Report to: Development Services Committee                  Report Date: November 2, 2010

 

 

SUBJECT:                    PRELIMINARY REPORT

                                       Proctor Investments Ltd.

                                       Application for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments

                                       34 Proctor Ave. Thornhill

                                       OP 10-121403 ZA 10-121404

 

PREPARED BY:         Geoff Day – Planner, West Development Team    

 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

That a Public Meeting be held to consider the applications submitted by Proctor Investments for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments located at 34 Proctor Avenue, within the Thornhill Secondary Plan area.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Not Applicable

 

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary information regarding applications for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments.  The proposal is to redesignate the subject lands in the Thornhill Secondary Plan from “Medium Density Housing” to “Low Density Housing”, and; to amend the current zoning of “First Density Multiple Family Residential” [(H) RM1] in By-law 2237, as amended to accomodate 3 single detached dwellings.   It is recommended that a statutory Public Meeting be held to consider these applications.

 

This report contains general information in regards to applicable Official Plan and other policies, as well as other issues, and the report should not be taken as Staff’s opinion or recommendation on the applications.

 

BACKGROUND:

Property and Area Context

The 0.375 ha (0.93 acre) vacant lands are located at the northwest corner of Henderson Avenue and Proctor Avenue within the Thornhill Community (figure 1). 

 

Adjoining the subject lands are:

 

  • Canadian National Railway (CNR) to the north; and, to the north of the railway a residential subdivision consisting primarily of semi-detached dwellings;
  • Proctor Park to the south; and, to the south of Proctor Park a cul-de-sac containing single detached dwellings;
  • Single detached dwellings to the east;
  • Henderson Avenue to the west; and, to the west of Henderson Avenue a condominium townhouse development; and,
  • A townhouse development to the southwest;

 

The area is comprised of three parcels, two lots with 60 foot (18.3m) frontage and one 0.22 ha (0.54 ac), triangular parcel with the remaining frontage. 

 

Proposal is for 3 single detached dwellings

As noted above, the applicant is proposing to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit 3 single detached dwellings with floor areas ranging from 273 m2 (2,940 ft2) to 374 m2 (4,025ft2) (figures 6 & 7). 

 

1994 CNR Agreement registered on title

The subject lands, previously owned by CNR were sold to a private entity in 1994.  In conjunction with the sale of the lands, an agreement between CNR and the then purchasers of the lands was registered on title.  The agreement sets out specific requirements and restrictions pertaining to setbacks, drainage, and required works if the lands were ever to be developed.

 

Highlights of this agreement include:

 

  • Prohibiting habitable buildings from being constructed closer than 20 metres from the CNR lands;
  • Prohibiting alteration of existing drainage onto CNR lands;
  • Construction of a 1.83 metre high fence along the common property line of the Owner’s lands and CNR lands;
  • Residential dwellings shall contain at the minimum, brick veneer, upgraded windows, central air conditioning and a minimum 600 square foot outdoor living area protected by noise;
  • Vibration mitigation measures;
  • A clause requiring a 2.5 metre high berm running parallel to the CNR lands for any development in excess of 3 units.

 

Official Plan and Zoning

The lands are currently designated “Urban Residential” in the Official Plan and “Medium Density Housing” in the Thornhill Secondary Plan.  The current zoning of the lands is “Hold - First Density Multiple Family Residential” [(H) RM1] (figure 2).  Single detached dwellings are not provided for in the Medium Density Housing designation in the Secondary Plan or the First Density Multiple Family Residential in the Zoning By-law.  The applicant is proposing to amend the Secondary Plan to designate the subject lands “Low Density Housing” to provide for the proposed single detached uses; and, to rezone the lands to permit single detached dwellings.

 

 

 

Previous Ontario Municipal Board Decision (OMB)

In 2004 applications were submitted for the subject lands to amend the Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the development of nine townhouse dwellings (figure 4).  The applications were adopted/enacted by Council in October 2006.  The amendments were appealed to the OMB by area residents.  In 2007, the OMB approved the Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments for the subject lands to permit the proposed townhouse development.  The approval was subject to conditions set out by, among other agencies, CNR.   Late in 2009, Staff met with the applicant and was advised that the cumulative infrastructure costs of developing the 9 townhouse unit development was not economically viable.  The current proposal has been circulated to CNR.  CNR has provided their comments/conditions attached as figure 5. 

 

Regional exemption has been granted

In a letter dated August 31, 2010, the Region of York exempted the proposed Official Plan Amendment from Regional approval as the amendment was deemed to be of local significance.

 

Allocation is available

Allocation for 9 townhouses units (25.4 pop.) had been previously granted through the June 20, 2006 report on Servicing Allocation.  This exceeds the requirement for the current proposal of 3 single detached units (11.1 pop).  Therefore, in the event these applications are approved, sufficient allocation would be available subject to Council re-directing the existing allocation to the proposed development.

 

POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSAL:

·      Proposal allows for the development of an undeveloped vacant plot of land in a form that is compatible with surrounding low density residences.

CONCERNS/ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED:

The following is a brief summary of concerns/issues raised to date. These matters, and any others identified through the circulation and detailed review of the proposal, will be addressed if necessary, in a final staff report to Committee.

 

·      A Preliminary Noise Report has been submitted by J.E. Coulter Associates Limited.  The Report states that the noise levels of passing trains produces decibel levels in the proposed rear yards of +/-74dBL; well above the Ministry of the Environment’s (MOE) guidelines of 60dBL.  Therefore, the active amenity area is proposed in the front yards of the dwellings.  Further review will be required with Urban Design in order to ensure these areas can function as private amenity spaces or courtyards. 

·      The proposed built form will need to be in keeping with the Town’s architectural control and design standards;

·      A greater understanding of the visual impacts associated with the installation of noise reduction measures in the front yard is required; and,

·      Submission for review of the type and materials used in the proposed front yard amenity areas (figure 7).

 

FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS AND TEMPLATE:

There are no financial matters to be considered in this report.

 

ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PRIORITIES:

The proposed development would utilize a neglected parcel of land on an infill lot.  As existing services are already in place, the proposal would not require additional services and therefore is an efficient use of the Town’s existing infrastructure. 

 

BUSINESS UNITS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED:

The applications have been circulated to various Town departments and external agencies and are currently under review.  Requirements of the Town and external agencies will be reflected in the preparation of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments.

 

RECOMMENDED BY: 

 

 

 

____________________________                      _______________________________

Biju Karumanchery, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.                   Jim Baird, M.C.I.P., R.P.P.         

Senior Development Manager                              Commissioner, Development Services

 

ATTACHMENTS:

Figure 1:          Location Map

Figure 2:          Area Context and Zoning By-law

Figure 3:          Air Photo

Figure 4:          2004 Concept Plans (Townhouses)

Figure 5:          CNR Letter

Figure 6:          2010 Conceptual Site Plan

Figure 7:          2010 Proposed Front Yard Amenity Areas

 

APPLICANT / AGENT:     Evans Planning                                  

                                                Attention:  Murray Evans                              

                                                28 Ellery Drive

                                                Richmond Hill, ON  L4C 8Z6

Fax:     (905) 886-8502

 

File path: Amanda\File 10 121404\Documents\Preliminary  Report