|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of
Planning & Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Ron Blake, Senior Project
Coordinator, West District Team |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
PRELIMINARY REPORT Application by Loblaw Properties
Limited for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit development
of a retail plaza of 329,671 square feet at 2938 Major Mackenzie Drive East
in the West Cathedral Community. File Nos. OP 04 010924 and ZA 04
010910 |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the report entitled “Preliminary Report: Application by Loblaw Properties
Limited for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit development of
a retail plaza of 329,671 square feet at 2938 Major Mackenzie Drive East in the
West Cathedral Community”, be received (File Nos. OP 04 010924 and ZA 04
010910);
AND THAT a public meeting be held regarding the
proposed development of a retail plaza.
PURPOSE:
BACKGROUND:
Property and Area Context
The subject lands cover an area of
approximately 16.8 hectares (41.57 acres) and are bounded on the south by Major
Mackenzie Drive, on the west by Highway 404, on the east by Woodbine Avenue,
and on the north by Lot 22 Concession 3 (see Figures 2 and 3).
The majority of the site is flat
table land and has not been farmed for several years.
Several environmental features are
located on the property (see Figure 4), including:
Existing Secondary Plan Provisions
The subject lands are located
within the Cathedral Community Secondary Plan (OPA 42). As set out in
Key policy provisions applying to
these land use categories include:
Business Corridor:
The Business Corridor designation
extends from Highway 404 to the proposed northern extension of
Community Amenity/Business Area:
The Community Amenity/Business Area
designation extends from
Hazard Lands:
The Hazard Lands designation is
located in the north-west quadrant of the
Transportation Plan
In addition, the Secondary Plan
designates a collector road connection within the West Cathedral Community
between the Highway 404 north bound off-ramp at
Current Studies
There are several ongoing planning
studies that will have a direct bearing on the subject application. These include:
Existing Zoning By-law provisions
The subject lands are zoned Agricultural
One (A1) by By-law 304-87. Permitted
uses are limited to agricultural uses and one single detached dwelling as an
accessory use to a permitted farm operation.
Proposed Development
The Owner is proposing to develop
the property with a variety of free-standing single storey retail pads, a
two-storey office building, and 2 gas bar/car washes in a “power centre”
configuration (see Figure 4), as follows:
Amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law are required
The owner is submitting
applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments. The Official Plan Amendment application
addresses amendments related to both the Business Corridor and Community
Amenity/Business Corridor designations, as well as the Transportation Plan, as
follows:
Business Corridor Area:
Community Amenity-Business Area:
Transportation Plan:
·
Deleting the
collector road linkage between the north bound Highway 404 off ramp at Major
Mackenzie Drive and Markland Street from the Cathedral Community Secondary Plan
Transportation Plan (Schedule ‘BB’).
The property is zoned Agricultural
One (A1) by By-law 304-87. The intent of
the Zoning By-law Amendment application is to rezone the property in conformity
with the Business Corridor and Community Amenity – Business Area designations
of the Cathedral Community Secondary Plan, as amended above. In addition, the floodplain area on the
eastern portion of the property would be zoned OS1, in conformity with the
existing Hazard Land designation in the Secondary Plan.
POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL:
There is a need to develop some
additional retail and commercial amenities in this area to serve the needs of
Cathedral Community residents, as well as those living in the northern portion
of the Woodbine North community and Cachet Estates. However, staff have concerns about the
development as currently proposed, as set out in the next section.
The following is a summary of concerns/issues raised to date. These matters, and any others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, will be addressed in a final staff report to be presented to Committee at a later date. The primary concerns associated with this development revolve around the appropriateness of the proposal in terms of the existing policy structure of the Markham Official Plan and Cathedral Community Secondary Plan. Staff also have concerns relating to the physical and site planning specifics of the proposal, but these more detailed concerns are secondary to the broader policy-related issues presented below:
The
proposed development does not meet the provisions and intent of the Official
Plan and the Cathedral Community Secondary Plan
There are several key respects in which the proposed development does not meet the provisions of the Cathedral Community Secondary Plan, as follows:
Business
Corridor Designation:
· The planned function of the Business Corridor designation, as set out in the Markham Official Plan, is to provide locations for a mix of “high quality business activities in corridors along major road frontages, primarily adjacent to areas intended for industrial and commercial uses that require the exposure offered by such locations in order to accommodate the business and service needs of companies and employees, and to accommodate at appropriate locations certain businesses that may also serve the general public”;
· The Business Corridor designation limits floor plates of individual retail stores to a maximum of 6,000 m2 (64,586 sq. ft.).
Based on the above policies, the planned function of the Business Corridor designation is primarily intended to be an employment and business-oriented designation, providing for mix of prestige industrial and office uses, as well as accommodating the business and service needs of surrounding companies and employees. While provisions are made for retail uses, they are intended to be secondary to the primary employment-oriented role of the Business Corridor Area, and they are intended mainly to serve the needs of surrounding businesses. The Official Plan places a cap on retail premises within the Business Corridor designation, to ensure that retail operations do not dominate the land use mix in this designation. The subject proposal, for a 146,578 sq. ft. (13,617 m2) Loblaws superstore, which would be entirely oriented to serving the general public (rather than the local business community) on a regional scale, does not, in Staff’s opinion, comply with the intended planned function of the Business Corridor designation.
