|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and
Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird,
Commissioner of Development Services Valerie
Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
|
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Recommendation Report 973125 Ontario
Ltd. and Constantinos Pallas Draft Plan of
Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment File Nos. SU 04
016284 and ZA 04 016314 |
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report dated
That notwithstanding the Council moratorium on
residential draft plan and site plan approvals, the Draft Plan of
Subdivision (SU 04 016284) and Zoning By-law Amendment (ZA 04 016314)
applications be approved and that water and sewer
allocation be granted in accordance with York Region commitments, as outlined
in a letter to the Town, dated October, 19, 2004;
That the draft plan of subdivision
prepared by Humphries Planning Group Inc., identified as File Number 0422, dated
May 12, 2004 as revised, and attached as Figure 3, be approved, subject to the
conditions of Draft Plan Approval attached as Appendix ‘A’, the execution of a
comprehensive subdivision agreement and revisions to the draft plan including:
That Council endorse the
parameters for the drafting of a zoning by-law, including Hold (H) provisions, as
discussed in the report, including tree preservation and noise attenuation, and
that staff be directed to bring forward the implementing by-law at the first
available opportunity.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report
is to discuss and make recommendations on applications to permit a 15 single
detached lot plan of subdivision (including an existing home which is proposed
to be relocated on site) and implementing zoning. The report identifies issues associated with
these applications and recommends conditions of draft plan approval and an
amending by-law.
BACKGROUND:
This 1.11 ha (2.75 acre) site is located at
the southwest corner of
East -
South - existing plan of subdivision (single
detached dwellings)
West - existing plan of subdivision (single
detached dwellings)
Area context and surrounding
zoning is shown on Figure 2.
The site is generally flat
with a tree stand at the intersection of 16th and Warden and tree
cover in various locations throughout the site.
There is a house and shed on the property (
The proposed subdivision (Figure 4 – proposed
Plan of Subdivision) consists of 14 single detached lots, with frontages ranging
from 15 metres up to 23 metres (49 to 75 feet). Nine lots will front onto the
north side of
Road dedications are required for the
completion of the cul-de-sac on
Table One, below, outlines
the site statistics.
Table One Site Statistics |
||
|
|
Lot Area – square metres |
1 |
30.35 |
921.4 |
2 |
15.0 |
568.1 |
3 |
15.0 |
641.1 |
4 |
15.0 |
703.8 |
5 |
15.0 |
724.1 |
6 |
15.0 |
740.3 |
7 |
15.0 |
743.3 |
8 |
18.5 |
611.0 |
9 |
21.11 |
690.5 |
10 |
21.58 |
762.0 |
11 |
18.0 |
683.6 |
12 |
18.0 |
684.0 |
13 |
18.0 |
684.0 |
14 |
18.0 |
828.8 |
15 |
22.94 |
791.8 |
A public meeting was held on
The
lands are designated “Urban Residential” in the Official Plan. Detailed land
use Schedule “A” of Secondary Plan Amendment PD 1-10, identifies the subject
lands for low density housing and permits development on the basis of a maximum
of 11 units per hectare of gross residential area (4.45 units/gross acre). The proposal is generally consistent with the
planning standards and criteria contained in Appendix 2 – Planning Standards
and Criteria, which further defines density targets for the lands subject to PD
1-10.
A
Zoning By-law amendment is required to implement the plan of subdivision.
The
lands are zoned Agriculture One (A1) Zone on the north of
Proposed performance standards
include a minimum 15 metre frontage for all lots, and a minimum area of 511
square metres, consistent with the R6 provisions of By-law 118-79. Maximum height would be 10.7 metres and
coverage for one and two storey dwellings would be 45 and 40 percent
respectively. In order to address tree
preservation measures, the applicant has submitted a tree survey and has agreed
to work with staff to refine the building envelopes for certain lots within the
plan in an attempt to preserve some of the more significant trees within the
plan area. The schedules of the zoning
by-law should be drafted in consultation with the applicant to protect
identified trees, while integrating required noise attenuation measures.
COMMENTS:
Water Allocation and Sanitary
Sewer Capacity
On May 11, 2004, Council
passed a resolution respecting sanitary sewer capacity/allocation stating that no further residential draft plans of
subdivision or site plans be approved until staff report back and the Region of
York confirms, in writing that sewage capacity is available.
In reviewing this application
and providing conditions of draft plan approval, York Region advised they
require a temporary easement over all of proposed
Cash-in-lieu of parkland will
be required to be paid to the Parkland Reserve Fund. Parklands to the south
were previously sized to include this subdivision, at the time of the Warden
Woods subdivision agreement, and were acquired by the Town with monies drawn
from the Reserve Fund.
