MINUTES
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PUBLIC MEETING
JUNE 2, 2009 - 7:00 p.m.
Council
Chamber
Meeting No. 8
All
Members of Council
Development
Services
Chair: Councillor J. Webster
Vice-Chair: Councillor D. Horchik
Attendance
Regrets
Councillor A. Chiu
|
J. Baird, Commissioner of
Development Services
M. Boyce, Senior Policy Coordinator
D. Cheng, Senior Planner
B. Karumanchery, Senior Development
Manager
A. Tari, Committee Clerk
|
The Development Services Public
Meeting convened at 7:12 PM in the Council Chamber with Councillor
J. Webster in the Chair. Councillor C.
Moretti assumed the Chair at 7:41 PM. Councillor J. Webster re-assumed the
Chair at 7:52 PM.
DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST
None disclosed.
1. MARKHAM
STOUFFVILLE HOSPITAL
ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT
APPLICATION
FOR ADDITIONAL HOSPITAL LANDS
(ZA.09-112246) (10.5)
Report Attachment
Mr. Jim Baird, Commissioner of Development Services advised the subject
of the Public Meeting this date was to consider an application submitted by the
Markham Stouffville
Hospital for additional Hospital
lands (ZA 09-112246).
The Committee Clerk advised that 143 notices were mailed on May 12, 2009, and a Public Meeting
sign was posted on May 12, 2009. No written submissions were received
regarding this proposal.
Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal, site description,
area context and surrounding uses. There
are no outstanding issues.
Ms. Marilyn DuChene, 23 Riverlands, addressed the Committee advising
that her house facesthe north side of this proposed parking lot. She is requesting that the area of the
parking lot that abuts Riverlands be buffered and landscaped.
Staff advised that there will be a landscape edge for the area that
abuts Riverlands. Staff also advised
that they are continuing to work with the Hospital’s landscape architect.
There was discussion regarding the proposed permitted use being surface
parking for the two parcels on the north side of Church
Street and whether it should be granted on a
temporary basis. Staff advised that
temporary use zoning by-laws are for a maximum duration of 3 years and can continue
to be renewed as required. The Committee
would like to have an opportunity in the future to re-evaluate the permitted
use of these parcels.
Mr. Jim Kirk, Malone Given Parsons Ltd., addressed the Committee
advising that once the Hospital expansion is completed there will be a need for
approximately 2,100 parking spaces which includes the proposed spaces on the
north side of Church Street. He presented the Committee with a site plan
that demonstrated a colour coded parking strategy.
Moved by Deputy Mayor J. Heath
Seconded by Councillor J. Webster
That Markham Stouffville Hospital is encouraged to
transition the use of the two parcels on the north side of Church Street from
parking lots to other permitted uses and that the Hospital be requested to
engage in discussion with Town staff and Council, upon the earlier of the
completion of the Hospital’s current expansion or within 7 years, regarding the
future use of these two parcels.
CARRIED
Moved by Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded by Deputy Mayor J. Heath
1) That the report from the
Development Services Commission dated May 5, 2009, entitled “Preliminary Report, Markham
Stouffville Hospital Zoning By-law Amendment Application for additional
Hospital lands. File No. ZA 09-112246” be received; and,
2) That the Record of the
Public Meeting held on June 2, 2009, with respect to the rezoning application
submitted by Markham Stouffville Hospital to amend By-laws 304-87 and 1229,
both as amended, be received; and,
3) That the
application by Markham Stouffville Hospital to amend By-laws 304-87 and 1229,
both as amended, be approved; and further,
4) That the
proposed amendments to By-laws 304-87 and 1229, both as amended, be enacted
without further notice.
CARRIED
2. TOWARD
A MARKHAM
GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY:
SECTION 37 OFFICIAL PLAN
POLICIES
AND GUIDELINES (10.0)
Report Attachment
Mr. Baird advised the subject of the Public Meeting this date was to
consider a Town-initiated amendment to the Official Plan (Revised 1987), as
amended respecting the use of Section 37 of the Planning
Act (MI 510).
The Committee Clerk advised that 18 notices were mailed on May 18, 2009, and notice of the
Public Meeting was published in the May
14, 2009 edition of the Economist and Sun and the Thornhill Liberal
newspapers. Four written submissions
were received regarding this proposal.
Mr. Murray Boyce, Senior Policy Coordinator provided the Committee with
opening comments relative to the proposed Town-initiated amendment to the
Official Plan (Revised 1987), as amended respecting the use of Section 37 of
the Planning Act. Mr. John Gladki, Consultant, delivered a
PowerPoint presentation regarding the use of Section 37 of the Planning Act. Mr. Boyce also reviewed the purpose and
effect of the proposed amendment and the next steps.
There was brief discussion regarding developers that may choose to
exempt themselves. The Committee
inquired about the difference of this proposal from what already exists in the
Town’s Official Plan. Staff advised that
this amendment would introduce new Official Plan provisions that would assist
the Town in obtaining certain facilities, services or matters that would not
otherwise be secured under the other provisions of the Planning
Act or the Development Charges Act,
and that can be of particular benefit to a specific area or the Town as a
whole. Staff also advised that bonusing
would not be suggested from the start of an application and that ‘good
planning’ will always be a primary consideration.
Ms. Eileen Liasi, Thornhill resident and on behalf of the Bayview Glen
Ratepayers Association, addressed the Committee with respect to the use of
Section 37 Height and Density Bonusing and spoke in opposition. She believes that the mandated
intensification is already in excess of what people are willing to accept. Ms. Liasi stated that if the Town does adopt
bonusing, it is important that residents be consulted prior to any negotiation/agreements
being established.
Ms. Marilyn
Ginsburg, Grandview Area Residents Association, addressed the
Committee regarding the use of Section 37 Height and Density Bonusing, stating
her opposition. She is concerned that
this will not benefit existing residents but rather the developers. Ms. Ginsburg referred to the proposed Liberty
Developments at 7171 Yonge Street
as an example and feels that the bonusing provisions should not allow for extra
density.
The Committee stated that the Section
37 Height and Density Bonusing must be used responsibly throughout the
Town.
Mr. Fred Webber, addressed the
Committee and spoke in opposition to the Section 37 Height and Density
Bonusing. He believes it is important to
keep the existing communities involved.
Mr. Webber is concerned that this policy would encourage developers to
request additional density in areas that can not support it.
Mr. Bobby Bhoola, Ballantry Homes,
addressed the Committee regarding the use of Section 37 of the Planning Act stating he wants to
ensure this will not impact his future application in the Cornell area.
Staff confirmed that bonusing only
applies on mutual consent between the applicant and the Town.
Mr. Peter Miasek, 34
Normandale Road, addressed the Committee with
respect to the use of Section 37 Bonusing and spoke in support.
The Committee stated that these
proposed provisions can be used as another tool to obtain extra benefits for
communities in Markham. The Committee
indicated that Town is doing everything it can to balance the approach of the
mandated Provincial Growth and that a lot of the intensification is being
planned along the transportation corridors to try and minimize the impact on
the existing communities.
Moved by Deputy Mayor J. Heath
Seconded by Councillor L. Kanapathi
That the correspondence from Ms. Eileen Liasi, Mr. Myron P. Pestaluky,
Mr. Ira Kagan and Mr. Al Burton be received.
CARRIED
Moved by Mayor F. Scarpitti
Seconded by Councillor C.
Moretti
1) That the record of the
Public Meeting held on June 2, 2009 with respect to the proposed draft official
plan amendment, be received; and,
2) That staff be directed to
report back to the Development Services Committee with appropriate
recommendations.
CARRIED
ADJOURNMENT
The Development Services
Public Meeting adjourned at 9:25 PM.