,  every dwelling unit in a two unit house shall be inspected to ensure that it complies with all relevant standards determined to be applicable, as set out in the Ontario Building Code, the Ontario Fire Code,  the Fire Protection and Prevention Act, and

        the applicable Zoning By-law and the Property Standards By-law, all as amended from to time;

(c)  the Town’s Fees and Charges By-law (By-law 2002-276) be amended to:

      - recognize that the $300.00 inspection fee for a two unit house compliance includes a maximum of “4” Fire Services inspections after which an individual inspection fee of $75.00 per hour or part thereof  will be applied at the discretion of the Fire Chief or delegated Fire Services staff;  and

      -require an additional inspection fee of $300.00 for each unit in excess of the main and the second dwelling unit.

(d)  a new Two Unit House Declaration Form as set out in  Appendix “A” be approved for use by 

      the Building Standards Department in qualifying “grandfathered” two unit houses;

(e)  funding in the amount of $6000.00 be approved from the Development Services Commission operating budget for consulting services for AMANDA set-up and training support for   the managers and staff assigned from Fire Services Department, Building Standards Department, and the Clerks Department (By-law Enforcement) to coordinate administration of “grandfathered” two unit houses;

(f) the procedural flowchart as set out in Appendix “B” be approved as a template for an enhanced  process for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses and enforcement of illegally established units;

(g)  Corporate Communications be authorized to publish an in-house public information sheet specifically for owners, landlords, architects, engineers, builders and general contractors, for use as a guide to inspection and registration of “grandfathered” two units houses;

 

THAT the necessary  funding be considered  in the 2005 Operating Budget for staff resources (including fire prevention, by-law enforcement and prosecution administrative staff) and training support to implement the enhanced procedures, recommended in this report;

 

AND FURTHER THAT staff from the Development Services Commission (Building Standards), Corporate Services Commission (By-law Enforcement), and Community Services Commission (Fire Services), be directed to implement the actions outlined in this report and provide a status report on the delivery of enhanced procedural changes for “grandfathered” two unit houses to the CAO and Commissioners in six months time.

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to outline recommended actions for enhancing current Town procedures for inspecting and registering eligible “grandfathered” two unit houses in Markham.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

In 2002, Markham Council decided to explore options for regulating second suites in the Town.  Second Suites are more commonly known as basement apartments, accessory apartments or two unit houses, and are currently not identified as a permitted use in the Town’s Zoning By-laws.  Some two unit houses have been legally established through exemptions resulting from previous provincial legislation.

 

The number of second suites in Markham is increasing, notwithstanding that second suites are generally not permitted.  The Town undertook a review to determine if granting zoning permission for these units could improve the life safety of tenants and homeowners, assist Markham residents in complying with Fire and Building Code requirements and increase the stock of affordable housing.  Options considered by the Development Services Committee included enhanced procedural changes respecting inspection and registration of legislated “grandfathered” two unit houses only and enforcement of illegal units, as well as options to introduce new zoning provisions Town wide that would identify the types of buildings best suited to accommodate second suites and appropriate development standards and parking requirements for buildings containing second suites.

 

At its meeting of March 23, 2004, the Development Services Committee received a staff presentation on strategy options and endorsed, in principle, enhanced procedural changes for legislated “grandfathered” two unit houses only, as a base condition for a preferred strategy.  These procedural changes do not alter current zoning provisions for second suites.  In particular, the Committee requested that staff provide a joint report on implementation of the enhanced procedures for “grandfathered” two unit houses, including further detail regarding staffing implications, to the Finance and Administrative Committee. 

 

The recommended procedural enhancements are consistent with the priorities identified by Council through previous presentations and discussions of strategy options for second suites. The emphasis for the future delivery of a strategy will continue to be life safety.  The Fire Services Department will continue to be identified as “Lead” Department given that the future role of the Building Standards with regard to registering “grandfathered” two unit houses will be limited to confirmation of zoning compliance only and possibly a building permit application for renovations to an existing “grandfathered” two unit house or to re-establish a “grandfathered” two unit house.  Compliance with Zoning and Property Standards will be addressed in a number of areas.  Most important will be a consistent inspection, enforcement and registration process that will coordinate the enforcement of zoning and property standards by By-law enforcement in support of registering eligible “grandfathered” two unit houses and removing illegally established units.

