EIGHTH MEETING OF THE

HERITAGE MARKHAM COMMITTEE

 

TOWN OF MARKHAM

Canada Room, Markham Civic Centre

Wednesday, August 13, 2003

 

MINUTES

 

 

Members                                                                      Regrets

Julie Christian, Chair                                                     Keith Irish

Joan Natoli, Vice-Chair                                                Marie Jones

Susan Casella

Ted Chisholm

Judy Dawson-Ryan

Elizabeth Plashkes

Councillor Joe Virgilio

Councillor Jack Heath  

Councillor Stan Daurio

 

Staff

R. Hutcheson, Manager Heritage Planning

M. Seaman, Senior Heritage Planner

G. Duncan, Heritage Planner

Yvonne Hurst – Committee Secretary

 

 

The meeting convened at the hour of 7:15 p.m.

 

 

1.                  APPROVAL OF AGENDA (16.11)                                                                           

 

Ted Chisholm disclosed an interest with Item #33 – 10 Eckardt Street as he is the owner of this property.

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the Heritage Markham agenda be approved as revised with the inclusion of the addendum agenda.

 

CARRIED.

 

 

 

2.         REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

            7292 NINETEENTH AVENUE

UDEL-HAMILTON HOUSE AND LUNAU BARN - PROPOSED PLANS & ELEVATIONS (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Mike Bradshaw, Owner                                                                      

 

Mr. Bradshaw was in attendance with regard to 7292 Nineteenth Avenue and

indicated that he is willing to work with Town (Heritage Section) staff with respect to the revised drawings for the Udel-Hamilton House and Lunau Barn.

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the proposed restoration plan for the Udel-Hamilton house and Lunau barn subject to the following:

House

-         Since evidence of shutter hardware has been found on the front windows,

segmental headed shutters should be added to the front elevation:

-     The original windows have segmental heads, therefore the windows should be shown with this type of detail on the elevation drawings;

       -    No shutters are required on the rear of the house;

      -     There is no objection to the new window on the north elevation;

      -     There is no objection to the garage door on the north elevation;

-         Wood storm windows from the building should be re-used in the restoration;

-         The detailing of decorative work in the front gables should be based on further examination of physical evidence through the removal of the existing shingles;

-         The horizontal detail of the gable should be changed to a simpler moulding;

-         The source of inspiration for the diagonal detail of the gable should be confirmed with Town (Heritage Section) staff;

-         Chimneys on the main roof should have more decorative corbelling than shown on the current drawings, in keeping with the ornate late Victorian architecture of the last period of development of the house; the chimney should be of a larger scale and situated at a higher peak position; the side elevation of the chimney should have a wider shaft on the side; the top should be detailed on the chimneys as they are on the front;

-         The roof is not to be removed to facilitate the move;

-         A small, bracketed stoop over the side door for rain protection is supported;

-         The owner is encouraged to retain the grained finish on the interior doors, and where possible on the interior trim;

-         The owner is encouraged to consider exterior paint colours that would highlight the late Victorian character and architectural details;

-         Drawings should indicate what is to be repaired or restored, as well as anything that will be replaced;

-         A picket fence will be shown on the site plan.

Barn

-         The barn is to be moved intact onto its new site;

-         The existing siding is to be retained as the exterior finish, with an interior weatherproofing solution if necessary;

-         The sliding door hardware is to be shown on the drawings;

-         The existing metal roof is to be repaired and retained;

-         Lightening rods may be added to the roof;

-         Existing openings on the rear wall should be replicated on the new site, showing on the exterior even if they are not all operable.

 

AND THAT the owner enter into a heritage conservation easement with the Town for preservation and maintenance of the existing heritage structures if required.

 

CARRIED.

 

 

3.         SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION - 26 CHURCH LANE

APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL -

REVISED ELEVATION (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage                                                                               

                                    Anthony Reale, Owner                                                            

 

The Senior Planner, Heritage and Conservation, advised that issues with respect to the proposed drawings originally submitted by Mr. Reale in December, 2002 for 26 Church Lane have been reviewed by Town (Heritage Section) staff.  He noted that all issues had been resolved save and except for 2 issues.  The applicant would like to install windows that are constructed of vinyl clad wood.  The Senior Planner indicated that Heritage Markham has previously supported a new product available through Mason Windows and may wish to consider this product as appropriate for windows at 26 Church Lane.  He noted that the owner also wants to stucco the window trim.

