SYNOPSIS OF ALIGNMENT EVALUATION FINDINGSSEGMENT C (MARKHAM) |
|||
Objectives And Goals |
Alternative C1: Hwy 7 between |
Alternative C2: Woodbine Ave., |
Alternative C3: Hwy 7 from |
Improve Mobility· Inter-regional transit connectivity · System expansion flexibility · Speed, safety, ride comfort · Service quality and effectiveness · Station catchment · Convenience of access |
· Indirect service to future Markham Centre reduces daily boardings by 4-5% · Has no direct connection to Stouffville GO service · Good alignment geometry but Hwy 7 traffic activity could affect reliability · Convenient access from residential use north of and mixed-use on Hwy 7 |
· Provides direct service to future Markham Centre and direct connection to GO Stouffville rail service · Fair alignment geometry on partially exclusive ROW but still requires several at-grade intersections · Station catchment is mainly employment and Markham Centre mixed-use |
· Provides direct service to future Markham Centre and direct connection to GO Stouffville rail service · Fair-good alignment geometry requiring several intersections and partial interface with Hwy 7 traffic activity · Convenient access to mixed- uses along most of route |
Protect &
Enhance Social Environment · Effects on communities · Road traffic and pedestrian circulation · Public safety and security · Noise and vibration · Effects on cultural resources ·
Community vistas and street aesthetics |
· Causes very few adverse community effects after construction · Hwy 7 median location has most traffic interface with greater safety risk · Alignment entirely in Hwy 7 minimizes effect of system noise and vibration and offers good urban design potential · Minimal effect on community vistas |
· Some intrusion in river/ creek valleys but few other adverse community effects ·
· Noise & vibration attenuation may be required in Markham Centre civic mall and river valleys. ·
Urban design potential mainly in Markham
Centre and |
· Minor intrusion in river valley and few other adverse community effects · Some Hwy 7 traffic interface and several intersections increases safety risk · Noise & vibration attenuation may be required in Markham Centre civic mall ·
Good urban design potential in Markham Centre, on |
Protect Natural
Environment · Effect on aquatic ecosystems · Effect on terrestrial ecosystems · Effect on Air Quality ·
Effect on Hydro-geological conditions |
· Has little adverse effect on aquatic & terrestrial ecosystems · Some potential for minor effect on air quality · Highest number of potentially hazardous material sites |
· Potential for some effects on aquatic ecosystems due to the alignment requiring new crossings at Beaver Creek and Apple Creek · Least potential for adverse effect on air quality (fewer receptors) · Few potentially hazardous material sites |
· Potential for some effects on aquatic ecosystems due to the alignment requiring bridge widening at Beaver Creek and Apple Creek · Minor potential for adverse air quality effects · Few potentially hazardous material sites |
Promote Smart
Growth / Economic Development ·
Regional/Mun. Plans
and Urban Structure ·
Access to community facilities ·
Effect on business activities ·
Goods movement ·
Promote transit-oriented development |
· Conforms well with planning policies and provides acceptable access to community facilities, but by-passes Markham Centre · Provides good potential for increase in existing business activities along Hwy 7 · Provides opportunities for higher order uses |
· Conforms with planning policies and supports urban structure of Region · Provides good access to community facilities · Serves Markham Centre well, Civic Centre less convenient · Provides some potential for increase in existing business activities (Kennedy,Woodbine · Provides good opportunities for TODs / higher order use |
· Conforms best with planning policies and supports urban structure of Region · Provides very good access to community facilities · Serves both Civic Centre and Markham Centre well · Provides good potential for increase in existing business activities (Hwy 7, Kennedy) · Provides good opportunities for TODs / higher order use |
Maximize Cost-effectiveness
of rapid transit ·
Effect on Capital Costs ·
Property required Effect on operating and maintenance costs |
· Capital cost +/- $147 million · Minor property cost · Lowest vehicle and O&M costs due to alignment being shortest. |
· Capital cost +/- $154 million · Property cost for 2.5km ROW · Vehicle and O&M costs marginally higher due to longer alignment |
· Capital cost +/- $156 million · Property cost for 0.6 km ROW · Vehicle and O&M costs marginally higher due to longer alignment. |