Logo

 

MINUTES

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

2004-10-05

Meeting No. 17

 

 

PART A - 11:00 a.m. – Council Chamber

PART B - 1:00 p.m. - Council Chamber

 

Attendance

Vice-Chair:  Councillor D. Horchik

Members:

            Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti  (1:00)

            Regional Councillor J. Heath

            Regional Councillor B. O’Donnell

            Councillor S. Daurio (11:20)

            Councillor E. Shapero

            Councillor J. Webster

            Councillor K. Usman (11:30)

            Councillor A. Chiu

J. Livey, Chief Administrative Officer

J. Baird, Commissioner of Development Services

A. Taylor, Commissioner of Corporate Services

C. Conrad, Town Solicitor

V. Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design

D. Clark, Town Architect

R. Kendall, Senior Project Coordinator

S. Heaslip, Senior Project Coordinator

M. Boyce, Senior Policy Coordinator

L. Wheeler, Senior Planner

K. Bavington, Committee Clerk

 

 

The Development Services Committee convened at the hour of 11:10 a.m. without quorum, in the Council Chamber with Councillor D. Horchik in the Chair.  A quorum was achieved at 11:20 a.m.

 

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST - none declared

 

 

1.         MARKHAM CENTRE, STREET LIGHT STANDARD (10.0)  report

 

Moved by: Councillor John Webster

Seconded by: Councillor Erin Shapero

 

That the report entitled “Markham Centre Street Light Standard” be received;

 

And that the upgraded street light standard for public streets in Markham Centre be endorsed;

 

And that staff report back on the full enhanced streetscape package for Markham Centre to the first Development Services Committee in November 2004.

CARRIED

 

2.         RETAIL IMPACT AND URBAN DESIGN STUDIES
            HIGHWAY 48 FROM 16TH AVENUE TO MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE
           
(10.8, 16.0)     Weblink

 

Staff reviewed the recommendations presented.

 

Terry LeGrice, 20 Forest Manor Place, asked for clarification on the objectives of the studies, the time-frame involved, and the impacts of a potential Interim Control by-law on an application he may submit for his property at 60 Anderson Road. Staff responded to his questions.

 

Committee discussed the feasibility of Interim Control or another method of ensuring appropriate development, and of expanding the Business Improvement Area. Legal staff provided advice on implementing Interim Control.

 

Amy Pialagitis, owner of Tim Clark’s Flowers, on behalf of Markham Village BIA, proposed four actions:

1.   Prepare a Retail Impact Study

2.   Implement a tax levy to help pay for Main Street improvements

3.   Implement Interim Control until the Retail Impact Study is completed

4.   Prepare a Secondary Plan to detail the requirements of this area

 

Staff advised that tax and financial considerations would be included in the course of the study.

 

Committee directed that further information be provided at Committee of the Whole on October 12, 2004, regarding land ownership in the area and servicing constraints.

Moved by: Councillor J. Webster

Seconded by: Regional Councillor B. O’Donnell

 

That the deputations by Terry LeGrice, and Amy Pialagitis on behalf of Markham Village BIA, with concerns regarding commercial development on Highway 48, north of 16th Avenue, be received;

 

And that the staff report dated October 5, 2004 entitled “Retail Impact and Urban Design Studies– Highway 48 from 16th Avenue to Major Mackenzie Drive,” be received;

 

And that staff be authorized to retain John Winter and Associates to study the potential impact of the anticipated retail development in the study area on Main Street Markham and other nearby retail areas, and to recommend appropriate mitigating measures to address any identified detrimental impacts;

 

And that staff be authorized to retain a qualified retail market consultant to undertake a peer review of the above referenced study and the April, 2004 study by John Winter and Associates entitled “Review of Markham’s Commercial Policies;”

 

And that staff be authorized to retain a consultant to undertake an urban design and streetscape study of the study area;  

And that staff be authorized to retain the aforementioned consultants as provided for in the Town’s purchasing by-law;

 

And that the projects be approved with upset limits of:

  • commercial impact study - $20,000 (excluding GST);
  • peer review of the commercial impact study and the April, 2004 “Review of Markham’s Commercial Policies” study - $15,000 (excluding GST);
  • urban design and landscape study -  $25,000 (excluding GST).

 

And that the projects be funded from the Development Charges Reserve fund (90%), in the amount of $54,000, and from Capital Account # 80-5399-3515-005 Markham Village Transition Zone Design Guideline (10%), in the amount of $6,000.

