Report to: Development
Services Committee Date of Meeting: June
20, 20006
SUBJECT: Revised Precinct Plan and Draft Plan Conditions
Ruland
Properties Inc. (The Remington Group)
SU 01-113921
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the
report dated June 20, 2006 entitled “Revised Precinct Plan and Draft Plan
Conditions, Ruland Properties Inc. (The Remington Group)” be received;
That the
revisions to the Precinct Plan as they relate to the retail core be endorsed;
and,
That the amended
draft plan of subdivision prepared by Bousfields Inc. (drawing no. X-0033-1-1dp,
dated
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In July, 2003, Council granted draft plan approval to the Remington
Group’s ‘Downtown Markham’ project which occupies approximately 94.3 ha (233
acres) between
Since 2003, the applicants have been working to address the
remaining technical issues associated with the conditions of draft plan
approval, prior to executing a subdivision agreement. Addressing these technical issues requires
amendments to the conditions of draft plan approval. In addition, transitioning away from the earlier proposed
lake to a park as a central amenity feature for Markham Centre has necessitated
revisiting the road network and precinct plan design for the adjacent retail
core.
This report also speaks to a peer review process which was undertaken at Council’s direction, given the comprehensive, mixed use nature of the application, the extensive design and built form criteria, and the projected long-term build-out of these lands.
Proposed revisions to the draft plan
and conditions of approval include deleting
the lake block and incorporating a reconfigured park block representing the new
central amenity feature. Changes to the local
park network and the revised road pattern in and around the retail core are
also addressed in the revised plan, as are lane widths and turning radii,
previously identified as redline revisions to the original plan.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Not applicable
1.
Purpose 2. Background 3. Discussion 4.
Financial 5.
Environmental
6. Accessibility 7. Engage
21st 8. Affected Units 9. Attachment(s)
The purpose of this report is to
discuss and make recommendations on revisions to Remington’s precinct plan for
the retail core of their Downtown Markham project and on amendments to the draft
plan of subdivision and conditions of draft plan approval.
In July,
2003, Council granted draft plan approval to the Remington Group’s comprehensive,
mixed-used project ‘Downtown Markham’. It
is a project which implements many of the Town’s objectives for Markham Centre,
including protecting for the introduction of rapid transit through the centre;
respecting and enhancing the Rouge River valley; providing for a internal road
network; creating a series of new public spaces and urban parks; and, providing
for a variety of development parcels to accommodate a wide range of uses.
The plan
contributes to achieving the Markham Centre vision though the introduction of
up to approximately 362,750 square metres (3,904,736 square feet) of office and
business park uses, 33,755 square metres (363,348 square feet) of grade-related
retail and up to 3,889 residential units in a medium to high density built
form.
The plan, which will be phased, anticipates an approximate
20 year plus build-out, and
provides for a series of residential and mixed-use neighbourhoods and local
parks. Office uses are strategically
located within three large blocks between
A key
component of the original Remington proposal was the approximately 2.4 ha. (6
acre) water feature referred to as “
In recognition of some of these technical challenges, the conditions of draft plan approval contained policies to deal with issues related to the lake. These issues included the need for environmental agency approval, and the long term ownership and maintenance of the lake if approved for construction. The conditions also spoke to the owner undertaking studies to develop, and construct an alternative form of central, publicly accessible open space amenity within Markham Centre, if, prior to final approval of the draft plan, it was determined that the lake was not feasible.
Subsequent
to the granting of draft plan approval, and as a result of further discussions
with the regulating agencies and the Town, the applicant concluded that the
lake was not a viable amenity within Downtown Markham. The applicant made a presentation to Development
Services Committee in December, 2003, at which time Council referred this
matter back to staff to work with the applicant to identify an alternate
amenity feature for Downtown Markham.
Council
subsequently endorsed the concept of a design charrette process, with public
participation, to create plans for an alternate open space amenity
feature. The design charrette resulted
in a preferred concept for an urban park being selected in May, 2004, with
initial park design now underway.
In July, 2004, the Markham Centre
Zoning By-law (2004-196) was enacted to implement the plan, including
establishing an appropriate park zoning for the central amenity feature. Since the granting of draft plan approval and
enactment of the Zoning By-law, the applicant has been working towards
addressing the remaining technical issues associated with the conditions of
draft plan approval, prior to executing a subdivision agreement.
Addressing these technical issues requires
amendments to the conditions of draft plan approval. In addition, transitioning away from the lake to
a park as the central amenity feature for Markham Centre has necessitated
revisiting the road network and precinct plan design for the adjacent retail
core.
