|
REPORT
TO GENERAL COMMITTEE – COMMUNITY SERVICES & ENVIRONMENT |
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
FROM: |
Stu Taylor, Director of |
|
|
PREPARED
BY: |
Catherine Harrison, Communities in Bloom Program Manager |
|
|
DATE
OF MEETING: |
2006-Jan-09 |
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Communities in Bloom 2005 – Final Report |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the
staff report entitled “Final Report on the 2005 Communities in Bloom Ontario
Program” be received;
AND THAT
Council approve the participation of the Town of
AND THAT
the Town of Markham extend the contract position for the Communities in Bloom
Program Manager for the period of September 15, 2005 to September 30, 2006;
PURPOSE:
The purpose of
this report is to report on the results of and learning from the 2005
Communities in Bloom
BACKGROUND:
In 2005,
Two
provincial CIB judges visited our community for two days in July and assessed
the entire community – government, business, community groups and residents –
on accomplishments in the eight criteria: community involvement, environmental
awareness, heritage conservation, floral displays, turf and ground cover,
landscaped areas, urban forestry and tidiness.
The judges
commented on
Accomplishments:
|
||
Goal |
Target |
Actual |
Raise Business
Support/In-kind Donations |
$100,000 |
~$48,000 |
Increase
Adopt-A-Parks by 25% |
34 |
34 (as of
Sep-15) |
Increase Susie
Award Participants (from 65) |
100 |
170 |
Deliver Colour Your
Corner Projects |
15 |
10 (As of
Sep-15) |
Deliver
Sustainable School Projects |
4 |
4+ |
Create Awareness
of CIB program** |
Outlined
separately |
Achieved |
Improve
stewardship/tidiness of community** |
Outlined
separately |
Achieved |
Document efforts
in Community Profile Book and ancillary materials |
Prepare CPB and
binders for judges review |
completed |
** Community and
business outreach activities and stewardship/tidiness measurements are detailed
in Appendix B.
Participant Satisfaction
The Town of
Overall
survey results indicated a high-level of satisfaction with the experience of
serving on the volunteer committee. Several suggestions were received for
restructuring the committee to maximize its effectiveness and a number of
program ideas were brought forward to implement in 2006. A copy of the survey
results is attached in Appendix C.
Participant Recognition
In 2006,
In
addition, the following will be instrumental to ensure high scores at the
national competition:
The Judges’ Tour at the national competition will be a full two-day
tour. Many of the tour elements (presentations, air tour, and community
involvement) will be kept from 2005 and built upon. Tour will be expanded to
ensure coverage of the entire community and to harness
As well, enhancing relationships with and participation of local
media will be essential to meeting our community involvement goals. A banner
program will be put in place to promote the program and generate revenue.
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
For the delivery of the 2005 program, $290,000 was budgeted:
$170,000 for parks maintenance—specifically for service level improvements for
shrub beds on roads and at entrances and the installation and maintenance of
perennial beds—and $120,000 for the program manager position,
planning, coordinating, and promotion of the program and the delivery of the
judges’ tour. Actual program spending reflected the need for increased
resources to research, write and produce the Community Profile Book and to
compensate for lower-than-anticipated fundraising during the first year of the program.
Expenditures:
Parks Maintenance 170,000
Personnel (manager
& 1 student) 90,000
Non-personnel 78,000
Total: $338,000
The additional program spending of $48,000 ($338,000 actual - $290,000 budget) was absorbed in the 2005 Community and Fire Services budget. One-time spending of $25,000 in 2005 for research, writing and presentations will not be required for the 2006 program.
For the delivery of the 2006 program, an additional $32,000 was
requested for the
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
See above.
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
None.
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
Participation in the Communities in Bloom program is alighted to the
following corporate goals:
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
Operations, Parks Maintenance
Finance
ATTACHMENTS:
Appendix A – 2005 Evaluation Grid for
Appendix B – Beautification/Tidiness Initiatives and Community
Outreach Activities
Appendix C – CIB Committee Satisfaction Survey Results
|
|
|
Stu Taylor, Director, |
|
Jim Sales Commissioner,
Community & Fire Services |
Q:\Strategic Services\Shared Data\Dept
Wide\Reports\General Committee\CIB FINAL.doc