 

The enhanced process is initiated by “complaint” or “voluntary request”.  It is to be in response to identified issues of life safety and enforcement of zoning and property standards violations.   Adopting this protocol will clarify the Town’s intention to only permit two unit houses where exempted by previous provincial legislation and where full compliance of life safety, zoning and property standards can be achieved. Overall, a priority for the enhanced procedures is to improve customer service and it is recommended that a communication component be developed to inform and educate the public on the Town’s Regulations for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses.

 

At this time, it is recommended that Council approve the recommended Town regulations for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses as outlined in this report. 

 

A further report comparing the enhanced procedures to a possible strategy option to introduce new zoning provisions Town-wide for second suites will be presented to the Development Services Committee later this month.  At that time, staff will seek further direction from the Committee, on the timing and scheduling of a public information meeting of the Committee to explore possible strategies for second suites in Markham (i.e. a strategy that would apply the base condition of enhanced procedures for “grandfathered” two unit houses only as recommended in this report compared to a strategy that would apply zoning provisions for second suites Town-wide).

 

BACKGROUND:

 

A Second Suite in a dwelling is the same as a Two Unit House

A second suite is a common name for a two unit house, a basement apartment, an accessory apartment, an apartment in a house, and a two unit dwelling or occupancy.  Second suites can be controlled by development and safety standards established by the Province/Town and administered by the Town  such as the Planning Act, Municipal Act, Building Code and Fire Code regulations and any other legislated exemptions (i.e. Bill 20 – the Land Use Planning and Protection Act).  Currently, second suites are not permitted or defined in the Town’s zoning by-laws.  However, two unit houses are deemed to be permitted where exempted by previous provincial legislation. 

 

A two unit house consists of two “residential units” each with the following characteristics:

·        a

self contained set of rooms in a building or structure;

·        is used, or intended for use, as a residential premises;

·        contains kitchen and bathroom facilities that are intended only for those of that unit, and

·        has a means of egress to the outside of the building, which may be a means of egress through another residential unit.

 

If a house contains more than two “residential units” or two lodging units which are not self

contained (ie. occupants of more than one unit must share a kitchen or bathroom), then the house

would not be considered a two unit house.

 

Provincial Legislation Respecting Two Unit Houses

Changes in provincial policy and legislation respecting two unit houses have occurred with changes in provincial government bodies.

 

In 1994, the NDP provincial government passed the Residents Rights Act (Bill 120) which took away municipal zoning authority to prohibit two units in detached, semi-detached and townhouse dwellings located in zones which permit residential use. To be considered legal, a two unit house has to meet applicable building, fire and planning standards. The intent of the Residents Rights Act was to create more opportunities for the creation of new apartments in houses and the legalization of existing ones.  However, it should be noted that the Residents’ Rights Act also clarifies that municipalities do not have the authority to license private, self contained dwelling units.

 

 

 

In 1996, the PC provincial government passed the Land Use Planning and Protection Act (Bill 20) which restored the municipal zoning authority to determine where two units houses are permitted and what standards apply, but concurrently “grandfathered” all two unit houses which had been established as a result of Bill 120 and were “in use or occupied” on November 16, 1995. Bill 20 also allows municipalities to set up a registration system for two unit houses.  Inspection may be required as a precondition of registration and municipalities may charge a one-time fee to cover costs of registration and inspection.

 

   The intent of the Land Use Planning & Protection Act was to set out a new framework for municipal planning authority over two unit houses.   However, it should be noted that the Planning Act currently does not give municipalities the power to restrict two unit houses to cases where the owner lives on the premises.

 

Provincial Legislated Exemptions

Bill 20 “grandfathers” two unit houses established under the Provincial legislation (Bill 120) prior to Nov. 16,1995 (or those suites established after May 22, 1996, where the building or change of use permit for installation was issued on or before that date). Where “grandfathered”, two unit houses continue to be permitted in all zones which permit residential use, subject to Bill 120 planning rules and municipal zoning standards as modified by Ontario Regulation 384/94.  Where these standards apply, no municipal planning document shall, among other things, prohibit exterior alterations required for installation of a second unit, require a minimum floor size or floor area for the units or require that the property on which the two unit house is located have more than two parking spaces.

