|
REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE |
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services |
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, Director, |
PREPARED BY: |
Richard Kendall, Senior Project Coordinator, ext.
6588 |
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
2006-01-10 |
|
|
SUBJECT: |
2005 |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That the report entitled “2005 Markham Centre Performance Measures
Report Cards” dated
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is
to present a series of “Report Cards” (Appendix A) on applications presented to
the Markham Centre
DISCUSSION:
Guiding
Principles provide the basis for Performance Measures Document
The Guiding Development
Principles, endorsed by Council in June, 2003, together with the Secondary
Plan, articulate the goals and objectives for the development of Markham
Centre. The Markham Centre Advisory
used these goals and objectives as a platform from which specific Performance
Measures were developed. The measures
contain a series of checklists relating to five key themes consisting of Greenlands, Transportation, Built Form, Green
Infrastructure and Public/Open Spaces.
The Performance Measures are
applied during the review of development applications within Markham Centre, to
ensure consistent, high quality development, to provide clear direction
regarding expectations for development.
As well, the Performance Measures play an on-going role in monitoring
the achievement of the Markham Centre vision. The measures establish a “Bronze, Silver or
Gold” ranking based on the relative merits of the various components of a
proposal.
The Performance Measures
document includes a reporting section, which identifies targets intended to
monitor activity within Markham Centre.
Through the results of this monitoring, a better understanding of the
success of the individual performance indicators and the overall measures can
be evaluated and a determination made as to whether additional refinement of
the measures or their targets is warranted.
Report Cards have been
prepared
The 2005 Report Cards prepared
by the Advisory (see Appendix A) identify the project, provide a brief
description and status up-date, outline the Advisory Process Stage(s), and
contain an evaluation of the Sub-Group Indicators (Built Form, Open Spaces, Greenlands, Transportation and Green Infrastructure). The Report Cards rank (Bronze, Silver, Gold)
the projects relative to each of the Sub-Groups and comment on whether the
project, and ultimately the Town, is on-target to realizing the Markham Centre
vision.
Performance Measures have
been applied
Staff’s review of development
applications within Markham Centre have employed the Performance Measures to
ensure proposals reflect the Town’s goals and objectives, and respect the
Markham Centre vision for a sustainable community. The staff report on
These projects were presented
to the Markham Centre
Subsequent to the Advisory’s evaluation
of the
Located off
Precinct Plan for
The East Precinct encompasses the lands east of the GO transit
line, north of Highway 407, west of Kennedy Road and south of the Rouge River,
and consists of approximately 46 ha. (114 acres). Precinct Plans establish parameters for
detailed land uses and built form and are intended to provide a physical
representation of a proposed community to assist the Town in determining
appropriate zoning, subdivision and infrastructure requirements. Staff presented an overview of the draft Precinct Plan to the Advisory
for their review and the Plan was rated “Silver”, and considered on
target. The Advisory recommended that
the proposed grade-related retail component of the plan be emphasized because
of the Precinct’s isolation from established or proposed retail developments.
Circa – Tridel/Dorsay
Developments – Phase II
Tridel presented their plans
for the second phase of their Circa project on the north west corner of Highway
7 and Town Centre boulevard to the Advisory on December 8, 2005. This phase comprises 390 units within a 16
storey building employing materials and built form consistent with the first
phase building which is nearing completion.
The representative for Tridel outlined the plans and the various
initiatives that Tridel is undertaking with their first phase building,
including connecting to the District Energy network and installing a green roof
on their amenity building. In rating all
applicable criteria “Silver”, the Advisory reiterated past reservations
regarding the massing and built form of this project, while acknowledging it’s
appropriateness given the site’s landmark location in the Secondary Plan. It was recommended that Tridel consider
implementing a 3-stream waste programme for the building and that consideration
be given to linking office and/or institutional
component of their plan to the next residential phase to help achieve a
live/work mix sooner. Staff will report
to Council on this site plan application pending resolution of servicing
allocation distribution in Markham Centre.
Performance
Measures Targets
The
final component of the Report Card contains a section which asks the Advisory
to comment on whether or not they feel the Town is on target in achieving the
Markham Centre vision based on the review of the individual development
proposals. In each instance discussed in
this report, the Advisory felt that we were on target and that the applications
represent another step in the evolution of Markham Centre.
FINANCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no financial
considerations at this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
Environmental considerations
are addressed through the implementation and application of the Performance
Measures document, specifically matters relating to Greenlands
and Green Infrastructure.
ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS:
Accessibility considerations
are addressed, in part, through the implementation and application of the
Performance Measures Document.
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
The application of the
Performance Measures document aligns with the following Town of
BUSINESS
UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
Town Departments were involved
throughout the approvals process for the subject projects. The ratings in this report reflect
discussions with the Markham Centre Advisory Committee.
CONCLUSIONS:
The
For
Council’s consideration, in 2006 the
ATTACHMENTS:
Appendix A
– Report Cards -
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth,
M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of |
|
Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development
Services |
Q:\Development\Planning\Teams\Markham Centre\Annual
Report Cards\2005\DSC 2005 report card recommendation report.doc