|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Michael Seaman,
Senior Planner - Heritage and Conservation |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
November 9, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Deeming By-law Frank and Felicetta Marciano 30 Wales Avenue Plan 1318 Lot 34, Part Lot 36 Building Code Act Requirements |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council enact a by-law to deem
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to enact a by-law
under the Planning Act which would allow the owner of
BACKGROUND:
Mr. and Mrs. Marciano
are owners of the property known municipally as
The applicants are proposing to construct a
detached garage, a rear addition to the existing heritage house and a new rear
and side deck. The proposed garage
would straddle both
The Building Code Act requires any
building located on more than one lot to be connected separately to the
municipal services from each lot.
Notwithstanding that Mr. and Mrs. Marciano own
both lots, each lot is a separate property, which can be conveyed. The subject property has access to municipal
services through only one lot. The
applicant intends to use both lots as one single residential property and has
no need to provide connections to the other lot as required by the Building
Code. Merging of the lots will also
negate the need for additional zoning related variances from the Committee of
Adjustment.
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:
The existing residence and garage
at
Merging of the properties into one
legal lot would resolve this problem.
Accordingly, staff has proposed the two lots be
merged so that a building permit can be issued for the proposed garage, once
the applicant enters into a site plan agreement with the Town. This can be accomplished by the Town enacting
a by-law pursuant to Subsection 50 (4) of the Planning Act, which would
deem Lots 34 and the south part of
Once the by-law is enacted and
registered on title, the Owners would not be able to convey either lot
separately without first obtaining a severance.
This would enable the Owners to obtain a building permit under the Building
Code Act. Merging the two lots will
not require any additional variances.
Staff has discussed this matter with the Owners and they
are in support of the proposed course of action as outlined in this report.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Currently there is no fee for applications by
property owners to have their property deemed not to be part of a registered
plan of subdivision. Town (Development
Services) staff is working to amend the fee by-law to establish a fee for
similar applications in the future to cover staff time spent on processing and
implementing the deeming by-law request.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
None
ENGAGE 21ST
CONSIDERATIONS:
The proposed application is
consistent with the community vision of preserving our natural and physical
environment by accommodating the sensitive improvement of a heritage property
in the Markham Village Heritage Conservation District.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The Building Department and the Legal
Department have been consulted in the preparation of this report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Figure 1 – Applicant and Location Map
Figure 2 – Existing Survey –
Figure 3 – Proposed additions and new
construction –
Appendix A – Draft By-law
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
FIGURE 1
APPLICANT: Frank
Marciano,
FILEPATH: Q:\Development\Heritage\PROPERTY\WALES\pms1119.doc
LOCATION MAP: