Logo

            M I N U T E S

 

                                             DEVELOPMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE

2001-11-20

Meeting No. 19

 

 

PART A - 12:00 noon - Canada Room

PART B - 1:00 p.m. - Council Chamber

 

Attendance

 

Chair:  Councillor G. McKelvey

Vice Chair, Community Character:

            Regional Councillor T. Wong

Vice Chair, Markham Centre:

            Councillor D. Horchik

Vice Chair, Economic Development:

            Regional Councillor B. O'Donnell

Members: 

            Regional Councillor G. Landon

            Councillor S. Daurio

            Councillor J. Virgilio

            Councillor J. Heath

            Councillor K. Usman

            Councillor A. Chiu

 

J. Livey, Chief Administrative Officer

M. F. Turner, Commissioner of Development

    Services

J. Baird, Director of Planning & Urban Design

A. Brown, Director of Engineering

S. Chait, Director, Corporate Quality & Effectiveness Office

D. Clark, Town Architect

R. Hutcheson, Manager, Heritage Planning

L. Irvine, Manager, Urban Design

S. Heaslip, Manager, Planning

P. Watts, Manager, Development Engineering

T. Northcott, Senior Business Development Officer

G. Singer, Intermediate Planner

G. Day, Zoning Examiner

K. Bavington, Committee Clerk

 

 

The Development Services Committee convened at the hour of 12:10 p.m. in the Canada Room with Councillor G. McKelvey in the Chair. 

 

DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST - none declared at this time

 

 

1.         ACCEPTANCE FOR MAINTENANCE OF RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISIONS, REGISTERED PLAN NUMBERS: 65M-2911
(CEDARLAND PROPERTIES LTD); 65M-2901 (DENISON PROP. CORP.)
65M-3262 (HILLSTAR ESTATES INC.) (10.7)

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the services in Subdivisions, Registered Plan Numbers 65M-2911, 65M-2901, and 65M-3262 be accepted;

 

That by-laws be enacted by Council to accept these subdivisions and to establish each of the roads within the residential subdivision as a public highway of the Town of Markham;

 

That the Community Services Commission assume the responsibility for operating and maintaining the infrastructure within the Subdivisions as part of the Town’s system;

 

That acceptance of the Subdivisions be taken into consideration in future operating budgets;

 

That the by-law to amend Schedule ‘12’ of Traffic By-law # 106-71, by including compulsory stop to the indicated streets be approved;

 

That the by-law to amend Schedule ‘A’ of the Speed By-law # 105-71, by including a maximum speed of 40 kilometers per hour to the streets indicated be approved;

 

That the by-law to amend Schedule ‘I’ of the Parking By-law # 336-88, by including a no parking zone on the streets indicated be approved;

 

That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the necessary releases from the terms of the Subdivision Agreements subject to confirmation from the Director of Engineering that the final two year guarantee periods have been completed.

 

 

2.         MR. AND MRS. WAN, 34 FORESTER CRESCENT
            REQUEST FOR MUNICIPAL ADDRESS CHANGE (10.15)

 

Committee discussed the Town's policy and the criteria for numbering changes.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the request by Mr. and Mrs. Wan for an address change, from 34 Forester Crescent to 32 Forester Crescent, be approved;

 

And that Mr. and Mrs. Wan be responsible for cost associated with the requested numbering change, to a maximum of $ 500.

 

 

3.         IRISH ROSE DRIVE, SIDEWALK LOCATION (5.18)

 

The Committee had before it the report dated November 20, 2001 from the Development Services Commission regarding location of sidewalks on Irish Rose Drive, and correspondence objecting to the sidewalk on the south side of Irish Rose Drive, from: Alex Siu Chong, 33 Irish Rose Drive; Stella Fan-Kwong and Ernest Kwong, 5 Irish Rose Drive; Jason Szczur, 41 Irish Rose Drive; Peggy Wahl, 45 Irish Rose Drive; and, Thomas Chau, 31 Irish Rose Drive.