 

Mr. Reale noted that a number of houses in the area have stucco trim around the windows (e.g. houses on Colborne Street).  He advised that he is supportive of all other issues in the staff report.  He pointed out that samples of the proposed window and window trim could be provided to Town (Heritage Section) staff for review.

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham does not object to the revised site plan and elevations submitted in support of the Site Plan Control Application for additions and alteration of the house at 26 Church Lane, Thornhill, subject to the applicant complying with the conditions outlined by the Ontario Municipal Board;

 

AND THAT the following heritage conditions be included in the site plan agreement:

 

Stonework

The proposed stonework is to resemble a design, texture and colour which is consistent with local historic fieldstone in the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District.  Samples are to be provided to Town (Heritage Section) staff for review and approval prior to installation;

 

Stucco

The proposed stucco cladding should be of a roughcast variety, which is compatible with local historic precedents;

Samples are to be provided to Town (Heritage Section) staff for review and approval prior to installation;

 

Shingles

The proposed roof shingles should be of a type, texture and colour which is compatible with the Thornhill-Markham Heritage conservation district.  Samples should be provided to Town (Heritage Section) staff for review and approval prior to installation.  Cedar Shingles, as originally proposed by the owner are acceptable.

 

Shutters

The proposed shutters are to be louvered wood, each ½ the width of the window and attached to the window frame with hinges;

 

Windows

The proposed windows are to be consistent with the Heritage Markham Window Policy in that the windows on the visible elevations (south and east) are to be wood, interior and exterior with either true divided lights and real wood muntin bars or externally adhered wood muntin bars;

A sample of the proposed windows and a simple window trim to be provided to Town (Heritage Section) staff and Thornhill representatives for review and approval;

 

Trim

As per the approved elevations the window trim and sills are to be made of pre-finished wood;

 

Dormers

The proposed dormers are to be clad in wood.

 

Colours

All colours are to be from the Thornhill Heritage Palette;

Samples should be provided to Town (Heritage Section) staff for review and approval prior to installation;

           

Heritage Conservation Easement

As per the requirements of the Ontario Municipal Board decision, the owner is to enter into a heritage conservation easement with the Town for preservation and maintenance of the existing cedar hedge and for preservation of the exterior faηade of the Robert Watson Watt House as revised according to Site Plan Control Application 02100392.

 

Interpretation

The owner is to provide and install at its cost a full size Markham Remembered Plaque in a publicly visible location on the property outlining the history and architecture of the Robert Watson-Watt house. 

 

Landscaping

As per the requirements of the Ontario Municipal Board decision, the owner is to design and install a period landscape plan which would be compatible with the Victorian character of the core area of the Thornhill Heritage Conservation District.

 

CARRIED.

 

 

4.                  REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK  - 7149 - 16TH AVENUE

            RESTORATION PLAN - PLAN OF SUBDIVISION (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    Frank Bonn, Mattamy Homes

                                    Scott Heaslip, East District Co-ordinator                                              

 

Mr. Scott Rushlow was in attendance with respect to 7149 16th Avenue – restoration plan.  Mr. Rushlow advised that the proposed new corner lot is approximately 40’ x 105’.  The house is 26’ wide.  Tongue and groove siding has been revealed under the insul brick cladding.  The interior of the restored house will be approximately 2500 square feet while other homes on the street are approximately 2800 square feet.  The house would face the street as do all the other homes on the street and garage access would be from a rear lane.  The veranda is 5 ½ feet. The proposed addition will be clad in board and batten.  

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the proposed restoration pan for the house at 7149 - 16th Avenue be approved in principle and the applicant be requested to provide further details to the Architectural Review Sub-Committee;

 

AND THAT the proposed restoration plan be referred to the Architectural Review Sub-Committee with authority to approve delegated to the Sub-Committee.

 

CARRIED.

5.         REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

            160 MAIN STREET, UNIONVILLE

            OUTSTANDING RENOVATION ISSUE FOR BARN (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    David Johnston

                                    Mr. Kenyon                                                                                        

 

Mr. Kenyon (owner) and Mr. Johnston (Architect) were in attendance. 

 

The Heritage Planner advised that the applicant (160 Main Street, Unionville) wishes to clear up a number of outstanding renovation issues with respect to the commercial barn.  He noted that a site visit has been undertaken and he has met with the architect, David Johnston.  A compromise is being proposed for certain of the outstanding issues.