CARRIED

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other matters considered by Development Services Committee on October 5, 2004:

 

 

3.         COMMERCIAL POLICY REVIEW COMMITTEE
            HIGHWAY 48 FROM 16TH AVENUE TO MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE
            MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 MEETING
(10.8, 16.0)    Minutes 

 

Staff advised that reports will be coming forward in the next few weeks with respect to some of the recommendations of the Commercial Policy Review Committee.

 

Moved by: Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti

Seconded by: Councillor K. Usman

 

That the written submission by Mr. S. Ridgley, on behalf of the Markham Village BIA, regarding the issues surrounding Main Street Markham, be received;

 

And that the minutes of the Commercial Policy Review Committee meeting held September 29, 2004, be received.

 

Moved by: Deputy Mayor F. Scarpitti

Seconded by: Councillor E. Shapero

 

That staff initiate an Official Plan Amendment to amend policies in accordance with the recommendations contained in the commercial policy review conducted by John Winter Associates Ltd., in order to preserve the planned function of the Business Corridor Area;

 

And that a public meeting be called to consider the proposed Official Plan Amendment.

 

Moved by: Regional Councillor J. Heath

Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu

 

That Public Meetings be held to consider the two (2) applications for the developments proposed by Loblaw’s at 2938 Major Mackenzie Drive, and Woodbine Cachet at 2960 16th Avenue.

CARRIED

4.         MARKHAM CENTRE UPDATE (10.8)

 

Staff provided an update on Markham Centre issues such as the newsletter, the website, the amenity feature competition, and Financial and Parking Studies, as well as updates on ongoing activities and applications:

-         YMCA ground breaking was held on June 14th. The site plan is being finalized.

-         Liberty’s zoning approval has been finalized, with no appeals being received. The sales centre will be opening this fall.

-         Remington’s zoning approval has been finalized, with no appeals being received.

-         Work has commenced on construction of Enterprise Boulevard.

-         The application for Hilton Suites Hotel is being processed.

      -     A Public Meeting will be held for the Stringbridge/Times application later this fall.

      -     The Sciberras Road and Riverside Drive Precinct Plan, held in abeyance pending

            resolution of traffic issues, is now proceeding.

      -     The East Precinct Plan, initiated by the Town to address major road patterns, location of York Region High School, YMCA, and multiple ownership pattern, is ongoing.

 

It was noted that the developments are contingent on servicing allocations being available.

 

Staff gave a presentation on the proposed Light Standards for Markham Centre. A report and recommendation are scheduled for later in the meeting, and a discussion regarding developing a strategy to retrofit existing streetscape components over time is scheduled for later this year.

 

Moved by: Regional Councillor B. O’Donnell

Seconded by: Councillor K. Usman

 

That the staff update regarding Markham Centre issues be received.

CARRIED

 

 

5.         MARKHAM ROAD COMMERCIAL, NORTH OF 16TH AVENUE  (10.8)

 

This presentation preceded a staff report and recommendation provided later in the meeting. Staff reviewed the background studies and designation of commercial development on Markham Road, north of 16th Avenue.

 

The majority of lands on the west side have recently been designated for commercial use, while the east side remains light Industrial, mixed use, and agricultural lands. In December, 2003, John Winter was retained to study the east side, to review business corridor policies, and address the lack of local commercial and retail activities. The resulting report and recommendation were referred to the Commercial Policy Review Committee in June, 2004. The Committee is recommending that Mr. Winter be retained to complete a detailed inventory for commercial and retail use in Markham, to be completed by late 2004. As directed by the CPR Committee, staff will be reporting on the scope and cost of the retail impact study, and on the legal implications of an interim control by-law.

 

Concerns identified at a Public Information meeting are the scale and amount of land required for the Big Box format, traffic impacts, the impact on Main Street businesses, and that the proposal is not transit-supportive. These concerns will be addressed in the proposed retail impact study.

 

Committee reviewed the recommendations of the Commercial Policy Review Committee and the submission to the CPR Committee by Sid Ridley on behalf of the Markham Village BIA. Discussions involved the inclusion of Main Street Unionville and other stores along Highway 7 in the proposed retail impact study, and a peer review of the current and past studies by John Winter.

 

Legal staff provided comments regarding the implementation of an Interim Control By-law.

 

Moved by: Regional Councillor B. O’Donnell

Seconded by: Councillor J. Webster

 

That the staff presentation regarding Markham Road Commercial, north of 16th Avenue be received.

CARRIED

 

 

6.         PLACES OF WORSHIP PARKING STANDARDS (10.8)

 

Staff gave a presentation on Place of Worship parking standards, reviewing the origins of the Place of Worship Study, initiated by Council in 2001 with a consultant team and extensive public input. The Study resulted in Council's enactment of OPA 115 and amendments to the Parking Standards, which are now in effect. The Study determined that the most common problem surrounding Places of Worship is the lack of parking.

 

Committee reviewed details of the new parking standards, and discussed alternative parking opportunities, including providing relief from parking standards through the Committee of Adjustment, subject to justification by a parking study. On-street parking would be monitored and restrictions could be enacted if necessary.

 

Committee requested that a copy of the staff presentation be provided to the members.

 

Moved by: Regional Councillor B. O’Donnell

Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu

 

That the staff presentation regarding Places of Worship parking standards be received.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

7.         BUR OAK FIRE STATION  (10.0)

 

Staff gave a presentation on the Bur Oak Fire Station. Paul MacIntosh of Thomas Brown Architects displayed elevations, floor plans, and a site plan. Committee discussed TRCA lands and directed that the parking area be adequately screened by the landscaping. Committee also requested consideration be given to solar heating or other energy efficient methods.

 

Staff clarified that site plan approval is not delegated to staff for this application. Committee endorsed the plans displayed, and delegated approval of further details to staff.

 

Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by: Councillor K. Usman

 

That the staff presentation regarding the Bur Oak Fire Station be received;

 

And that the Site Plan for the Bur Oak Fire Station be approved, and further details be delegated to Planning staff.

CARRIED

 

 

8.         MAIN STREET MARKHAM COMMITTEE MINUTES (16.39)
- September 15, 2004     Weblink

 

Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by: Councillor S. Daurio

 

That the minutes of the Main Street Markham Committee meeting held September 15, 2004, be received for information.

CARRIED

 

 

9.         DELEGATED APPROVALS UNDER BY-LAW 2002-202
(DM 2001-03) (10.6)      Weblink   

 

Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by: Councillor S. Daurio

 

That Council be advised that in accordance with Delegation By-law 2002-202, and additional site specific delegations authorized by Development Services Committee, the Commissioner of Development Services or the Director of Planning and Urban Design have approved applications listed in the report dated, October 5, 2004.

CARRIED

 

 

 

10.       REPORT ON INCOMING PLANNING APPLICATIONS
FOR THE PERIOD OF AUGUST 28, 2004 TO SEPTEMBER 10, 2004
(10.0)     Weblink           

 

Moved by: Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell

Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu

 

That Committee receive the report entitled “Report on Incoming Planning Applications for the period of August 28, 2004 to September 10, 2004” and direct staff to process the applications in accordance with the route outlined in the report, with the exception that the Site Plan applicaion for Seneca College, File SC 04 024643, be bumped-up to Committee and Council level approval.

CARRIED

 

 

11.       1530633 ONTARIO INC., 38 BUTTONFIELD ROAD
            ZONING AMENDMENT TO ADD A COMMERCIAL FITNESS
            CENTRE AND BAKERY TO THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES
            PLAN 65M-2522, BLOCK 167 (
ZA 04-024173)(10.5)      Weblink

 

Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by: Councillor S. Daurio

 

That the staff report entitled “Preliminary Report:  38 Buttonfield Road (1530633 Ontario Inc.); Application for zoning amendment to add a commercial fitness centre and bakery to the list of permitted uses – Plan 65M-2522, Block 167 (ZA 04-024173)" be received;

 

And that a Public Meeting be held to consider the application submitted by 1530633 Ontario Inc. for the retail/commercial plaza at 38 Buttonfield Road to amend the existing zoning to add a commercial fitness centre and bakery to the list of permitted uses.

CARRIED

 

 

12.       READ-EASTERN CAPITAL, DOVCOM REALTY INC.
            & DANVEST WISMER INVESTMENTS LTD.,
            SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MAJOR MACKENZIE DR & MCCOWAN RD
            OFFICIAL PLAN AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENTS TO PERMIT
            A GAS BAR, A CAR WASH AND A FUTURE NEIGHBOURHOOD
            COMMERCIAL PLAZA (OP 04 025509, ZA 04 018923, SC 04 018004)
            (10.3, 10.5)   Weblink

 

Moved by: Councillor K. Usman

Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu

 

That a Public Meeting be held to consider the applications submitted by Read-Eastern Capital, Dovcom Realty Inc. & Danvest Wismer Investments Ltd. for Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments to permit a gas bar, a car wash, and a future commercial plaza at the southeast corner of Major Mackenzie Drive and McCowan Road.