 

Staff reviewed the survey results, and displayed site plans to illustrate the proposed sidewalk, advising that Hydro transformers would complicate it being located on the north side.

Mr. Art Lougheed, 3 Irish Rose Drive; Mr. Ernest Kwong, 5 Irish Rose Drive; Ms. Tina Kotsiomitis, 7 Irish Rose Drive; and Ms. Kim Black, 1 Irish Rose Drive, expressed concerns for reduced parking, safety of pedestrians, and that the results of the survey were not reflected in the staff recommendation. It was discussed that two streets in the area do not have sidewalks, and that the developer is still promoting the sale of Irish Rose Drive homes with the sidewalk on the north side. Staff agreed to contact the developer in this regard.

 

The Committee considered having no sidewalks on Irish Rose Drive. It was announced the recommendation of this Committee would have to be ratified by Council at its meeting scheduled for November 27, 2001.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the deputations by Mr. Art Lougheed, 3 Irish Rose Drive; Mr. Ernest Kwong, 5 Irish Rose Drive; Ms. Tina Kotsiomitis, 7 Irish Rose Drive; and Ms. Kim Black, 1 Irish Rose Drive, regarding objections to the location of the sidewalk on the south side of Irish Rose Drive, be received;

 

And that correspondence objecting to the location of the sidewalk on the south side of Irish Rose Drive, from: Alex Siu Chong, 33 Irish Rose Drive; Stella Fan-Kwong and Ernest Kwong, 5 Irish Rose Drive; Jason Szczur, 41 Irish Rose Drive; Peggy Wahl, 45 Irish Rose Drive; and, Thomas Chau, 31 Irish Rose Drive, be received;

 

And that there be no sidewalk constructed on Irish Rose Drive, except for the north side of Irish Rose Drive, between Sharon Lee Drive and Irish Rose Drive, if determined to be appropriate through discussions with the residents affected.

 

 

4.         MAIN STREET MARKHAM STUDIES:
            1)MAIN STREET MARKHAM VISION FOR THE MILLENNIUM
            2)MAIN STREET MARKHAM MARKET & PLANNING REVIEW
            3)MAIN STREET MARKHAM STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES (10.0 & 16.39)

 

RECOMMENDATION;

 

That the Main Street Markham Vision for the Millennium, the Main Street Markham Market and Planning Review and the Main Street Markham Streetscape Guidelines (on file in the office of the Town Clerk) be received and endorsed in principle;

 

And that the three documents be officially forwarded to the Markham Village BIA to help guide the activities of the BIA and individual property owners;


 

And that Town staff continue to work with these documents along with the Markham Village Heritage Conservation District Plan, Official Plan Amendment 108 and the current zoning by-law to ensure that the overall Town objectives for the Markham Village area are consistent and properly addressed, and to determine any necessary changes to the Official Plan, Secondary Plan or the Zoning By-law 1229, as amended;

 

And that Town staff and other interested parties be guided by the findings and direction provided by these documents when reviewing or initiating proposed changes, in both the public and private realms, to the Main Street Markham environment.

 

 

5.         YORK DOWNS SANITARY SEWER - FINAL ACCEPTANCE
            BERCZY VILLAGE MANAGEMENT & ANGUS GLEN VILLAGE LTD.(5.5)

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the York Downs sanitary sewer constructed as part of the Berczy Village Management Limited and Angus Glen Village Ltd., services-in-lieu Agreements be given final acceptance;

 

And that the Community Services Commission assume the responsibility for operating and maintaining the York Downs sanitary sewer;

 

And that the final acceptance of York Downs sanitary sewer be taken into consideration in future operating budgets.

 

 

6.         DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE
SPATIAL SEPARATION AGREEMENTS 10.0, 10.13)

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council delegate authority for the execution of all future spatial Separation Agreements to the Chief Building Official.

 

 

7.         LOBLAW PROPERTIES LTD., 200 BULLOCK DRIVE
WALL SIGN VARIANCES (01-110844, 01-110847, 01-113177, 01-113745) 2.16.2)

 

Councillor J. Heath disclosed an interest with respect to the proposed sign variance applications by Loblaw Properties for 200 Bullock Drive, by nature of owning property near the subject property, and did not take part in the consideration or discussion of or vote on the question of the approval of such matter.


 

The Committee had before it a report dated November 20, 2001, and a staff Memorandum dated November 16, 2001 from the Development Services Commission, and a submission by Harry Froussios of Zelinka Priamo Ltd., agent for the applicant, dated November 12, 2001, regarding sign applications 01-110844, 01-110847, 01-113177, 01-113745, submitted by Loblaw Properties Ltd., 200 Bullock Drive.

 

Mr. Greg Priamo of Zelinka Priamo Ltd., representing Loblaw Properties Ltd., suggested the regrettable situation and improper procedures during this application were a result of a that lack of communication on the part of the applicant. He advocated that the proposed sign variance is appropriate for this building.

 

Staff suggested a further staff report dealing with an overall context could be provided for the  Council meeting scheduled for November 27, 2001. Staff confirmed that charges for by-law infractions will be pursued, regardless of whether the sign variance is approved or not.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the following recommendation be deferred for consideration at the Council meeting scheduled for November 27, 2001, pending a further staff report:

 

"That the Wall Sign Variances, submitted by Loblaw Properties Ltd. 200 Bullock Drive, Files # 01-110844, 01-110847, 01-113177, 01-113745 proposing:

 

a)The following increases in allowable wall sign area:

i)          01-110844 combined with 01-113745 (South/West elevation) - 9.6m2 to 30.31m²

            ii)         01-110847 (South/East elevation) - 11.25m² to 33.1m²

 and;

 

b)                  In the number of wall signs per building face on the West Elevation from:

             i)         01-113177 - One (1) sign per building face to Two (2) signs per building face  (NOTE: The installation of the second sign would increase the overall sign area of the wall from a maximum of 20.0m² to 23.7m2 (West Elevation))

Be Denied."

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

*          Amended by Council at its meeting held on November 27, 2001 to be deferred to Development Services Committee on December 4, 2001 or Council on December 11, 2001, if necessary.

 

 


 

8.         GREENSBOROUGH DEVELOPERS GROUP
DRY PERMIT REQUEST (5.5)

 

The Committee expressed concern that the contingency plan involves trucking sewage, and that it may be a long-term situation. Staff advised a report on the status of the sewer construction project will be available for the next Development Services Committee meeting. It was suggested that McNally representative be invited to attend to discuss the status and potential delay scenarios.

 

The Committee discussed the addition of a clause requiring home purchasers to be made aware of potential occupancy delays, due to servicing requirements.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the Greensborough Developers Group dry permit request for Phase 1 be deferred to the Development Services Committee meeting scheduled for December 4, 2001, pending an update of the status of sewer construction;

 

And that a condition of approval be added, to require the Developer to provide the Town with copies of Purchase and Sale Agreements, demonstrating that purchasers have been made aware of potential occupancy delays due to servicing requirements.

 

 

9.         CORNELL REVIEW (10.4)

 

Eileen Charlton, 16 Cornell Common, had questions regarding maintenance of the strip of land along 9th Line, and the need for a sidewalk. Staff advised the Town will be maintaining the greenway. Committee directed that planning staff meet with Ms. Charlton to discuss her concerns further, and that Town staff address her concern for weeds.

 

Mr. Gary Atkins, President of the Cornell Ratepayers Association, advised he is in support of the staff recommendation. The Committee emphasized the importance of establishing a Developers Group.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That Council reaffirm the principles of New Urbanism as the guiding principles for the development of future phases of the Cornell Community;

 

And that the Secondary Plan, community design plan and architectural control guidelines be updated in consultation with the residents and landowners/developers to capture and strengthen the implementation of the vision for the Cornell Community;


 

And that future phases of the Cornell Community proceed on the basis of ongoing community consultation and Peer Review in consultation with Andres Duany and other expert practitioners of New Urbanism;

 

And that the Cornell Landowners be requested to work together and with the Town to put in place the necessary plans, guidelines, Developers Group Agreement(s) and Phasing Plans to provide for the orderly development of Cornell;

 

And further that the Town expresses appreciation to all who participated in the August 2001 Cornell Review and contributed to its success.