           

Mr. David Johnston advised that he supports the recommendations put forward by Town (Heritage Section) staff with respect to the outstanding renovation issues for 160 Main Street, Unionville.  He noted that the only issue which would be very difficult to accomplish is the replacement of the window on the S/E corner.  He requested that the committee consider permitting a wood frame to be installed over the existing window.  The wood trim would make the non conforming window appear more traditional.  

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham accepts the staff recommendations to reach a resolution to the outstanding issues with respect to the exterior treatment of the barn at 160 Main St, Unionville, to include:

1.      The exterior board and batten siding, trim and air conditioner lattice is to be stained to suggest the colour of weathered wood;

2.      Existing window and door openings that do not have sills and frames are to be given plain wood frames about 3 ½ inches wide (or proportioned to match the one remaining original window frame on the north wall, ground floor);

3.      The heavy window frames of the south wall are to be removed and replaced to match the above noted standard;

4.      The box bay window on the front wall is to be given sills and frames to match the standard detail described in point number 2, and that battens are to be applied to the vertical siding of the bay window;

5.      The windows that presently have grilles should have the grilles removed and each window is to have a one over one pane glazing configuration;

6.      The south front window (the metal slider) is to be trimmed externally with wood to give the appearance of a traditional one over one double hung windows (2) with a mullion between them;

7.      The owner/tenant is to be asked to consider the future removal of all individual air conditioning units and their replacement with a less obtrusive and more energy efficient system.

 

CARRIED.

 

 

6.         BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION

            9404 HIGHWAY 48

            DEMOLITION PERMIT (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    B. Bunting , Owner's Representative                                                    

 

The Heritage Planner reviewed the issues surrounding the demolition permit for 9404 Highway 48.  He noted that the staff recommendation to designate the building under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act was made in view of the heritage significance of the structure.  

 

Mr. Brian Bunting, father of the owner, noted that the staff recommendation supports moving the structure within the development but does not address moving the structure off site.  Mr. Bunting advised that he has spent time researching the history of 9404 Highway 48 at the registry office and noted that Menno Raymer did not purchase the property until 1915.  He noted that, although Mr. Raymer owned the property there is no documented evidence that he built the existing house.  The property was bought in 1925 by Mr. Wambolt and the property was generally known in the area as the Wambolt house, in his opinion. 

 

Mr. Bunting provided a list of historical dates relating to the properties owned by Menno Raymer.  Mr. Bunting suggested that an error in historical facts has been made by Town (Heritage Section) staff relating to 9404 Highway 48.  He stressed that the siding, interior and trim are typical of a circa 1925 house. 

 

Mr. Bunting noted that interest has been expressed in purchasing this property, however, the developer has not solidified the option to purchase due to the presence of the heritage house.  Mr. Bunting advised that he is willing to advertise the house for relocation and provide sufficient time for the house to be relocated.  He further noted that when the road is widened the house will have to be relocated as the road widening would cut through the heritage home.  Mr. Bunting indicated that the developer is willing to provide architectural details on his new buildings to compliment the Markham Museum.

 

The Manager, Heritage Planning noted that Menno Raymer owned the property from 1915 to 1925.  Since building normally takes places early in the purchase of a property, the house would likely have been built during this period.  The architectural attributes of the house also appear to be from this period.  The Manager, suggested that Menno Raymer may have built this house as an income property or to house one of his children.

 

Also, staff typically name houses after the person who own the property when the house is constructed.  The Manager also indicated that staff had met with Mr. Bunting earlier in the day to review his research and do not believe the new material would change the rating of the house as a Group 2 heritage building.

 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the demolition permit application for the Meno Raymer House at 9404 Highway 48 be denied;

 

AND THAT the Meno Raymer House at 9404 Highway 48 be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

7.         CORRESPONDENCE LIST (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the following July/August 2003 correspondence be received as information:

a)         East Markham Strategic Review Committee Final Report - July 2003 (Heritage extracts only)

            b)         Heritage Canada Media Review, June, 2003

            c)         Unionville Villager Publication, July 2003

            d)         Rouge Park - Natural & Cultural Heritage Funding Program 2004

            e)         Rouge Park - Small Grants Program 2004

f)          Toronto Star Article, "Councils lock tools to preserve heritage" by J. Blumenson, July 12-03

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.         ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES

            SEVENTH HERITAGE MARKHAM MEETING

            JULY 9, 2003 (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the minutes of the seventh Heritage Markham meeting held on July 9, 2003 be adopted and received.