Studies
have been submitted
The applicant has provided
studies identified by Planning Staff and requested through circulation of the
application to Town departments and external agencies. These studies include:
noise study, servicing study, tree assessment, and an archaeological study, and
the details of the studies will be addressed in the following sections of this
report.
Subdivision
As identified on Figure
3 – Proposed Plan of Subdivision, this plan is generally in accordance with the
planning approach and parkland strategy adopted for the lands at the southwest
corner of
Other possible design
changes staff reviewed with the applicant are identified on Figure 5, Scenario
1 and include reorienting the cul-de-sac to the south rather than the north and
reconfiguring the lots in the vicinity of the existing dwelling. The effect of staff’s suggested changes include
providing larger lots and greater flexibility for the siting of dwellings,
noise attenuation measures and tree protection adjacent to the Warden/16th
Avenues intersection and consolidating three of the lots (10, 11 & 15) on
the south side of 16th Lane to accommodate the applicant’s dwelling while
utilizing the existing access drive to Warden Avenue. In the long term, should this dwelling be demolished,
then the consolidated lots could be severed in accordance with the proposed
zoning standards. The two new lots would
then take access off
Specific design
issues with the orientation of the dwellings identified at the public meeting
were reviewed by staff, including treating
During the course
of development review, the potential changes to the plan noted above were
explored. However, the applicant has not
indicated a willingness to revise the plan to address the improvements
identified by staff. The proposed
changes discussed are desirable but staff note that from a technical
perspective the proposed plan of subdivision is acceptable. Beyond shifting the termination of the
cul-de-sac to the west and redesigning the cul-de-sac in accordance with Town
standards, the other suggested improvements are not
being required as red line revisions.
Engineering matters:
Services are available
Comments from the
Cul-de-Sac must be modified
The applicant is
proposing to introduce a cul-de-sac at the easterly termination of
Noise Study has been submitted
A noise study has
been submitted which concludes that the unattenuated daytime sound levels in
the outdoor living areas associated with some of the dwellings will exceed the
recommended acceptable levels (MOE Guidelines), requiring noise control
measures and warning clauses. In
addition, the unattenuated sound levels at the outside walls of all of the
dwellings are such that indoor noise controls are required for all units, with
relevant warning clauses. The study
identifies that the sound levels can be mitigated and specific measures are
identified for individual lots within the plan.
These measures include noise barriers, warning clauses, requirements for
central air conditioning and acoustic insulation. For those lots adjacent to 16th
Avenue and Warden Avenue (lots 1 to 10) the required acoustic barrier would be
2.2 metres in height (7.2 feet) consisting of a combination of earth berm and
fence.
Based on the
design of the subdivision staff remained concerned that the current cul-de-sac
configuration limits opportunities to adequately integrate noise attenuation
measures (berms and noise walls) while protecting trees in the vicinity of the
intersection. The changes required by
Tree Conservation
Town staff
inspected the subject site on
Architectural Control will be required
The Regional
Municipality of York Region has advised of no objection to approval of the
draft plan of subdivision subject to conditions and resolution of the easement
requirements associated with
External Agencies
Comments received from the former Markham Hydro
Distribution indicate that the proposed buildings would be located too close to
existing hydro lines on
Archaeological
Study
An Archaeological Assessment has been submitted in
support of these applications which concludes that there is no evidence of
archaeological deposits and that archaeological concerns relating to these
lands can be considered as addressed.
This study has been submitted to the Ministry of Citizenship, Culture
and Recreation for their review and any requirements arising from that review
will be addressed through the conditions of draft plan approval.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no financial implications for the
Town in this report.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
A tree survey and preservation plan has been submitted and the conditions
of draft plan approval speak to tree preservation measures. The proposed zoning by-law will also provide
building envelopes to accommodate specific setback requirements associated with
individual trees within the plan.
ACCESSIBILITY
CONSIDERATIONS:
Accessibility considerations such as pedestrian access from the
proposed cul-de-sac to
ENGAGE 21ST
CONSIDERATIONS:
The
infill proposal aligns with the following key Town of
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The
applications have been circulated to internal departments and external agencies
and their requirements have been incorporated into the conditions of draft plan
approval.
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth,
M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning and
Urban Design |
|
Jim Baird,
M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development
Services |
DOCUMENT: Q:\Development\Planning\APPL\SUBDIV\04
016284 Pallas\Pallas reommendation report
ATTACHMENTS: Figure 1 – Location Map
Figure
2 – Area Context and Zoning
Figure
3 – Aerial Photo
Figure
4 – Plan of Subdivision
Figure
5 – Scenario 1- Suggested Modifications to
Appendix ‘A’
- Conditions of draft plan approval
OWNER: Constantinos Pallas AGENT: Rosemarie Humphries
L3R 0K2
L4L 8S5
Fax: 905-264-8073
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION
MAP: