DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES COMMITTEE
2002-03-19
Meeting No. 6
PART A - 12:30 p.m. - Canada Room
PART B - 1:00 p.m. - Council
Chamber
Attendance
|
J. Livey, Chief Administrative
Officer
M. F. Turner, Commissioner of
Development
Services
J. Baird, Director of Planning
& Urban Design
V. Shuttleworth, Manager,
Development
J. Clohecy, Senior Project
Coordinator
T. Northcott, Senior Business
Development Officer
K. Bavington, Committee Clerk
|
The Development Services Committee convened at the hour of
12:35 p.m. in the Canada Room with Councillor G. McKelvey in the Chair.
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST
Councillor Heath disclosed an interest with respect to Item
# 5, the proposed wall sign variance for Loblaw Properties Limited, 300 Bullock
Drive, by nature owning a warehouse nearby, and did not take part in the
consideration or discussion of or vote on the question of the approval of such
matter.
1. STAFF
MEMO - HUMBOLD PROPERTIES LIMITED
REQUEST FOR STREET NAME
APPROVAL, DRAFT PLAN OF
SUBDIVISON 19T-95013 (SUB
95-006) (10.14)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the
street name "Coral Cove Court" be approved for use in plan of
subdivision 19T-95013 (Humbold Properties Limited).
2. HOSTING
THE CARY, NORTH CAROLINA DELEGATION
APRIL 25 & 26, 2002
(10.16)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the
Economic Development Department be authorized to plan and implement a program
of activities for the Cary delegation in Markham, at a cost not to exceed
$5,500.
This
expenditure is to be funded from within the 2001 base budget for Business
Development, account # 610-998508.
3. MAIN
STREET UNIONVILLE PARKING AND LAND USE STUDY (10.8)
Staff confirmed to the Committee
that the study will address permitted land uses.
RECOMMENDATION:
That
Marshall Macklin Monaghan Limited be
authorized to undertake the Main Street Unionville Parking and Land Use Study
in accordance with the Work Program attached as Appendix ‘B’, for an upset
limit of $43,400.00, subject to the execution of a contract with the Town;
And that
John Winter Associates Limited be authorized to assist in the Study as
sub-consultant (retail market specialist) in accordance with the Work Program
attached as Appendix ‘C’, for an upset limit of $10,000.00, subject to the
execution of a contract with the Town;
And further
that consultant fees be paid from the 2002 Capital Budget (Planning and Urban
Design Department accounts) with additional funding for the amount exceeding
the 2002 Budget allocation being paid from existing Land Use Study Capital
Accounts.
4. BINEWOOD
INVESTMENTS LTD., 7676 WOODBINE AVE.
WALL SIGN VARIANCE (02-100402)
(2.16.2)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the application for wall sign
variance, File Number 02-100402, submitted by Binewood Investments Inc.,
proposing a wall sign located on the third floor (East elevation) of a
multi-tenant commercial/industrial building at 7676 Woodbine Avenue, be
approved.
5. LOBLAW PROPERTIES LIMITED, 200 BULLOCK
DRIVE
WALL SIGN VARIANCE AND MILNE
CREEK IMPROVEMENTS
(01-110844, 01-110847,
01-113177, 01-113745) (2.16.2)
Councillor Heath disclosed an
interest with respect to the proposed wall sign variance for Loblaw Properties
Ltd., 300 Bullock Drive, by nature owning a warehouse nearby, and did not take
part in the consideration or discussion of or vote on the question of the
approval of such matter.
Staff explained the
negotiations that had taken place with the applicant for this proposal,
displaying site plans of the subject property. Committee requested the
applicant consider granting an extension of the 10-foot easement from Bullock
Drive to the railway tracks, for stream rehabilitation purposes. Committee also
requested the required fencing be noted as a "small" chain link
fence.
Mr. Harry Froussios,
of Zelink Priamo Ltd., representing Loblaw Properties, agreed to consider the
request for extension of the easement, with the understanding that there are
existing parking spaces within the proposed northerly portion of the easement,
and that any costs for rehabilitation work would be the responsibility of the
Town.
a) Increases in allowable wall sign area:
i) South/West elevation – from 9.6m2
to 30.31m²
ii) South/East
elevation – from 11.25m² to 33.1 m²
iii) West
Elevation – from 20.0 m2 to 23.7 m2
and;
b) From
one (1) sign per building face to Two (2) signs per building face for the west
elevation.