Community
Amenity-Business Area Designation:
· In the Markham Official Plan, retail development in Community Amenity Areas is restricted to a maximum of 6,000 m2 (64,586 sq. ft.) and outdoor storage and display of goods is not permitted. Furthermore, the Community Amenity/Business Area designation of the Cathedral Secondary Plan does not permit retail development adjacent to Major Mackenzie Drive, and does not permit the proposed automobile service station.
Transportation
Plan:
Town staff are of the opinion that the proposed collector road linking the northbound Highway 404 off ramp at Major Mackenzie Drive with Markland Street will be required in the future to relieve forecast traffic congestion at the Highway 404/Major Mackenzie Drive interchange. Staff, therefore, do not support the owner’s application to delete the designated collector road linking the off ramp to Markland Street from the Cathedral Community Secondary Plan.
The
Town is currently undertaking a review of its commercial policy structure
The Town has hired John Winter and Associates, a retail consultant, to undertake a review of the Town’s commercial policy structure. This analysis incorporates a review of evolving retail trends, the suitability of current commercial designations in light of projected retail growth, as well as the appropriateness of specific retail policies in the Markham Official Plan and in Secondary Plans.
In relation to this application, the retail policy provisions of the Business Corridor Area designation have also been reviewed, in order to assess the appropriateness of the proposed large-format retail development within the context of the Town’s overall retail structure. Key conclusions of this study, as they relate to this application, include:
· Reaffirmation that the planned function of the Business Corridor designation is to accommodate employment-oriented uses, as well as to provide a location for ancillary retail and personal services as an amenity to surrounding employees and businesses;
· In this regard, there are no relevant retailers in the 6,000 m2 size category;
· Instead, the sole large retailers of relevance are a) office supply stores which typically have floor areas up to a maximum of 3,000 m2 and b) computer/software stores which are considerably smaller.
· The study therefore recommends reducing the maximum retail store size in the Business Corridor designation to “generally 1,000 m2”, with exceptions for office supply and computer/software stores
Development
of large format single use retail on the Business Corridor lands represents a
further loss of employment land in the Town
The Town is currently experiencing a shortage of industrially-designated land, in the Business Park, Business Corridor and General Industrial land use categories. Development of a large format, single use supermarket on the subject lands, at the scale proposed by the applicant, would preclude the development of industrial and office commercial uses on this site, which are intended to be the primary land use types in the Business Corridor designation.
If
policy related issues were resolved, other site plan issues are still
outstanding
If the policy-related concerns noted above were addressed to the Town’s satisfaction, a number of physical planning concerns would still be outstanding, including:
· Provisions for a north-south entry road from the northbound 404 off-ramp at Major Mackenzie Drive, to the Markland Street extension.
· Improvements to the streetscape frontages of Major Mackenzie Drive, Markland Street and Street B, and the interface between the proposed development and the Woodbine North residential community to the south.
· Improvements to the interface between the Community Amenity/Business Area portion of the site and the proposed residential development to the north are required.
· Earlier discussions with the fire department indicated that a new fire hall is required in the vicinity of the Woodbine Avenue/Major Mackenzie Drive intersection. Further discussions with the Fire Department are required to confirm whether or not this facility is still required and the most appropriate location.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no
financial considerations at the present time.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Key environmental considerations that require
further review include:
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no accessibility
considerations associated with this application at the present time.
ENGAGE 21ST
CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no Engage 21st considerations associated with this
application at the present time.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The
application has been circulated to all relevant departments and outside
agencies. Comments and requirements will
be addressed during the review process.
CONCLUSIONS:
This report identifies a number of
fundamental policy-related issues associated with the proposed
development. These include the
proposal’s lack of conformity with the planned function and policy intent of
the Business Corridor and Community Amenity – Business Area designations of the
Markham Official Plan and the Cathedral Community Secondary Plan; potential new
commercial policy directions emerging from the Town’s review of its current
commercial policy structure; and the further loss of employment-oriented land
to other uses. Whereas the environmental
and site planning issues identified in this report can be addressed through the
development review process, the policy-related issues present a fundamental
concern, and will remain. Therefore,
while it is appropriate to hold a Public Meeting at this time, the applicant and
the Committee are advised that, in staff’s opinion, resolution of the
policy-related issues would require fundamental revisions to this proposal.
ATTACHMENTS:
Figure 1 – Location Map
Figure 2 – Air Photo
Figure 3 – Zoning and Area Context
Figure 4 – Proposed Site Plan
Concept
Figure 5 – Cathedral Community
Secondary Plan – Schedule ‘AA’ Land Use Plan
Appendix A – Draft Official Plan Amendment
Appendix B – Draft Zoning Amendment
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim
Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
Q:\Development\Planning\APPL\ZONING\04 010910 Loblaws\Preliminary report
05 18 revision 1.doc
FIGURE 1
OWNER: Loblaw Properties Limited
Mario Fatica
Senior Director of Real
Estate Development
22 St. Clair Avenue East
2nd Floor
Toronto ON M4T 2S5
Tel: 416-967-2567
Fax: 416-960-6949
AGENT: Zelinka Priamo Limited
Richard Zelinka
Principal
318 Wellington Road
London ON N6C 4P4
Tel: 519-474-7137
Fax: 519-474-2284
e-mail: richard.z@zpplan.com
LOCATION MAP: