|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Markham Centre Team Richard Kendall, Senior Project
Co-ordinator, extension 6588 |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2004-June-28 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Enhanced Hoarding
Programme |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report dated
That lifestyle imaging and wordmark messaging
be endorsed for use on enhanced construction hoarding as set out in this
report;
That Council endorse the Guidelines for
Hoarding Signs, including the submission of a Sign Uniformity Plan, outlined in
this report as the basis for permitting signage on hoarding;
That staff be directed to draft a Hoarding
Agreement for execution by developers who wish to participate in the enhanced
hoarding programme;
And that a public meeting be held to discuss
the amendments to the Sign By-law (attached as Figure 3) to introduce signs on
hoarding, as addressed in this report.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s
endorsement for an enhanced hoarding programme, which includes additional site
identification in concert with Public Information Signage.
BACKGROUND:
Staff have been working with developers within
Markham Centre to incorporate the Markham Centre logo and various associated
Markham Centre messages into marketing of their developments, and into their
sales trailers/offices. This is intended
to help define the Markham Centre area, identify developments as Markham Centre
projects, and to co-ordinate the look and visual impact of hoarding programmes
in the area. The on-going need to
identify and communicate ‘Markham Centre’ within the community, has been
identified as part of the Markham Centre Communications Strategy.
One method which has been identified to achieve
greater awareness of Markham Centre, help define its boundaries, identify
coming features and high-light significant development approvals is through the
use of construction hoarding erected by builders. Depending on the type of construction
proposed, hoarding could be in place for up to two years, and this represents
an important opportunity to identify a site as a Markham Centre project and
introduce a common element, theme or other message, which would help promote
the Markham Centre vision. Working with
the development community is a way to communicate unified, key messages about
the vision, benefits and vibrant urban lifestyle opportunities within the
centre.
Staff presented proposed hoarding details,
colour palette, and examples of lifestyle and Markham Centre messages to the
May 18th, meeting of the Markham Centre Steering Committee. At that meeting, the committee endorsed the
enhanced hoarding detail, with ivory (tan) as the primary colour for the
hoarding accented by a black band across the top. The committee also directed that staff give
additional consideration to the types of messages to be included as the Markham
Centre component of the hoarding programme and report on recommendations for
changes to the sign by-law.
DISCUSSION:
The first opportunity to incorporate Markham
Centre messaging and lifestyle images is with the recent installation of the
hoarding for the Tridel/Dorsay project along portions of
Hoarding
Detail and colour identified, developers consulted
Tridel has installed hoarding which, when
completed, would represent a higher standard of construction, including a
covered arcade above the sidewalk adjacent to
Staff, together with development
representatives, selected a neutral, tan background colour for the hoarding
which would provide high visibility for the Markham Centre logos but also serve
individual builder needs, when it comes to combining other project-related
signage in accordance with the sign by-law.
The top of the hoarding would be finished in a contrasting colour such
as black.
In addition to the logo, examples of Markham
Centre messaging could include phrases such as ‘Another project in Markham
Centre….our new Downtown’, or bullet points from the series of presentations
which staff have prepared: ‘A place for all’, ‘A community integrated with
nature’, ‘A vibrant centre’, ‘A sense of place’, ‘A walkable downtown’ or ‘An
accessible centre’. A map outlining the
boundaries of Markham Centre could be oriented towards pedestrians walking next
to the hoarding. Including the website
address is another option for the Markham Centre component of the
hoarding. The Markham Centre messages
would be provided by the individual participating developers.
This programme has also been discussed with
representatives of Tridel, the Remington Group and Liberty Development
Corporation, all of which are supportive of including this elevated level of
Markham Centre messaging within their hoarding programmes.
Hoarding
and site identification signs require changes to the Sign By-law
The second component of the programme involves
lifestyle messages and images, consistent with the mixed-use, urban vision for
Markham Centre, and additional site identification on the hoarding.
The Sign By-law clearly articulates the Town’s
interests in regulating signs to ensure that they:
(a)
Are appropriate in size,
number, and location to the type of activity or use to which they pertain.
(b)
Provide the public with
reasonable and appropriate means to locate and identify facilities, businesses,
and services without difficulty and confusion.
(c)
Are compatible with their
surroundings.
(d)
Protect, preserve, and
enhance the aesthetic qualities and visual character of the Town of Markham.
(e)
Are consistent with the
Town’s urban design and heritage objectives.
(f)
Do not create a distraction
or safety hazard for pedestrians or motorists.
(g)
Minimize possible adverse
effects on nearby public and private property.