----
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Amended
by Council at its meeting held March 26, 2002, to replace the above-indicated
paragraphs, as follows:
And that the easement documents
provide that the Town may undertake rehabilitation/renaturalization work within
the Milne Creek corridor (at no cost to the applicant), and that any such
rehabilitation/renaturalization work may at the Town’s discretion extend onto
the lands subject to the easement;
6. 1430486 ONTARIO LTD. THE LIBERTY TOWER
IN TIMES/GALLERIA, BLOCK 40, REGISTERED PLAN 65M-3226
PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM (CU 01-117323) (10.20)
RECOMMENDATION:
That draft plan of condominium
application CU 01 – 117323 submitted by
1430486 Ontario Inc.,
(19CDM-200105), identified as Project Number 1786-0, be draft approved,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval
shall relate to a draft plan of condominium prepared by R. Avis Surveying Inc.,
dated October 25, 2001.
2. That all provisions of the site plan
agreement dated May 30, 2001 between the Owner and the Town be fulfilled to the
satisfaction of the Town.
3. That the Owner enter into a condominium
agreement, if required by the Town.
4. That the Town of Markham receive and
accept the following certificates prior to registration of the condominium:
a) A certificate from the Owner’s architect
stating all buildings have been substantially completed in accordance with the
plans contained in the site plan agreement with the Town dated May 30, 2001 and
in accordance with the Building Code.
b) A certificate from the Owner’s surveyor
stating all buildings are substantially completed and have been located on the
ground in accordance with the requirements of the applicable Zoning By-law and
the plans and conditions in the site
plan agreement.
c)
A certificate from the Owner’s engineer stating that
all grading, drainage, above and below ground services, asphalt paving and
demarcation of parking spaces have been substantially completed in accordance
with the plans and conditions in said site plan agreement; and that Centralized
Mail Box facilities have been supplied and installed substantially in
accordance with Canada Post Corporation specifications.
d)
A certificate from the Owner’s landscape architect
stating that all landscaping has been installed and completed in accordance
with the landscape plans and conditions in the said site plan agreement.
e) A
certificate from the Owner's noise consultant stating that all
noise control features have been completed according to conditions in said
site plan agreement.
5. That
prior to final plan approval the Owner submit the condominium declaration to
the Town for review.
6. That appropriate easements or similar
instruments be granted to the condominium corporation allowing access to the
main private roads leading to the public road system.
7. That the condominium corporation assume
proportionate ownership and maintenance obligations for common elements.
8. Payment of any outstanding taxes owing
to the Town of Markham.
9. Payment
of any outstanding local improvement charges owing against the subject lands.
10. That
prior to final approval the Owner shall arrange inspections of the on-site
works with the Engineering and Design Departments, and shall rectify any
deficiencies relative to the approved plans and specifications, to the
satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and the Manager of Urban Design.
7. COTSWOLD
OF BAYVIEW
NORTH OF STEELES AVE., WEST OF
BAYVIEW AVE.
PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM (CU
01-110802) (10.20)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the application for Plan of Condominium.
File Number CU 01 110802, submitted by Monarch Construction Limited, for 17
residential townhouses on Arlington Way located on the north side of Steeles
Avenue and west of Bayview Avenue, be approved subject to the following
conditions:
1.
Approval shall relate to the Draft
Plan of Condominium prepared by Donevan Fleischmann Petrich Ltd., dated
November 6, 2001;
2.
That all provisions of the Site Plan
Control Agreement dated March 22, 2000 between the Owner and the Town be
fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Town;
3.
That prior to release for
registration the Owner shall satisfy all the conditions of the Regional
Municipality of York as follows:
a. Revise the condominium plans to show a 0.3 metre
reserve across the full frontage of the site where it abuts Steeles Avenue, to
be conveyed to the Regional Municipality of York, free of all costs and
encumbrances upon registration of Plan of Condominium;
b. The Owner shall enter into an Encroachment Agreement
with the Region of York to permit an existing masonry wall to extend onto
Regional property following dedication of the 0.3 metre reserve;
c. The Owner shall provide a solicitor’s certificate of
title in a form satisfactory to the Regional Solicitor, at no cost to the
Region, with respect to the conveyance of lands to the Regional Municipality of
York;
d. The Region of York Planning and Development Services
Department shall advise that Conditions 3a to 3c inclusive, have been
satisfied.
4.
