|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Stuart Taylor,
Director, Strategic Services |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Victoria
McGrath,
Manager, Environmental Leadership |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2006-Jan-23 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Report
on Spending of 2005 Markham Council Grants for Rouge River and Don River
Watersheds |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That the staff report entitled “Report on Spending of 2005 Markham Council Grants for Rouge River and Don River Watersheds”, dated January 23, 2006, be received;
And that Council defer providing further grants to the Don River Watershed until such time as the Don Watershed Regeneration Council reports back on projects completed in Markham using the $75,000 already granted for 2003, 2004 and 2005 which are being held by the Town of Markham in a capital based account.
PURPOSE:
The
purpose of this report is to provide details on how the $50,000 grants,
approved through the annual budget process to fund capital projects in the
Rouge Park and Don Watershed, were spent and what projects were undertaken in
Markham as a result of the grants.
BACKGROUND:
During the 2003 budget process, it was recommended that a grant of
$50,000 be provided annually for
DISCUSSION:
Reporting
Requirement
To ensure accountability, both the Don Watershed Council and the
·
Location
of the Project
·
Monitoring
·
Future
requirements for the Project
Council
committed $25,000 to projects in 2003, 2004 and 2005 to projects located
in the
The attached report Summary
(Appendix 1) from
The Financial Summary
(within Appendix 1) shows that $25,000 from the Town was spent together with
other sources and community “in kind” for the two projects for a total value of
$100,000. This information demonstrates that the
Rouge Park Alliance representatives advise that
ongoing monitoring is being undertaken for these projects. The
Don Watershed
Council committed
$25,000 to projects in 2003, 2004 and 2005 located in the
The DWRC have submitted
a letter each year outlining how they may use the aggregated grants for development
and installation of river crossing signs and potentially a large project (see
Appendix 2). By aggregating the grant funds, the DWRC will have $75,000 to
leverage with other partners to secure additional funding, in addition to the
matching funds provided by the TRCA. The DWRC has therefore requested that the
grant money from 2003, 2004 and 2005, plus any additional funds offered,
continue to be held by the Town of
The Town will be
undertaking the Pomona Mills Creek Erosion Restoration and Habitat Enhancement
Study soon for the Pomana Creek component of the
Prior to issuance of a cheque to DWRC, a report
on the completed project must be presented to General Committee. Staff
recommends that Council wait until the DWRC has implemented projects in
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Funds have been dedicated
for these initiatives in a capital account from taxed based funding. The attached
financial summary from
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
Finance, Planning and Engineering staff have
been consulted in the preparation of this report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Appendix 1 –
Appendix 2 - Letter from
DWRC dated
|
|
|
Stuart
Taylor, Director, |
|
Jim
Sales, Commissioner, Community
and Fire Services |
Q:\Strategic
Services\Shared Data\Environmental Leadership\Reports\2005 Reports\Rouge and
Don grants report to F & A 01 23 06.doc