(h)
Regulate signs while
impairing the public’s right to expression as little as possible and
proportionately to the purpose of the By-law.
In reviewing hoarding signage incorporating
lifestyle imaging a number of matters were identified relative to the purpose
and intent of the sign by-law. These
matters include the size and frequency of signage on hoarding, the Town’s
ability to regulate content of signs and to restrict an enhanced hoarding
programme to Markham Centre only.
Size
and spacing requirements
With respect to the purpose and intent of the
Sign By-law, staff suggest that hoarding signage be limited in size to 0.25
square metres (2.7 square feet) of sign area per linear metre of street
frontage, to a maximum of not more than 18 square metres (197 square feet) in
area. With respect to a separation
distance, 1 lifestyle sign per 30metres (98 feet) frontage, is proposed,
subject to area requirements discussed above.
Furthermore, such signs could only be located on continuous lengths of
hoarding 100 metres (328 feet) or greater, with no signage other than Public
Information Signs located between Hoarding signs. Hoarding signs should not be illuminated or
project above the height of the hoarding.
This would allow the long expanse of hoarding
to be broken up by intervals of Markham Centre or other Public Information
Signs combined with lifestyle images and site identification. Hoarding signage could only be introduced in
concert with the enhanced hoarding programme as discussed in this report. It is further recommended that the proposed
site identification signage should be an adjunct to the hoarding/lifestyle
messaging, and should therefore represent not more than 25% of the total area
of the additional signage.
Better
quality of construction hoarding provided
One advantage of the hoarding sign programme is
that hoarding would be in place on a temporary basis (typically, no more than
two years) and would have limited impact on the surroundings, with no long term
adverse effect on adjacent properties.
Since the hoarding would be in place, regardless of whether additional
signage was incorporated into the design, the enhanced hoarding programme would
provide for a better quality of construction and finish to the hoarding, and
thereby enhance its aesthetic quality, support urban design objectives and
provide the Town with an opportunity to achieve greater awareness and introduce
key lifestyle messages in communities such as Markham Centre.
Hoarding
Sign programme should apply across the Town
Based on staff discussions and the intent of
the Sign By-law, it was determined that the hoarding programme should not be
exclusive to Markham Centre, but should apply in other areas of the Town.
The ability to regulate the messaging on the
hoarding is not provided for under the applicable legislation. While the specific Markham Centre messaging
component of the hoarding programme is not an issue under the Sign By-law, the
lifestyle imaging would have to be addressed under a separate agreement. In this regard staff have been crafting a
Hoarding Agreement, similar to Sales Trailer Agreements, already in effect
across the Town. The Hoarding Agreement
could be executed in conjunction with the site plan approval process and would
include a Sign Uniformity Plan, as currently provided for in the Sign
By-law. The Sign Uniformity Plan
requires drawings and specifications showing all wall signs on a premise
detailing the type, character, height and design of signs in relation to
architectural features. A component of
the proposed amendment to the Sign By-law includes adding a reference to
hoarding signs under the Sign Uniformity Provisions.
Staff also propose to introduce the following
definition of a Hoarding Sign into the Sign By-law, to promote urban living and
related project identification:
“Hoarding Sign”
means a temporary, non-illuminated sign associated with the development of
property which promotes urban living and advertises or identifies the
development of the property on which the sign is located.”
The
proposed amendments to the Sign By-law as discussed, combined with the enhanced
hoarding detail and the following recommended Guidelines for Hoarding Signs,
are intended to provide a mechanism to introduce lifestyle and other public
information messaging such as those identified for Markham Centre, while at the
same time providing for an up-graded level of finish to hoarding associated with
development projects and additional site identification.
GUIDELINES
FOR HOARDING SIGNS
FINANCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
There
are no financial implications for the Town in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no environmental
implications for the Town in this report.
ACCESSIBILITY
CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no accessibility
considerations in this report.
ENGAGE
21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
The proposal aligns with the
following key Town of Markham Corporate Goals: Managed Growth and Quality
Community.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
Discussions with Building and Legal staff
regarding proposed hoarding signs are addressed in this report.
CONCLUSION:
Staff recommend that
the Guidelines for Hoarding Signs be endorsed, and that a public meeting be held to discuss the proposed
amendments to the Sign By-law.
ATTACHMENTS:
Figures 1 & 2 – Examples of Hoarding
Signage
Figure 3 – Draft Amendment to the Sign By-law
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
Q\Development\Planning\Teams\Markham Centre\Coordinator\Enhanced
Hoarding Programme Report