DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

TO:

Mayor and Members of Council

 

 

 

 

FROM:

Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services

Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of Planning & Urban Design

Sheila Birrell, Town Clerk

 

 

 

 

PREPARED BY:

Dave Miller, Project Co-ordinator Zoning Program and Special Projects

 

 

 

 

DATE OF MEETING:

August 30, 2005

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

Front Yard Parking in Residential Areas

Discussion and Options 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION

That a Public Meeting be held to receive input on the strategy and options outlined in this report, including possible refinements to By-law provisions, by-law enforcement and on-street overnight parking provisions in residential areas.

And that following the Public Meeting staff report back to Development Services with final recommendations.

 

PURPOSE

 

This report outlines a strategy to manage the residential front yard parking issue. A strategy is required to deal with concerns about the widths of driveways on residential lots and the impacts front yard parking potentially has on the character of a dwelling and on the neighbourhood.  The strategy is comprised of three components: refinements to By-law provisions, measured and progressive by-law enforcement and expansion of the Town’s on-street overnight parking program.

 

The report includes a number of driveway illustrations that could be converted to development standards incorporated into a zoning by-law.  These figures show driveways 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 metres wider than the width of the garage door opening.

 

The report also summarizes the Town’s current enforcement practices and how an on-street overnight parking program could offset potential impact of enforcement of driveway width standards.

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

The widening of driveways in residential areas is of concern to area residents and the Town.  To address the issue staff have developed a comprehensive strategy to be presented to the public and endorsed by Council.  The approach is comprised of three components.

 

1. Zoning

A new section will be added to the Town’s zoning By-laws.  It will apply to ground oriented residential dwellings with direct access to a public street.  The new section will only permit parking on a driveway and the width of the driveway will be linked to the width of the garage.  Provisions to cover non-typical circumstances, such as circular driveways, dwellings with no garage and garages that face an interior side lot line, will also have to be added to the zoning By-laws.

 

2. Enforcement

The second component of the strategy is enforcement.  At the present time only the most flagrant violations of the zoning By-law are being addressed by By-law Enforcement staff.  With refined zoning provisions By-law Enforcement staff will be able to expand the enforcement program.  A public awareness/education campaign about the concerns of widened driveways will also encourage compliance, thus making enforcement easier.

 

3. On-street parking

The third component of the strategy is the potential expansion of the on-street overnight parking program.  Allowing on-street overnight parking may, to some degree, off-set the impact of limits to parking on private property.

 

This report recommends that Development Services Committee hold a Public Meeting and that the strategy and information in this report be presented to the public for comment.  Staff will submit a final report, with recommendations, to Development Services Committee after the Public Meeting.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Home owners are widening their driveways to create additional parking areas

Many homeowners in the Town have widened their driveways to accommodate additional front and exterior side yard parking.  Such actions are not in keeping with parking restrictions contained in the Town’s By-laws, which are intended to control and regulate permitted parking areas.  However, the By-law Enforcement Division has had difficulty enforcing these provisions because the courts have viewed the current provisions as ambiguous.

 

The concern about front yard parking relates to, amongst other issues:

·        the unsightliness of front yard parking;

·        decreased property values, resulting from the number of cars routinely parked in the front yard;

·        reduced landscaping and outdoor amenity space; and

·        the potential for derelict and/or commercial vehicles parked in residential areas.

The definition of “Driveway” allows front yard parking

The Town’s zoning By-laws limits the location of motor vehicle parking in a front or exterior side yard, to a driveway.  The term “driveway” means:

 

“…a defined area providing access for motor vehicles from a public or private street or a lane to facilities such as a parking area, parking lot, loading space, private garage, building or structure.”

 

This definition applies to residential and non-residential driveways.  The intent of this provision is to restrict motor vehicle parking to a driveway that leads to a private garage.  However, as defined, driveways not only lead to private garages, but also to parking areas, parking lots, loading spaces, buildings or structures.  Therefore, a “driveway” could be interpreted to lead to the dwelling itself and motor vehicles, arguably, could park in front of the dwelling.  This was not the intent of the By-law when it was written.

 

In January 2005 staff made a presentation to Development Services Committee about the driveway widening issue.  Committee asked staff to provide a more detailed analysis of the issue, prior to holding a Public Meeting.

 

 

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS

 

1. Zoning

The first component of the recommended strategy is refinements to the Town’s zoning By-laws, as they relate to residential parking in the front and exterior side yards of single detached, semi-detached and townhouses with direct access to a public street.

 

A practical way to regulate driveways is to link width to the size of the garage

Development Services Commission staff considered various ways to regulate front yard parking and have concluded that regulating driveway width by linking it to the garage door opening is the most practical.  Another common method of regulating front yard parking is to link driveway widths to lot frontage.  However, when driveway widths are linked to lot frontage, the permissible driveway width, on a small lot, may end up being less than the width of the garage door opening.  Conversely, on a large lot, the permissible driveway width may be much wider than the garage door opening, thus allowing the driveway and parking to spread across the lot.

 

Staff conducted a “windshield survey” of approximately 5,157 Markham homes

In the spring of 2005, Development Services and Corporate Services Commission staff conducted a ‘windshield survey’ of approximately 5,157 Markham homes, across all Wards.  The survey was conducted to gauge the extent of the driveway widening issue and to more fully understand the typical front and exterior yard driveway width practices of Town residents.  The survey placed driveway and garage widths in three groups.

                     i.            Driveways whose widths are no wider than the width of the garage door plus 1.0 metre. 

                   ii.            Driveways whose widths range between 1.0 and 1.5 metres wider than the garage door. 

                  iii.            Driveways that are wider than the width of the garage door plus 1.5 metres. 

(Driveways were compared to the width of the garage door opening(s), irrespective of the number or width of the garage door(s) and the dimensions were estimated.) 

From this informal survey it was determined that approximately 71 percent of the homes surveyed had driveways whose widths were no more than 1.0 metre wider than the garage door opening(s) and approximately 81 percent of homes had driveways whose widths were no more than 1.5 metres wider than the garage door opening(s).  The remaining 19% of homes surveyed had driveways more than 1.5 metres wider than the garage door opening(s).  The results of the survey have been summarized in Table ‘A’, attached.

 

Figures 1 to 12 illustrate some typical driveway width scenarios

Figures 1 to 12 graphically demonstrate the effect of linking the driveway width to the width of the garage door opening. They also illustrate how increasing the width of the driveway allows additional parking spaces.

 

Figures 1 to 5 illustrate scenarios related to typical 9.0 metre wide conventional lots and 10.7 metre wide wide shallow lots with driveways 1.0 metre, 1.5 metres and 2.0 metres wider than a “Single Car Garage Door”.  Figures 6 to 7 and 9 to 12 illustrate some general scenarios where the driveways are 1.0 metre and 1.5 metres wider than “Double Car Garage Doors”, “Two Single Car Garage Doors” and “Three Single Car Garage Doors”.  Figure 8 shows a “Double Car Garage Door” with a driveway 2.0 metres wider than the opening.

 

These figures include examples of the space typical classes of vehicles require.  (Table ‘C’ lists typical vehicle widths by class of automobile and Table ‘D’ list examples of vehicle widths by make and model.)  It should be noted that hard surface landscaping, such as interlocking walkways installed adjacent to the driveway are not included in driveway width calculations.

 

Two cars can park beside each other on a 3.94 metre wide driveway

Figure 2 shows a driveway 1.5 metres wider than a typical 2.44 metre wide “Single Car Garage Door”.  This driveway has enough room for a compact car (1.70 metres wide) and a subcompact car (1.63 metres wide) to park side by side with 0.61 metres between them.  In this example it is likely that the cars would face in opposite directions so that the passenger doors are next to each.  The drivers would exit the cars to the outside edges of the driveway.  With less than 0.7 metres between cars it becomes more difficult to exit the vehicle.  Observed distances between cars parked beside each other range from about 0.7 metres to more than 1.0 metre.

 

 

Additional cars can park on a driveway 2.0 metres wider than the garage

If the permissible driveway width is 2.0 metres wider than the garage door opening(s) the chance of additional vehicles being able to park next to each other increases.  Figures 3 and 8, attached illustrate driveways 2.0 metres wider than single and double car garages.  In the case of a single car garage, Figure 3, two midsize cars (1.77 metres wide) with approximately 0.9 metres between them could park on a driveway that is 2.0 metres wider than a typical 2.44 metre wide garage door.  (Widths of Single Car Garage Doors range from approximately 2.44 to 3.66 metres.)  In the case of a double car garage, Figure 8, three midsize cars (1.77 metres wide) parked with approximately 0.78 metres between them could park on a 6.88 metre wide driveway, (a typical 4.88 metre wide double car garage door plus 2.0 metres equals 6.88 metres).  It is also important to note that larger garage door openings would allow wider driveways and may allow additional parking opportunities.  (Widths of Double Car Garage Doors range from approximately 4.27 to 5.49 metres.)