CARRIED

COMMUNICATIONS

 

 

13.       TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY
“PLACES TO GROW” – A GROWTH PLAN FOR THE
GREATER GOLDEN HORSESHOE (10.0)

 

Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by: Councillor K. Usman

 

That the correspondence from the Town of East Gwillimbury, dated September 20, 2004, containing a report providing recommendations relating to the Province’s Discussion Paper, “Places to Grow”, be received.

CARRIED

 

 

14.       ROUGE PARK ALLIANCE TO LILLI DUOBA
            ROUGE PARK HERITAGE AWARD (10.0)

 

Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by: Councillor K. Usman

 

That correspondence from the Rouge Park Alliance advising that Lilli Duoba is the recipient of the Rouge Park Heritage Award, be received.

CARRIED

 

 

 

15.       NITTI SUBRAMANIAN, REGION OF YORK
            - SEPTEMBER 21, 2004, RESPONSE TO RICHARD DUSOME
            RE: ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS, TOOGOOD POND (13.4)

 

Moved by: Councillor A. Chiu

Seconded by: Councillor K. Usman

 

That the correspondence from the Region of York, in response to Richard Dusome regarding environmental concerns for Toogood Pond, be received.

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.       NEW BUSINESS (5.3 & 16.0)

 

Committee members requested that the following matters be addressed:

 

1.         Discussion of water allocation to be held at Committee of the Whole on October 12, 2004

 

2.         The matter of recorded votes for Standing Committee for items that are delegated to the Committee and will not be forwarded to Council, was referred to the CAO and Clerk.

 

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

IN CAMERA

 

17.       LEGAL MATTER (10.0)

 

Moved by: Councillor J. Webster

Seconded by: Councillor S. Daurio

 

That the meeting resolve in-camera (2:25 p.m.) to discuss a legal matter.

CARRIED

 

Moved by: Regional Councillor J. Heath

Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu

 

That the Committee rise from in-camera (2:28 p.m.).

CARRIED

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART C

Public Meeting

7:00 p.m. - Council Chamber

 

Attendance

Vice-Chair:  Councillor D. Horchik

Members:

            Deputy Mayor  F. Scarpitti

            Regional Councillor J. Heath

            Regional Councillor B. O’Donnell

            Councillor E. Shapero

            Councillor G. McKelvey

            Councillor J. Webster

            Councillor A. Chiu

V. Shuttleworth, Director of Planning and Urban Design

M. Seaman, Senior Planner

K. Bavington, Committee Clerk

 

 

 

The Development Services Committee convened at the hour of 7:10 p.m. in the Council Chambers with Councillor D. Horchik in the Chair. 

 

 

18.       NORVALLEY HOMES LIMITED
            57 MAIN STREET UNIONVILLE AND 1,3,5 RICHARD MAYNARD CRES.
            REZONING AND PLAN OF SUBDIVISION TO PERMIT A SINGLE
            AND SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS
(ZA 03 117259, SU 03 119972) (10.5, 10.6)      

 

The Chair advised that the subject of the Public Meeting this date was to consider the proposed Draft Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-law Amendment, Files SU 03 119972 and ZA 03 117259, submitted by Norvalley Homes Limited for 57 Main Street Unionville and 1,3,5 Richard Maynard Cres.

 

Committee was advised that 37 notices were mailed on September 15, 2004, and a Public Meeting sign was posted on September 14, 2004. There were no written submissions received.

 

Staff gave a presentation regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses, and proposed uses of the subject property. Staff advised that the entire parcel is within the Special Policy Area. Discussions included the decontamination of the former service station site to the north.

 

Committee directed staff to pursue a coordinated effort between the subject and adjacent landowners to share costs in providing a permanent road. Concern was expressed for emergency response issues relating to unconnected roads.

 

There were no comments from the public with respect to this application.

 

Moved by: Regional Councillor B. O’Donnell

Seconded by: Councillor A. Chiu 

 

That the Development Services Committee Report dated May 18, 2004, entitled "Norvalley Homes, Application for Rezoning and Plan of Subdivision to permit a draft plan of subdivision of singles and semi-detached dwellings, 57 Main Street, Unionville, and 1,3,5 Richard Maynard Crescent (SU.03 118872 and ZA.03 117259)", be received;

 

And that the Record of the Public Meeting held on October 5, 2004. with respect to the proposed  Plan of Subdivision and amendment to By-law 122-72, as amendment, be received;

 

And further that the applications be referred back to staff for a report evaluating the proposal.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

The Development Services Committee meeting adjourned at the hour of 7:30 p.m.

 

 

 

No Item Selected