 

            CARRIED.

 

9.         RESTORATION APPROACH

            7060 MARKHAM ROAD (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Brian Varner, Manager, Real Property

                                    Paul Cote, Capital Assets                                                                    

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the proposed restoration approach for the Daniels-Fairty House at 7060 Markham Road be received and endorsed;

 

AND THAT a research report be prepared by Town (Heritage Section) staff on the Daniels-Fairty House be brought forward to the September, 2003 meeting of Heritage Markham so that Heritage Markham may consider recommending its possible designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

            CARRIED.

 

10.       INFORMATION

            03-113159 & 03-113160

            9064 WOODBINE AVENUE, 2920 - 16th AVENUE

DESIGNATION REPORTS, BUTTONVILLE MILL HOUSE & THE WALKER HOMESTEAD (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Mr. Robert Turcotte                                                                            

                                    Wanda Stover, Applications Administrator                                           

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the designation reports on 9064 Woodbine Avenue and 2920 Sixteenth Avenue be received as information.

 

            CARRIED.

11.       REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

            45 JERMAN STREET, MARKHAM VILLAGE

            PROPOSED ALTERATIONS (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

           

THAT the proposed alterations to 45 Jerman Street be referred to the Architectural Review Sub-Committee upon receipt of a heritage permit application.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

12.       03 113 877

            APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENT- TEMPORARY OFFICE

7170 HIGHWAY #7 (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the owner is requested to confirm that the Pike House (7170 Highway #7) will not be impacted by the proposed development;

 

AND THAT, in the event of any alterations/proposed impacts on the dwelling, the applicant submit an application for review and approval by Heritage Markham prior to the undertaking of any works.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

13.       INFORMATION

            NEWSPAPER BOX PLACEMENT - TOWN POLICY (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    J. Virgilio, Councillor                                                                           

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the information regarding newspaper box placement – Town policy be

received as information.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

14.       HERITAGE PERMIT APPLICATION

            6 WISMER PLACE, MARKHAM HERITAGE ESTATE

            PROPOSED ALTERATION (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    Julie Christian, Owner                                                              

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the material regarding 6 Wismer Place, Markham Heritage Estates be

received as information.

 

AND THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the Heritage Permits for siding restoration on the Gapper-Duncan house and a metal roof for the Lunau shed subject to the following:

 

AND THAT the profile of the metal roof be ‘Barnmaster’, as shown in the catalogue attached to the application;

 

AND FURTHER THAT the colour be grey, either stone grey or charcoal.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

15.       SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATION

            7070 BAYVIEW AVENUE

            CONVERSION TO DAYCARE FACILITY (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    David Miller, Senior Planner                                                                

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the site plan application, 7070 Bayview Avenue – conversion to daycare facility, subject to the following conditions:

1)                  the owner be provided with guidelines for preservation of original features;

2)                  the owner enter into a Heritage Easement;

3)                  any exterior alterations be subject to review by Heritage Markham.

 

CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

16.       INFORMATION

            BUTTONVILLE SERVICING STUDY - UPDATE (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the material regarding the Buttonville Servicing Study - Update be received

as information.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

17.       UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATIONS TO A DESIGNATED BUILDING

            7 STATION LANE - UNIONVILLE TRAIN STATION

            ALTERATIONS TO UNIONVILLE TRAIN STATION(16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    Susan Styles, Community Services Department

                                    Glen Taylor, Manager, Community Centre Operations

                                    Brian Varner, Manager, Real Property                                     

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the recently installed metal doors and trim work are not appropriate for the architecture of the historic Unionville Train Station and should be removed;

 

AND THAT the c.1990 glass doors be returned (or replicated to original specifications) to the Unionville Train Station, 11 Station Lane, Unionville;

 

AND THAT the works be completed prior to Doors Open Markham (August 23, 24, 2003);

 

AND THAT all staff responsible for the administration of municipally owned heritage buildings or buildings in heritage districts be requested to submit any plans for alterations, additions, etc. to Heritage Markham or Town (Heritage Section) staff for review and approval prior to undertaking any such works and obtain any necessary permits (heritage permits).

