|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
|
|
FROM: |
Valerie Shuttleworth, Director of
Jim Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services |
|
|
|
|
PREPARED BY: |
Margaret Wouters, ext. 2758 Senior Planner, South District |
|
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
RECOMMENDATION REPORT Neamsby
Investments Inc. Rezoning and site plan
applications to permit an apartment development at the southeast corner of |
|
|
(FILE: ZA.04-028090, SC 04-014176)
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That Neamsby Investments Inc. be granted a servicing allocation of 273 units, constituting a transfer of servicing allocation of the same number of units from their lands at the northwest corner of Markham Road and Steeles Avenue;
And that the Region of York be advised of the servicing allocation for this development;
And that the Town reserves the right to revoke or reallocate servicing allocation should the development not proceed in a timely manner;
That
the Site Plan application (SC.04-014176)
submitted by Neamsby Investments Inc. to
permit a 273-unit apartment
building development at the southeast corner of Kennedy Road and Denison Street,
be endorsed for approval, with the following conditions:
1. That the final site plan and elevation
drawings be submitted to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Development
Services, including any revisions arising from the following:
a. Recommendations of the required noise study.
b. Recommendations of the required traffic
impact study.
2.
That a Landscape Plan, including
appropriate gateway treatments, be submitted, prepared by a Landscape Architect
having O.A.L.A. membership, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of
Development Services;
3.
That a traffic impact study be submitted
and any recommendations be implemented, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner
of Development Services;
4.
That the appropriate zoning be in effect
through the Milliken Main Street implementing zoning by-law (By-law 2005-250)
or through a site-specific amendment;
5.
That a noise study be submitted and any
recommendations be implemented, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of
Development Services;
6.
That an environmental site assessment be
submitted to the satisfaction of the Town and appropriate agencies, identifying
any required remediation to residential standards;
7.
That the Owner comply with all
requirements of the Town and authorized public agencies, to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner of Development Services;
8.
That the Owner enter into a site plan
agreement with the Town, containing all standard and special provisions and
requirements of the Town and public agencies including the following:
a.
Provision for the payment by the Owner
of all applicable fees, recoveries, development charges, parkland dedications
and financial obligations related to applicable Developers Group Agreements;
b.
Provision for a letter of
credit for the full value of the estimated area-specific development charge
amount, to be determined by the Director of
c.
Provision for contribution
towards community and infrastructure facilities (including, but not limited to,
the school site north of
d. Provision requiring the Owner to provide a driveway access easement over the southerly driveway in favour of the property to the south, if and when required by the Town.
9. That the Owner submit a satisfactory parking
study to justify a reduction in the parking standard for this development and
obtain a minor variance or zoning amendment to the Town’s parking standards;
10. That a
site plan agreement be executed prior to final site plan approval;
11. And that
the site plan approval shall lapse after a period of three years commencing
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to recommend approval in principle,
subject to conditions, of the site plan application by Neamsby Investments Inc to permit a 273-unit apartment
development at the southeast corner of
The Secondary
Plan designates the subject lands as Urban Residential – High Density II which
permits apartment development within a density range of 99-148 units per net
hectare (40-60 units per net acre) with a maximum height of 8 storeys.
The proposal,
as shown on the site plan and elevations (Figures 4 to 6), consists of 273 apartment
units in two buildings, ranging in height from four to eight storeys. Building A, most of
which faces
The proposed development has a density of 148 units
per hectare (60 units per acre) and
a floor space index (FSI) of 1.6.
Access is
proposed from restricted moves (right-in/right-out) driveways on both
The proposal includes amenity
space including a recreational facility, an outdoor playground as well as a
landscaped square, in the form of an enclosed private landscaped area, at the
corner of
DISCUSSION:
The implementing zoning by-law (By-law 2005-250) for the Milliken Main Street Secondary Plan Area, approved by Council in June 2005, provides for the required zoning of these lands. The implementing by-law will not come into effect until the Secondary Plan receives Regional approval, and appeals are resolved. Two appeals have been filed with respect to the zoning by-law, although not specifically for this site.
As the
proposed development complies with the current Official Plan designation (and
therefore does not rely on approval of the Secondary Plan), it is recommended
that site plan approval be conditional on the appropriate zoning being in
place, either through By-law 2005-250 coming into effect, or the approval of a
site-specific by-law amendment. A site-specific
zoning by-law could contain identical zoning provisions for the property as in
the implementing zoning by-law for the Secondary Plan and would be subject to the
same Holding provision as the Milliken Main Street implementation by-law (i.e.,
Hold removal subject to execution of a site plan agreement, availability of servicing
and transportation infrastructure, remediation of any contaminated soils, and
payment of an amount equivalent to the anticipated area-specific development
charges and contributions towards community facilities).
If the implementing zoning by-law for the Milliken Main Street Secondary Plan is delayed through the Regional Secondary Plan approval process, the Public Meeting authorized by Council in February, 2005 for the site specific rezoning application for this property would be held and a site specific zoning amendment brought forward for Council’s consideration.