That prior to release for
registration, the Owner shall undertake the following to the satisfaction of
the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and the Town of Markham:
a. That the Owner shall provide a letter stating
agreement to the Town that the Engineering Department is to hold their
Engineering Letter of Credit until the topsoil/fill material behind Unit 7 is
removed and the area is restored with topdressing, seeding and an erosion
control blanket to the satisfaction of the Town of Markham and the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority;
b. That the condominium declaration include a clause
specifying that any structural encroachments, including swimming pools, sheds,
decks and other appurtenances, are prohibited within 10-metres of the top of
bank.
5.
That the Owner shall enter into a
Condominium Agreement, if required by the Town;
6.
That prior to release for
registration, the owner shall provide the following, to the Town’s
satisfaction:
a.
That prior to release for
registration, the applicant shall submit to the Town for review and approval,
the condominium description and declaration which shall ensure, among other
matters that each townhouse unit has exclusive use for parking purposes, over
the driveway portion of the common element leading directly to the unit and
that the condominium corporation has assumed property ownership and maintenance
of all common elements;
b.
A certificate from the applicant’s
architect stating that all buildings are substantially completed and have been
constructed in accordance with the plans in the Site Plan Control Agreement and
in accordance with the Building Code;
c.
A certificate from the applicant’s
surveyor stating that all buildings have been located on the ground in
accordance with the plans in the said Site Plan Control Agreement and in
accordance with the applicable zoning by-law;
d.
A certificate from the applicant’s
engineer stating that all on site works, including but not limited to, grading
and asphalt paving have been installed and completed in accordance with the
plans and conditions in the Site Plan Control Agreement;
e.
A certificate from the applicant’s
landscape architect stating that all landscaping has been installed and
completed in accordance with the landscape plans in the Site Plan Control
Agreement;
f.
Arrange inspections of the on-site
works with the Engineering Department and Urban Design Group and shall rectify
any deficiencies relative to the approved plans to the satisfaction of the
Director of Engineering and the Manager of Urban Design;
g.
Payment of any outstanding taxes and
local improvement fees against the subject lands;
h.
Payment of any outstanding local
improvement charges, fees or recoveries owing against the subject lands.
7.
That appropriate easements or other
instruments be granted to the condominium corporation allowing access to the
main private roads leading to public streets;
8. The Owner shall ensure
that all waste and recyclable materials will be collected privately.
……………………………………………
The Committee recessed In-camera at
3:35 p.m. to discuss confidential property matters, and reconvened at 4:35 p.m.
to report.
……………………………………………….
8. AZURIA (1212763 ONTARIO LTD.)
10271, 10327, 10391 WOODBINE AVENUE
REVISIONS TO PROPOSED DRAFT
PLAN OF SUBDIVISION
(SU 01 106774, ZA 01 106727) -
ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD (10.5, 10.7, 8.0)
Staff reviewed the changes made to
the proposed draft plan of subdivision submitted by Azuria (1212763 Ontario
Ltd.), with respect to: the new Heritage feature and treatment of the Heritage
structures; maintenance of lot size adjacent to Jennings Gate, which has been
discussed with the Jennings Gate Ratepayers Association; and deletion of four
lots adjacent to the school site. Parkland dedication, buffer and open space
issues were discussed. The Committee expressed appreciation to staff for
working with the applicant to achieve significant improvements in the plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Town Solicitor be authorized to
request the Ontario Municipal Board to approve the conditions of draft plan
approval of subdivision 19TM-01002 (originally endorsed by Council on November
27, 2001; and revised and endorsed by the Ontario Municipal Board on December
10, 2001; and further revised as indicated in this report) set out in Appendix
“A” to this report, in order to reflect the revised draft plan of subdivision
prepared by Gagnon Law Bozzo on February 25, 2002;
That any heritage building retained on a lot
within the draft plan of subdivision not be subject to Town of Markham
Development Charges;
That the draft amendment to zoning by-law
177-96, endorsed by Council on November 27, 2001, and revised and endorsed by
the Ontario Municipal Board on December 10, 2001, be further revised to
incorporate the following additional provisions, as set out in Appendix “C”
(Draft Zoning By-law Amendment) to this report:
·
Revisions
to Schedule ‘A’ to zone Block 246 (the Residential Heritage Area) within the
Single Detached Residential (R1) Zone;
·
Revisions
to Schedule ‘A’ to include a new R2-LA zone on the east side of the
subdivision, north of Street ‘B’, to recognize the new block of lane-based
townhouses proposed in this location;
·
Text
revisions requiring that a Site Plan Agreement be executed prior to removing
any holding provisions within Block 246; and,
·
Text
revisions to incorporate special provisions relating to the R1 Zone;
And that with respect to the changes to the
proposed zoning by-law and draft plan of subdivision, Council hereby determines
that no further notice is to be given in respect of such changes, in accordance
with subsections 34 (17) and 51(47) of the Planning Act.
PUBLIC
MEETING
9. FOREST BAY HOMES LTD.,
MARKHAM ROAD AND STEELES AVENUE
REZONING APPLICATION TO PERMIT
SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS
(ZA.01-119053) (10.5)
The Chair advised that the subject of the Public Meeting
this date was to consider Rezoning application, File ZA 01-119053, submitted by
Forest Bay Homes Ltd., to permit semi-detached units at the northeast corner of
Markham Road and Steeles Avenue.
Committee was advised that 50 notices were mailed on
February 27, 2002, and a public meeting sign was posted February 26, 2002.
There were no written submissions received.
There were no comments from the audience with respect to
this application, and the Committee had no concerns.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Development Services Commission report dated
February 5, 2002, entitled "Applications submitted by Forest Bay Homes
Ltd. to revise townhouse zoning provisions for the Villages of Fairtree
community (ZA.01-119053)" be received;
And that the Record of the Public Meeting held on March 19,
2002, with respect to the proposed amendment to zoning By-law 90-81 be
received;
And that the application by Forest Bay Homes Ltd. to amend
zoning By-law 90-81 be approved;
And further that the proposed amendment to zoning By-law
90-81 be enacted without further notice.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Other items
considered by the Development Services Committee on March 19, 2002:
10. MARKHAM
CENTRE - ADVISORY GROUP (10.8.1) (Part A)
Staff reviewed the objectives of the
Advisory Committee, and provided a draft list of suggested names of members.
The Committee requested further information regarding two proposed members, and
suggested a representative of York Regional Police be included. Councillor
Horchik agreed to find a resident from the Tenstone area as a member-at-large.
The Committee discussed the responsibilities of School Board Trustees with
respect to communicating issues to the public, and requested the Commissioner
approach the School Board in this regard.
It was suggested that
the Advisory committee be structured as a permanent, formal subcommittee with a
one-year term of appointment. Staff were directed to prepare, and circulate to
members of the Development Services Committee, the terms of reference and scope
of the new committee, including the time commitment that would be required.
Associations should then be approached to appoint members. It was also noted
that: four (4) Markham Residents at large would be appropriate; that the
category "Major Local Business" also include other businesses; that
the Markham Environmental Alliance, as well as the Markham Conservation
Committee, be considered; and that Associations be approached to appoint a
member, rather than assuming the President of the Association would serve.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the staff
presentation regarding the Markham Centre Advisory Group be received.
11. MARKHAM CENTRE - ADVISORY GROUP (10.8.1)
(Part B)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Markham
Centre Advisory Committee be established;
And that the list
of suggested names be revised as discussed by the Committee;
And that staff
prepare Terms of Reference for the Markham Centre Advisory Committee,
including the
scope, the time commitment required, and that members be appointed for one-year
terms;
And that the Terms
of Reference and the revised list of names be presented to the Development
Services Committee meeting scheduled for April 9, 2002.
12. J.V.H. PROPERTIES, 70 DENISON STREET
ZONING APPLICATION TO PERMIT A MEAT PROCESSING
AND PACKAGING PLANT (ZA. 02-105323) (10.5)
The Committee
received correspondence from Mr. David S. Moore of Indusite Realty Corporation,
representing J.V. H. Properties, dated February 28, 2002.
Mr. Moore was in
attendance to confirm that the proposal does not include an abattoir, and to
request that a Public Meeting be held regarding Zoning Application ZA. 02-105323, to permit a meat
processing and packaging plant at 70 Denison Street.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the deputation
by Mr. David S. Moore of Indusite Realty Corporation, regarding the Zoning
Application submitted for 70 Denison Street, be received;
And that a Public
Meeting be held to consider Zoning application ZA.02-105323, submitted by
J.V.H. Properties, to permit a meat processing and packaging plant at 70
Denison Street.