 

Two unit houses created prior to the introduction of Bill 120 in 1994 are included as being “grandfathered” as long as they were permitted by Bill 120 and the physical structure of the suite was in existence on November 16, 1995. “Grandfathering” makes a two unit house a permitted use in a residential dwelling. It is not necessary for the two unit house to be in existence continually for this entitlement to be preserved.  Failure to meet safety standards does not affect the “grandfathered” status, however, the owner is responsible for ensuring compliance with Building Code, Fire Code, and the Fire Protection and Prevention Act in order for the two unit house to be considered legal.

 

 

 

Markham’s Planning Policy and Procedural Issues

The Official Plan permits accessory apartments in association with single detached and semi-detached dwellings provided that, among other things, all the requirements of the zoning by-law, Ontario Building Code and property standards can be satisfied.  No geographic restriction on location of accessory apartments is identified. Density provisions respecting accessory apartments are not addressed.

 

In August 1999, Council endorsed an approach to qualifying and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses and enforcement of non-complying two unit houses. This approach anticipated:

·     Fire Services would qualify and register “grandfatheredtwo unit residential occupancies under the Town’s Registration  By-law (308-97);

·      proof would be required to confirm that a two unit house physically existed on Nov. 16, 1995;

·      Fire Services would also enforce the Fire Code;

·      Building Standards would process permits for qualifying two unit houses and maintain a database on two unit houses; and

·      By-law Enforcement would prosecute non-complying two unit houses.

 

 

The procedures followed today are focused on Fire Code issues.  Staff have been able to provide at best a “coping” response to the legislated zoning exemptions for two unit houses and the mandated organizational responsibility to ensure residents are provided with fire safe accommodation.

 

A review of  current procedures determined that:

·     two unit houses are not routinely inspected for compliance with Building Code and Property

     Standards;

·     the burden of proof that a two unit house qualifies for legislated zoning exemption is not rigorous;

·     not all involved Departments share a common records system for monitoring Town activities regarding two unit houses;

·     building permits are not  being issued retroactively for  pre 1996 “grandfathered” two unit houses;

·      “stoves on wheels” makes enforcement against illegal two unit houses difficult;

·     current procedures are not consistent with provisions of the Town’s Registration By-law; and

·      no information is readily available to the public on two unit house procedures.

 

In June 2002, the Development Services Committee directed staff to report on a strategy for second suites.  Over the past two years, an interdepartmental working group comprising staff from Planning and Urban Design, Fire Services, Legal, Building Standards, By-law Enforcement, and Corporate Communications, has met frequently to advance and present strategy options for the Committee’s consideration.

 

 

Direction on a Strategy for Second Suites

At its meeting of March 23, 2004, the Development Services Committee received a staff presentation on strategy options for second suites and endorsed, in principle, enhanced procedural changes for legislated “grandfathered” two unit houses only, as a base condition for a  preferred strategy. In particular, the Committee requested that staff:

·     provide a joint report on implementation of the enhanced procedures for “grandfathered” two unit

     houses, including further detail regarding staffing implications, to the Finance and Administration

     Committee;

·     provide a further report to the Development Services Committee on issues and a possible strategy

     option for the introduction of new zoning provisions Town-wide for second suites; and that

·     after reporting back, identify, for a further decision by the Committee, a schedule for holding a public information meeting to discuss  possible strategies for second suites in Markham (i.e. a strategy that would apply the base condition of enhanced procedures for “grandfathered” two unit houses only compared to a strategy that would apply  zoning provisions for second suites Town-wide).

 

DISCUSSION:

As of January 2004, the Fire Services Department has conducted over 1200 property inspections and registered approximately 500 “grandfathered” two unit houses Town-wide.  This report to the Finance and Administration Committee will address in detail eight recommended actions to implement enhanced procedural changes for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses.  A further report comparing the enhanced procedures to a possible strategy option to introduce new zoning provisions Town-wide for second suites will be presented to the Development Services Committee later this month.  At that time, staff will seek further direction from the Committee, on the timing and scheduling of a public information meeting on the strategy options for second suites.