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18.       03 113 989

            10720 WOODBINE AVENUE "WESLEYAN CHAPEL"

BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION - RESTORATION PLAN FOR VICTORIA SQUARE CHAPEL (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Neil Mortson                                                                                       

                                    Ron Blake, Project Co-ordinator, West District

                                    Wanda Stover, Applications Administrator                                           

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham request Heritage Section staff to work with the Restoration Committee of the Victoria Square United Church to prepare a Terms of Reference for the restoration, accurately record existing early features, and fine-tune the details of the restoration plan;

 

AND THAT Heritage Markham delegates to Heritage Section staff the authority to approve the final plans for the restoration of the Wesleyan Chapel.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

19.       INFORMATION

RESTORATION PLAN - KATHLEEN GORMLEY MCKAY ART CENTRE (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    John Ryerson, Varley Art Gallery                                                         

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham supports the grant application that provides for a restoration plan for the Kathleen Gormley McKay Art Centre (dwelling, gardens, fencing).

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.       2982 ELGIN MILLS ROAD

            PROPOSED NEW DWELLING (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    Wanda Stover, Applications Administrator                                           

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the material regarding 2982 Elgin Mills Road – proposed new dwelling be

received as information.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

21.       ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION

            8971 WOODBINE AVENUE - HOLD REMOVAL (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    Neilish Surti, Planner, West District                                                      

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham has reviewed the proposed hold removal for 8971 Woodbine Avenue and has no comments.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

22.       INFORMATION

WEST NILE VIRUS - PRECAUTIONS FOR SITE VISITS (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the information regarding West Nile Virus – precautions for site visits be

received as information.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.       ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION

            9442 HIGHWAY 48 - "THE MILLER-BROWN HOUSE"

            APPLICATION FOR REZONING (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Steven Kitagawa, North District Co-ordinator                          

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the information regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 9442 Highway 48 – “The Miller-Brown House” be referred to Architectural Review Sub-Committee with authority to approve.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

24.       DESIGNATION - PART IV ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT

            10372 WOODBINE AVENUE (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Ron Blake, West District Co-ordinator                                    

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

           

THAT the Henry Arnold House at 10372 Woodbine Avenue be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act;

 

AND THAT the Town enter into a heritage conservation easement agreement with the owner of the property to ensure the protection of the historic Henry Arnold House at 10372 Woodbine Avenue.

 

            CARRIED.

 

25.       DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION

            9451 - NINTH LINE

            PIKE FARM BARN COMPLEX (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    Wanda Stover, Applications Administrator                                           

                                    Scott Heaslip, East District Co-ordinator                                              

                                    Nick Mracic, Metrus Devlopments                                                      

 

Mr. Nick Mracic, of Metrus Developments and Mr. George Kelava (tenant) were in attendance.

 

The Manager, Heritage Planning, advised that Town (Heritage Section) staff have inspected the barn at 9451 Ninth Line and a recommendation has been provided for the Committee’s consideration.  He noted that Metrus Developments is anxious to proceed with construction of underground work.

 

Metrus Developments advised that the developer is ready to proceed with the underground works and the barns are in the construction area.  He stressed that a 6 month delay is a serious concern to Metrus since the underground work is ready to proceed within the month.  He noted that discussions are on-going with Mr. George Kalava with respect to the heritage home.  He also noted that interest has been expressed by both George Kalava and a resident of Markham Heritage Estates with respect to the smaller of the two barns. 

 

George Kalava was in attendance and advised that he is meeting with Metrus on August 14, 2003 at 8:30 a.m. with respect to the heritage home and sufficient land to also accommodate the smaller barn.  Because of this meeting, Mr. Kalava requested that Heritage Markham defer any consideration of the matter until its next meeting.  He indicated that he is optimistic that the issues will be resolved with Metrus at the August 14th meeting. 

 

The representative from Metrus concurred that a meeting is to be held on August 14th and it is hopeful that a suitable arrangement can be reached between Metrus and Mr. Kelava with respect to the heritage home.  He pointed out that the barns are in the middle of the proposed road and it is not possible for them to remain on their present site. 

 

The committee noted that there was some disagreement between Metrus and Mr. Kelava as to the ownership of the barns.  However, Heritage Markham’s only interest is in the preservation of the smaller heritage barn and salvaging of any heritage aspects of the larger structure.