13. MOBIUS CORPORATION, 300 COMMERCE VALLEY
DRIVE EAST
NORTH WEST CORNER OF COMMERCE VALLEY DRIVE EAST
AND MINTHORN COURT, APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN
APPROVAL TO PERMIT A STAND-ALONE RESTAURANT COMPLEX
(SC 00 241935) (10.6)
Staff presented a report dated March 19, 2002, entitled
"Mobius Corporation, 300 Commerce Valley Drive East, application for Site
Plan Approval to permit a stand-alone restaurant complex, File SC 00
241935."
Mr. Robert Swayze, Solicitor, Mr. Peter Peltkoff, Architect,
and Mr. Rae, of Earthtech, Traffic Consultant, were in attendance representing
Mobius Corporation.
Staff reviewed the outstanding issue of parking, advising
there is a discrepancy between the applicant's and staff's interpretation of
parking requirement, based on whether calculations should include the kitchen
area. The applicant has applied to the Committee of Adjustment for a Minor
Variance to permit a reduction in parking.
Staff can support a reduction in the overall parking requirement by 33 stalls,
on the basis that the parking requirement can be reduced by some 10% due to
expected walk-in clients, which is unique to this business campus context, and
is supported by traffic consultants.
The remaining deficiency is on-site parking (77 spaces) should be
provided off-site, on adjacent lands.
This would need to be formalized through legal agreements and easements.
The Committee discussed peak demands, the need for 112
additional parking stalls in the evening, and the term of the shared parking
arrangement.
Mr. Swayze suggested the adjacent property has 56 parking
spaces above the zoning by-law requirement, which will assist in resolution of
the issue. He agreed to pursue a permanent shared-parking arrangement.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the staff report dated March 19, 2002, entitled
"Mobius Corporation, 300 Commerce Valley Drive East, application for Site
Plan Approval to permit a stand-alone restaurant complex, File SC 00
241935", be received;
And that the deputation by Mr. Robert Swayze,
representing Mobius Corporation, regarding the application for site plan
approval, File SC 00 241935, be received;
And that
application SC 00 241935, submitted by Mobius Corporation for site plan
approval to permit a stand-alone restaurant complex at 30 Minthorn Court (north
west corner of Minthorn Court and Commerce Valley Drive East), be approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. That
the Owner enter into a Site Plan Agreement with the Town;
2. That
site plan approval shall lapse after a period of three years commencing March
19, 2002, in the event that the Owner does not enter into a site plan agreement
with the Town during that period;
3. That
the site plan comply with the requirements of By-law 165-80, as amended;
4. That
prior to final approval of the site plan:
a) the owner verify the
location of all existing and proposed utilities and confirm that existing
services are adequate for the proposed use;
b) the owner confirm that the
proposed driveway and access curb radius comply with driveway by-law 158-93;
c) the owner submit revised drawings showing the location of proposed
refrigerated internal refuse storage areas;
d) the
applicant provide examples of parking utilization rates of hotel and office
buildings in the surrounding area and apply the findings to the subject proposal
for shared parking use with adjacent hotel and office uses during peak
restaurant parking demand periods, to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning and Urban Design, to substantiate the opportunities for shared use
parking during the lunch time peak use period, identified in their parking
study and the evening peak period;
e) the head lease
tenant of the proposed restaurant development enter into a joint
parking/long-term lease agreement, to be valid in perpetuity and to be
registered on the titles of the applicable lands, with the owner of the
adjoining property to the west (know legally as Block 3 Registered Plan
65M-2665) and, if feasible, the owner of the adjoining property to the north
(known legally as Part 1 Plan 65R-22501, Block 2 Registered Plan 65M-2665),
containing the following clauses, in a form satisfactory to the Town of
Markham:
(i) the parties jointly
agree to provide 112 shared parking spaces, collectively, on Block 3
Registered Plan 65M-3226 and, if feasible, on Part 1 Plan 65R-22501, Block 2
Registered Plan 65M-2665;
(ii) the
parties agree to broadly designate the parking spaces on each site to be
used as “shared use” spaces, and agree that customers of the subject restaurant
development will be allowed unrestricted access to these spaces (i.e. the
designated spaces will not be reserved for specific users or tenants);
(iii) the
parties agree to post appropriate signage directing restaurant customers to
overflow parking areas;
(iv) the
parties agree that no barriers, traffic control gates or other devices will be
erected across driveways that provide access between properties;
(v) the
parties agree that no charges will be levied on restaurant customers using
off-site shared parking;
(vi) the
parties agree to grant all necessary right of way easements to allow restaurant
customers to park on the designated off-site “shared use” parking spaces;
(vii) that the
parties will agree to undertake a program to monitor parking utilization on the
lands affected by this agreement.
f) the applicant
secure all required consents from the town to permit a long-term shared use
parking/lease agreement in excess of 21 years;
5. That
prior to the execution of the site plan agreement the Owner shall:
a) submit a Landscape Plan, prepared by a Landscape Architect having
O.A.L.A membership, to the satisfaction and approval of the Commissioner of
Development Services;
6. That the site plan agreement:
a) provide for
payment by the Owner of all applicable fees, recoveries and development
charges;
b) contain
provisions for satisfying Town Departments including all requirements of the
Director of Engineering, the Fire Department, Waste Management and Roads;
c) contain a clause whereby the owner agrees to
construct a 1.5 metre sidewalk along the Commerce Valley Drive frontage of the
property.
7. That the variance application to reduce parking requirements
on the subject property be revised as follows:
·
That
a minimum of 238 spaces will be provided on the subject lands;
·
That
a minimum of 112 spaces, shall be secured
off-site through shared use parking spaces on Block 3, Registered Plan
65M-2665, and, if available, Part 1 Plan 65R-22501, Block 2 Registered Plan
65M-2665;
·
If
fewer than 112 shared-use parking spaces
can be provided on the lots indicated above, that the applicant will either:
· Reduce the gross floor area of the proposed
restaurant to a size that could
be supported by the
available parking supply; or
· Enter into a site plan agreement with
the Town to provide the remaining
parking shortfall on a new parking lot to be located on Block 4,
Registered
Plan
65M-2665 (south east corner of Leslie Street and Highway 7).
14. PUBLIC
ART POLICY STEERING COMMITTEEE
MINUTES, JANUARY 21, 2002
(16.34)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the minutes of the Public Art
Policy Steering Committee, dated January 21, 2002, be received for information.
15. MARKHAM SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES - MARCH 7,
2002
RE: IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED, 380 MAIN STREET NORTH
APPLICATION FOR REZONING FOR GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE
STORE (ZA 01 113977, SC 01 115527) (10.5, 10.6, 16.15)
It was noted that Councillor McKelvey chaired the Markham
Subcommittee meeting. Staff advised a report is being prepared regarding the
discussions and recommendations of the Markham Subcommittee, and which will
provide alternative recommendations with respect to location of building,
placement of canopy, and Peter Street access.
Committee expressed concern with the
timing of the staff report, with respect to issuance of a Building Permit.
Staff advised the report is scheduled to be brought to the Committee on April
23, 2002, and that the Building Department will be requested to begin the
permit review process concurrently.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the minutes of the Markham
Subcommittee meeting, held March 7, 2002, regarding Rezoning Application File
ZA 01 113977, submitted by Imperial Oil, for 380 Main Street North, be
received;
And that a staff report regarding
the revised proposal be prepared for the Development Services Committee.
COMMUNICATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:
That Development Services Committee
receive and consents to the disposition of Item Nos. 16 to 18 in the following
manner:
16. ONTARIO
MUNICIPAL BOARD ORDER, MARCH 7, 2002
300 JOHN STREET LTD. AND
PROPERTIES CAD-CAR INC.(10.6 & 13.13)
-
Receive
17. ENBRIDGE
CONSUMERS GAS, FEBRUARY 27, 2002
CONDITIONS OF DRAFT APPROVAL,
1107656 ONT. LTD, 19TM-01013 (10.7)
-
Receive
18. JACK
VALIANES, JAKES PUB & GRILLE, MARCH 1, 2002
REQUESTING EXEMPTION FROM
INTERIM CONTROL BY-LAW (10.8)
-
Receive
Mr. Jack Valianes of Jakes Pub & Grille, was in attendance to
address his correspondence dated March 1, 2002, requesting an exemption from
the Interim Control By-law. Staff suggested that the Committee wait until the
appeal period for the Interim Control By-law is over, before assessing requests
for exemptions.
……………………………………………
The Committee recessed In-camera at
3:35 p.m., and reconvened at 4:35 p.m. to report.
……………………………………………….
19. CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY MATTER (10.12,
8.0)
The Committee discussed a
confidential property issue. This matter is to be brought forward to Council at
its meeting scheduled for March 26, 2002.
