Finance & Administrative Committee

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Andy Taylor, Commissioner of Corporate Services

Barb Cribbett, Treasurer

Joel Lustig, Director of Financial and Client Services

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Kevin Newson, Purchasing Manager

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

December 6, 2004

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Revisions to Purchasing By-Law 143-2000

 

 

 


 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT the report entitled “Revision to Purchasing By-Law 143-2000” dated December 6, 2004 be received;

 

AND THAT the Town of Markham By-Law 143-2000 be repealed in its entirety and be replaced in accordance with this report.

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to replace Purchasing By-law 143-2000, originally approved by Council in August 2000. The rationales for the changes are to improve the efficiencies of the purchasing process as well as ensure compliance with the Procurement Requirements of Section 271 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001.

 

BACKGROUND:

Section 271 of the Municipal Act, 2001 requires that Municipalities adopt procurement policies prior to January 2005. The Act defines a number of goals and circumstances under which municipalities should have clear policies to govern. For the most part the Town’s existing By-law meets the guidelines recommended in the Act. 

 

Staff began meeting with Operating Departments in 2003 to discuss Purchasing By-law 143-2000. The focus of these meetings was to obtain input and gain support for enhancements to the purchasing process. All Commissions offered recommendations for improvement, believing a more efficient procedure would greatly assist the time and effort required to process acquisitions. Further to these meetings, staff reviewed thirteen other Ontario municipal purchasing by-laws to determine best practices. The By-law reflects the improvements determined through this process.

 

OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:

 

Contract Award Authorities

The dollar thresholds that determine whether an acquisition requires a formal quotation have been increased.

 

The following chart outlines the proposed changes in cost levels.

 

                                                     Present                                     Proposed

Request for Quotation            less than $25,000                        less than $100,000

Formal Quotation                  $25,000 to $50,000                    replaced w/ Req. for Quotation

Request for Proposal             greater than $50,000                   greater than $100,000

Tender                                  greater than $50,000                   greater than $100,000

 

The proposed improvements are the same as the Region of York’s revised Purchasing By-Law, which was adopted at their Finance and Administrative Committee on November 4, 2004.    See attached Appendix “A” for a comparison of bid limits and award authorities of various municipalities.

 

Request for Quotation

This process permits an informal request for at least three quotations for specific goods or services. Bid responses can be submitted in writing, email or transmitted by facsimile. Currently Request for Quotations are used for items less than $25,000.  It is proposed that Requests for Quotation be called for the purchase of all acquisitions below $100,000, which would eliminate the need for Formal Quotations, RFP’s and Tenders for items less than $100,000.  Although not new in practice, this process was not clearly defined in the existing By-law.

 

The purchase of items for less than $100,000 represents approximately 41% of the Purchasing and Operating Departments’ procurement activities. This represents considerable resource allocation yet only 5% of the dollar value of items purchased.  Requests for Quotation for items that cost less than $100,000 will significantly streamline this process, reducing current delays and permit Purchasing staff the ability to better allocate their time to service their customers and develop new sources of supply.

 

Consultants and Professional Services

This section of the By-law has become redundant as the definition of goods and services now incorporates Consultants and Professional Services.

 

Disqualified bidders list

The current Purchasing By-law has no provisions for disqualifying bidders.  The proposed process will enable the Town to disqualify vendors from bidding on contracts for a period of two years based on properly documented poor performance, non-performance, or conflict of interest. To be included on the list staff must document the infraction and the vendor must be notified in writing. This new process will improve efficiency and productivity by reducing staff time required to evaluate quotations and monitor unacceptable vendors.

 

 

Negotiation of Request for Proposals and Request for Quotations

The current Purchasing By-law has no provisions for negotiating price.  The proposed By-law will enable the Town to negotiate specifications, terms and conditions or price of a proposal prior to the contract award.  This procedure will enable the Purchasing department to receive the best value for the goods and services it procures.

 

Standardization of product

The proposed Purchasing By-law recommends guidelines for the standardization of goods to permit economies of scale as well as reduced maintenance and inventory costs.   This new initiative will permit savings while reducing administrative costs.

 

Expression of Interest

The proposed Purchasing By-law recommends a new process that will enable the Town to conduct market research to better prepare formal bid documents. This procedure will allow Staff to determine product availability, vendor interest and explore new and innovative ideas.  

 

Pre-Qualification section with the ability to create rosters

The proposed Purchasing By-law will enable the Town to qualify suppliers based on their backgrounds, capabilities, resources and the goods or services they are offering. Successful suppliers will be invited to submit bids for a particular requirement or be included on a roster for future bids. This procedure has been improved over the process in the exiting By-law. Rosters will reduce administrative costs and dramatically improve the time required to process purchases while maintaining the integrity of an open competitive bidding practice.

