|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of
Planning & Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Margaret Wouters, ext. 2758 Senior Planner, South District |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
June 17, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
PRELIMINARY REPORT Official Plan, Rezoning and Site
Plan Applications by Forest Bay Homes Ltd., to permit an 80-unit Condominium
Apartment Building on the west side of Markham Road, between Highglen Avenue
and Golden Avenue (Part of Lot 4, Concession 7) |
|
|
(OP.03-111462, ZA.03-111480,
SC.03-111481) |
RECOMMENDATION:
That
a Public Meeting be held to consider the applications (OP.03-111462, ZA.03-111480, SC.03-111481) submitted by Forest Bay
Homes Ltd., for Official Plan and zoning amendments at Part Lot 4, Concession
7.
PURPOSE:
BACKGROUND:
The proposal consists of a four-storey, 80-unit condominium apartment building fronting Markham Road (see Figure 4). The main floor units of the building facing Markham Road will have individual access at grade (see Figure 5). Full vehicular access from Markham Road is proposed at the south limit of the subject lands. The site will also have access to the signalized intersection at Highglen Avenue and Markham Road through an easement within the future place of worship site to the north. Approximately 145 parking spaces are proposed in total (exceeding the 120 spaces required by the zoning by-law), with 59 of these spaces being provided underground.
The subject lands are designated Urban
Residential in the Official Plan and Urban Residential - Low Density
Residential in the PD 24-2 (Armadale East) Secondary Plan, which does not
provide for an apartment building. An
amendment to redesignate the subject lands to Urban Residential - High Density
I is proposed.
The lands are zoned Open Space and
Institutional (O2) in By-law 90-81, as amended, which permits a number of
community and institutional uses, but not an apartment building. An amendment to the zoning by-law is
required to permit the proposed development.
Interim Control By-law 2002-215 is currently in effect on the subject
lands.
The subject lands are within the
Markham Road Corridor Study area. This
study was initiated to develop an urban design vision for the Markham Road
corridor between 14th Avenue and Steeles Avenue. The vision is to
include streetscape guidelines for development along Markham Road and an urban
design concept for a community focus for the Armadale community.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE
PROPOSAL:
The potential benefits of the
proposed development are as follows:
·
the proposed built form is
consistent with the urban design vision for Markham Road as outlined in the
draft Markham Road Corridor Study;
·
the proposal would provide an
alternate form of housing, improving the mix of housing types available to the
community;
·
the proposed density is sufficient
to support transit use.
The following is a brief summary of concerns/issues raised to date. These matters, and any others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, will be addressed in a final staff report to be presented to Committee at a later date
Issues identified to date include:
·
Confirmation that the adjustment of
Blocks 43 and 44 to produce the subject lands is acceptable to the prospective purchaser of the place of worship
site, and the York Region District School Board;
·
Conformity of the site plan with
proposed urban design guidelines identified in the Markham Road Corridor Study;
·
Compatibility with the adjacent
proposed uses;
·
Integration of the proposed
development with the undeveloped commercial site to the south, and the
undeveloped place of worship site to the north;
·
Region of York approval for the
proposed access from Markham Road; and
·
Water allocation.
It is recommended that a Public
Meeting be held to consider these applications.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None expected to be identified.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
All Town departments and external agencies have been circulated with these applications and all comments will be considered in a final report.
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim
Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
Figure 1: Location Map
Figure 2: Area Context/Zoning
Figure 3: Aerial Photo
Figure 4: Proposed Site Plan
Figure 5: Proposed Elevations