|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Nilesh Surti,
Planner |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2004-Jun-01 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Novapharm Limited 575 Hood Road and 7500 Warden Avenue Lot 16, Plan M-1812 and Lot 35, Plan M-1807 Building Code Act Requirements File No. SC 03117169 |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council enact a bylaw to designate
PURPOSE:
The
purpose of this report is to enact a by-law under the Planning Act which
would allow the Owner of Lot 16, Plan M-1812 and
BACKGROUND:
Novapharm Limited, currently located in an existing
building at 575 Hood Road (Lot 16, Plan M-1812) acquired the adjacent southerly
lot (Lot 35, Plan M-1807), municipally known as 7500 Warden Avenue, and is
proposing to construct a 12,399m2
(133,466ft2) addition to the existing 6,755m2 (72,713ft2)
industrial building. The proposed addition extends from the existing
building onto the adjacent lot. Site plan approval for the addition was
granted on
The Building Code Act requires any building
located on more than one lot to be connected separately to the municipal
services from each lot. Notwithstanding
Novapharm owns both lots, each lot is a separate property which can be
conveyed. The proposed connections of
water distribution piping and sanitary building drains serving the existing
building and addition traverse the property line between the two lots and do
not connect to the municipal system separately as required by the Building
Code.
Staff have proposed a solution to the
Owner whereby the Town would pass a bylaw under the Planning Act to deem
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:
The existing building is
connected to the municipal water main at
Lots 16 and 35 are separate lots on a plan of subdivision. As such, the Owner could convey either
Merging of the properties into
one legal lot would resolve this problem.
Accordingly, staff has
proposed the two lots be merged so that a building permit can be issued for the
proposed addition. This can be
accomplished by the Town enacting a bylaw pursuant to Subsection 50(4) of the Planning
Act, which would deem Lots 16 and 35 not to be lots on a registered plan of
subdivision. The Planning Act requires the following steps to be taken
after the bylaw is enacted:
Once the bylaw is enacted and registered on title, the Owner would not
be able to convey either lot separately without first obtaining a severance.
This solution would enable the Owner to obtain a building permit under the Building
Code Act. Merging the two lots will
not require any additional variances.
Staff has discussed this matter with the Owner and
he has agreed to the proposed course of action as outlined in this report.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The
Building Department has been consulted in the preparation of this report.
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
FILE PATH: Q:\Development\Planning\APPL\SITEPLAN\03 117169 novopham\Novapharm
Report.doc
ATTACHMENTS: Figure 1
– Location Map
AGENT: Jan-Willem Gritters
Shore Tilbe
Irwin Architects
Figure 1