In the meantime, the applicants, working
in concert with the Town have completed construction of
Technical issues with T
Since the granting of draft plan
approval, the applicants have been working closely with the
Original Draft Plan Conditions were Peer Reviewed
Given the comprehensive, mixed use nature of the application, the extensive design and built form criteria, and the projected long-term build-out of these lands, the “Downtown Markham” proposal has been subject to intensive review by Town Departments and public agencies. In approving the original precinct plan, plan of subdivision and proposed zoning amendments, Council authorized staff to proceed with a peer review of the conditions of draft plan approval and the zoning by-law.
Planning staff retained The Butler Group (Consultants) Inc. to peer review the draft plan conditions and draft by-law, and the Legal Department retained the firm of Goodmans. Staff previously reported out on the peer review process for the zoning by-law at the time of adoption. Comments on the peer review for the conditions of draft plan approval have been pending resolution of the remaining technical issues associated with the review by the environmental approval agencies, which have now been addressed.
The Butler Group, in their review, concluded that the draft plan conditions are appropriate, protect municipal and agency interests, implement the Ruland proposal, and represent good planning. The Butler Group recognized that given the size, complexity and projected length of build-out, that modifications to the draft plan should be expected over the projected planning period. Notwithstanding, the conditions adequately and appropriately provide the necessary safeguards for implementing the Precinct Plan.
The conditions as noted are rigorous, and in order to
maintain a degree of flexibility in implementing the plan, the Butler Group
made a number of suggestions relating to fixing the structural elements of the
plan such as roads and development limits and establishing an internal process
for dealing with the conditions as each phase of development proceeds.
Goodmans, in reviewing the original conditions of draft plan approval, made a number of recommendations regarding consistent use of wording to clarify the conditions relating to the timing of approvals or other triggers. In addition, they commented on matters of applicable law in relation to certain clauses in the agreement. They further emphasized the need to coordinate the release of the various phases of the subdivision to available infrastructure, particularly given the projected long-term build-out; scale of this development; and, potential for future land transfers. A ‘Master Subdivision Agreement’, with separate Master Phasing Plan is a recommended approach to deal with these issues. These recommendations are reflected in the attached revised conditions of draft plan approval (Appendix A), where appropriate.
Revised Precinct Plan for the Retail Core
With the change from a lake as a central feature of the Downtown Markham plan, the Remington Group began to explore opportunities to enhance the shopping and entertainment experience within their retail core. To this end, Remington sponsored work sessions with retail experts in 2004, to establish parameters for a dynamic retail area consisting of a compact shopping district anchored by hotel and entertainment facilities. In order for this retail core to be successful, the experts concluded that the area had to be able to attract shoppers beyond the boundaries of Markham Centre, and needed to encompass a variety of merchandising uses, cultural amenities, and other attractions with a high level of urban design and architecture.
The retail core will adopt some of the elements typically associated with “Lifestyle Centres”, including an urban environment featuring stores with a streetfront presence. The core will also contain a variety of retailers ranging from specialty food stores, home furnishings, décor and design shops, sporting goods, to health and fitness centres, restaurants and cafes, and a wide range of personal service shops.
Key elements contributing to the design of the retail core include, a pedestrian-friendly urban environment; an intimate link to the central park; emphasis on entertainment and hospitality venues; and, the availability of parking. These lands encompass the area generally framed by the Rouge River to the north, Enterprise Boulevard to the south, Birchmount Road to the west and the central amenity feature to the east, and comprise 8.53 ha (21 acres). Within this area, the draft plan anticipates approximately 1,600 residential units, and the by-law permits 33,000 square metres (355,000 square feet) of retail floor area.
The applicant’s retail profile identifies the potential for up to 42,734 square metres (460,000 square feet) of retail floor area and, depending on phasing and building programme, zoning amendments may be required to achieve this level of retail development. This would be the subject of a separate report to Council. In the interim, the residential unit count, height programme and built form is consistent with the zoning by-law.
In order to create the core, the area has been broken into 6 distinct districts, distinguished by a varying retail mix, along with building and mixed-uses programming elements (Figure No. 4).
High Street
The High Street District, which encompasses the lands on either side of a north/south street which bisects the retail core, will be the most intense, retail oriented component of the Remington plan. It will feature a highly animated shopping environment which will be home to a variety of signature retailers and brands. The streetscape will have a high level of design and furniture, framed by continuous building elements with large windows at grade. The north end of this district will be anchored by a hotel and spa, while the south end leads to a piazza.
The Piazza
Intended as a central focus within the retail core, the piazza, reminiscent of a European square, will be ringed by a series of shops, offices and mixed-use buildings where people enjoy seasonally programmed events. The piazza is strategically placed adjacent to the central park to extend the pedestrian experience to the park and provide opportunities for joint-programming of activities.
Civic Mall (Simcoe Promenade)
The Civic Mall is intended as a linear park which will traverse the Remington plan, providing pedestrian and bicycle links between the various communities. Adjacent to the retail core, the Civic Mall will be bracketed by the entertainment district which will feature large, mid-rise buildings accommodating theatre, cinemas, restaurants, clubs and other entertainment related activities. The Civic Mall is also intended to serve as a transit mall or corridor for future phases of the VIVA transit service within a dedicated corridor.