 

Enhanced Procedures for Two Unit Houses

The Development Services Committee has endorsed in principle, eight recommended procedural changes as they apply to the inspection and registration of “grandfathered” two unit houses only:

 

1.      Clarify definition of Two Unit House

2.      Introduce new declaration form

3.      Fire designated as “Lead” Department

4.      Commitment to AMANDA reference system

5.      Amendments to Registration By-law

6.      Consistent Inspection/Enforcement/Registration Process

7.   Communication Component

8.      Budget/Resource Requirements

 

These procedural changes were developed by an interdepartmental working group in response to the current policy and procedural issues identified by staff and have been endorsed by the CAO and Commissioners.  The working group acknowledges that the successful implementation of these enhanced procedures will require the commitment and coordination of several departments.  As such, those Departments directly involved in the delivery of the enhanced procedures have been consulted and participated in the formulation of this joint report to the Finance and Administration Committee.

 

1.  Clarify Definition of a Two Unit House

The definition of “dwelling unit” is not consistent in the Town’s zoning by-laws or the Town’s 1997 registration by-law for two unit residential occupancies.   Furthermore, at the provincial level there is an inconsistency in the definition of “dwelling unit” found in the Ontario Building Code and the Ontario Fire Code with the definition of “residential unit” found in the Section 76 transitional provisions of the Planning Act respecting “grandfathered” two unit houses.   The provincial definition of “residential unit” provides the greatest clarity for interpreting whether or not a two unit house exists or not.  On this basis, staff are recommending that the Town’s registration by-law be amended to better reflect the provincial definitions of a residential unit and two unit house. 

 

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Town’s By-law for Registration of Two-Unit Residential Occupancies (By-law 308-97) be amended to replace the existing definition of “two unit house” and “dwelling unit” with the following:

two unit house” means a detached house, semi-detached house or a rowhouse where there are 

  two residential units.

residential unit” means a unit that,

  -   consists of a self  contained set of rooms located in a building or structure;

  -   is used or has the capability of being used as a residential premise;

  -   contains kitchen and bathroom facilities designated for the exclusive use of its occupants; and

  -   has a  means of egress to the outside of the building, which may be a means of egress 

      through another residential unit.

 

2.      Introduce a New Declaration Form

It is important to emphasize that not all existing two unit houses would qualify for “grandfathering”. Many two unit houses have been established illegally since November 16, 1995.   In such cases, there is little or no incentive for the owner to come forward and voluntarily comply with current regulatory and life safety requirements (i.e. apply for a zoning by-law amendment to permit the use). 

 

Alternatively, when complaints are filed on an illegal two unit house there is often an attempt by the owner to qualify the house as a “grandfathered” two unit house. This raises the importance of determining exactly when a two unit house was created. Unless a building permit or change of use permit was issued, it is often difficult to determine when a second unit was created (whether before or after the date the new legislation is introduced).

 

To qualify as a Bill 20 “grandfathered” two unit house the onus is placed on the owner to demonstrate that the two unit house existed under the Provincial legislation (Bill 120) and was in use or occupied (i.e. physical structure of dwelling consisted of two-units) prior to November 16, 1995 (or that the second unit was established after May 22, 1996 where the building permit or change of use permit was for installation was issued on or before that date).  Owners are required to provide some form of proof, such as invoices for construction, proof of tenancy (such as income tax returns) and must swear an affidavit.

 

 

 

In practice, regulating approval of  grandfathered” two unit houses has proven to be a difficult task.  Declarations completed by owners do not consistently verify the date of the second unit occupancy in the house but rather, only that second unit existed at the time of purchase of the house.  No further proof of conformity with legislative standards is currently  being required.

 

Staff are recommending that an increased emphasis be placed on the applicant demonstrating proof that the two unit house qualifies for “grandfathering”.  To accomplish this, staff are recommending that a stronger and more substantiated declaration form be submitted to the Zoning Division of the Buildings Services in support of qualifying “grandfathered” two unit house.  A copy of the draft Declaration Form is attached in Appendix “A”.  The updated declaration form includes the new definition of a two unit house.  In addition to declaring that two residential units were existence on a property on November 16, 1995, a qualified individual will also provide one or more pieces of supporting evidence (i.e. a cancelled rent cheque, a lease or rental contract, etc) as further proof of the existence of the two unit house on November 16, 1995.

