|
|
|
|
||
|
||
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Peter Loukes P. Eng., Director Operations |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
|
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the report titled “
AND THAT the Region be requested to calculate
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to respond to the
Region’s request to the Local Municipalities for input into the development of a
distribution policy for future WDO funds.
In
February 2004, the Ministry of the Environment approved a five-year blue box
funding plan to reimburse municipalities up to 50% of their net blue box
recycling costs. For various reasons, municipalities actually receive considerably
less than 50% of their net program costs. For 2005, the
Region and the
Since blue box recycling in York Region is a shared responsibility, the Region retains a percentage of the WDO money to fund a capital reserve for the replacement of the new recycling facility and distributes the balance to the Local Municipalities. Currently, funds are distributed based on net program costs, reflecting the WDO’s funding model.
Regional staff have indicated that future WDO funds could be distributed based on program performance and diversion achieved rather than costs, and has asked the Local Municipalities to indicate their preference.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The WDO has stated its intention to move away from a cost based funding program towards a funding formula that provides increased funding to municipal blue box programs that are most cost effective at diverting recyclables from landfill. The funding model is in the process of being re-worked and is expected to reward efficient and high diverting programs in the future.
The WDO has confirmed that the Region of York will receive Blue Box funding totaling $2,714,748 in 2006. The Region will retain 50% or $1,357,374 of this funding and redistribute the balance to the Area Municipalities.
Depending on the response from the Area Municipalities to the Region’s request to indicate a preferred method for funding redistribution, the Region will redistribute WDO funding to the Area Municipalities either on their relative program performance and diversion rates achieved or each program’s relative recycling costs. This report recommends that funding be redistributed based on relative program performance and diversion rates achieved.
Moving from a cost based to a performance
based funding distribution model may result in an estimated initial estimated 2%
reduction in funding in 2006 as 2006 funding is based on 2004 data. In years
2007 and 2008,
Table #1 outlines the estimated impact on
the 2006
2006
WDO PAYMENT
FUNDING SCENARIO |
ESTIMATED PERCENTAGE
SHARE* |
ESTIMATED *2006 WDOPAYMENT |
2006 BUDGET |
Fav./(Unfav.) |
WDO payment based on costs |
35% |
$475,081 |
$450,000 |
$25,081 |
WDO payment based on program performance |
33% |
$447933 |
$450,000 |
($2,067) |
Scenario Difference |
2% |
($27,148) |
|
|
CONCLUSION:
Under the current ‘cost’ based distribution model, Local Municipalities with high operating costs are rewarded without consideration for increasing blue box diversion or implementing collection program efficiencies.
The 2006 Waste Management Operating Budget includes $450,000 for WDO funding revenues. Markham be about $2,000 under budget in 2006 if the Region distributes WDO funding based on program performance and diversion but, will see increased revenues in 2007 and 2008 as a result of the new expanded recycling program.
It is proposed that the Region be requested to distribute WDO funding for 2006, 2007, 2008 based on program performance and diversion achieved.
|
|
|
Peter Loukes, P.Eng. Director, Operations |
|
Jim Sales Commissioner of Community and Fire Services |