|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Andy Taylor,
Commissioner of Corporate Services |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Mark Visser,
Manager of Strategy, Innovation & Investments, Corporate Services |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2006-Feb-20 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
2005 Investment
Performance Review |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the report dated
PURPOSE:
Pursuant to Regulation 74/97 Section 8, the
Municipal Act requires the Treasurer to “prepare and provide to the Council,
each year or more frequently as specified by Council, an investment report”.
The investment report shall contain,
(a) a statement about the performance of the
portfolio of investments of the municipality during the period covered by the
report;
(b) a description of the estimated portion of
the total investments of a municipality that are invested in its own long-term
and short-term securities to the total investment of the municipality and a
description of the change, if any, in that estimated proportion since the
previous year’s report;
(c) a statement by the Treasurer as to whether
or not, in her opinion, all investments were made in accordance with the
investment policies and goals adopted by the municipality;
(d) a
record of the date of each transaction in or disposal of its own securities,
including a statement of the purchase and sale price of each security;
(e) such other information that the Council may
require or that, in the opinion of the Treasurer, should be included.
BACKGROUND:
For the year ending
The 2005 budget assumed an average general
fund portfolio balance of $180 million to be invested at an average rate of
return of 3.70%. The actual average
portfolio balance was $180 million and therefore did not factor into the
variance. The higher realized rate of
return on investments contributed to the $530,000 variance.
At the beginning of 2005, the Bank Rate
was 2.75%. It remained at this level
until September. A succession of rate
hikes late in the year saw the Bank Rate close the year out at 3.50%. During
2005, the Town’s investments (excluding Capital Gains) had an average rate of
return of 3.59%; 11 basis points lower than budget. However, through active bond trading, the
Town realized $727,000 of Capital Gains, thereby increasing the actual rate of
return to 3.99%; 29 basis points higher than budgeted. The actual rate of return (including Capital
Gains) accounts for the $530,000 favourable variance.
The average
portfolio balance for 2005 was $180 million, which was on target with the
forecast.
The general
portfolio balance is lower than in pervious years (2004 = $200 million) because
as of
Portfolio Composition
All
investments made in the year 2005 adhered to the Town of
The year-end general investment portfolio
was comprised of the following instruments:
Bonds 44%, Banker’s Acceptances 31%, Banker’s Deposit Notes 19% and Provincial
Promissory Notes 6% (Exhibit 2).
The
Town’s year-end portfolio (all funds excluding DCA) of $197.2 million was
broken down into the following investment terms (Exhibit 3):
2005 (2004)
1 month to 3 months 30.3% (20.2%)
3 months to 1 year 16.9% (22.7%)
Over 1 year 31.5% (36.2%)
Weighted average days to maturity 555.6 days (564.5 days)
Money Market Performance
The Town of
2005 marked the fourth year of an aggressive bond trading
strategy. The 2005 highlights of the program
are as follows:
At
The strategy for 2005 was
to take advantage of the increase in the price of longer term bonds. Throughout the year, the yield curve
flattened significantly (i.e. the difference in yield between one year bonds
and ten year bonds decreased) which allowed the Town to take profits on a
portion of its longer term holdings and placing the funds in shorter term
instruments. The Town will begin to
increase the weighted average to maturity once the 10 year bond yields go back
up in 2006. 2005 marked the most
successful year to date for the Town’s bond trading strategy, resulting in
$727,000 of Capital Gains.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
After the rapid
interest rate hikes by the Bank of Canada in late 2005, it is not expected that
the Bank Rate will change significantly in 2006. The forecast is for both the average
portfolio balance and rate of return to increase for 2006 (although Capital
Gains are not expected to reach the same levels as 2005). The 2006 budget will be based on a $184
million average portfolio balance with an estimated 3.85% rate of return,
resulting in Investment Income of $7.084 million (an increase of $424,000 over
the 2005 budget).
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit
1 – Investment Portfolio by Issuer
Exhibit
2 – Investment Portfolio by Instrument
Exhibit
3 – Investment Terms
Exhibit
4 – 2005 Money Market Investments
Exhibit
5 – 2005 Bond Market Investments
Exhibit
6 – 2005 Bond Market Investments
|
|
|
Barb Cribbett, Treasurer |
|
Andy Taylor, Commissioner, Corporate Services |
Q:\Finance and Administration\Finance\SHARED\2006
General Committee Finance\0603 2005 Year End Investment Report.doc