|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Sheila Birrell, Town Clerk |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
same as above |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2005-05-30 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Ward Boundaries |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That a by-law be enacted to adopt new ward boundaries to be effective
for the 2006 municipal election, as outlined on Schedule “A”.
PURPOSE:
To conclude the ward boundary review.
BACKGROUND:
Chronology of Events
January 2004 Council Retreat identified
discrepancies in representation by population in current ward boundaries
November 2004 Information
Report to Committee of the Whole
January 2005 Council Retreat considered
three options: (1) a 4 ward system; (2) an eight ward system; and (3) a nine
ward system and selected an option
February 2005 Report to
Committee of the Whole and Council requested
further
changes to Wards 4 and 6
March 2005 Council approval of two
options to proceed to a public
consultation
process.
May 2005 Public Consultation
Process completed
May 2005 Council approval of new
ward boundaries
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:
At the meeting of Council held on May 10th, Council selected
the final ward boundaries and directed staff to prepare a report and by-law for
presentation to Council in June. At the
Committee of the Whole meeting held prior to Council, two e-mails from an area
resident were tabled. The first e-mail
recommended a four ward system and the second recommended that the areas of
Legacy, Box Grove and the Rouge not be included in the proposed Ward 7 and,
rather in the proposed Ward 5.
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION: (cont’d.)
The resident appeared in delegation at the May 10th meeting
recommending that the areas of Legacy, Box Grove and the Rouge be included in
the proposed Ward 5.
Consideration had been given to a four ward system but rejected in the
early stages of the process. Staff was
directed to narrow the review to the current eight ward system. The resident was advised that Council was
unanimous in the option finally selected.
He was also advised that there are two additional venues where he might
lodge his objections, the first being when the report and by-law go forward to Committee
and Council, and the second through the Ontario Municipal Board. The resident was advised that, in order to proceed
to the O.M.B. level with his objection, it would be prudent for him to bring
forward a recommendation, including reasons that would meet the accepted
criteria.
The ward boundaries being adopted by an enacting by-law meet all of the
accepted criteria for the re-distribution of wards:
Criteria
for Establishing
Or
Re-Dividing
Ward
Boundaries
The council of a municipality in dividing or re-dividing a municipality into wards for the purpose of election shall have regard to the following:
1. Boundaries of wards shall be established so that the number of electors in each ward shall be, as near as possible, the average number of electors calculated by dividing the total number of electors in the municipality by the number of wards.
2. The number of electors in any ward may vary from the average number of electors calculated in (1) where the municipal council is of the opinion that the variance is necessary or desirable because of:
· The presence or absence of a community of interest
· Means of communication and accessibility
· Topographical features
· Populations trends, or
· Special geographical considerations including the scarcity, density or relative rate of growth or
loss of population
Caution was exercised throughout the process to ensure public
input. There were ads placed in the two
local newspapers, individual letters sent to all Ratepayer Associations, an
extensive webpage, and two public meetings held out in the community. In addition, both School Boards were notified
of the review. The only objection
received was by the resident at the May 10th meeting.
The next steps will be the enactment of the by-law on June 7th,
following which notice of passing will be placed in the two local
newspapers. A 45 day appeal period will
follow. Residents who wish to appeal the
by-law must do so within that 45 day period and must file the objection with
the Town Clerk, together with a cheque, payable to the Ontario Municipal Board,
in the amount of $125.00. If no
objections are received, the by-law will automatically come into effect at the
expiry of the 45 day appeal period.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
None
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
Schedule
“A” – Proposed Ward Boundaries
|
|
|
Sheila
Birrell, Town
Clerk. |
|
Andy
Taylor, Commissioner
of Corporate Services |