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT consideration of the Pike Farm Barn Complex, 9451 Ninth Line, be deferred to a special meeting of the Architectural Review Sub-Committee pending the outcome of the meeting between Metrus Development and Mr. George Kelava.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26.       ELECTION

HERITAGE CANADA FOUNDATION - ELECTION FOR GOVERNOR (16.11)

Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham authorizes the Chair to vote on behalf of Heritage Markham for Michael Seaman for the position of Ontario Governor Heritage Canada.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

27.       HERITAGE MARKHAM EVENTS (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the material regarding Heritage Markham Events be received and referred to the Architectural Review Sub-committee for consideration.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

28.       BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION

            77 JOHN STREET, THORNHILL

            DEMOLITION OF HOUSE (16.11)  

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    Wanda Stover, Applications Administrator                                           

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT, in view of the fact that a severance was approved in 1992, Heritage Markham has no comment on the demolition of the house at 77 John Street, Thornhill;

 

AND THAT the applicant is to be advised that the subject lands fall within the Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District and that any new structure is to be compatible with the character of the Thornhill-Markham Heritage Conservation District.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

29.       WORKS UNDERTAKEN WITHOUT A HERITAGE PERMIT

            121 JOHN STREET, THORNHILL

ALTERATIONS TO BUILDING IN THORNHILL HERITAGE DISTRICT (16.11)

Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the works undertaken without a Heritage Permit at 121 John Street, Thornhill be deferred to the September meeting of Heritage Markham for consideration.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

30.       INFORMATION

            DOORS OPEN MARKHAM - AUGUST 23, 24, 2003 (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

Elizabeth Plashkes, Chair of Doors Open Markham provided an overview of events and requested that any volunteers contact her.  The Chair of Heritage Markham thanked Elizabeth for all her efforts in organizing this event.

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the material regarding Doors Open Markham – August 23, 24, 2003, be received as information.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

31.       GROUND SIGN PROPOSAL

            4400 HIGHWAY 7 - RASOEE - THE INDIAN KITCHEN

            UNIONVILLE HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT(16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    D. Hutcheson

                                    Steve Cortis                                                                                        

 

The Heritage Planner advised that the applicants (4400 Highway 7 – signage) are proposing a new ground sign for the property.  He noted that some minor design changes are being recommended by Town (Heritage Section) staff.  He further noted that the wall sign would be constructed of wood with PVC lettering and external illumination.

 

 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the design of the proposed ground sign and wall sign for the Rasoee restaurant at 4400 Highway 7 provided that the same design is submitted for permit;

 

AND THAT approval of the signage be delegated to Town (Heritage Section) staff;

 

AND FURTHER THAT the proposed signage conform to the Town’s sign by-law.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

32.       REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

            PROPOSED DEMOLITION

            7217 BAYVIEW AVENUE (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

                                    David Miller, Senior Planner, West District                                           

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT a site visit with the owner or his agent be arranged for the Heritage Markham Architectural Review Sub-Committee to further examine the house at 7215 Bayview Avenue, to determine its significance and condition.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

Ted Chisholm declared a disclosure of interest with respect to Item #33 as he recently purchased this property.  He did not participate in the voting with respect to Item #33. 

 

 

33.       10 ECKARDT AVENUE, UNIONVILLE

            PROPOSED NEW RESIDENCE

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Ted Chisholm (Owner)                                                            

 

Ted Chisholm presented drawings of the proposed new residence at 10 Eckardt Avenue, Unionville.  He noted that the veranda would have a hip roof and the proposed residence clad in brick with quoining detail.  He indicated that he was not aware of the policy that indicated a preference for Edwardian Classicism or Arts and Crafts styles on Eckardt Avenue. 

 

 

The Senior Planner, Heritage and Conservation, advised that the Unionville Heritage District Plan indicates that architectural styles for this area should be Edwardian Classicism or Arts and Crafts. 

 

Mr. Chisholm was encouraged to use the resources of Town (Heritage Section) staff to develop a house style that would conform to the Unionville District Plan.

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the request for feedback with respect to a proposed new dwelling at 10

Eckardt Avenue, Unionville be referred to the Architectural Review Sub-Committee

for review and commentary;

 

AND THAT the Architectural Review Sub-Committee be given the authority to refer

final details to Town (Heritage Section) staff if the proposed new residence is in compliance with the District Plan.

 

CARRIED.

 

 

34.       REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK

            HERITAGE STATUS OF HOME

            11 ECKARDT AVENUE – ARTS AND CRAFTS STYLE COTTAGE (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the material with respect to 11 Eckardt Avenue – Arts and Crafts Style

Cottage be received as information.

