DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Alan Brown, Director of Engineering

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Alan Laver

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

2003-Jun-17

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Merano Subdivision (65M-3600)

Noise Attenuation

 

 

 


 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

THAT the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute an amendment to the Merano Developments Inc. subdivision agreement dated August 1, 2002 for the phasing of the noise attenuation requirements based on the following principles;


PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to seek Committee and Council authorization to amend the Merano subdivision agreement to re-evaluate the requirement for construction of an external noise wall required due to an off site industrial noise source (Assinck Limited), based on the status of that property and corresponding noise levels.

 

BACKGROUND:

Merano Developments Inc.(Merano) entered into a residential subdivision agreement with the Town dated August 1, 2002.  The Merano subdivision, located in the Greensborough Planning District, (Figure1) has proceeded and houses are now under construction with occupancies anticipated this summer. As a condition of the agreement Merano is required to undertake the following noise attenuation as noted in Figure 2;

 

a)                          Construct an off site noise wall to shield the homes in the subdivision from noise generated by an existing industrial use at 9577 Hwy #48 (Assinck Limited) which manufactures aggregate conveyor systems.

b)                          Modify the noise levels from Assinck crane equipment.

c)                          Install noise fences to mitigate Go Rail noise.

d)                           

The noise requirements were identified in a noise study prepared by the developer’s consultant and was peer reviewed for the Town.  The recommendations were outlined in the subdivision agreement as per Attachment ‘A’ and security in the amount of $137,370 has been retained by the Town of Markham to ensure the work is completed.

 

The Developer has requested the Town defer installation of the wall based on their understanding that the Assinck property has been recently marketed for sale, and the specific industrial manufacturing use may change in the near future.  As more development occurs in the area Town staff envision that most of the lands in the area between Hwy 48 and the Go line north of 16th Ave will shift to commercial/office uses.  These potential uses would not require noise mitigation and would make the noise wall redundant.

 

The Go noise and Assinck crane mitigation measures will be installed prior to occupancy, as per the subdivision agreement.

 

DISCUSSION:

The proposal to defer the construction of the Assinck noise wall and reconsider its need at the  Acceptance of Maintenance Stage would allow an approximate 2 year period to determine if the land use is going to change on the Assinck property.   Merano will also be required to monitor the noise source during the deferral period and will be required to install the wall should it be determined at any time during the ± 2 year period that noise levels become a concern to future residents in this area.

 

If it is determined that the wall is not required Merano has agreed to make a cash contribution to the Town in an amount equivalent to the cost of the wall  (approximately $75,000 to $100,000), to be used by the Town for streetscape improvements to Main Street Markham.

 

Merano will be required to indemnify and save harmless the Town with regards to their proposal to defer the wall and will also be required to execute an amendment to the existing subdivision agreement.

 

It is staff’s opinion that subject to the above noted principles being incorporated into a legally binding amendment to the subdivision agreement, the proposal can be supported.  The proposal also offers an opportunity to provide funding for the Main Street streetscaping in the event that the noise wall is determined not to be required.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

There are no new financial considerations resulting from this report.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

Planning and Legal departments have reviewed the report

 

ATTACHMENTS:

 

Figure 1-Location Plan

Figure 2-Site Plan

Attachment ‘A’-Subdivision Agreement Conditions

 

 

 

 

 

Alan Brown, C.E.T.

Director of Engineering

 

Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Commissioner of Development Services