|
REPORT TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE |
|
|
|
|
TO: |
Mayor and Members of Council |
|
|
FROM: |
Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services |
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, Director, |
PREPARED BY: |
|
|
|
DATE OF MEETING: |
|
|
|
SUBJECT: |
PRELIMINARY REPORT Unionville Village Investments Inc. Applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments OP.05 016826 and ZA 05 016845 |
|
|
RECOMMENDATION:
That a Public Meeting be held to consider the applications submitted by Unionville Village Investments Inc. for Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments to permit additional restaurant use at 139 Main Street, Unionville.
PURPOSE:
BACKGROUND:
Property
is located within the Unionville Heritage Conservation District
The
subject property is located at
Unionville
Core Area study was undertaken in 2002
In 2002, the Town of
The Study confirmed that the increased number of restaurants was
undermining the planned function of
New Official Plan policies were approved for the
Unionville Core Area
A new Secondary Plan (Official Plan No. 107) was adopted for the
Unionville Core Area on
The Secondary Plan for the Unionville Core
Area includes the following policies concerning restaurant use:
1. The Secondary Plan indicates that in addition to the uses
permitted restaurant uses may be permitted by Council subject to an amendment
to the zoning by-law. When considering
such an application, the applicant shall be required to satisfy Council that
there is sufficient parking available and that the new use will not negatively
affect the predominance of at-grade retail uses along
2. The Secondary Plan also articulates what is meant by a
“traditional shopping experience”. It
shall be the policy of the Town that Main Street Unionville provides a
traditional shopping experience in the form of a historic commercial area where
the at-grade uses are predominantly retail.
Specifically, it is intended that in the Main Street Unionville
Traditional Shopping Area (which is identified in the Secondary Plan), in
excess of 50 percent of the total at-grade, gross floor area shall be in retail
use. Council shall only approve
additional restaurant floor space within the Traditional Shopping Area when
retail uses represent greater than 50% of the total at-grade, gross floor
area.
Zoning
By-law was amended in 2003 to reflect the Core Area recommendations
The
subject property is zoned Heritage Main Street (HMS). This zone permits speciality retail, personal
service shops, arts and crafts workshops, photo studios, bed and breakfast and
professional office (but not on the ground floor). A site specific exception allows one
restaurant having a maximum gross floor area of 296 m2 on this
property. Restaurants are not permitted as of right in the Heritage Main Street
(HMS) Zone.
Applicant has previously
requested additional restaurant space
A review of the Site Plan Control Agreement for the
property dated
The applicant responded to this issue by reducing the proposed
size of the restaurant, but a shortfall of 12 spaces still existed (utilizing
typical parking standards at the time for restaurant and retail, 67 spaces were
required with the applicant providing 55 spaces). The
The Site Plan Agreement was amended on
In 1987, an application to expand the existing restaurant operations to 311 m2 (3348 sq. ft.) was abandoned following publication of a negative staff report. The staff report indicated that in light of the aggravated parking situation on the subject property and the immediate area, and the floor area cap in the site plan agreement, expansion of a use that required a high ratio of parking was not considered appropriate.
Request
is to increase restaurant space to 409 m2
The existing restaurant is 203 m2 (2182 sq.
ft.) in size. The Site Plan Agreement
restricts the maximum size to 232 m2. When Council amended the
Zoning By-law in 2003, it provided for an additional 64 m2 of future
restaurant space on this property for a total of 296 m2 (the owner
of the Living Waters Restaurant had originally expressed a need for an
additional 93m2 or 1000 sq ft of space for restaurant expansion).
The
applicant is now requesting an additional 113 m2 of restaurant space
for a total of 409 m2.
Although the existing site plan agreement and zoning by-law permits only
one restaurant on this property, the applicant has indicated that they
want the additional restaurant space for anywhere in the building and may
include the development of a second restaurant.
Council
has not approved any new restaurant floor space in historic Unionville since
2003
Since
Council approved a new Unionville Core Area Secondary Plan and amended the
zoning by-law in 2003, no additional restaurant floor space has been
approved. Applications have been
reviewed against the criteria identified in the Secondary Plan:
-
will the new use negatively affect the predominance of at-grade retail
uses along
-
is the total, at-grade,
gross floor area of retail uses within the Traditional Shopping Area greater than 50%; and,
-
is sufficient parking available;
In June
2005, official plan and zoning by-law amendment applications by the owner of
The planned function for
Unionville’s historic commercial core is to provide a traditional shopping
experience where the at-grade uses are predominantly retail. The Secondary Plan policies indicate that the
objective is to have over 50% of the total at-grade, gross floor area in retail
use. A review of the current total,
at-grade floor space within the traditional shopping area reveals the
following:
Retail 45.7%
Restaurant 27.9%
Other 26.4%
If the request for restaurant
expansion at
Applicant indicates that
sufficient parking spaces are available on the property
As outlined above, the policy restriction on
restaurant use is the key issue to be addressed in considering this
application. Parking is another key
concern in dealing with restaurant applications. In order to support a restaurant use, Council
must be satisfied that there is sufficient parking. The current parking requirement for
restaurant use in the
The current building is
1,235.48 sq m in size. The applicant’s
agent has submitted a calculation indicating that 25 parking spaces would be
required for the 408.76 m2 of proposed restaurant space (net floor
area of 367.88 m2) and 25
parking spaces would be required for the 826.72 m2 of floor area
devoted to office and retail (net floor area of 744.05 m2). Total parking spaces required would be 50
spaces with 54 spaces provided.
These figures are yet to be confirmed by the
Town’s Zoning Department.
POTENTIAL
BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL:
The potential benefits of the proposal include:
·
The additional restaurant space would assist the owner and restaurant
tenant in allowing an expansion to the existing restaurant.
The following is a brief summary of concerns/issues raised to date:
·
The proposal for additional restaurant space must be considered in the context
of the current Official Plan and Zoning criteria for such uses, arising from
the 2003 policy study (OPA 107);
·
Although each
application should be evaluated on its own merits, support for the requested
amendments could be viewed as contentious given that Council only recently
approved the new Secondary Plan policies and zoning provisions for
·
In order to
support a restaurant use, Council must be satisfied that the new use will not
negatively affect the predominance of at-grade retail along the
·
The proposed
parking supply must be reviewed by Zoning to assess whether it would meet the
requirements for expanded restaurant use.
It is
appropriate that a Public Meeting be held to receive input on the proposal,
prior to Council making any decision.
FINANCIAL
CONSIDERATIONS:
None
at this time.
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
None at
this time.
BUSINESS
UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
The applications for Official Plan and Zoning
By-law amendments have been circulated to internal departments and external
agencies. As the property is located within the boundaries of the Unionville
Heritage Conservation District, Heritage Markham was also circulated the
applications. Heritage
ATTACHMENTS:
Figure 1 Applicant
Figure 2 Area Context/ Zoning
Figure 3 Site Plan
Appendix A Draft Official Plan
Amendment (
Appendix B Letter from
Applicant (October 14, 1986)
|
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of |
|
|
Figure 1
File: Q:\Development\Heritage\PROPERTY\MAINSTU\139\REPORT
TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE Jan 10 2006.doc
Applicant: Unionville Village Investments Inc.
Mr. Domenic DiBernardo
L3R 2G6
(905) 475-6616 (T)
(905) 475-1969 (Fax)
Agent:
Mr. David Johnston
L3R 1R2
(905) 479-9992 (T)
(905) 479-9985 (Fax)
Location Map: