Councillor Karen Rea declared a conflict of interest on Agenda Item 4.4 – City Park (Town Crier) Homes Inc., Application for Zoning By-Law Amendment, to permit 25 detached dwellings at 7 Town Crier Lane (Ward 4), File No. Plan 23 121107 (10.5), due to an ongoing legal matter.
Councillor Karen Rea did not participate in the discussion of this matter.
The Public Meeting this date was to consider an application submitted by City Park (Town Crier) Homes Inc.
The Committee Clerk advised that 118 notices were mailed on August 30, 2023 and a Public Meeting sign was posted on August 29, 2023. There were 6 written submissions received regarding this proposal.
Stephen Lue, Senior Manager, Development, introduced the item and advised that Council needs to make a decision on this development application by October 22, 2023.
Peter Wokral, Senior Heritage Planner, gave a presentation regarding the proposal, the location, surrounding uses and outstanding issues.
Jim Levac, GSAI, consultant for applicant noted that although a private road had been installed to accommodate the previously approved development of 11 dwelling units, the market has changed and the owner wishes to pursue a more efficient, compact development with smaller lots and dwellings. He indicated that all proposed dwellings would be two storeys with a maximum size ranging from 2700-3000 sq ft on a private road shifted to the centre of the site. He also noted the new dwellings would have excellent access to local and regional transit operations.
The following deputations were made on the proposed development:
Mike Clare, representing Grace Anglican Church, spoke in opposition to proposed height, density, and size of the detached dwellings being proposed on the subject lands. Mr. Clare expressed concern that emergency and waste management vehicles will not be able to access the proposed detached dwellings, and that residents of the proposed detached dwellings will use the church for overflow parking. Mr. Clare requested that a future fence be installed on the east side of the property adjacent to the church, and that purchase agreements include provisions to advise future residents that the church lands are not available for overflow parking and to agree not to oppose the church pursuing affordable housing on their property in the future..
Laura Galati spoke in opposition to the height and density of the proposed detached dwellings. Ms. Galati expressed concern that residents will use the proposed development to access Maple Street, and that this will impact traffic and pedestrian safety near Franklin Public School.
Tiffany Huebel expressed the following concerns regarding the proposed development: the proposal density does not fit the heritage character of the area; the impact the proposal may have on flooding in the area; the proposed detached dwellings may be difficult for emergency vehicles to access, and the proposal will worsen existing traffic safety concerns. Ms. Hubel advocated for responsible, well planned development and suggested the plans were being rushed.
The Committee discussed the flood remediation plans for Markham Village, and that Council had hoped that the developer would follow through with the plans originally approved by Council.
Mr. Lue advised that the proposed development will be subject to a Major Heritage Permit Application and a Municipal Service Agreement. At this time, the Applicant will work with the City’s Engineering Department to address the serving requirements for the area, including the flooding component. This is a new process resulting from Bill 109.