|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Elizabeth
Wimmer, Senior Planner, Urban Design |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2005-Jun-07 |
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Variance
to the Fence By-Law 277-97 at 625 Cochrane Drive |
|
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the report entitled “Variance to the Fence
By-Law 277-97 at 625 Cochrane Drive” to Development Services Committee, dated
June 7, 2005 be received;
AND THAT the request to grant
relief from the provisions of the Fence By-Law 277-97 to permit a 1.8m high
decorative metal screen fence in the front yard of a commercial office
building (to screen a proposed backup generator unit) at 625 Cochrane Drive,
whereas the by-law permits a maximum 1.2m high fence in the front yard, be
approved. |
PURPOSE:
The proposed fence variance is in response to
Committee of Adjustment Application File No. A/30/05, in
order to screen a generator unit.
BACKGROUND:
The owners of
Urban Design staff conducted a site visit and determined
that the generator could be acceptable in the front yard, provided the unit is
screened with a permanent structure and associated landscape planting. The screening structure should be
architecturally compatible with the building design and materials and will be
subject to the approval of the Town Architect.
OPTIONS/DISCUSSION:
The applicant has submitted a satisfactory design
solution. A decorative, aluminium, 1.8m high fence has
been proposed to enclose the generator.
The proposed material is an architectural material and is commonly
incorporated in to commercial building design.
The material has aluminium vertical louvered panels and the colour
reflects that of the existing building.
The back-up emergency generator is approximately 1.8m high and the fence
will be required at that height in order to fully screen the unit from view.
Staff recommend the request for the variance to the fence By-Law 277-97 be approved
based on the design submitted. (See appendix A)
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
No financial considerations are required.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
The unit will emit noise when it is running.
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
No accessibility considerations are
required.
ENGAGE 21ST
CONSIDERATIONS:
No engage 21st
considerations are required.
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
Committee of Adjustment
By-law enforcement
ATTACHMENTS:
Appendix A/B
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of Planning & Urban Design |
|
Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
Q:\Development\Design\WEST\SW_BROWN\625
Cochrane Drive.doc