MUNICIPAL ACCESS AGREEMENTS COMPARISON
WITH OTHER YORK REGION MUNICIPALITIES |
|||
MUNICIPALITY |
|
FEE STRUCTURE |
INFLATION OF FEES (Causal Cost Recoveries) |
|
Yes |
·
(YDUCG ) Standard ·
2010
Agreement Modified for inflation (Attachment ‘A’) |
·
Proposed
Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase for 5 year term of original agreement
(8.5%) ·
CPI
yearly indexing of fees going forward |
Region of |
Yes |
·
YDUCG
Standard (Attachment ‘C’) |
·
CPI/Added
after end of 5 year term |
|
Yes |
·
YDUCG
Standard-modified No sliding scale
for minor application, use blanket charge, under review to change to full
YDUCG Standard |
·
Inflation
Index used |
|
Yes |
·
YDUCG
Standard |
·
Standard
YDUCG template clause allows yearly for
review ·
Not
updated to date |
|
Yes-Not executed
to date |
·
Don’t
now use permit fees ·
Annual
blanket fees ($20,000 for only Bell/Rogers) not covering costs ·
Proposing
YDUCG fees for new agreements, now with their Legal Dept. |
·
standard
new agreement one year term ·
will
review fee annually for inflation ·
will
be looking at using CPI |
|
Yes – Not
executed to date |
·
Proposing
YDUCG Standard ·
Annual
Fee under review ·
Using
$350.00/permit at present |
· Reviewing CPI index as part of new agreements |
Stouffville |
No- looking at
using YDUCG agreement this year, no existing agreements in place |
·
Proposing
YDUCG Standard ·
Not
charging utility fees now |
·
Will
review inflation index ·
Will
be looking for input from others ·
Hope
to execute this summer |
O:\Commission
Share\Operations and Asset Management\Reports\2010\Asset Mgmt\Authorization to
Execute Municipal Access Agreements Attachment B.doc