GENERAL COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Alan Brown, Director of Engineering

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Arup Mukherjee - Manager of Transportation

Phoebe Fu - Senior Transportation Engineer

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

2005-Jan-24

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Regional Road Assumption Criteria

 

 

 


 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the criteria for assumption of roads by the Region of York be endorsed by Council;

 

And that, in the event a road is transferred to the Region, The Region and the Town develop an agreement to establish and maintain the appropriate streetscape and urban design standards to reflect the Town’s objectives;

 

And that the transfer of any Regional roads to the local municipality will be subject to appropriate consultation with local staff and approval by local council;

 

And that Kees Schipper, Region of York Commissioner of Transportation and Works be advised accordingly.

 

PURPOSE:

 

To review the proposed criteria to be utilized by the Region of York to determine if they will accept jurisdiction of local roads.

 

BACKGROUND:

 

The Region’s Official Plan identifies the long-term road network required to support growth in the Region. Some of these roads are currently under local municipal jurisdiction and are anticipated to be transferred to the Region as growth occurs.  In the past, the Town of Markham and other municipalities have requested the Region adopt municipal roads (16th Avenue, 14th

 

 

 

 

Avenue, 9th Line) without specific criteria.  The Region has now developed formal criteria to quantify and identify if a roadway should be transferred to the Region.

 

The Council of the Regional Municipality of York adopted Clause No. 4, report No. 10 (Attachment A) of the Transportation and Works Committee that authorized “copies of this report proposing Regional Road Assumption Criteria be circulated by the Regional Clerk to the Clerks of each of the local municipalities with a request for review and comments by December 17, 2004.” Attachment B shows the road ownership within the Town of Markham for reference.

 

Comments from local municipalities will be considered by the Region prior to formal adoption of the Regional Road Assumption Policy expected this Spring.

 

OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:

 

In discussion with Regional staff, they confirmed that the Region will not assume a road unless the local municipality formally makes a request for assumption. Should the Town wish to transfer a local road to the Region, the Region will consider this request based upon the criteria noted in the Region’s report. It should also be noted that the Region may also use these criteria to determine if a Regional road should be transferred to a local municipality. Prior to the downloading of a Regional road to local jurisdiction, staff recommend that discussions be undertaken with Regional staff with respect to the traffic implications, costs, streetscaping, urban design stands, and any other local issues.  Acceptance of a Regional road will be subject to Council approval.

 

The proposed Regional Criteria for assumption of roads is broken into two categories, rural and urban roads. For each category, a number of criteria were identified to determine if a road meets the requirements for assumption by the Region.

 

Rural Roads

Rural roads were defined as roads that falls outside of urban areas as defined in the Region’s Official Plan Map 5.  The criteria for assumption by the Region are noted as follows:

 

1.      Connects designated rural settlements, having existing major commercial/industrial development or more than 150 persons, to each other and a Regional road or Provincial Highway.

 

2.      Connects a Provincial Highway or Regional road to:

a.   Provincial Highway.

b.   Major commercial and industrial areas.

c.   Major Institutional complexes such as colleges, hospital, etc.

 

3.      Provides service close to consistent major attractors or generators of heavy vehicles.

 

4.      Provides service parallel to and, where justified, crossing major barriers to free traffic movement.

 

5.      Provides service on those roads which are extensions of roads designated as Regional roads in urban areas and then to a Regional road or a Provincial Highway.

 

6.      Provides service on those roads which are extensions of roads designated as Regional or County Roads in neighbouring jurisdictions and, then, to a Regional road or a Provincial Highway.

 

7.      Roads should have a current traffic volume greater than 4,000 annual average daily traffic (AADT).

 

8.      Roads should be part of the original concession road grid.

 

In order for a rural roadway to be assumed by the Region, the roadway must satisfy criteria #7 and #8 along with one of the first six criteria.

 

Town staff generally agree with the eight criteria proposed by the Region to designate a Regional road in rural areas.

 

Potential candidates that may meet, in whole or in part, the above criteria now or in the future are:

·        Elgin Mills Road

·        19th Avenue

·        Reesor Road

 

Urban Roads

 

Urban roads were defined as roads that fall within urban areas as defined in the Region’s Official Plan Map 5. The criteria for assumption by the Region are noted as follows:

 

1.      Provides the necessary arterial capacity in a major travel corridor and in general, should be used for inter-municipal traffic.

 

2.      Comprises a reasonable direct and unbroken major traffic route or corridor which connects with major arterial roads or to one or more existing or proposed Provincial Highways at a grade-separated interchange.

 

3.      May include a linkage, existing or proposed, required to cross or circumvent a physical barrier that breaks the logical continuity of the route.

 

4.      Roads should have a current traffic volume greater than 5,000 AADT.

 

5.      Roads should be part of the original concession road grid.

 

In order for a road to be assumed by the Region, criteria #4 and #5 must be satisfied along with one of the first three criteria.

 

Staff generally agrees with the five criteria proposed by the Region to designate a Regional road in urban areas.

 

Potential candidates that may meet, in whole or in part, the above criteria now or in the future are:

·        Esna Park Drive / Alden Road (Woodbine Avenue to Warden Avenue)

·        John Street (Bayview Avenue to Woodbine Avenue)

 

Staff recommend John Street (Yonge Street to Bayview Avenue) be maintained in the Town of Markham ownership due to its heritage nature.

 

Streetscaping/Urban Design

 

Streetscaping and urban design are important aspects that enhance and define the function of a roadway.  These elements help to promote alternative modes, encourage a pedestrian-friendly environment and link the adjacent community with the street.  The Town makes a significant investment to ensure our roads incorporate good streetscape and urban design.  On some roads, these elements are an important aspect of the existing community.  In the event that a roadway is considered for transfer to the Region, it is important that there is an agreement to ensure that an acceptable level of streetscape and design is maintained on the road. 

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

 

The Regional report also outlined the financial implications as a result of assumption.  The report states that municipalities will have a corresponding reduction in the maintenance costs, thus creating some tax room, which should be transferred to the Region. Further analysis by Town staff is required to determine the financial implications for the transferring of road to/from the Region at the appropriate time.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The Operations Department was consulted and provided their consent on this report.

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment A – Regional Road Assumption Criteria – Clause No. 4, Report No. 10 of Transportation and Works Committee.

 

Attachment B – Road Ownership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alan Brown, C.E.T.

Director of Engineering

 

Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Commissioner of Development Services

 

Q:\Development\Engineering\REPORTS\2005\Jan\Regional Road Assumption Criteria.doc