|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Stephen Kitagawa, Senior Planner |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
PRELIMINARY REPORT Application for zoning by-law
amendment and draft plan of subdivision approval to permit 27 part lots and
14 single detached lots East of Kennedy Road, south of SU.04-028638 |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That a Public
Meeting be held to consider the applications submitted by Kennedy Mackenzie Investment
Limited for zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision approval to
permit 27 part lots and 14 single detached lots east of Kennedy Road and south
of Major Mackenzie Drive in the Berczy Village Community.
PURPOSE:
BACKGROUND:
Property and Area Context
The 1.53
hectare (3.7 ac) vacant property is located east of
Adjoining
the property are residential subdivisions to the north, west and east (across
The
subject lands comprise 4 remnant blocks purchased by the applicant, from the
York Region District School Board. The
surplus lands were not required by the school board to construct the high
school (Pierre Elliot Trudeau High School) located on the north side of Bur Oak
Avenue, east of Kennedy Road.
Secondary Plan designation and existing
zoning
The
subject lands are designated Urban Residential – Low Density in the Berczy
Village Secondary Plan. The proposed single
detached lots comply with uses and density (17 to 37 uph or 6.9 to 14.9 upa) in
the Urban Residential – Low Density designation.
TABLE A |
RESIDENTIAL UNITS |
HECTARES |
ACRES |
Single detached |
41 |
|
|
Gross Site Area |
|
1.538 |
3.80 |
Net Site Area |
|
1.538 |
3.80 |
Net Site Density |
|
26.6 uph |
10.78 upa |
Existing Zoning
The
lands are currently zoned Rural Residential by By-law 304-87, as amended.
Proposal for 27 part lots and 14 single
detached lots
The
applicant is proposing to combine part lots from a previously registered plan
(65M-3536) with 27 part lots from the subject lands in addition to 14 single
detached lots with frontages ranging from 10 metres (32.8 ft.) to 13.3 metres
(43.6 ft). 27 of the lots are of conventional
depth and will be combined with the adjacent part lots to the north, while 14
are wide shallow lots.
TABLE B |
|||
Unit Type |
Frontage |
Depth |
Number of Units |
M(Ft) |
M(Ft) |
||
Single Detached |
10 m (32.8 ft) |
32 m (104 ft) |
7 part lots |
Single Detached |
10.6 m (34.7 ft) |
32 m (104 ft) |
5 part lots |
Single Detached |
11.1 m (36.4 ft) |
32 m (104 ft) |
15 part lots |
Single Detached |
11.1 m (36.4 ft) |
28 m (91.8 ft) |
1 |
Single Detached |
13.3 m (43.6 ft) |
28 m (91.8 ft) |
13 |
POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE
PROPOSAL:
Some of the anticipated benefits of
the proposal include:
The following is a brief summary of concerns/issues raised to date. These matters, and any others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, will be addressed in a final staff report to be presented to Committee at a later date.
· Additional servicing allocation required from the Region prior to draft plan approval.
As set out in
the
Allocation has previously been granted on the registered part lots that are to be combined with 27 part lots proposed by the applicant. The recommended allocation for 27.5 units is sufficient to cover the proposed 27 part lots (13.5 units) and 14 single detached units.
Roads must be constructed
·
Through the site plan approval
of the high school, the roads surrounding the school site (extensions of
Lots north of subject site to be reconfigured through
part lot control
·
In order to maximize the number
of lots, the applicant has configured the part lots in a north south direction
fronting onto
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no financial matters to be considered in
this report.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED:
The applications have been circulated to various Town departments and
external agencies and are currently under review. Requirements of the Town and external
agencies will be reflected in the preparation of the draft plan conditions and
zoning by-laws.
It is recommended that the
Committee authorize the scheduling of a Public Meeting to consider the
applicant’s proposed draft plan and zoning amendments.
|
|
|
Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim
Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
DOCUMENT #: Q:\Development\Planning\APPL\SUBDIV\04 028638 KENNEDY MACKENZIE
CONSIX\preliminary report.doc
ATTACHMENTS: Figure 1 –
Applicant/Agent and Location Map
Figure
2 – Area Context and Zoning
Figure
3 – Air Photo
Figure
4 – Proposed Draft Plan
APPLICANT/AGENT: Macaulay,
Shiomi, Howson Ltd.
Attn: Elizabeth Howson
M4P
1L3
Tel: 416-487-4101
Fax: 416-487-5489