DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services

Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning & Urban Design

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Isa James, ext. 2520

Senior Planner, East District

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

December 7, 2004

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

PRELIMINARY REPORT

Tri-Block Group Ltd.

142 White’s Hill Road and Parts 6 and 7 65R-21662

Zoning by-law amendment and subdivision applications to permit a draft plan of subdivision containing 6 residential units (19TM-04005).

Cornell Community

FILES: SU.04-015260 & ZA.04-015352

 

 

 


 

RECOMMENDATION:

That a Public Meeting be held to consider zoning by-law amendment application (ZA.04-015352) and subdivision application (SU.04-015260), submitted by Tri-Block Group Ltd., to permit 6 townhouse units (19TM-04005) at 142 White’s Hill Avenue, within the Cornell Community.

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding zoning and subdivision applications submitted by Tri-Block Group Ltd. and to recommend that a statutory public meeting be held to consider these applications.

 

BACKGROUND:

The subject lands comprise approximately 0.214 hectares (0.53 acres) located on the north side of  White’s Hill Avenue, west of Bur Oak Avenue, in the Cornell Community (Figure 1).  The lands are currently vacant.  There are no environmental features on the subject lands.

 

The lands were originally part of the Cornell Phase 1 holdings. However, only a small portion, required for a temporary lane connection for the Phase 1, Stage 4 lands, was registered. The bulk of the subject lands were originally included as parts in a reference plan that was registered as Phase 1, Stage 5a, but were not included in the Stage 5a agreement due to uncertainty regarding the lot depths required along Bur Oak Avenue. The lands were also omitted from the subsequent sale of the adjoining lands to the north and east to Wykland Estates Inc., as they were considered to be part of the Phase 1 lands.

 

The lands are designated Community Amenity Area – Corridor in the Secondary Plan and the largest portion is currently zoned as A1 –agricultural by By-law 304-87. The temporary lane connection lands are zoned R3*5.

 

As shown on Figure 2, the adjoining lands to the north and east are proposed to be developed with single detached and townhouse units.  To the south is a place of worship block, and lands to the west have been developed with primarily townhouse units.

 

The proposed plan comprises one 6-unit townhouse block and the corresponding section of laneway. The proposed lots will have a depth of 33.51 metres. The units will be 6.0 metres wide.

 

 

OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:

 

The proposed plan completes the housing pattern established in the adjoining plans of subdivision. The proposal conforms to the land use designations, density and height provisions and established street pattern of the Secondary Plan and is consistent with the surrounding context.

 

Zoning by-law amendment required

Zoning by-law amendments are required to delete the lands from By-law 304-87, and to incorporate them into the Town’s Urban Expansion By-law 177-96.  The applicant is requesting the same zoning as currently applies to the neighbouring lands.

 

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL:

The potential benefits include:

  • Provision of lands necessary to complete the required infrastructure, including hydro and telecommunication facilities, during the first phase of the Wykland Estates Inc. subdivision build-out;
  • Allow development of the subject and adjoining lands to be completed; and
  • Completion of the established community design pattern.

 

CONCERNS/ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED:

The following is a brief summary of concerns/issues raised to date. These matters, and any others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, will be addressed in a final staff report to be presented to Committee at a later date.  The concerns/issues raised to date may include, but are not limited to the following:

 

·      The Trustee for the Developer’s Group has not assigned water supply allocation to permit the proposed development.  Assignment of allocation for 6 units would be required.

 

·      Approval of the proposed development cannot be finalized until current sewer capacity issues have been resolved.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

There are no financial implications for the Town in this report.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The proposal is currently in circulation to other Town Departments and agencies for review and comments.

 

CONCLUSION:

It is recommended that Committee authorize the scheduling of a public meeting to consider the proposed development. The applicant has been requested to provide drawings of the proposed townhouses prior to the public meeting.

                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Director of Planning & Urban Design

 

Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Commissioner of Development Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q:\Development\Design\EAST\CORNELL\SUBDIVIS\Phase 1\Tri-Block\DSCReportTri-Block.doc

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Figure 1:           Location Map

Figure 2:           Proposed plan of subdivision

Figure 3:           Area Context/Zoning

 

AGENT/APPLICANT:            Tri-Block Group Limited                      Tel: (905) 809-1682

                                                c/o Galen Lam                                      Fax: (905) 201-6726

                                                129 Rougehaven Way

                                                Markham, Ontario L3P 7W5