 

Development Services Commission staff are of the opinion that By-law refinements to regulate front yard parking should link driveway widths to garage widths.  However, before making detailed recommendations about the specific provisions Development Services Commission staff would like to hear from the public.

 

The By-law should also be amended to deal with non-typical circumstances such as circular driveways, dwellings without garages and garages that face an interior side lot line

Provisions for circular driveways, dwelling without garages and garages that face interior side lots lines should be incorporated into the By-law.  The circular driveway provisions should be consistent with the provisions in the Town’s “Curb Cut Standard By-law”, By-law 158-93.  The “Curb Cut Standard By-law” permits a “Secondary Entrance” not exceeding 3.7 metres in width, that connects the street to the driveway that leads directly to the garage, provided: the lot frontage is greater than 19.1 metres (62.66 feet), the building is setback at least 8 metres from the front lot line, and the distance between the inside edges of the two legs of the circular driveway measured along the front lot line is at least 7.0 metres.  The “Curb Cut Standard By-law” does allow circular driveways on lots with frontages between 16.8 (55.11 feet) and 19.09 metres (62.63 feet) provided neither curb cut exceeds 3.7 metres.  Similar provisions should be incorporated into the Town’s zoning By-laws.

 

Dwellings without a garage could be regulated by a method other than linking the driveway width to the width of the garage door opening(s).  One possible approach, would be to add provisions into the By-law that regulate “Parking Pads”.  A possible parking pad definition is noted in Appendix ‘A’.  General provisions that limit the number of motor vehicles and/or limit the maximum dimensions of parking pads and their locations could also be added to the zoning By-laws.

 

Dwellings with garages that face an interior side lot line and not the front lot line would also have to be dealt with carefully.  For example, the maximum driveway width may only apply to the section of the driveway that is located in the front yard.  Any portion of the driveway located behind the main wall closest to the front lot line could be exempt from the maximum driveway width provisions.

 

A new section applying to Single Detached, Semi-detached and Street Townhouses would be added to the Town’s zoning By-laws

Development Services Commission staff are of the opinion that to incorporate refined provsions into the zoning a new section should be added to the Town’s by-laws.  The new section will apply to Singles, Semi’s and Street Townhouses, where vehicular access to a private garage or parking space or pad is from a public street.  It would include refined driveway width standards and some new definitions.  Some of the definitions and general provisions that may be included are listed on Appendix ‘A’.

 

2. Enforcement

Currently, the Town’s Enforcement Division is addressing only the most severe contraventions in the following situations:

·        Parking beside and along garages in front and side yards

·        Parallel parking in front yard

·        Parking on grass

·        Illegal curb cut & boulevard conversions

 

Upon receipt of a complaint and after a By-law Enforcement Officer has investigated, residents are being provided written notice advising them of the current by-law limitations and the method to remedy the problem.

 

After the zoning By-law is amended, the Enforcement Division is recommending there be a two month period for:

·        community advertising and communication of standards;

·        written notices requesting conformity and providing a date for compliance;

·        written notices for curb cuts and boulevard conversion.

 

The Enforcement Division anticipates a proactive approach on an area by area basis.  The Property Standards By-Law will be used to require the removal of hard surfaces if they continue to be used for parking purposes.

 

At the Public Meeting, By-law Enforcement staff will discuss options for the timing and implementation of the enforcement program.  The specific details of this component of the strategy will also be included in a recommendation report.

 

3. On-street parking

Increased enforcement of refined parking restrictions may leave some homeowners with more cars to park than available legal parking spaces on their property.  This is a situation that many existing homeowners in Markham either face today or could face in the future as families continue to grow.  The Town's overnight permit parking program could be used to address this situation equitably on a Town-wide basis.  The Clerk’s Department has had success with this permit parking system in Cornell, Thornhill (Tamarack Drive and Inverlochy Boulevard) and Angus Glen.  Requests for overnight parking will be administered by the Clerks Department and reviewed by the Transportation and Operations Groups to ensure safe road operations.  Key criteria in reviewing the request will include road width, proximity to intersections, snow clearing and other road maintenance operations.  Subject to a satisfactory review by Clerks and the Transportation and Operations Group, on a street by street basis, area residents would be notified  of the proposed introduction of permit parking on the street.  The Clerks Department will then prepare a by-law for Council approval to amend the existing permit parking schedule and designate the portion of the street required for overnight parking.  It is recommended that permits only be issued subject to the resident demonstrating that there are more cars registered to the occupants of the dwelling than there are legal parking spaces for that residential dwelling.