20. CONFIDENTIAL PERSONNEL
MATTER (11.8)
The Committee discussed a
confidential personnel matter.
…………………………..
The Development Services Committee recessed at the hour of
4:35 p.m. and reconvened at the hour of 7:00 p.m.
……………………………
Public Meeting
Attendance
|
J. Livey, Chief Administrative
Officer
M. F. Turner, Commissioner of
Development
Services
R. Robinson, Town Solicitor
V. Shuttleworth, Manager,
Development
B. Karumanchery, Senior Project
Coordinator
D. Wylie, Senior Planner
M. Wouters, Planner
K. Bavington, Committee Clerk
|
The Development Services Committee
convened at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber with Councillor G.
McKelvey in the Chair.
DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST - none declared
21. NEAMSBY
INVESTMENTS INC., 1525 DENISON STREET
REZONING APPLICATION FOR
FARMERS MARKET
(ZA.01-118464) (10.5)
The Chair advised that the subject of the Public Meeting
this date was to consider Rezoning application, File ZA 01-118464, submitted by
Neamsby Investment Inc., to permit a farmers Market at 1525 Denison Street.
Committee was advised that 64 notices were mailed on
February 27, 2002, and a public meeting sign was posted February 13, 2002. The
Committee received one written submissions from Mr. Chang, 293 Milliken Meadows
Drive, Markham, in objection.
Staff made a presentation regarding the proposal, explaining
the location, surrounding uses, and the proposed uses of the subject property.
The Committee requested clarification in the follow-up staff report, with
respect to uses included in "Indoor Recreational Uses", and with
respect to hours of operation.
Mr. Rudy Buczolits, representing the applicant, Neamsby
Investments Inc., was in attendance to answer questions from the Committee.
Mr. Edward Li, 293 Milliken Meadows Drive, questioned the
need for a large market so close to the existing supermarket, and expressed
concern for increased traffic, and odours during the summer. Staff advised
indoor storage, and possibly refrigerated storage, can be required as part of
the site plan approval. The Committee recommended Mr. Li visit the existing
Farmers Market in Thornhill, to get an understanding this type of operation.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Record of the Public Meeting held on March 19,
2002, with respect to "Neamsby Investments Inc., Application for rezoning
to permit at farmers market at 1525 Denison Street", be received;
And that the application be referred back to staff for a
report and recommendation.
22. WISMER MARKHAM DEVELOPMENTS INC.,
WEST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 48, NORTH OF 16TH AVENUE,
SOUTH OF MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE
OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT
A COMMERCIAL SHOPPING FACILITY (OP 01 116736, ZA 01 116747)
(10.3, 10.5)
The Chair advised that the subject of the Public Meeting
this date was to consider Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments,
application Files OP 01 116736 and ZA 01-116747, submitted by Wismer Markham
Development Inc., to permit a commercial shopping facility on the west side of
Highway 48, north of 16th Avenue and south of Major Mackenzie Drive.
Committee was advised that 87 notices were mailed on
February 27, 2002, and a public meeting sign was posted February 27, 2002.
There were no written submissions received.
Staff made a presentation regarding the proposal, explaining
the location, surrounding uses, and the proposed uses of the subject property.
Mr. James Kennedy, of KLM Planning Partners, was in
attendance representing the applicant, Wismer Markham Developments Inc. He
explained that the surrounding lands designated for Major Commercial use are
fragmented into small parcels, which cannot contain the proposed large
commercial shopping facility.
Committee expressed concern for setting a Big Box precedent
in the Highway 48 corridor, and for Big
Box development replacing Community Amenity areas. Staff were directed to
review the allocation of Community Amenity properties in the area, and to
address how tighter control over site plans can be achieved, with respect to
changes made after zoning approval has been given.
Staff recommended that the applicant be invited to speak to
the Committee to discuss their intentions and plans for this site, and that a
working group be formed to guide this proposal.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Record of the Public Meeting held on March 19,
2002, with respect to "Applications submitted by Wismer Markham
Developments Inc. to permit a commercial shopping facility on the west side of
Highway 48, north of 16th Avenue, and south of Major Mackenzie Drive
(OP 01 116736, ZA 01-116747)", be received;
And that the application be referred back to staff for a
report and recommendation.
And that staff arrange a meeting with the applicant as
soon as possible, to discuss concerns identified.
ADJOURNMENT