DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design

Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Teema Kanji, ext. 4480

South District

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

2003-Mar-04

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

PRELIMINARY REPORT

 

 

Abidien Inc. (Best Homes).  Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a technical by-law amendment for lots within draft plans 19TM-97009 and 19TM-98005.

South Unionville Planning District

FILE: ZA.03-106144


 

RECOMMENDATION:

That a Public Meeting be held to consider a Zoning By-law Amendment (ZA. 03-106144) application, submitted by Abidien Inc. (Best Homes) to permit a technical by-law amendment for lots within draft plans 19TM-97009 and 19TM-98005.

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding a rezoning application to permit a technical by-law amendment, and to recommend that a public meeting be scheduled to obtain public input on this application.

 

BACKGROUND:

The lots subject to this rezoning application form part of draft approved plans 19TM-97009 (formerly known as Felice) and 19TM-98005 (formerly known as Pomezia)(Figure 1 and 3), in South Unionville.  The applicant owns both parcels of land, and to date two phases in each plan have been registered.

 

Minor variances consistent with the proposed amendment have already been obtained. 

Over the past year or so, the applicant has received three separate variances for lots within draft plans 19TM-97009 and 19TM-98005.

 

Minor variances were granted for Lots 15-19, Plan19TM-97009 (all single detached lots) to permit garages at the front of the dwelling, whereas the zoning by-law only permits houses with garages accessed from the rear lane (Figure 4).  The intent of the applicable zoning by-law was to ensure that units facing South Unionville Avenue, a major collector road, would only have garages at the rear, accessed from a lane.  The above lots do not face South Unionville Avenue but were adjacent to and could, therefore, utilize the rear lanes required for the units facing South Unionville Avenue.  At the time the zoning by-law was passed (1997) staff and the developer expected that the above units would take advantage of the presence of the rear lanes and the lots were accordingly zoned with the R2-LA zone category which required rear lane access.  The current applicant/builder subsequently acquired the subject lands and through their market research concluded that their preference was to not build rear lane products on lots fronting on local roads.  It should be noted that similar lots fronting on local roads on the adjoining plan of subdivision to the east (Plan 19TM-98005 - Pomezia) were zoned in 1998, at the developer’s request, to permit either front facing garages or rear lane access.   The current applicant/builder applied for and, with staff support, obtained a minor variance in December 2001, which allowed garages at the front for Lots 15-19 on Plan19TM-97009 (see Figure 4).   

 

A minor variance was also granted for Blocks 13-15 (19TM-97009) and Blocks 12-14 (19TM-98005) in July 2002 to permit reduced rear yard setbacks in order to accommodate single car garages attached to the rear of townhouses (Figure 4).   Typically the R2-LA zone category in South Unionville requires a 14.5 metre rear yard setback for the main building from the rear property line/rear lane.  This setback was intended to accommodate both the detached rear lane based garage as well as each unit’s private outdoor amenity space located between the detached garage and the main dwelling.  The applicant proposed a different design with the rear lane garage being attached to the rear of the main dwelling.  In effect, the garage then became part of the main building and was no longer permitted within the rear yard setback.  To accommodate this design the rear yard setback had to be reduced for the applicable lots from 14.5 m to 8.75 m.   

 

Subsequently, in December 2002 the applicants returned with a request for minor variance for additional single detached lots (Lots 20-29) within Plan of subdivision 19TM-97009 to permit garages at the front of dwellings, whereas the zoning by-law required rear lane access (See Figure 4).  At this time the Building Department raised a concern regarding the number of minor variances being granted within the Felice and Pomezia plans of subdivisions noting that it could lead to administrative difficulties in the future when tracking the development standards applicable to these lots.  Staff felt that the requested minor variance was supportable provided the applicant agreed to apply for a zoning by-law amendment to consolidate the minor variances into an amending by-law, for administrative purposes.  The applicant agreed and this requirement and subsequent rezoning was made a condition of approval for the latest minor variance. 

 

Zoning by-law amendment required for administrative purposes

The lands are currently designated Residential in the Official Plan.  The subject properties are currently zoned Residential Two – Lane Access [R2-LA*52 (H)], under By-law 177-96, as amended, which only permits houses with garages with rear lane access (Figure 2).  As noted above, minor variances have been obtained to vary the development standards.  A zoning by-law amendment is required, for administrative purposes, to rezone Lots 15-19, and Lots 20-29 (19TM-97009) to the appropriate zone category that allows garages to be located at the front of the dwelling.  Again, for administrative purposes, a zoning by-law amendment is also required to permit Blocks 13-15 (19TM-97009) and Blocks 12-14 (19TM-98005) to have reduced rear yard setbacks to accommodate garages attached to the rear of the houses.

 

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL:

The anticipated benefits include:

 

 

CONCERNS/ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED:

There are no issues or concerns related to this zoning application.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

There are no financial implications for the Town in this report.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The application was circulated to internal departments (Fire, Building, Engineering, Design, Waste Management), and external agencies for comments.

 

A Public Meeting should be held to obtain input on the proposed zoning amendment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Director of Planning and Urban Design

 

Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Commissioner of Development Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                FIGURE 1

DOCUMENT:             Q:/Development/Apps/Zoning/03106144/DSC_Mar4

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Figure 1:           Location

Figure 2:           Area Context/Zoning

Figure 3:           Aerial

Figure 4:           Lots subject to zoning by-law amendment

 

APPLICANT/AGENT:            Masongsong Associates Engineering                 Tel: (905) 944-0162

                                                c/o Tony Masongsong                                      Fax: (905) 944-0165

                                                1151 Denison Street, Unit 15

                                                Markham, ON

                                                L3R 3Y4