Issues
identified through site plan review have been addressed and site plan is
acceptable
Site plan and elevations
consistent with urban design vision
The site layout and
elevations are in keeping with the urban design vision for the Milliken Main
Street Secondary Plan area. The
buildings are located close to the street, providing a strong street edge along
all three frontages. A more direct relationship between ground
floor units and the street has been incorporated in the site plan. Ground floor units have direct access to
private amenity/patio areas facing
The number of units has been
reduced from 275 to 273 to comply with the Secondary Plan and zoning
by-law. The final site plan will reflect
273 units.
Recreational and open space is provided
through a recreational facility (pool, multi-function room, exercise room,
video room, billiards, etc.) within Building ‘A’, an outdoor playground in the
interior of the site, and a private landscaped square at the
A square at
this intersection has always been a component of the urban design vision for
the
Overall, the proposed development with its massing and the significance of the undertaking at this gateway location is expected to set the stage and serve as a catalyst for the redevelopment/revitalization of the north end of the area, if not the entire Study Area.
Integration of the proposed
development with the vacant parcel and
An
extension of
Therefore,
as a condition of site plan approval, the applicant is required to provide a
driveway access easement over the southerly driveway in favour
of the property to the south, if and when required by the Town. When reviewing applications for the property
to the south, a similar condition requiring that property to provide an access
easement to the subject property can be required.
Old
As indicated
previously, recommendations arising from the recently completed Safety Audit of
the
Parking
study is required
The 376 parking spaces provided fall short (by 34 spaces) of the 410 spaces required by the Town’s parking by-law at the rate of 1.5 spaces per unit (including visitor parking). The applicant is preparing a parking study to justify the parking deficiency and will be applying for relief from the Town’s parking standards through a minor variance. It is recommended that site plan approval be conditional on approval of the parking study, and the approval of a minor variance or zoning amendment to the Town’s parking standards.
Servicing
and stormwater management
Servicing and stormwater management studies are under review. Based on preliminary information problems are not anticipated.
Servicing
allocation
The applicant is proposing to transfer 273 units of approved
allocation from another high density residential development site at the
northwest corner of
Noise study
A noise study
is required to identify appropriate mitigation measures for noise generated from
Financial
contributions with respect to an area-specific development charge by-law and
cost-sharing for park/school sites
An
area-specific development charge by-law is currently being prepared for the
Milliken Main Street Secondary Plan Area.
The applicant will be required to deposit a letter of credit for the
full value of the estimated charges, to be determined by the Director of
The Owner will also be required to enter into a developers group agreement with owners of lands identified for a Neighbourhood Park and school site north of Victory Avenue, or make alternate arrangements with the Town, regarding the payment of a proportionate share of the cost of these and other applicable community facilities, prior to execution of the site plan agreement.
Environmental clearance for
residential uses
The Milliken Main Street
Secondary Plan requires that prior to development, the proponent must
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Town, that the
environmental condition of the property is suitable for the proposed land use
and will not result in adverse effects to human health or the natural
environment. An environmental site
assessment will be required as a condition of site plan approval, and any
required remediation measures will be required to be implemented prior to
development.
Relationship to community – the concern was that the development not be isolated from the rest of the community and that areas not be created that could result in undesirable meeting/loitering places. As indicated at the meeting, dual entries to the building from the front and the rear will help ensure that these undesirable spaces are not created. The direct grade access provided from ground floor units at the front and back of the buildings will also assist with providing a greater degree of resident surveillance which will discourage loitering.
Traffic
and timing of improvements – concerns were expressed
about the level of existing traffic and how the proposed development would be
handled without short term traffic improvements. It was also suggested that the
Visual
impact of Building ‘B’ – the concern is that the
8-storey portion of Building ‘B’ would have a negative visual impact on the low
density residential community north of
FINANCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
None at this
time.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
None at this time.
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
The site plan has been reviewed with respect to the accessibility
guidelines and was found to be acceptable.
Landscape plans will be reviewed for conformity with the accessibility
guidelines, prior to final site plan approval.
ENGAGE 21ST CENTURY CONSIDERATIONS:
The proposed development promotes a number of key goals set out in
"Engage 21st Century Markham" by providing for efficient
use of infrastructure, transit-supportive land use patterns and density,
compact development and high levels of architectural and urban design.
BUSINESS UNITS
CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
All Town departments and external agencies have been circulated with these applications and all comments have been considered in this report.
|
|
|
Valerie
Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director
of |
|
Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner
of Development Services |
DOCUMENT: Q:\Development\Planning\APPL\SITEPLAN\04 014776
Neamsby Kennedy Denison\Final DSC Rpt 20sept05.doc
Figure 1: Location Map
Figure 2: Area Context/Zoning
Figure 3: Air Photo
Figure 4: Site Plan