 

            CARRIED.     

 

 

35.       ONTARIO HERITAGE FOUNDATION

            HERITAGE COMMUNITY RECOGNITION PROGRAM, 2003

            REQUEST FOR NOMINATION SUGGESTIONS TO COUNCIL (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                     

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the information with respect to the Ontario Heritage Foundation Community Recognition Award Program be received;

 

AND THAT Susan Casella be recommended to Council for nomination for the Ontario Heritage Foundation Community Recognition Award in the Built Heritage Category;

 

AND THAT George Duncan be recommended for nomination for the Ontario Heritage Foundation Community Recognition Award in the Cultural Heritage Category;

 

AND FURTHER THAT the award brochure be circulated to the following organizations requesting feedback to Heritage staff by September 1, 2003 with respect to possible nominations for the Natural and Landscape Garden heritage categories:

-Unionville Historical Society

-Markham Village Conservancy

-Markham Historical Society

-The Society for the Preservation of Historic Thornhill

-The Town Parks Planner

-The Town (Rouge Park) Planner

 

CARRIED.

 

 

36.       HERITAGE MARKHAM – MEMBERS

            RESIGNATION FROM HERITAGE MARKHAM

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                     

                                    Sean Stanwick                                                                                     

                                    Judy Kee, Clerk's Department                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the resignation of Mr. Sean Stanwick be received with regret.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

37.       HERITAGE MARKHAM – MEMBERS

            RESIGNATION FROM HERITAGE MARKHAM (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

            Ross Caister

            Judy Kee, Clerk's Department                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

           

            THAT the Chair's e-mail to Mr. Caister dated Aug. 8, 2003 be received;

 

            THAT the resignation of Mr. Ross Caister be received with regret;

 

            AND THAT Mr. Caister be thanked for his many years of service to Heritage

Markham.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

38.       SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION

            REQUEST TO AMEND CONDITIONS – DORMER AND GABLES

            8 WISMER PLACE (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                        Michael Seaman, Senior Planner                                                                                               Chris Keeley and Kim Morgan                                                

 

Town (Heritage Section) staff advised that the owners of 8 Wismer Place do not wish to reinstall the gable walls and dormer due to the presence of asbestos tiles.  It was noted that the owners have cited health reasons and the fact the contractors are unwilling to install the features once it becomes known that asbestos is present.

 

The Committee discussed the fact that the gable walls and dormers were the only parts of the original roof remaining and that options should be explored to retain these original features.

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the request to amend conditions – dormer and gables – 8 Wismer Place be

referred to the Architectural Review Sub-Committee with authority to approve.

 

            CARRIED.

 

39.       DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION

            6937 HIGHWAY #7, BARNS (16.11)

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning

                                    Michael Savas

                                    Wanda Stover                                                                                     

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT Heritage Markham has no objection tot he demolition permit application for 6937 Highway #7 (barns) subject to the standard conditions for documentation, advertising and salvage as outlined the Conditions of Draft Approval of the Plan of Subdivision.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

40.       HERITAGE MARKHAM – MEMBERS

            FEATURE ARTICLE – ELIZABETH PLASHKES

            DOORS OPEN MARKHAM (16.11)                                                            

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT the information with respect to a feature article – Elizabeth Plashkes – Doors

Open Markham, be received.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

41.       96 JOHN STREET

            WORKS PROGRESSING ON HERITAGE BUILDING

            DUSAN NICOLIK (16.11)                                                                                        

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

THAT the owner of 96 John Street be requested to restore and reinstall the original windows;

 

AND THAT the appropriateness of works progressing on the heritage building at 96 John Street be referred to the September meeting of Heritage Markham for discussion;

 

AND FURTHER THAT the owner be requested to attend the September Heritage Markham meeting to review these issues.

 

            CARRIED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

42.       6 ALEXANDER HUNTER PLACE

            PROPOSED PICKET FENCE

            FRED WATT (16.11)                                                                                                 

            Extracts:           Manager, Heritage Planning                                                                 

 

            HERITAGE MARKHAM RECOMMENDS:

 

            THAT Heritage Markham has no objection to the proposed picket fence for 6

Alexander Hunter Place;

 

AND THAT final details be referred to Town (Heritage Section and Design) staff for

approval.

 

            CARRIED.

 

The meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m.