DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services

Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning & Urban Design

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Stephen Kitagawa, Senior Planner

 

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

June 21, 2005

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

PRELIMINARY REPORT

Fairglen Homes Limited

Application for zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision approval to permit 18 single detached lots

9765 Kennedy Road

East side of Kennedy Road, north of Bur Oak Avenue

Berczy Village Community

SU.05-009324 & ZA.05-009327

 

 

 


 

RECOMMENDATION:

That a Public Meeting be held to consider the applications submitted by Fairglen Homes Ltd. for zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision to permit 18 single detached lots at 9765 Kennedy Road, located east of Kennedy Road, north of Bur Oak Avenue in the Berczy Village Community

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding applications by Fairglen Homes Ltd. for zoning by-law amendment and draft plan of subdivision to permit 18 single detached lots, at 9765 Kennedy Road, located east of Kennedy Road, north of Bur Oak Avenue in the Berczy Village Community.

 

BACKGROUND:

The subject lands are located within the Berczy Village Community, on the east side of Kennedy Road, north of Bur Oak Avenue, municipally known as 9765 Kennedy Road.  The 0.968 hectare (2.39 ac) property contains the heritage dwelling Henry Pingle Senior House.  To the north and east are single detached dwellings.  To the west, across Kennedy Road, are single detached dwellings, townhouses and vacant commercial lands within the Angus Glen community.  To the south is the York Downs Garden Centre.

 

 

Heritage building is located on the subject property

The subject property contains the Henry Pingle Senior House, which is identified as a heritage resource in the Berczy Village Secondary Plan and is listed on the Markham Inventory of Heritage Buildings.  The property has been listed on the heritage inventory since 1993.

 

Heritage building identified as Group 1

In 1994, as part of a review to establish policies for the Berczy Village Secondary Plan, the house was identified as a Group 2 structure, a building of significance and worthy of preservation.  In October 2002, the Heritage Markham Architectural Review Sub-Committee found the structure to be of greater significance than the original evaluation. The building was reassessed and rated in the Group 1 category, indicating a building of major significance and importance to the Town and worthy of designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

Council endorsed preservation on site (in situ or on new lot)

In February 2003, Council passed a resolution confirming that the Henry Pingle Senior House is to be considered a significant heritage resource and should be preserved within any future development, preferably on its original foundation, on an appropriately sized lot.  However, after consultation with staff, it was agreed that, if retention on its original foundation is not feasible due to development constraints, the dwelling could be relocated to another lot on the property, provided the aesthetics of the dwelling are not compromised, and that an appropriate outdoor amenity area is provided which would allow the dwelling to continue to face Kennedy Road.

 

Previous application to amend the zoning by-law refused

In September 2003, an application to amend the zoning by-law to permit residential uses at 9765 Kennedy Road was submitted by a previous applicant.  The proposal comprised 22 single detached, condominium dwellings.

 

Following a number of meetings with the applicant, staff recommended that Committee refuse the proposal for the following reasons:

 

  • The proposal is not in keeping with the policies of the Berczy Village Secondary Plan;
  • The proposal does not respect the existing development pattern in an area context;
  • The proposal does not provide for integration with adjacent lands; and,
  • The proposal does not comply with current engineering standards.
In November 2003, Development Services Committee deferred the application as requested by the applicant, to allow the submission of a revised proposal to address the concerns noted by staff.
Current zoning and Official Plan Designation

The subject property is designated Urban Residential in the Official Plan and Urban Residential – Low Density in the Berczy Village Secondary Plan.  The intent of this designation is to identify lands to be used primarily for low density housing with direct frontage on a public street. 

 

The proposed single detached lots comply with the uses and density (17 to 37 uph or 6.9 to 14.9 upa) in the Urban Residential – Low Density designation (Table A).

 

TABLE A

RESIDENTIAL UNITS

HECTARES

ACRES

Single detached

18

0.623

1.539

Gross Site Area

 

0.968

2.392

Net Site Area

 

0.623

1.539

Net Site Density

 

28.8 uph

11.69 upa

 

The subject lands are currently zoned Agricultural (A1) by by-law 304-87, as amended, and a zoning amendment is required to permit the proposal.

 

18 single detached lots proposed

The applicant is proposing 18 single detached dwellings with frontages ranging from 9.15 m (30 ft) to 16.2 m (53.1 ft).  The lots have similar lot frontages to the adjacent subdivision to the north and east.  11 lots are of conventional depth and the remaining 7 lots are wide shallow lots.

 

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL:

Some of the anticipated benefits of the proposal include:

 

·        Proposal is in keeping with the Berczy Village Secondary Plan.

·        Completion of vacant lands within a largely built up area of the Berczy Village Community.

·        Completion of Tannis Street and Cynthia Jean Street.

·        Preservation of the heritage dwelling within the draft plan of subdivision.

 

CONCERNS/ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED:

The following is a brief summary of concerns/issues raised to date. These matters, and any others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, will be addressed in a final staff report to be presented to Committee at a later date

 

  • Additional servicing allocation required from the Region prior to draft plan approval

As set out in the February 15, 2005 servicing allocation report, Council recommended that an additional 18 units be allocated to the subject lands.  This allocation is part of a larger regional allocation to the Town of over 4,000 units, which is contingent on approval by Regional Council.  This approval is still outstanding.  As a result, draft plan approval cannot be granted until additional servicing allocation is confirmed by the Region, in accordance with the recommendation of the Feb 15 report.

 

  • Heritage Markham recommends that the Henry Pingle Sr. House be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act

Heritage Markham recommended at its April 25, 2005, Committee meeting that the Henry Pingle Sr. House be designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.  In addition to the standard conservation requirements to protect the building (letter of credit, heritage designation and other preservation requirements for heritage buildings preserved within plans of subdivision), the Committee recommended that the heritage house be retained on a larger lot to provide a larger amenity area.

The applicant is currently responding to the recommendation and has indicated that a response is being prepared and will be forwarded to Heritage Markham outlining a justification for retaining the heritage dwelling on the proposed lot.  Heritage Markham expressed a concern with the size of the amenity space and whether the dwelling would be saleable.  To alleviate the Committee’s concern, the applicant intends to demonstrate that the heritage dwelling is sustainable on the proposed lot and has indicated that there is a potential purchaser.

 

  • Temporary turning circle required

The Engineering Department requires a temporary turning circle and will require several lots be frozen until Tannis Street is extended southward.

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:

There are no financial matters to be considered in this report.

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The applications have been circulated to various Town departments and external agencies and are currently under review.  Requirements of the Town and external agencies will be reflected in the preparation of the draft plan conditions and zoning by-laws.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Director of Planning & Urban Design

 

Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Commissioner of Development Services

 

 


DOCUMENT #:  Q:\Development\Planning\APPL\SUBDIV\05 009324 FAIRGLEN HOMES LTD\preliminary report.doc

 

 

ATTACHMENTS:                Figure 1 – Applicant/Agent and Location Map

                                                Figure 2 – Area Context and Zoning

                                                Figure 3 – Air Photo

                                                Figure 4 – Proposed Draft Plan

 

APPLICANT/AGENT:          Joanne Barnett

                                                6 Dunkirk Road

                                                Toronto, ON

                                                M4C 2L9

 

                                                Tel:  (416) 990-8367

                                                Fax:  (416) 423-1980