Along this portion of
The
Retail Programme Presented to Development Services Committee and Markham
Centre Advisory Group
The applicant and their retail consultant presented the retail programme in detail to Development Services Committee in February, 2005. The presentation outlined the importance of a strong identification for the retail core using architecture, atmosphere and landmark features. The discussions at committee focused on the phasing and timing for the delivery of the retail programme, as well as the provision of parking within structures. A similar presentation was made to the Markham Centre Advisory at their December, 2004 meeting. The comments from the Advisory were very supportive of the emerging retail programme and the architectural direction of the retail core.
Public Road Network will Terminate at
One of the key elements of the retail
district, as it relates to the original draft plan conditions is the road
pattern. The southerly extension of a
street which could potentially align with Verclaire Gate, north of Highway 7, was
originally intended to bisect the retail core and connect with the road
proposed adjacent to the lake (Figure No. 4).
In order to maximize opportunities for below-grade parking and provide a
higher level of finish and maintenance for the retail core, the applicants are
proposing to terminate this road as a public street at
Terminating the road in this fashion would create opportunities to park beneath the road, provide linkages between parking structures and allow increased flexibility, from an operations perspective, to close the road for special events and functions. The draft plan conditions recognize this option and require appropriate arrangements to be in place to secure public access and regulate the timing of road closures.
Transportation Up-date has been Prepared and Reviewed
The applicant’s traffic consultant
has undertaken a transportation up-date to determine if reconfiguring the potential
Verclaire Gate extension and
This matter has been reviewed with
Transportation staff who concur with the consultant’s analysis and the
conditions of draft plan approval include a clause which allows consideration to be given to private condominium
roads as part of the local road network.
This clause requires a seamless transition between the private and public
road network and also requires the road to be designed to function as the
equivalent of a public road, and meet all of the Town’s operational criteria.
Phasing Plan has been Up-dated to Include the Retail Core
The applicant has updated the
phasing plan to incorporate the retail programme. This plan identifies the lands on the west
side of
Parking within the retail core is ultimately intended to be accommodated entirely below grade, beneath the combined retail/residential parcels, and in accordance with the Markham Centre By-law. Consistent with the Parking Strategy, the applicants have identified a programme of temporary surface spaces on adjacent lands in association with each phase of development. This temporary parking is required to address the short-term parking supply until remaining lands are developed and potential municipal and/or on-street parking is available. In the fullness of time, these lands would be converted to development blocks and the temporary surface parking eliminated. This phasing programme will be reported out in concert with individual development applications.
Revisions to the Draft Plan and Conditions of Approval are Recommended
The draft plan and conditions of draft plan approval have been amended to:
Specifically, the revised draft plan
(Figure No. 1) deletes the lake block and incorporates a reconfigured park
block representing the new central amenity feature. Changes to the local park network within the
plan reflect the creation of the new amenity feature. The draft plan reflects the revised road
network in and around the retail core and also incorporates lane widths and
turning radii, previously identified as redline revisions to the original plan. The final alignment of
These changes, however, require
new conditions of draft plan approval to incorporate comments provided by the
FINANCIAL TEMPLATE (Separate Attachment):
Not applicable
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no environmental implications for the Town. This development has been evaluated against the Markham Centre Performance Measures document, and has been rated on-target by the Advisory Group. The Downtown Markham project serves to deliver significant areas of valleylands to the Town. Environmental buffers are consistent with or exceed the Secondary Plan requirements.
Not applicable
ENGAGE 21ST CONSIDERATIONS:
The proposal aligns with the
following key Town of
BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:
CONCLUSION:
Representing
the largest and most comprehensive development opportunity within Markham
Centre, Remington’s Downtown Markham plan serves to advance the shared vision
for Markham Centre and create a dynamic, transit supportive, people-friendly
and vibrant mixed-use downtown. The
proposed amendments to the draft plan and conditions of draft plan approval
reflect recent technical approvals; on-going discussions between the applicant,
staff and Council; and, are consistent with the approved Markham Centre Zoning
By-law, the objectives of the Markham Centre Secondary Plan and Guiding
Development Principles.
RECOMMENDED BY:
|
|
|
Valerie Shuttleworth, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Director of |
|
Jim
Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P. Commissioner of Development Services |
Figure 1: Revised Draft Plan
Figure 2: Original Precinct Plan
Figure 3: Revised Precinct Plan
Figure 4: Retail District
Figure 5: Retail Phasing Strategy
APPENDIX ‘A’ – Revised Conditions of Draft Plan Approval
Q:\Development\Planning\Teams\Markham
Centre\Coordinator\Remington\Draft Plan\Revised Draft Plan Conditions Report -
2006.doc