 

 

10.       1212763 ONTARIO LTD. (AZURIA)
10271, 10327, 10391 WOODBINE AVE.
DRAFT PLAN OF SUBDIVISION AND REZONING
(SU 01 106774, ZA 01 106727) (10.7, 10.5)

 

The Committee had before it:

- Staff report dated November 20, 2001 from the Development Services Commission regarding an application 1212763 Ontario Ltd. (Azuria) for Draft Plan of Subdivision and rezoning at 10271, 10327 and 10391 Woodbine Avenue; and

- correspondence from Kimberley L. Beckman, of Davis, Howe Partners, representing 12127630 Ontario Limited, dated November 19, 2001, requesting deferral of approval, pending ongoing negotiations regarding heritage preservation of three buildings on the site.

 

Dr. Michael Kusner, 11030 Woodbine Avenue, Gormley, discussed the proposed Woodbine By-pass. Committee requested staff meet with Dr. Kusner to provide an update on the By-pass.

 

Ms. Kimberly Beckman of Davis, Howe Partners, representing 12127630 Ontario Limited, addressed her correspondence dated November 21, 2001. Staff advised the applicant had been requested to withdraw demolition applications for the three Heritage structures.

 

The Committee discussed the importance of identifying properties for Heritage designation, and reiterated staff's request to withdraw the demolition applications. The Committee also directed a change be made to a condition concerning landscaping. 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the Record of Public Meeting held on October 2, 2001, regarding the proposed plan of subdivision and implementing zoning by-law be received;

 

That Phase 1 of draft plan of subdivision 19TM-01002 prepared by Gagnon Law Bozzo Urban Planners Ltd., identified as Project Number 00.704.0, be draft approved, subject to the conditions of draft plan approval set out in Appendix ‘A’ to the report, and the following red-line revisions:


 

·        Revisions to the boundaries of the draft plan of subdivision to reflect a Phase 1 area consisting of a maximum of 162 lots; the open space blocks adjacent to Woodbine Avenue (Blocks 263, 265, 266, 267, 268 and 262); the Stormwater Management Block (Block 264); the Neighbourhood Park (Block 259); the Elementary School Block (Block 258); the north-south collector road (Street ‘A’); the southernmost east-west collector road (Street ‘B’) located between Woodbine Avenue and Street ‘A’; and the northern east-west collector road (Street ‘C’) located between Woodbine Avenue and Street ‘C’;

·        Widen the right of way of the window street portion of Street ‘G’ from 15.0 metres to 15.5 metres;

·        reconfigure lot 82 flanking onto the open space blocks,  widen the noise buffer block (Block 261), and reconfigure lots 232, 233, 233 and 234, if required, to accommodate noise fence/berm combinations, as determined through a noise feasibility study, so that satisfactory noise mitigation can be achieved with noise fencing and berming (fencing not to exceed 2 metres in height);

·        reconfigure the lotting patterns adjacent to window street portion of Street ‘G’, so that all lots front onto the window street;

·        reconfigure the residential blocks located between Streets ‘G’, ‘H’, ‘B’ and ‘A’ to accommodate the draft plan revisions noted in the previous two bullet points;

·        revisions to the draft plan of subdivision, if necessary, to meet the requirements of Condition 24.1 (TRCA requirements), and to address any minor adjustments to the development limits associated with the Carlton Creek valley and associated environmental buffer;

·        any additional red-line revisions required by the York Region District School Board, or other agencies, to meet their conditions;

 

That any future approval of Phase 2 of Draft Plan of Subdivision 19TM-01002, be deferred until such time as the Town has approved additional water allocation to the Cathedral Community;

 

That the Ontario Municipal Board defer draft plan approval until the applicant has submitted a noise feasibility study to the satisfaction of the Town, and if necessary, the recommendations of that study have been incorporated into the draft plan of subdivision;

 

That the applications to amend zoning by-laws 177-96 and 304-87 be approved and the implementing by-laws, set out in Appendix ‘B’ to this report, be enacted;

 

That the plan or any phase thereof not be released for registration and the (H) Holding zoning provision not be removed from the zoning until the Development Phasing Plan for the East Cathedral Community is completed to the satisfaction of the Town, and until the East Cathedral Developers Group has entered into a legal agreement with the Town to implement the provisions of the phasing plan as approved by the Town;

 

That water supply allocation for 162 units be granted to the subject property;


 

That the Town reserves the right to revoke or reallocate water supply to the Draft Plan of Subdivision should the development not proceed in a timely manner;

 

That Phase 2 of Draft Plan of Subdivision 19TM-2007 not be draft approved until additional water allocation is assigned to the Cathedral Community or until a Developers Group Agreement is struck and alternate arrangements for distribution of water allocation are made and agreed to by the Town in consultation with the Trustee for the Developer’s Group.

 

That the applicant submit the required 30% subdivision processing fee for the Phase 1 portion of the subdivision.

 

That the heritage properties located at 10271, 10327, 10391 Woodbine Avenue be designated pursuant to Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act;

 

That the Clerk’s Department be authorized to:

·        Publish and serve Council’s Notice of Intention to Designate as per the requirements of the Act; and

·        Prepare the Designation By-law for the heritage properties.

 

And that the demolition applications submitted on behalf of the owner of the above three heritage properties be denied by Council;

 

And further that Heritage Markham and Planning Staff continue negotiations with the owner regarding the disposition of the three heritage buildings within the plan of subdivision, currently located on the above-noted properties.

 

And that the applicant be strongly encouraged to withdraw demolition permits submitted for three structures on the subject property identified for Heritage protection;

 

And that condition 4.1 e)  "Tree Preservation and Landscaping" of Appendix 'A', Conditions of Draft Approval, be amended to require wrought iron fences and cedar hedges.

----                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*               Amended by Council at its meeting held November 27, 2001, to add the following:

 

And that staff of the Development Services Commission be directed to immediately begin the process to acquire a Heritage Designation for all three heritage dwellings on the site;

 

And that any additional watercourses or drainage features that may be identified be addressed through the required Environmental and Stormwater Master Plan.

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 

Other matters considered by the Development Services Committee on November 20, 2001:

 

 

The Commissioner took an opportunity during the meting, to introduce two new Development Services Commission staff, Jane Clohecy and Doris Cheng.

 

 

11.       CORNELL PHASE 4 (10.7)

 

Mr. Dan Leeming and Mr. Rick Merrill, representing the applicant, made a presentation of the proposed Cornell Phase 4 Master Plan that will be formally submitted in the near future. They advised that information meetings had been held with area residents and ratepayer groups. Discussions included the greenway linkages, traffic concerns, and transfer of North American Properties commercial proposal to the subject site. Mr. Leeming and Mr. Merrill agreed to continue working with staff to address the concerns identified.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the presentation by Mr. Dan Leeming and Mr. Rick Merrill, representing Cornell, with respect to the proposed Cornell Phase 4 Master Plan, be received.

 

 

12.       MARCONI ART COMPETITION (12.2.6)

 

Staff gave a verbal update on the proposed Marconi Art Competition, advising the organizers are aiming for a public announcement date of December 12, 2001. The Town's Public Art Policy is being prepared and won't be finalized until the spring, however, the consultant preparing the policy report has provided a position paper dealing with this specific request and outlining recommended procedures that should be considered if the Town supports the request. Staff suggested meeting with the Marconi Committee and reporting back to the December 4th Development Services Committee meeting. It was emphasized that the applicant's preferred site of the Civic Centre cannot be approved until the Public Art Policy has been completed.

 

The Committee discussed whether it was premature to determine what is appropriate for recognition, until the Public Art Policy is established.    

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the request by the Marconi Monument Committee for a Marconi Art Competition, be deferred to the Development Services Committee meeting scheduled for December 4, 2001, and that staff  bring forward a framework for determining the appropriateness of moving forward with a Marconi Monument in the Town of Markham.

 


 

13.       PRESENTATION OF SERVICE AWARDS (12.2.6)

 

The following employees were presented with service awards:

 

Mike Dimitrijevic, Building Inspector 2, Building Services - 15 years

Ian Hermack, Waterworks Operator - 10 years

 

 

14.       PROPOSED C.N. TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWER
            WITHIN C.N. RIGHT-OF-WAY, EAST OF THORNHILL SQUARE
            SHOPPING CENTRE, NORTH OF JOHN STREET (10.0)

 

The Committee had before it the minutes of the Community Information Meeting held on November 8, 2001.

 

Mr. Ian Thomson, C.N. Director of Communications, representing C.N., made a presentation regarding the proposed C.N. Telecommunications Tower within the C.N. right-of-way east of Thornhill Square and north of John Street.

Ms. Marion Matthias, 33 Colborne Street, Thornhill, expressed concern that changes to the approved tower, or additional towers may not require the Town's approval. Staff advised that approval has been given for a single mono-pole and that any changes or additions, other than a possible second dish on the single pole, would be subject to site plan approval by the Town.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the site plan application by Canadian National Railways to construct a telecommunications monopole in the C.N. right-of-way, north of John Street, be approved;

 

And that Industry Canada be informed of this approval.

 

 

15.       VISIONING PRINCIPLES OF PROPOSED
            "MILLENNIUM GARDEN" (16.28)

 

Mr. Marc Rose, representing the Markham Conservation Committee, made a presentation regarding the visioning principles of the proposed "Millennium Gardens" to be located on the Anthony Roman Centre grounds. 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the presentation by representatives of the Markham Conservation Committee, regarding the Visioning Principles of the proposed "Millennium Garden", be received;


 

And that appreciation be conveyed to the many volunteers and members of the Markham Conservation Committee for their hard work on this project.

 

 

16.       HONG KONG AS A BUSINESS CENTRE IN THE
ASIA PACIFIC REGION AND BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES
FOR CANADIAN COMPANIES (10.16)

 

Ms. Rosanna Ure, Director of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office (HKETO) in Toronto,  made a presentation regarding business opportunities for Canadian companies. Ms. Ure reviewed Asia/China economic outlooks and the challenges of China markets.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the presentation by Ms. Rosanna Ure, Director of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office (HKETO) in Toronto, regarding business opportunities for Canadian companies, be received.

 

 

17.       CORNELL COMMON ROAD PUBLIC SCHOOL
186 COUNTRY GLEN ROAD, SITE PLAN APPLICATION
SC.01-108106 (10.6)

 

Staff advised that the architectural details have been negotiated to a satisfactory level. The Committee discussed the scheduled opening of the school.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the site plan application, File SC.01-108106, submitted by the York Region District School Board to permit a new elementary school at 186 Country Glen Road be approved, subject to the following conditions:

 

1.         That the Owner give a written undertaking to the Town that it will construct the project in accordance with the approved plans;

 

2.         That the Owner submit and receive approval for a Landscape Plan, prepared by a Landscape Architect having O.A.L.A. membership;

 

3.         That the owner satisfy Town Departments including all requirements of the Director of Engineering, the Fire Department, and the Waste Management Department;


 

4.         That the undertaking provide for payment by the Owner of all applicable fees and recoveries, and submission of any required letters of credit to guarantee compliance with Town requirements.

 

And that the School Board be encouraged to open the school by September, 2003.

 

 

 

ADJOURNMENT

 

The Development Services Committee meeting adjourned at the hour of 4:40 p.m.

 

 

No Item Selected