 

Options relating to the regulation and implementation of on-street overnight parking should be discussed at the Public Meeting.

 

Permitting Second Suites requires resolution of the front yard parking issue

The Development Services Committee has identified that the resolution of illegal front yard parking is an important step in developing a strategy to deal with second suites in Markham.  Consequently, it is desirable to incorporate new standards regulating driveway widths and the location of front and exterior side yard parking into the Town’s zoning By-laws prior to or concurrent with developing a strategy for regulating second suites.

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

The By-law should prohibit parking on a front or exterior side yard except on a driveway

Any amendment adopted by Council should clearly prohibit parking in a front or exterior side yard, except on the driveway between the garage and the street line or a parking pad and the width of the driveway/parking pad should be controlled.  The By-law should also make allowance for front yard parking on driveways in non-typical situations, such as circular drives, dwellings with no garages and garages that face an interior side lot line.

 

To implement refinements to the zoning By-laws a number of provisions would need to be amended

Staff anticipate that a number of revisions to the zoning By-laws will be required.  Adding a new section to the parking By-law may be the most appropriate way to incorporate new provisions into the Town’s zoning By-laws.  The new section would regulate front and exterior yard parking associated with single detached, semi-detached and townhouses that have direct access to a public street.  The new section would include:

 

·        definitions, similar to those listed in Appendix ‘A’;

·        provisions to regulate the maximum width of residential driveways, for lots with and without garages;

·        provisions to clarify that motor vehicles can only park within this defined area; and

·        provisions to allow for and regulate circular driveways and driveways that face an interior side lot line.

 

It is appropriate to hold a Public Meeting to consider possible changes to the Town’s zoning By-laws and options for administration of by-law enforcement and on-street overnight parking.  Development Services Commission staff recommend the strategy and options discussed in this report be presented at a Public Meeting.  These matters, and any others identified at the Public Meeting, will be addressed in a recommendation report to be presented to Development Services following the Public Meeting.

 

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

None at this time.

 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

Landscaping such as trees, shrubs, flowers, grass and other horticultural elements are less likely to be replaced with hard non-permeable surface areas such as stonework and paving.

 

 

ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS

None at this time.

 

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED

The business units consulted and affected include Legal, By-law Enforcement, Strategic & Policy Planning, Transportation and Zoning Divisions. 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

Tables

Table A – Driveway Survey

Table B – Vehicle Widths by Class of Automobile

Table C – Examples of Vehicle Widths by Make and Model

Appendices

Appendix ‘A’ Proposed Definitions/General Provisions for Inclusion in a By-law Amendment

Figures

Figures 1 to 5 – Parking/Driveway Scenarios Conventional and Wide Shallow Lots

Figures 6 to 12 – General Parking/Driveway Width Scenarios

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Director of Planning & Urban Design

 

Sheila Birrell,

Town Clerk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.

Commissioner of Development Services

 

 

 

 

Q:\Development\Planning\APPL\ZONING\04 025944 Front Yard Parking\front yard parking report (draft_4).doc

 

 

 


Attachments

Table A – Driveway Survey

Driveway width no wider than the garage door opening plus 1.0 metre

Driveway widths range between 1.0 and 1.5 metres wider than the garage door

Driveways that are wider than the garage door opening plus 1.5 metres

Total Driveways Surveyed

3,686

493

978

5157

71.48%

9.56%

18.96%

100%

 

 

Table B – Driveway Widths

 

Garage Type

Garage Door Opening Width (metres)

Driveway Width Equals Garage Door Opening plus 1.0 metres (metres)

Driveway Width Equals Garage Door Opening plus 1.5 metres (metres)

Driveway Width Equals Garage Door Opening plus 2.0 metres (metres)

Single Car Garage Door

2.44 – 3.66 1.

3.44 – 4.66

3.94 – 5.16

4.44 – 5.66

Double Car Garage Door

4.27 – 5.49 2.

5.27 – 6.49

5.77 – 6.99

6.27 – 7.49

Two Single Car Garage Doors

5.18 – 7.62 1 & 3.

6.18 – 8.62

6.68 – 9.12

7.18 – 9.62

Three Single Car Garage Doors

7.92 – 11.58 1 & 4.

8.92 – 12.58

9.42 – 13.08

9.92 – 13.58

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Notes:

1.        The “Single Car Garage Door” opening width is a common dimension.  The widths of single car garage door openings range from approximately 2.44 to 3.66 metres.

2.        The “Double Garage Door” opening width is a common dimension.  The widths of double car garage doors range from approximately 4.27 to 5.49 metres.

3.        The “Garage Door Opening Width” for “Two Single Car Garage Doors” equals two “Single Car Garage Doors” plus 0.3 metres for one intervening column.

4.        The “Garage Door Opening Width” for “Three Single Car Garage Doors” equals three “Single Car Garage Doors” plus 0.6 metres for the two intervening columns.

 

Table C – Typical Vehicle Widths by Class of Automobile

Class of Automobile

Typical Range of Vehicle Width

Subcompacts

1.52 to 1.73

Compacts

1.68 to 1.73

Midsize

1.70 to 1.83

Large Cars

1.73 to 2.03

Large Pick-ups

1.96 to 2.14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table D - Examples of Vehicle Widths by Make and Model

 

Mercedes Smart Car - 1.515

Toyota Highlander - 1.826

Mini Cooper - 1.688

Pontiac Montana - 1.830

Toyota Corolla - 1.700

Ford Explorer - 1.831

Chrysler PT Cruiser - 1.704

Cadillac STS - 1.844

Saturn ION - 1.707

BMW 525i - 1.846

Dodge SX - 1.712

Nissan Pathfinder - 1.849

Honda Civic - 1.715

BMW X3 - 1.853

Chevrolet Cobalt - 1.724

Ford Taurus - 1.854

Chevy Cavalier - 1.745

Pontiac Grand Prix - 1.875

Subaru Outback - 1.770

Ford 500 - 1.892

Pontiac Vibe - 1.775

Ford Crown Victoria - 1.963

Chrysler Sebring - 1.793

Toyota Siena - 1.965

Toyota Camry - 1.795

Chevy Silverado - 1.994

Honda Accord - 1.814

Chevy Tahoe - 2.004

Hyundai Santa Fe - 1.820

General Motors Hummer H2 - 2.063

Mercedes E 350 - 1.822

Jeep Grand Cherokee - 2.139

Note:  Width dimensions were collected from the manufacture specifications posted their web sites.  All dimensions are in metres.

 

 


 

Appendix ‘A’

 

Proposed Definitions/General Provisions for Inclusion in a By-law Amendment

 

"DRIVEWAY means a defined area providing access for motor vehicles from a public or private street or lane to facilities such as a parking area, parking lot, loading space, private garage or other building or structure.”

 

New General Provision

Where a driveway leads to a private garage, the driveway shall have a maximum width equal to that of the garage width of the private garage, plus X metres.  In cases where there is no private garage, a parking pad is permitted, provided it is no wider than Y metres.  In no case shall a driveway or parking parking be located in the required interior side yard for the main building on the lot.”

 

“GARAGE WIDTH means the width of the garage opening(s), which is used for vehicular access.  Where there is more than one opening, the garage width shall be the distance between the two outer of the garage openings, including any intervening columns, doors, windows or wall sections which may separate two or more garage openings.”

 

"PARKING PAD means an open area of land that is paved and/or treated with a stable surface that is used for the parking and/or storage of no more than three MOTOR VEHICLES in the FRONT YARD on a LOT.”

 

“FRONT YARD means a YARD extending across the full width of the LOT between the FRONT LOT LINE and the nearest MAIN WALLS of the MAIN BUILDING or STRUCTURE on the LOT.”

 

“YARD means an open, uncovered space on a LOT appurtenant to a BUILDING and unoccupied by BUILDINGS or STRUCTURES except as specifically permitted in this By‑law.”

 

"MAIN BUILDING means a BUILDING in which is carried on the principal purpose for which the LOT is used.”

 

"MAIN WALL means the exterior front, side and/or rear wall of a BUILDING and all structural components essential to the support of a fully enclosed space.”