 

Recommendation:

It is recommended that a new Two Unit House Declaration Form as set out in Appendix “A” be approved for use by the Building Services Department in qualifying “grandfathered” two unit houses.

 

3.  Fire Services designated as “Lead” Department

 

Substantial discussion took place at the working group level on which Department should be designated the “lead” for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses.   Given most complaints respecting second suites are centred around zoning by-law or property standards violations, staff reviewed whether it would be in the Town’s best interest to assign By-law Enforcement as the lead Department especially in the event the second unit is determined to be illegal and should be removed.  At the same time, staff took into consideration Council’s priority for life safety and determined that it was neither practical nor appropriate for By-law Enforcement to carry out initial inspections on complaints.  Currently, the Town does not have an internal property standards by-law that would allow By-law Enforcement legal entry to inspect the interior of a dwelling.  The Fire Services Department is the only Department that can gain access legally (without a search warrant) to determine the status of a complaint.  Staff are recommending that the Fire Services Department continue to be designated as “Lead” Department, supported by new and improved procedures respecting shared use of AMANDA data files and a coordinated approach to inspection and registration of “grandfathered” two unit houses and enforcement of illegal units as set out in this report.  Fire Services will continue to register two unit houses which meet all registration by-law requirements.

 

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Fire Department continue to act as “Lead” Department for the inspection and registration of “grandfathered “two unit houses.”

4.  Commitment to AMANDA reference system

Not all involved Departments have shared a common records system for complaints and requests related to two unit houses.  The Fire Department’s “Computer Aided Dispatch” (CAD) system is not compatible with the Town’s AMANDA system.  Consequently, the Fire Department has been using a separate registration tracking system in excel and forwarding it to the Building Department and By-law Enforcement Division for entry onto the AMANDA system.  As a result, not all of the Town’s Departments share the most current information on the status of a two unit house.

 

 

New Fire Department access to the AMANDA system will provide a central Town reference system for sharing up to date real time records of complaints, requests for inspections, orders, declarations, permits, registrations, etc.  The AMANDA folder created by the Fire Department will include processes assigned to Buildings Standards and By-law Enforcement and ensure proper tracking of responses by individual Departments so that a consistent corporate response to administering complaints or requests for inspection, enforcement, or registration of two unit houses can be achieved.

 

An initial 3-5 week start-up period will be required to:

·        Develop and set-up the required folders;

·        Establish the folders types;

·        Test the folder types;

·        Develop the functionalities;

·        Establish folder links; and

·        Insert the established correspondence.

 

Staff are recommending that AMANDA set-up and training support be provided for the various Departments participating in the inspection and registration process.

 

Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that funding in the amount of $6000.00 be approved from the Development Services Commission operating budget for consulting services for AMANDA set-up and training support for the managers and staff assigned from Fire Department, Building Standards Department, and By-law Enforcement Division of the Clerks Division to coordinate administration of “grandfathered” two unit houses.

 

5.      Amendments to Registration By-law

Current procedures are not consistent with provisions of the Town’s By-law for Registration of Two-Unit Residential Occupancies (By-law 308-97).  The Registration By-law requires full compliance with Fire Code and Building Code, but currently two unit houses are only inspected for Fire Code compliance.

 

In practice,

not all two unit houses are routinely inspected for compliance with Ontario Building Code and Property Standards resulting in current procedures inconsistent with the legislative intent of Bill 20 and the requirements of the Town’s Registration By-law.  The current process may pre-empt certain inspections and compliance requirements as not all complaints/requests received are being filed with Building Standards and By-law Enforcement for full inspection of units to determine compliance with Building Code, Zoning By-law and Property Standards By-law.  

 

No building permits are being issued for existing “grandfathered” two unit houses.  Building Standards is unable to issue retroactive building permits for work completed prior to Nov 16, 1995 without their full knowledge and inspection record.

 From a safety perspective, the Fire Code and the Fire Protection and Prevention Act can be applied at any time after the unit was constructed.  However, unless there is an original record of a building permit on file, it is not possible to issue a building permit retroactively for the construction of the second unit. This has undermined the registration by-law requirement to ensure that safe construction standards are being met through compliance with the Building Code.  As a result, some two unit houses are being registered without confirmation of compliance with all applicable standards and regulations.

 

Staff are recommending that the Registration By-law be further amended to require compliance with the Building Code, where determined applicable, and the applicable Zoning By-law and Property Standards By-law prior to registration of a two unit house.

 

Schedule ‘A’ to By-law 308-97 identified a fee requirement of $300.00 for inspection for compliance and all subsequent inspections and a one time registration fee requirement of $150.00.  In 2002, the Town’s Fees and Charges By-law amended By-law 308-97 to delete Schedule ‘A’.

 

At this time, staff are not recommending an increase of the combined $450.00 inspection and registration fee.  However, staff are recommending that the Town’s Fees and Charges By-law be amended to recognize that a maximum of  “4” Fire Services inspections will be covered by the current inspection fee, after which any subsequent inspection would be covered by an individual inspection fee to be applied at the discretion of Fire Services staff.   In addition, any dwelling units in excess of the second grandfathered unit would not be permitted.  In these instances, staff are recommending that the Town’s Fees and Charges By-law be amended to include an additional inspection fee of $300.00 be collected for each unit in excess of the second grandfathered unit.

 

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Town’s By-law for Registration of Two-Unit Residential Occupancies (By-law 308-97) be amended to require that:

·        prior to registration every dwelling unit in a two unit house shall be inspected to ensure that it complies with all relevant standards set out in (a) the Ontario Building Code where determined to be applicable, (b) the Ontario Fire Code where determined to be applicable,  (c) the Fire Protection and Prevention Act where determined to be applicable, the applicable Zoning By-law and (d) the Property Standards By-law, all as amended from to time.

It is recommended that the Town’s Fees and Charges By-law (By-law 2002-276) be amended to:

·        recognize that the $300.00 inspection fee for a two unit house compliance includes a maximum of “4” inspections after which an individual inspection fee of $75.00 per hour or part thereof will be applied at the discretion of the Fire Chief or delegated Fire Services staff; and

·        require an additional $300.00 inspection fee for each dwelling unit in excess of the main and  second dwelling unit (permission subject to zoning compliance).

 

 

6.      Consistent Inspection/Enforcement/Registration Process 

Complaints related to zoning use and development standards, external property standards and/or compliance with Fire and Building Codes, or requests for registration of a “grandfathered” two unit house, are to be received by the Fire Services, Building Standards, and Clerks Departments and directed to Fire Services for follow-up inspection in accordance with Registration By-law. 

 

However, under certain circumstances, By-law Enforcement and Building Standards have proceeded with inspections of  complaints” relating to zoning or external property standards issues or construction occurring without a building permit on a property with a two unit house on their own prior to notifying Fire Services.  This practice has often resulted in the owner receiving several inspection requests and no coordinated response.

 

A great deal of time was spent by the Interdepartmental Working Group to develop and apply a consistent procedure for:

·        Inspection of two unit houses;

·        Enforcement of applicable code and by-law requirements; and

·        Registration of “grandfathered” two unit houses

 

The results of the working group’s efforts are highlighted in the procedures flowchart attached in Appendix  B”.  The flowchart identifies the proposed inspection and registration process for “grandfathered” two unit houses and the enforcement process for illegal two unit houses.   The process is initiated by “complaint” or “voluntary request”.  It is a responsive process to be undertaken  by the Town in response to identified issues of life safety and enforcement of zoning and property standards violations.   Adopting this protocol will clarify the Town’s intention to only permit two unit dwellings where exempted by provincial legislation and where full compliance of life safety and zoning and property standards is achieved.  A summary of the enhanced inspection, enforcement, and registration process for two unit houses is outlined in Appendix “C”.

 

The Fire Services Department will continue to be identified as “Lead” Department given that the future role of the Building Standards with regard to registering “grandfathered” two unit houses will be limited to confirmation of zoning compliance only and possibly a building permit application for renovations to an existing “grandfathered” two unit house or to re-establish a “grandfathered” two unit house.  Compliance with Zoning and Property Standards will be addressed in a number of areas.  Most important will be a consistent inspection, enforcement and registration process that will coordinate the enforcement of zoning and property standards by By-law Enforcement in support of registering eligible “grandfathered” two units and removing illegally established units.

 

Recommendation:

It is recommended that Council approve the procedural flowchart as set out in Appendix “B” as a template for an enhanced process for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses and enforcement of illegally established units.