 

Emergency purchase of Real Property

A procedure to give authority to the Chief Administrative Officer to purchase real property when it is deemed to be in the best interest of the Town has been added to the proposed Purchasing By-law. This process will allow the Town to secure real property when time constraints will not permit the regular process.

 

Local Supplier Preference

The proposed Purchasing By-law includes a principle stating that according to the Discriminatory Business Practices Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D.12, preference cannot be given to local suppliers.  This statement clarifies existing legislation to local suppliers.

 

Updating of titles

The proposed By-law updates the definition for the title Director to additionally include General Manager, Treasurer, Town Architect and Deputy Fire Chief.

 

In-house Bidding

The Municipal Act, 2001, requires that procurement policies make provision for in-house bidding. The new By-law accommodates this requirement by stating that the Town will not solicit in-house bids in competition with outside firms.

 

 

Benefits of Changes to the By-law

·        An efficient system for processing purchases under $100,000

·        Through the pre-qualification procedure an improved system for processing most contracts

·        An opportunity for negotiated savings

·        The development of new sources of supply

·        Purchasing will improve its’ customer service with more of their input on larger contracts

·        Compliance to the Procurement Requirements of Section 271 of the Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001.

The proposed changes will not alter the number of reports presented to Council.

 

Expenditure Control Policy

A complimentary policy governing the control of expenses was modified to further streamline processes. The Expenditure Control Policy was changed to improve the procedure for payment of invoices, contract overruns and contingency contracts. The new processes will permit the payment of invoices in a timely manner allowing the corporation to take advantage of discounted payment terms.

 

Conclusion

Staff have reviewed the Town’s existing Purchasing By-Law 143-2000 in light of the requirements of the Municipal Act, 2001 and the recommendations from Operating Departments.  The proposed amendments to the Purchasing By-law are recommended to ensure the By-law remains responsive to the need for timely and responsible procurement of goods and services.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

There are no financial implications associated with the recommendations set out in this report.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

All business units have been consulted and their recommendations have been incorporated in the revised Purchasing By-law.

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Appendix  “A” –     A Comparison of Bid Limit and Award Authorities Between Various Municipalities

 

 

Joel Lustig, Director of Financial and Client Services

 

 

 

 

 

Barb Cribbett, Treasurer

 

Andy Taylor, Commissioner, Corporate Services

Q:\Finance and Administration\Finance\SHARED\2004 Finance_Admin Cttee Reports\0474 Revisions Purchasing By-law 143-2000.doc



Appendix “A”

Tender, Proposal and Quotation Limits Survey

November 25, 2004

A Comparison of Bid Limits and Award Authorities

Regions and Municipalities

Formal Quotes

 

Formal Tender/RFP

Authorization to Award

Durham

>$20,000

<$100,000

>$100,000

  • Manager of Supplies & Services – Quotations
  • CAO - Low Bid
  • Council - RFPs

Halton

>$25,000

<$100,000

>$100,000

  • CAO – Quotations, low tenders and low RFPs

Markham

(current)

>$25,000

<$50,000

>$50,000

·         Department Heads up to $100,000

·         CAO/tenders/RFPs up to $350,000

·         Council over $350,000

Markham (proposed)

<$100,000 Informal Quotation

>$100,000

  • Same as current

Mississauga

<$50,000

Informal Quotation

>$50,000

  • Manager of Material Management – Quotations
  • Dept. Directors – up to $200,000
  • Commissioners – Over $200,000

Niagara

>$25,000

<$50,000

>$50,000

·         Department Heads – Quotations

·         CAO/low tenders/RFPs up to $1 million

  • Council over $1 million

Peel

>$25,000

<$100,000

>$100,000

  • Purchasing Manager - Quotations

·         CAO - Low Bid

Richmond Hill

>$25,000

<$100,000

>$100,000

·         Department Heads – Quotations

·         Council/Tenders/RFPs

Richmond Hill (proposed)

Proposed

>$50,000

<$100,000

>$100,000

·         Department Heads – Quotations

·         CAO/low tenders/RFPs up to $1 million

  • Council over $1 million
Vaughan

>$20,000

<$100,000

>$100,000

·         Department Heads – Quotations

·         Council/Tenders/RFPs

York

<$100,000 Informal Quotation

>$100,000

·         Department Heads – Quotations

·         CAO - Low Tenders

·         $100,000 - $500,000 low RFPs