 

 

 

 

7.  Communication Component

At present, no information is readily available to the public on two unit house permissions or procedures. There is no support material to educate owners and applicants on procedural requirements respecting inspection and registration of a “grandfathered” two unit house. An opportunity to send clear and consistent information to property owners and applicants is being missed at present.

 

Staff are recommending that a public information sheet be published specifically for owners, landlords, architects, engineers, builders and general contractors for use as a guide to inspection and registration of “grandfathered” two units house.  The information sheet will be written in user friendly language and presented in a simple format similar to the series of Building Inspections information sheets currently available at the Buildings Standards counter. This brochure could be distributed through postal-drops in selected wards, by Fire and Bylaw staff and will be available to pick up at the Civic Centre and to download from the website.  Consideration will be given to translating information into other languages.

 

Corporate Communications will also implement a public education program to promote the need and the process for registering two-unit dwellings.  Information will be included on the Markham Town Page in the local papers and on the Town website. Cost for the brochure production, delivery and translations is estimated to be $5,000.00.

 

 

 

Recommendation:

It is recommended that Corporate Communications be authorized to publish an in-house public information sheet specifically for owners, landlords, architects, engineers, builders and general contractors for use as a guide to inspection and registration of “grandfathered” two units house. 

 

8.  Budget and Resources

The successful implementation of an enhanced “complaint” or “voluntary request” initiated process for “grandfathered” two unit houses will require the commitment and coordination of several departments.   Budget and staff resource implications for each of the three Commissions are outlined below.

 

Budget/Resource Impacts:                                Existing                         Proposed

Fire Services                                                 1 staff               3 additional staff

By-law Enforcement                                      minor                            2 additional staff

Court Administration                             minor                            minor **

Communications                                               no impact                     minor

Building Standards                                         minor                            minor*

Legal                                                                minor                            minor

Planning (Committee of Adjustment)                 minor                            minor

* - $6000 in consulting services for AMANDA set-up and training support

** - minor in 2005 but could increase and require additional staff for 2006

 

Fire Services has advised that at least two Fire Prevention Officers along with at least one clerical staff member will be required to keep pace with the disposition of the existing stock of two unit houses.  These Fire Prevention Officers and the Clerical position salary costs could be recoverable from the inspection fees payable to the Town.  By-law Enforcement would require two additional staff members if they were to participate in the proposed enhanced corporate response to inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two units houses and enforcement of illegal units.  Also, Building Services would require a one time funding allocation of $6000.00 for consulting services for AMANDA set-up and training support.

Senior staff from all three Commissions have reviewed the proposed budget and funding scenarios and are in agreement with the recommendation that they be presented to Council for consideration as part of the 2005 Operating Budget.

 

Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that the necessary funding be considered in the 2005 Operating Budget for staff resources (including fire prevention, by-law enforcement and court administrative staff) and training support to implement the enhanced procedures recommended in this report.

 

CONCLUSION:

It is recommended that Council approve the recommended Town regulations for inspecting and registering “grandfathered” two unit houses as outlined in this report.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

Staff from the Fire Services, Building Standards, Clerks (By-law Enforcement), Planning and Urban Design, Legal and Corporate Communications were consulted on the recommendations/actions outlined in this report.

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Appendix ‘A’ - Proposed Two Unit House Declaration Form

Appendix ‘B’ – Proposed Inspection/Enforcement/Registration Process Flowchart

Appendix ‘C’ - Proposed Inspection/Enforcement/Registration Process for Two Unit Houses

 

 

 

__________________________________                _________________________________ 

Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P                                           Jim Sales,

Commissioner of Development Services                        Commissioner of Community Services

 

 

___________________________________              _________________________________

Andy Taylor,                                                                Catherine Conrad,

Commissioner of Corporate Services                            Town Solicitor

 

Report Document:Q\Development\Planning\MISC\MI464\f&aNov8-2004

Appendix A Document:Q\Development\Planning\MISC\MI464\f&aNov8-2004AppendixA

Appendix B Document:Q\Development\Planning\MISC\MI464\f&aNov8-2004AppendixB (excel)

Appendix C Document:Q\Development\Planning\MISC\MI464\f&aNov8-2004AppendixC